« first day (5185 days earlier)      last day (31 days later) » 
00:00 - 14:0014:00 - 00:00

00:55
Connections
Puzzle #590
🟨🟦🟦🟦
🟨🟦🟦🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟦🟦🟦🟦
I didn't quite get blue's category until it was revealed.
Connections
Puzzle #590
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟦🟦
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟪🟪🟪🟪
I didn’t get purple except as the leftovers.
I got it!
Despite only knowing two of the items.
But I guessed the two others.
Maybe I had heard one of them at some point in the past without remembering.
Ouch. :(
Hypercorrection strikes again.
> For Ms. Page, the fires struck not long after she moved into her rental house above El Prieto Canyon with her adult son and nephew. The $5,500 rent was a stretch, but it felt like home.
Who in the world has $100k of their salary sunk into fricking rent? What are these people?
Let alone, who has a $100k salary in the first place. Gosh.
01:12
@tchrist It's not that much in this day and age, and $5,5000 rent is not that much in California either.
> For the year 2022, the U.S. Census Bureau estimates that the median annual earnings for all workers (people aged 15 and over with earnings) was $47,960; and more specifically estimates that median annual earnings for those who worked full-time, year round, was $60,070.
@tchrist That includes all the min-wage workers, who I believe comprise the bulk of all earners.
Assuming that she's paying 30% of her annual salary as rent, that puts her at 250% the that level. But remember that she's paying after tax not before tax.
When I was working, I didn't know anybody who was established in my profession who was making less than $100K.
I mean, you couldn't live in the Boston area for less than that.
> While ZipRecruiter is seeing annual salaries as high as $95,500 and as low as $33,000, the majority of Entry Level Computer Programmer salaries currently range between $50,500 (25th percentile) to $80,000 (75th percentile) with top earners (90th percentile) making $87,000 annually across the United States.
01:18
Across the United States. Not in either of the Bay areas.
There are plenty of companies who pay all remote workers on the same scale, no matter where they live.
It just sounds like nobody whatsoever without a high-power high-salary senior position can afford to live in any of these places. No teachers. No hourly workers. Nobody.
Yes, that is a big problem.
Many commute.
Before my son was a senior scientist he lived in various houses with 4 or 5 roommates. Now he owns his own house.
The city assigns some 'cheap' houses for teachers, nurses, and policemen. But not enough by far.
This is the exact problem in places like Aspen. Nobody can work there.
> The median home price in Aspen, Colorado varies depending on the type of property and the neighborhood. As of March 2024, the median price for a single-family home in Aspen was $12 million. The median price for a condo or townhome was $3 million.
01:23
Teachers get a shit deal everywhere in the US.
Isn't that utterly insane?
I do not know it, what makes that city/town so expensive?
@tchrist Are there trailer parks in Aspen?
I think a lot of billionaires fly their private jets into Aspen, where they own their own homes.
I mean, who else can afford that?
Someone like me could afford a vacation home in, say, Pagosa Springs (assuming I cared to waste my time and money), but never in one of the main ski resorts.
I believe that the ski companies have assigned corporate housing/barracks for at least some of their workers. Others commute from afar. I'll let you figure out just how well that works in a place that gets 25 feet of snow per year.
@Robusto Exactly.
Strands #324
“You don't say ...”
🔵💡🔵🔵
💡🔵💡🔵
💡🔵🟡🔵
01:28
@Robusto Yes, I kind of like Pagosa Springs.
I like it to visit, but I would never take on the responsibility of two homes.
@Cerberus It's where the movie stars go skiing. Well I'm exaggerating. Probably. There are other rich people who fly there too.
@Robusto nope
OK I suppose a skiing village is expensive because there is little space to build?
Yes, that is exactly part of it.
If you Google why Aspen is so expensive, it says this:
> AI Overview
Learn more
Aspen is considered one of the most expensive towns in the United States primarily due to its reputation as a luxury ski resort, attracting wealthy individuals with its exclusive atmosphere, world-class skiing, limited land availability, strict development regulations, high-end amenities, and a focus on luxury real estate, which all contribute to high property prices and overall cost of living in the area.
Key reasons for Aspen's high cost:
Exclusive image and celebrity appeal:
It sounds like a nightmare.
01:32
Correct. I believe I've only bothered to go through there once, and I wasn't the driver.
Cold, expensive tourist Hell.
You know, even if I had that kind of wealth I wouldn't spend it sniffing the asses of those awful people.
Exactly.
Because of this, I never ever come at the Maroon Bells–Snowmass National Wilderness from the north via Aspen, only 6 or 8 hours away from the south via Crested Butte, a far humbler town.
Similarly to how I would never approach the Grand Canyon from the south where all the idiots are, but only from the north which gets like a tenth the visitors because it's "out of the way". The North Rim is much nicer than the South Rim. It was designed to be this way.
The idiots from Los Angeles can get to the South Rim too easily.
I've known people who've owned homes in San Francisco. Several, in fact. But all were of my own generation or older.
And no, don't reach for the facile explanation that I know no one younger than myself. :)
I went through Aspen the time I was in the back of a little Jeep Wrangler that had the insane gumption to traverse the nearly impassable Devil's Punchbowl beyond Schofield Pass. Many people have died trying that, but they were also in stupid big vehicles at night during bad storms. Every other time I've done that route I've walked it.
> Schofield Pass is a narrow and scenic road between Marble and Crested Butte. The 4WD road follows the Crystal River past the Sheep Mountain Power House (aka Crystal Mill) and takes you through the semi-ghost town of Crystal and past the water fall known as the Devils Punchbowl.
It is very, very, very pretty. But just walk. Those personal ATVs can do it, too, though.
01:47
I had to speak at an early Web conference in Beaver Creek three decades ago. It was summertime, though, so the plutocrats weren't there.
You know, I'm pretty sure I did something similar in that time frame but I'll be damned if I can remember anything about it. Maybe it will come back to me tomorrow.
@Robusto There's plenty of buildings around here where a tiny studio goes for $3500-4000 a month.
@alphabet Oh, I'm sure of it.
The non-insane ski towns are kinda nice in the summer. I wouldn't go there otherwhen.
@alphabet How many square m?
01:55
Not to mention anywhen, somewhen, everywhen, nowhen, elsewhen, mostwhen. But I should avoid seldwhen as the OED says it is rarely used.
@Cerberus Around 35-40.
OK that is pretty big for a studio.
But, yeah, that's expensive.
That would be more like 2000 here.
Maybe a bit more.
There are, of course, neighborhoods and buildings where the prices are less absurd.
I hear some people say that rents in Amsterdam are now higher than in Paris.
@Cerberus A dubious honor.
01:59
Indeed.
The tax cut of 30% for rich foreigners doesn't help the housing market.
> 1546 Meete shall they seldwhan, or haply neuer. —J. Heywood, Dialogue Prouerbes English Tongue i. xii. sig. F
a1500 (1422) Thow shalte Preyse and commende scarsly and seldewannes. —J. Yonge, translation of Secreta Secretorum (Rawlinson MS.) (1898) 157
(a1387) Men of that lond haueþ no feuere, but onliche þe feuere agu, and þat wel silde whanne. —J. Trevisa, translation of R. Higden, Polychronicon (St. John's Cambridge MS.) (1865) vol. I. 333
?c1225 (?a1200) Swich ach wummone lare to beon. luuelich & liðe. selthwenne sturne. —Ancrene Riwle (Cleopatra MS. C.vi) (1972) 315
My rent isn't that insane. But I could never live outside the city.
Probably it lost out to simple seldom.
No great loss, I suppose.
@Cerberus ?
Foreigners with a high salary get a 30% cut off their income taxes for a number of years.
Why in the world for?
02:02
Lobbying by big companies.
They like to attract foreign employees.
No, wrong direction of for.
I meant to what purpose not from what cause. But ok, close enough.
Yeah, purpose, reason, and cause are often the same.
In Iberian tongues you have to distinguish the direction, maybe like para un resultado futuro versus por una causa pasada.
English just has for either way.
But there are many completely idiomatic uses that do not appear to follow that rule, or at least, obey higher rules than I have been able to here encapsulate.
I'm super tired. Even English syntax comes out sounding funny to me right now.
@Cerberus This sounds like some strange kind of a bribe or kickback.
Wouldn't that infuriate the Dutchman earning the same salary in the same job?
It does.
Especially those trying to compete in the housing market.
And rightly so, by my jaded yet childish sense of justice.
02:10
Bidding against foreigners with a similar job is useless.
But the liberal conservatives want to keep it.
That's certainly not going to improve the general populace's attitude about immigrants.
@Cerberus Orwellian newspeak, that.
@tchrist Exactly.
There has been backlash.
Even informal workers paid in cash here getting to keep it all bugs people who have to pay taxes on everything they make because it all goes through official channels.
Right.
But that's below board; your country's situation is above board!
Out in the open and explicitly permitted.
02:15
So even worse.
People who let themselves be hired for 'gigs' rather than being employed by an organisation also get tax cuts.
This has resulted in a large proportion of the population no longer having permanent contracts, being without labour protection and pensions.
We've seen a lot of that here. It's a terrible thing.
The plutocrats always win, right up until there's a bloody revolution that's even worse.
Smaller employers also win, and high-paid workers may also win.
But especially poor and middling workers lose, and society loses because of the lower tax income.
It bugs people ground up by the gears either of the sausage maker or of the bureaucracy to have no voices in their own fate.
Yeah.
02:20
Oh, Hawaii.
Hawaii: America's Switzerland.
That seems to be the same scale?
Except that Switzerland is a lot bigger.
@Robusto Probate Court
I can't believe that Czechia should be far more expensive than Austria!
@Xanne Yeah, MetaEd pointed that out.
So someone quoted Swift to me, and I didn't recognize the quote. Turns out she was talking about Taylor, not Jonathan.
02:24
Ouch.
@Cerberus Vienna is certainly more expensive than Prague to live in.
I will believe that.
Allegedly about 25% more expensive.
Houses in Amsterdam are about €10,000 per m².
That's of course just one data point.
By other measures it about 33% higher. I don't know about out in the country, though. Assuming they still have any countryside left for cows and bison and such.
Most cows pay more than most apartment dwellers do: they pay with their lives.
Oh it's Romania they're trying to rewild the bison in, not Czechia.
02:31
Even the most densely populated countries are still mostly countryside, city-states excepted.
@Cerberus By winter, yes. By summer when it's 100 to 110 at lower elevations, it's a pleasant and actually liveable 60 to 80.
@Cerberus I know. I was kidding.
Phew.
@jlliagre Paris under 30, really?
But there's tilled and untilled: there's countryside that's farmed and there's countryside left wild. Those proportions vary greatly.
In Amsterdam, a room is about €50 per m². Of course larger houses are less expensive per m².
02:35
Managed agriculture of any sort, not just tilled, versus unmanaged land.
A country that cannot grow its own food is an easily besieged city-state.
What if it imports from friendly neighbours?
Singapore, Monaco, and Vatican City all have their friends.
@Cerberus That depends on the neighborhood. One site tells it's between €27 and €44 per m². Paris has a rent control law that try to prevent them to skyrocket. Anyway, it is very difficult to find something to rent inside Paris. Easier outside.
In 1925, only 1% of Ireland was forested because they'd cut it all down for growing food. Today it's up to 11.6%. Well, or 9% in Northern Ireland.
Rent regulation is a system of laws for the rental market of dwellings, with controversial effects on affordability of housing and tenancies. Generally, a system of rent regulation involves: Price controls, limits on the rent that a landlord may charge, typically called rent control or rent stabilization Eviction controls: codified standards by which a landlord may terminate a tenancy: 1  : 1  Obligations on the landlord or tenant regarding adequate maintenance of the property A system of oversight and enforcement by an independent regulator and ombudsman The loose term "rent control" covers a...
> Rent regulations are determined in France based on the Rent Reference Index, which serves as the basis for what landlords can increase yearly rents by. In July 2022, France introduced a new cap on yearly rent increase of a maximum of 3.5% for one year.
02:50
@jlliagre I really wish my yearly property tax would stop going up 30–40% every two years.
It's not like my salary does that.
@jlliagre That sounds very similar to Amsterdam.
@tchrist I hope you are not in serious financial problems.
Paris housing prices are going down since 2021.
@tchrist Boulder is a pricey market anyway. At our house in MA we were paying $1,000/mo in property taxes, and that's when it was only valued at about $850,000. Now that it's up to $1.4 million I can't imagine what it must be.
@Robusto A property a few doors away from me, at the street corner but without any of the views or open space access that I have, just sold to a developer for $1.6M who completely scraped it to the ground in the past few days.
So of course my place has been assessed an even higher value. It's insane.
@tchrist Yeah, it's the San Francisco syndrome. $2M homes are teardowns.
03:02
@jlliagre That is probably still higher than here. But our rents are relatively high compared to buying.
Then, there is Monaco :-)
@tchrist Nice, then at least you can always up your mortgage if you ever need money?
@Cerberus Um what? You mean borrow money and be forced to pay back more than that?
@jlliagre Yeah, there is always rich and richer...
@tchrist Yes. To get cash.
But that's just stealing from myself.
03:04
Only if you need cash.
I worked very hard to no longer have a mortgage's guillotine blade of Damocles yoked over my neck. The idea of going back to that sounds like penury to me.
And people wonder why I can never retire.
@Robusto I pay $1500 a month in taxes and fees on a home I own completely, and this goes up around 30% or worse every two years. There's no way I will ever be able to afford to retire. Ever. It's miserable.
Adding a fucking mortgage to that would make me suicidal.
Sure I could sell my home and retire to somewhere dry and dusty in South Dakota and live for 30 years just on the interest alone.
Nobody will ever do that. Or the kids complaining about not being able to buy homes in downtown San Francisco or Boston or Manhattan for their remote jobs would have done that a long time ago.
It's too late at night. Life seems hopeless. I blame looking at the news. I'm going to bed.
@tchrist It can be a small mortgage.
As small as the yearly increase in the price of the house.
Sleep well, for now.
03:21
A reverse mortgage might work.
Reverse?
Your bank pays you $X a month, then they get your house when you die. (Basically.)
I assume it's for a fixed term, not until your actual death; the latter would create some odd incentives.
Yes. Like alphabet says.
"Every reverse mortgage comes with a free lifetime supply of cigarettes."
No, it’s often for life. I don’t know about provisions if you need to move to a nursing home.
03:25
Odd.
Sounds similar to a viager.
Le Viager is a 1972 French comedy film directed by Pierre Tchernia and starring Michel Serrault, Michel Galabru and Claude Brasseur, adapted from a script by René Goscinny, the creator of the Asterix comics. == Plot == In 1930 in Paris, Dr Léon Galipeau examines 59-year-old Louis Martinet. Convinced that his patient has a maximum of two years to live, Galipeau convinces his brother Emile to use a 'viager' (life annuity) to buy Martinet's lovely country house in the fishing village of Saint-Tropez (at the time, St-Tropez was not the world renowned destination it is today). The 'viager' is a French...
Think of it like selling your house with the right to remain there until you die.
Huh. I just sorta assumed that tchrist was obscenely wealthy, given that he has his own Wikipedia page and seems to heap scorn on the unrefined peasantry.
@Xanne Exactly.
> The 'viager' is a French system whereby someone buys a house from a person, repaying them by instalments until the person's death, only upon which the house finally transfers to the buyer.
@alphabet This is very, very American thinking. Money has absolutely nothing to do with refined taste. On the contrary.
03:40
@Cerberus Certainly one can have refined taste without money. But contempt for the vulgus is usually associated with the well-to-do.
@alphabet Not contempt for bad taste.
@Cerberus Contempt for the tastes of most ordinary people.
That is a different thing.
Yes.
There is some overlap, but those are different things.
03:44
"Refined" taste is, traditionally, just the taste associated with the upper class.
That is not its essence.
It does seem to be its origin.
Not sure what you mean.
But good art is good art.
Is it, though? Or is it just art you were conditioned to see as good?
Good art is generally art with some depth, and which is pour l'art, or at least not wholly the contrary.
03:53
What does "with some depth" mean? Can you measure it? Or is it something people just assure themselves exists in order to find a reason behind their aesthetic judgments?
E.g. inspecting it again gives more interesting experiences. That is what depth can be like.
But doesn't that depend entirely on the beholder? Different people derive more interesting experiences from different things.
Everything depends on the beholder.
It's art.
Without a beholder, it is a blind collection of molecules.
💩
Exactly, which is why there's no objective reason why one person's tastes would be better than another's.
03:59
Who cares?
There is no objective reason why killing two people is worse than killing one.
It suggests that the usage of the term "bad taste" makes little sense.
It is a strange idea to think that nothing makes sense in life.
If a bear poops in the woods, does anyone hear it?
Of course it is true at the highest level.
But it is banal.
@Mitch Exactly.
It's all so arbitrary man.
04:01
@Cerberus Surely most people don't just believe but know that killing two people is worse than killing one.
Everything is a series of arbitrary collisions of atoms, as Lucretius said.
@Cerberus my imagination makes me think they must be pretty loud.
I don't know.
@alphabet How would that be objective?
The Amazon Forest doesn't care whether you kill one or two people.
@alphabet depends on the people?
@Cerberus Why is that relevant?
04:02
@Mitch Perhaps you should wander around a forest and wait until you hear it happen.
@alphabet Because it isn't objective. It is how people feel about it.
Ultimately nothing is 'objective'.
Speaking of the Amazon, I'd really like to visit but I hear they have an insect problem.
And many of the most important things in life are far less objective than most other things, if objectivity is even a sensible category.
@Cerberus So there's nothing less objective about "Killing two people is worse than one" than there is about "I have two hands"? That's my position, but I don't think it's yours.
Also I'd want to see a Jaguar in the wild, but I have a feeling they don't like tourists.
I don't follow.
Art is not about objectivity, even if objectivity really existed.
It makes no sense to me.
04:04
You're walking through the forest looking to see a jaguar, and all the time they're stalking you, just waiting for just the right time to pounce.
@Mitch Perhaps more so than do bears.
I'd wear one of those masks on the back of my head so the cat thinks I'm always looking at it.
Does that work?
I don't think they'd really fall for that kind of stupidity.
@Cerberus Art certainly isn't about objectivity. That doesn't mean that nothing is.
04:06
Cats are pretty stupid.
@alphabet Ultimately, nothing is. But art least of all.
@Cerberus it's really too bad. I'd take really awesome pictures, as well as a shaky phone could.
And videos?
I'd cuddle their babies, so soft and furry. Take teal good care of them too.
Ending in screams followed by a mauling sound?
@Cerberus I've rarely taken videos...takes up an awful lot of disk space.
04:08
@Mitch That's a really good idea, approaching the bear's lair to take care of their cubs.
If that is indeed what they call more persistent memory these days.
But it would be your final video.
@Cerberus and jaguars babies too.
Sweet.
Not at the same time, that would be a lot to handle.
04:09
But the bear mother will be the most touched by your concern.
@Cerberus Have you tried only assenting to kataleptic impressions?
I hear only assenting to kataleptic impressions can help with that sort of problem.
@Cerberus yeah I'd expect bears to be a bit more tolerant. Cats can be very...
They like things just right.
Wouldn't stand for holding jaguar cubs the wrong way.
@Cerberus they're not the brightest tool in the shed
@alphabet Well, objectively there is no such thing.
I can say that because cats can't read.
So they pretend.
04:12
@Cerberus that's absurd. I would never do that, no matter how angry or hungry I was.
OK, good to know.
So you are more cat than bear.
@Cerberus I don't think I've ever seen a cat even bother
@Cerberus what?
My avatar is just a random picture I like. I don't identify in any way with a cat in a box with a cat, in a box.
Not usually.
@Cerberus How do we know certain things objectively exist? G.E. Moore proved it.
Also, despite some philosophers to the contrary, there is an objective world out there, just it is difficult to determine all the circumstances. Subjectivity is for people who don't know better.
You'll never find an argument in favor of relativism or skepticism whose premises will be more obviously true than "I have two hands."
04:16
@alphabet unless you're Capn Hook.
Who has no hands at all because he's -fictional-.
@Mitch Oh, now I must cast away all my preconceptions about you.
@alphabet That looks like a highly advanced theory of proof.
@Cerberus Yup. It works.
I'm pretty sure some of your preconceived notions about me aren't too far from the truth. But no I'm not a cat.
Cats are effing idiots.
They're just...
Now, now.
I don't know how they survive.
Oh actually I do know. By being the Nazis of the backyard, killing for pleasure.
By causing the Holocaust of birds.
04:20
That's how you respond to the "How do I know we're not in the Matrix?" argument of Descartes et al. Why would you ever, on the basis of some thought experiment you come up with, reject things so obviously true as "I have hands"? Surely the latter must be more persuasive than the former; they're so clearly accurate that you can use them to refute any argument a skeptic gives you.
@alphabet You can dream about having body parts you lack.
@Cerberus Yes, and I'm not dreaming now, and I know I'm not dreaming now, and right now I know I have two hands.
You think that you know.
Until you wake up.
We are trying to wake you up.
1. If we live in the Matrix, I wouldn't actually have hands.
2. I actually have hands.
3. Therefore, we don't live in the Matrix.
Make you see the truth, the light.
04:23
@Cerberus Yes, but that's irrelevant, since right now I am awake.
I mean if you're going to invoke common sense, a lot of the infrastructure of modern academic philosophy just crumbles away, like a bag of crunchy flaming hot Cheetos in a cloth bag on a week long boat trip down the Amazon
@alphabet As strong as a typical proof of the existence of God.
@Mitch Yes, that's what I like about G.E. Moore, or at least that paper of his.
@alphabet You're not.
@alphabet I'm about unsure about #1
04:24
@Mitch Some academic philosophers reserve an important position for common sensen.
@Cerberus Nope. Again: no argument you can give to me will be as obviously correct to me as the fact that I am currently awake.
And yet you are dreaming all that.
@alphabet and yet he still got payed to be a professor.
Sure, if I were dreaming, I might falsely think that I had three hands, or one. But I'm not dreaming now, and I know I have two hands.
We can see your legs move while you're inside the brain scanner.
Thinking you're running after a trash can.
04:25
@Cerberus weirdos
No you can't, because that would only work if I were asleep, and I'm not asleep.
But you are.
@Cerberus haha! Tickle his feet! See if the Matrix can stop that!
Nahhh we don't want to wake him up.
And realise that he has no hands.
@alphabet the scanners are way too noisy.
04:27
But only paws.
Oh actually.,.
Again: you'll never find any premises more obviously true than "I currently have two hands." If any argument tells me that I don't have two hands, I'll obviously need to reject one of the argument's premises or question its validity, since it makes more sense to reject a questionable claim than an obviously false one.
Yes, I suppose my example should be "I have four paws." I was simplifying things for you humans.
Thanks to G.E. Moore for solving philosophy.
I've been in an MRI multiple times for a brain scan (for security purposes) and even though it is super loud, like in the engine room of a steam locomotive (which I have never experienced in this life)) and I just took a nap.
@alphabet Well, that is not true.
It isn't obviously true.
(I've read the paper that argument's from and find it quite straightforwardly correct.)
04:30
@alphabet I think the Matrix would have thought of giving you two hands.
@Cerberus Yes it is. I just held up a paw right now. I can see it and everything. Same with my other three paws. So I have four paws.
@Mitch Can you wear ear plugs to protect your ears?
@alphabet Then how can you type so fast?
I mean, duh, it didn't take me any effort to observe this obvious truth.
I'm getting spider vibes.
@Cerberus yes. I don't remember but little plastic ear plugs, the ones that are squishy and expand a bit, they probably have them.
04:33
OK makes sense.
How was security assured by putting you in a scanner?
To check for any devices.
@Mitch They gave me all these warnings about how to deal with claustrophobia and I also half fell asleep.
@alphabet exactly.
But to be honest I can totally see how it can be bad if you're claustrophobic.
@Mitch Where did they think you may have acquired devices?
Or rather for any normal person. I kept wondering how if something were to 'go wrong' how to scooch out of there using just wriggling with my elbows and ankles to move
But then I fell asleep.
It was a Head MRI, so I suspect teeth, sinuses, and maybe ear canal?
04:38
My latest neurologist decided I needed a new MRI because her hospital's MRI machines are apparently way, way better than anyone else's.
But nope, they still haven't tracked down what's going on in there.
I don't think devices can be inserted so easily into brain ventricles without you noticing new bare spots on your scalp.
So, maybe your dentist?
@alphabet I suspect not
@Mitch There was some complicated explanation she gave me. Apparently the magnets are better? I don't know.
@Xanne dental X-rays are perfectly safe every other year but a full head X-ray is maybe too much?
I don't know
@alphabet I mean every year there's a new model out. I feel sorry for those suckers from 20 years ago.
They do seem to up the Tesla's every few years, and I suppose more is always better.
04:42
@tchrist I feel for you. But don't lose hope. I mean it. There will be a better day.
Holy crap, not only do we have to sell our Nazi EVs now but we can't get an MRI without pledging allegiance.
That name has been ruined by shame.
Let's call them Gauss.
@Robusto Nope, nope, it's all crap from here on out.
Perhaps calm down on a scenic cruise of the Gulf of America?
I hear there's some good crap mixed in with the bad.
You know Greenland will have some nice real estate once the glaciers melt.
I wonder if some of the ice cap will 'slip' off
It would make a great action/thriller set piece, but in reality I wouldn't want to be in the way.
You know like those videos of people tapping their snowed covered rooves with the end of a snow shovel and the the entire roof slides right off on top of them?
Like that but a mile deep ice pack into the Atlantic.
04:57
At least we might keep TikTok while the dictatorship sets in.
Silver linings
Dumbest romcom ever
How sweet! Two borderline (figuratively, not the clinical meaning) people meet and complementarily don't need their meds anymore.
As not a doctor of any kind of mental health I suspect thing would not turn out so rosy.
05:19
@Mitch I don't think you'll be allowed to sell your Teslas.
 
3 hours later…
07:54
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in link text in body, blacklisted website in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +1 more (176): How to Use an Essay Plagiarism Checker for Assignment Help?‭ by BookMyEssay‭ on english.SE
08:41
@alphabet it's usually not the machine. Rather, a new image processing algorithm, or a whole new technology
09:10
> Though the patients did not have skin cancer, their skin was riddled with thousands of clones, and one-fifth to one-third of the eyelid skin cells contained cancer-linked mutations. smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/…
Interesting and well-written sci-pop article on recent research into single-cell-level mutations that happen over the life on an individual.
 
2 hours later…
10:41
@CowperKettle saw the video. Definitely a salute, and he was definitely high.
 
2 hours later…
12:41
@Cerberus Me neither, though being where I am, I should have guessed blue sooner. Like you, I also guessed purple sooner.
Connections
Puzzle #590
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟦🟦
🟪🟨🟦🟦
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟨🟨🟦🟨
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟦🟦🟦🟦
13:36
@Robusto I did a search on your references to Camus and Sisyphus, found them here, here and here. I think I'm beginning to see the connection between Camus, Sisyphus, and being happy despite of drudgery.
My first noticing Camus was when in college my part-time-job co-worker came to work immediately from her class on Camus where she (knowing that I have been asking my colleagues about "meaning of life") shone such a joyful light on her face and looked at me in the eye and saying along the lines of "don't worry about finding the answer, be FREE and be HAPPY creating your OWN meaning".
I'm reminded of you and her because I came across this article which includes a contrast of visions between Camus and Rahner to deal with the Sisyphean boulder we are tasked with. That article is part of defending this new question in C.SE which is in danger of being closed by a Protestant who denies the value of investigating humanity deeply.
Quote from the article:
> In Le Mythe de Sisyphe (1942), published one year after Rahner’s Hörer des Wortes, Albert Camus described the absurdity of our continually asking the question about the meaning of life when, as he claimed, there is none. The absurdity of this paradox is embodied in the image of Sisyphus, who repeatedly pushes a rock up the mountain, only to see it roll back down, requiring him to begin the process of pushing it uphill again and again.
> By contrast with Camus, Rahner argued that this unquenchable questioning was not absurd, but rather a constitutive feature of human nature, drawing us toward that holy mystery named God.
I can still see her joyful face very clearly today in my mind, I don't know why (BTW no romantic interest here), as clear as the much more recent devotion to Scolnik's technique taught to the Japanese pianist I was talking about yesterday (from whom I took about 12 lessons), shown clearly in her desire to spread "the good news" of better piano playing to me, in the characteristic (sorry for stereotyping) Japanese preference of precision, excellence, and dedication.
So my personal response to my own boulder is this: pay it forward (this is one of my dad's last message to me as his college tuition was completely financed by a wealthy relative who didn't want to be repaid but asked him to pay it forward). We can all transmit to others the good things we have received to those who need and appreciate them: piano technique, philosophy, financial assistance, or even mere technical assistance. And also (releveant to this room) love of words and languages.
13:55
@GratefulDisciple Every good thing in your life is a gift.
@Robusto Of course. I just feel that amidst the drudgery it would be a balm of joy to share it with others in need. This, despite being in doubt about the existence of the ultimate Giver, which (for non-atheists) would be an additional source of joy.
So now it's time for me to use my talents for work and family (today's drudgery). Hope you all have a good day.
00:00 - 14:0014:00 - 00:00

« first day (5185 days earlier)      last day (31 days later) »