I'm not clear to me how "the negative of 'I usually eat breakfast'" differs from "not eating breakfast is what I usually do." Do you mean to imply that not eating breakfast is the only action (or non-action) the person takes? — Robusto30 secs ago
Someone might want to have a look at this. I can't make head nor tail of his difficulty.
The negation of I usually eat breakfast is of course merely I don't usually eat breakfast. I have no idea what this person's confusion is, perhaps because it's past my bedtime.
Or perhaps they're just confused after all.
All that inversion contrapositive stuff is just so many LSD nightmares.
Yes, I'm just too tired to think, or perhaps not to overthink, because the next questions is equally perplexing.
Is this usage of "at" grammatically correct?
On behalf of the Columbia, South Carolina team at American Red Cross, I'd like to thank you for your generous donation.
"the Columbia, South Carolina team of the American Red Cross" sounds better to me, but is the version with "at" also correct? And ...
@Mitch Yeah, my mom only made it a few times. But it cost maybe 50 cents at the commissary, so I made it all the time, in the '80s. My mom was too busy cooking to teach us how to cook.
@Mitch I brought Nesquik in a plastic bag to school. Absolutely would not drink white milk. Told my parents it tasted like there was blood and pee in it. LOL. I still think Maola may have some pee in it. IDK why.
1️⃣📍1.2K km - 🗓️3 yrs - 🥈162/200 2️⃣📍3.4 km - 🗓️8 yrs - 🥇189/200 3️⃣📍3.0K km - 🗓️6 yrs - 🥈133/200 4️⃣📍1.9K km - 🗓️10 yrs - 🥈137/200 5️⃣📍4.3K km - 🗓️0 yrs - 🥈127/200
https://whentaken.com
@jlliagre Not quite a statistical tie. A couple of those had no clues as to location. How do you tell where a ship is in the world if all you can see is the deck, and damn little of that?
@Robusto Same with me; never heard the purple category before. Other words are also tricky because they can apply to multiple category (i.e. red herrings); my first guess was spoiler, confirmed by their Connection Bot which says that 19% made the same mistake.
@GratefulDisciple I'm going to coin a phrase here to describe Connections categories that are NWT3K: "Not Worth the Trouble to Know." That certainly describes today's purple.
@tchrist Thank you for the explanation; it's very helpful to see how you would apply historical citations and dictionary meanings into elucidating grammatical peculiarities. Plus it's rather inspiring to dig further into connection with evolution of Latin grammar. It's a field where as newbie I probably need learn if I go back to school for AI NLP.
@Robusto Completely agree with you there. The author (or the peer reviewers) must have invested interest in that category, or 2) simply desperate to try to find a connection, or 3) used a LLM bot to make that category for them.
@tchrist Knowing that Augustine was very well trained in Latin rhetoric (influenced by Virgil and Cicero), it would be interesting if Augustine was mangling (?) classical Latin motivated by the pathos he wanted to express in his sermons, or in his Confessions that is rightly regarded as the first Western autobiography.
> As the crypto boosters like to say, hold on for dear life. “A lot of bankers, they’re dancing in the street,” Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase said at a conference in Peru last year. Maybe they should be. The bankers are never the ones left holding the bag.
@Robusto Unless they are deemed "too big too fail" and got billions of bailout, which arguably can be a "moral hazard" that bankers sometimes cite hypocritically toward forgiving loans.
But then (not knowing much about finance) if the new administration supports crypto it would be a disaster for even less accountability and transparency. Better bail out banks rather than crypto.
> Powerful front page from L'Humanité on Jean Marie Le Pen: 'His Profession Was Hatred'. The dagger pictured was recovered at the scene of the brutal torture and murder of Ahmed Moulay in Algiers in 1957. One of multiple pieces of evidence showing Le Pen was a torturer.
@alphabet That's fair. Obviously I'm a newbie when it comes to the primary sources of post-classical Latin (is that the right term?). My lay "expertise" (as an amateur theologian) is more on the primary sources of Christianity.
@GratefulDisciple It is an odd word, though; I can't see the relation to cernere.
Aug. Conf. 5.10:
> talem itaque naturam eius nasci non posse de Maria virgine arbitrabar, nisi carni concerneretur.concerni autem et non coinquinari non videbam, quod mihi tale figurabam.
@alphabet Google search led me directly to the page in Loeb Classical Library, helpful to see the English side by side, though the translation is far from literal.
@HippoSawrUs For one summer my mom got me Lender's frozen bagels and baloney for me to make my lunch every day. To this day, I really don't like baloney. Lender's Bagels are fine though.
Why am I telling you this? I have no idea.
But I never had rice-a-roni or mac and cheese as a kid.
@Xanne Erich Fromm's book "To Have or To Be" seems to be the source of the ELU question. So I was mistaken, the hypothesis is about 'be' and not 'make'. But I think it would be fun to look at several languages and their histories and how they use have, be, make, whatever, in the relevant idioms and how (or if) they changed.
@handan_toddler Well, you can use that to answer your own question "Come on, no mac and cheese?".
If there was time travel, people always say they'd go back and kill baby hitler, or give penicillin to stop the Black Plague (OK no one ever says that last one but I had to add something for balance).
@Robusto Yes, the question is about ones ending in -ed that can't or, rather, aren't currently used as verbs (not in the usual sense). No specific name for that, I guess.
I guess some are leftovers from archaic verbs.
And IDK which came first, the chicken or the egg.
Maybe both
I find it hard to believe that every adjective ending in -ed has a root that was a verb before
But all I see people come up with is latter-half body parts: toed, legged, armed, hearted, etc.
three-toed, short-legged, long-armed, hard-hearted, etc.
Where -ed means having, not providing with
That is, M-W's definition of skilled, not OL&G's
Oxford Languages and Google
I got that abbreviation from here
Then I left and eventually came back, and you all forgot the abbreviation you made up in the interim
I'm busy baking and eating muffins and sewing pillow buddies and such
I'm not a wild abbreviation-maker
JSYK
Correction: I gather some are leftovers from archaic verbs (from answers).