« first day (5168 days earlier)      last day (48 days later) » 

00:02
The word ‘antler’ comes from the Latin word ‘anteoculāre’: something that is in front of (ante) the deer’s eye (oculus).
Oh, I may have heard of this.
Quite funny.
@CowperKettle So ... which is good, blue or red?
@CowperKettle Russian soldier mailbox (with a hole where his forehead used to be)? Or maybe Russian Cyclops mailbox?
00:22
@Cerberus I like Elon. A creative genius. Today’s Thomas Edison.
lots of good ideas, some not so good.
@Xanne I don't think he has invented or created anything himself?
@Xanne Musk is too much pro-Putinist. (See also snyder.substack.com/p/why-trumpomuskovia)
@Robusto It's a bird feeder :)
00:44
@Cerberus If others contributed, is the animosity a consequence of Elon’s getting the credit and wealth supposedly belonging to others?
Musk did provide Ukrainians with Internet access at a crucial time.
He also has investments in China.
I think it’s just envy.
@Xanne I'm sorry, I didn't understand this line.
Are you saying he did invent or create some technology?
He rather wanted promotion of himself or his companies, than actually helping Ukraine win war.
Okay, never mind.
China is increasingly collaborating with Russia against West (e.g. some weeks ago a Chinese ship destroyed cables in Baltic Sea.)
00:49
I don't get this cartoon. I wonder what this animal is.
@CowperKettle Piñata.
@Arfrever I don't know about that: it was nearly three years ago, he probably didn't lean so far right then.
@Arfrever I seriously wonder to what extent China knew what that ship was doing.
China does NOT want to antagonise Europe.
I don't have time to read articles now, any particular quotation?
Sweden should have done the same as what Finland did with Russian ship after it destroyed electricity cable in another accident.
Hold and inspect?
00:54
(If you have heard about these events, then no need to read articles.)
Sorry, not clicking links at the moment.
01:09
I invented a new wrap today, the 3 Cs: Chicken, Cheddar, and Catalina dressing with a bit of nice lettuce or romaine.
@HippoSawrUs why ruin the color scheme with green?
Does anyone want to try a Conexions game?
It's probably my greatest achievement in life so far, barring children, not all of them
I've tried to make this one a bit easier.
@HippoSawrUs What is Catalina dressing?
@Mitch I actually didn't have green on mine
I had a salad on the side
01:11
@HippoSawrUs oh then it's ok
@HippoSawrUs I take that back
With cherry tomatoes
omg
My husband makes the best chicken thighs in the world
My eyes
Too much color
I don't even like dark meat usually
IDK how he does it
01:12
@Cerberus I don't know this 'Conexions' thing but I'd you put up a 'Connections' 4x4 I'll try.
Over-seasoning, charring, finishing in the oven…something like that
@Mitch I prefer the more etymologically sound spelling!
But I got bored and put one in a wrap; it was great
@Cerberus we have different ideas of what 'sound' means.
It means vibrating air.
01:14
@Cerberus OMG, where have they locked you up? We'll come rescue you.
Or possibly other materials.
@HippoSawrUs there is no such thing as over seasoning
Well maybe too much salt
@HippoSawrUs In the Underworld.
@Cerberus hmm...well maybe there is a basis in reality between us then.
Catalina (like French dressing but better) is great with cheddar cheese
01:15
Do the conext thing then
@HippoSawrUs you had me up until cheddar cheese.
I had no idea. My friend used to come to my house and just eat cheddar cheese with Catalina on it.
She was right.
@Mitch I don't think it has to be cheddar necessarily, just orange…well, IDK.
> BONE, LENS, SAND, HE
STRONG, TEAR, MORSEL, SHRED
IOTA, COMMON, STONE, ALPHA
IRON, SOMETHING, HINT, BITTER
@Mitch It is untested!
Try at your own risk!
I think there are one or two things in it that may be considered Americanisms.
Word of the morn: tenebrescence (reversible photochromism)
@Cerberus testing the waters now
Ooh...hot
@Mitch I like to buy the seasoning blends in glass grinders when they go on clearance; they look so nice. And my husband uses like all of them. We'll never know his secret. The KFC recipe is easier to copy.
01:23
@Mitch That is the opposite of what I expected!
@CowperKettle I don't even know what regular photochromism is
@Mitch Ding!!
Do you want me to put that in a spoiler tag?
Oops yes
Was that easy?
No
01:34
You had it quickly, though.
And the next ones I'm having trouble again.
Even though I threw in alpha to distract you.
@Mitch I would say there are two 'easier' ones, one of which you have found; one harder one; and one that I had no idea how hard it is, maybe too unexpected, maybe not.
One is entirely thematic, the one you have found; one is collocations but with thematic words; one is also collocations but with more disconnected-seeming words; and the fourth one is a bit jocular.
What is it when someone does that take-it-to-extremes fallacy (What's it called?) Like they say: 'Then there is no place for that here or, dare I say, the world!' And you just agree with them, and add something: 'Yep, you said it, Jack. And no more doodle dogs.'
Thin end of the wedge?
Slippery slope?
It's my newest joke form. With One Caveat? IDK, but it's up there with my Whereas and Who Knew jokes…classics.
Nobody has noticed yet
01:42
@CowperKettle Looks more like a bird nesting place, but that's beside the point. It's painted to have a hat such as Russian soldiers have historically worn, and the red star button on the front supports that.
Dec 11, 2024 at 17:22, by Robusto
> I hope the first naturalized immigrant Trump deports is Elon Musk.
Musk is an evil SOB. He wants all the money in the world, and he's filled with hate. I don't mind sending a little back his way.
I hope Elon and Melania make a baby
@HippoSawrUs Elon has the technology
A severe/sexy looking baby
Like it's very attractive but in an uptight way
And is anti-Semitic
01:50
@Mitch Correct!!
Was that hard?
Now you have one left that should be relatively easy (collocations where the four words feel thematically linked).
And one that is a bit jocular and odd, not so much collocational.
@Cerberus well I have to mentally subtract the ones already chosen. One of those in the second 4 is not a collocation I'd really consider.
@Mitch Which one is that?
@Mitch Oh, we already have a Mel Gibson. I forget.
Maybe I need to improve the second 4?
@Mitch If you are not on your phone, you can copy-paste the words into your e-mail and remove the ones you have already conexed?
@Cerberus naw I'm practicing my Socratic talents of word memorization.
01:54
@Mitch Wait, I have a solution, one moment.
@Mitch good for you pal
💯✅
This is what it looks like, interactive web page.
Of course someone has made this, d'oh.
@Cerberus nice. I'm playing with that now. I made a guess that was wrong, despite my thing very very sure I was right.
@Mitch Ohh can you tell me what your guess was?
Maybe I need to change things?
02:07
@Mitch Ahh yes. I overlooked that one, stupidly.
The last 4 don't have a connection for me yet.
So your thinking was correct, there are 5 that fit there.
@Mitch Start with lens.
It is the jocular category.
@Mitch And the 'correct' one for the third category is actually slightly off, I overlooked that, too.
So I can totally understand your choice.
How can I fix this.
No worries at all. I'll write an angry letter to the publisher
Also, still working on it.
@Mitch Where you see ALPHA, read MACHO instead.
You see my mistake?
M...erf....er another bad guess.
02:14
Sorry...
The author of this puzzle... Goddammit.
He must be from Hell.
rips up letter
@Cerberus he'd be lucky to be in hell
Tartarus, then?
Cleaning the floors?
With a toothbrush?
That's honest labor
02:15
Doing it.
Three incorrect.
sigh
4 mins ago, by Cerberus
@Mitch Where you see ALPHA, read MACHO instead.
Did this help at all?
Only one chair smashed.
@Cerberus oh I didn't see that.
Ah, OK.
But still I did try an exchange with alpha/macho and that didn't do it.
02:18
Hmm.
@Mitch And if you start the purple category by thinking about LENS?
I mean, you almost got the other remaining category.
To be honest, to be frank, to be clear, I am watching 'Only Connect' at this very moment
Does it have the same game?
@Cerberus yeah doing the other category is a strategy, but 'lens' isn't saying anything to me
@Mitch And maybe also think about TEAR.
@Cerberus yes. The third round is the 'connections Wall' which is exactly this game.
02:22
Can you conex those two?
@Cerberus working on it.
Purple is probably too difficult...
But you almost have blue.
They usually are
I think you should be able to get blue right now, with what you have.
Which one of the five in blue can you ditch, making the remaining four more closely connected?
Well that's kind of too much of a hint two of the words in the other category...
Which I still don't get.
02:24
Yeah, sorry...
Yay! Got it!
Well done!
Without figuring out the commonality.
Without dying?
Ah.
So how did you get the third one?
I got the purple first.
02:28
You did!
How did you do it?
👍👍
It was the last choice of an item in the macho group that I made.
Sometimes you have to just do combinations.
You mean you eliminated an item from the macho group, then grouped the remaining four? Without getting the conexion between those four?
You can spoil here and I can delete after reading.
So that was a fair game, you're supposed to have lots of distractions, lots of multiple meanings, items can be in more than one category.
Did it have that?
02:33
Even spelling things.
I tried not to go the spelling way.
@Cerberus yeah
OK.
Not too much?
@Cerberus those can be easy or extremely hard because it's almost luck to see it.
@Mitch Yeah, I feel that way, too.
02:36
So despite my expletives and despite my actually getting it, that was a very reasonable square.
Maybe that substitution you made made it solvable though
Oh, that's good to know.
I liked alpha with iota.
Yeah alpha just didn't fit that way at all.
But alpha is not an exact collocation, somehow I overlooked that.
Right
So would MACHO make it too easy?
And how do you feel about purple: too impossible?
Not fun?
02:42
@Cerberus not impossible. I just didn't think of it (reading it afterwards it made sense)
@Mitch OK. Do you think anyone could ever think of it?
@Cerberus I think alpha made it impossible or 'just wasn't right'
@Mitch That I get.
But I can't tell if macho would make it too easy. (I did sort of think that was a mistake but couldn't figure out which of the others should be exchanged.
OK.
Maybe I can think of something other than macho. Like muscle? Super?
Could purple be improved in some way?
02:47
Macho is fine
@Cerberus no I think that works fine.
OK.
Could anyone ever get purple except after all the others?
Maybe. But that's ok.
As long as the connection works afterwards without groaning.
Haha right.
Still, it would be nice if purple had a chance of independent success.
Could I change anything about it to make it guessable?
Yeah, groaning matters.
I could replace SAND with something easier?
Like MOTE?
That would fuck with one of the other categories, though...
02:54
@Cerberus it did. I just happened not to see it myself. Others might.
OK.
Still, if I could make it a little bit easier by replacing something...
03:05
So they mainly live wherever there is trash.
People feed them
Right, some crazy old women.
Hope I haven't insulted anyone.
Well, those are the six most populous countries
With over half the world's population
Yes.
But we have old women who feed pigeons here, too.
03:20
@Cerberus are they crazy?
...independently of their being old and female?
Look at that^ difference
@Mitch I think feeding vermin, causing them to breed more and damage more buildings and poop on more people, is kind of crazy?
03:58
@Mitch What if I replaced lens with retina?
Or too easy?
@Cerberus If we look at # of pigeon per capita, here's the ranking:
Yeah but there is still a strong correlation, isn't there?
So the worst offender to feed pigeon is USA followed by Russia. Or maybe pigeons feel more comfortable to live there and thus breed more.
It is hard to say, there will be many factors.
@Cerberus I don't see a correlation:
04:14
What could be the flaw in that reasoning?
Not torturing the data enough.
1 hour ago, by Cerberus
So they mainly live wherever there is trash.
This was the correlation I suggested.
And trash correlates with population.
and poverty
Though there will be various other factors.
@handan_toddler I don't know.
(within densely populated countries)
1 hour ago, by handan_toddler
With over half the world's population
04:34
@handan_toddler Graph is outdated ;)
04:50
@Robusto Yes, the ushanka hat, from ushi - ears
05:06
@Vikas 👍
Our neighbor, a retired man who clipped his grass nearly every day with a manual reel mower, lived next door to a young couple with homing pigeons, dozens. Every time they were released, they pooped like rain on the old man's yard, the bane of his existence.
I visited the pigeon guy's wife one day, and there were 100s of things on the living room floor, not all toys either. Their little boy would just go get something (a brush, a bowl, a shoe, anything) and throw it on the floor, over and over and over.
@Mitch ↓
Definitive version of the Connections game I made: connectionsplus.io/game/8cITdt It may be a bit easy now.
They must've thought, 'Oh well, that's what toddlers and pigeons do.'
Maybe a bit too easy now.
I would've bought a shot gun and first done some clay pigeon shooting as a warning.
05:17
I never went back
It was terrifying
Like this Nightbitch movie on Hulu
I don't even like dogs anymore now
So it's crazy young people
The pigeon thing
They just grow old sometimes
Despite all the poop
And junk
Somehow
Good morning, happy 2025
2
 
2 hours later…
07:25
@GratefulDisciple And the Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal contains only words after 1500 or it would have been quite a bit bigger still. So I think the size of a dictionary doesn't really tell you that much about a language.
Guess the birds.
07:57
Correct
08:52
Connections
Puzzle #573
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟦🟪🟦🟦
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟪🟪🟪🟪
09:48
@GratefulDisciple TBH that looks like correlation
10:48
TBF I think it looks like causation
 
1 hour later…
11:55
> Updates to DALL·E
We are no longer allowing new users to DALL·E 2. DALL·E 3 has higher quality images, improved prompt adherence, and we've started rolling out image editing. It is available for ChatGPT Plus, Team and Enterprise and the OpenAI API.
-_____-
 
2 hours later…
14:09
#travle #752 +0 (Perfect)
✅✅✅✅✅✅
https://travle.earth
14:35
#WhenTaken #312 (04.01.2025)

I scored 866/1000🏆

1️⃣📍201 m - 🗓️4 yrs - 🥇196/200
2️⃣📍3.8 km - 🗓️7 yrs - 🥇191/200
3️⃣📍608 km - 🗓️22 yrs - 🥈129/200
4️⃣📍718 km - 🗓️13 yrs - 🥈154/200
5️⃣📍8.9 km - 🗓️4 yrs - 🥇196/200

https://whentaken.com
15:10
Wordle 1,295 5/6

⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛
🟨⬛🟨⬛⬛
🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩⬛🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Connections
Puzzle #573
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟨🟨🟨🟨
Daily Octordle #1076
5️⃣4️⃣
🕚6️⃣
🕛🔟
7️⃣9️⃣
Score: 64
Daily Sequence Octordle #1076
5️⃣6️⃣
7️⃣8️⃣
9️⃣🔟
🕚🕛
Score: 68
Tightrope, a daily trivia game | Britannica

Jan. 4, 2025

T I G H T R O P E
✅ 💔 ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ 🎉

My Score: 1800
Strands #307
“Literary couples”
🔵🔵🔵🔵
🔵🔵🟡
15:39
#WhenTaken #312 (04.01.2025)

I scored 793/1000🏅

1️⃣📍620 m - 🗓️1 yrs - 🥇199/200
2️⃣📍147 m - 🗓️4 yrs - 🥇196/200
3️⃣📍551 m - 🗓️1 yrs - 🥇199/200
4️⃣📍1.8K km - 🗓️23 yrs - 🥉98/200
5️⃣📍6.6K km - 🗓️9 yrs - 🥉101/200

https://whentaken.com
Wordle 1,295 4/6

⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟨🟨🟩⬛
🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Tightrope, a daily trivia game | Britannica

Jan. 4, 2025

T I G H T R O P E
✅ 💔 ✅ ✅ 💔 ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ 🎉

My Score: 1730
She looks pretty good for 116.
In fact, she looks a lot like my mother-in-law, who died a couple years ago at 104.
15:59
Connections
Puzzle #573
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟨🟪🟨🟨
🟨🟪🟩🟨
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟪🟪
🟪🟩🟪🟩
Daily Octordle #1076
6️⃣7️⃣
9️⃣5️⃣
🔟🕚
🕛3️⃣
Score: 63
Daily Sequence Octordle #1076
4️⃣5️⃣
6️⃣7️⃣
8️⃣9️⃣
🔟🕚
Score: 60
Wordle 1,295 3/6

🟨🟨⬛⬛🟨
🟨🟨⬛🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Strands #307
“Literary couples”
🟡🔵🔵🔵
🔵🔵🔵
Connections
Puzzle #573
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟪🟪🟪🟪
16:26
> fie ken orp waw wis wit cant mele mell moot nurn rede rime dight lance neven roose rothe shire spile witter
> boo cry jot log nag put say tsk tut yap yip
> bark bawl bray carp clap crib draw dump emit hiss hoot howl know mark mean moan note page peel send show sing tell type vent wail warn yell yelp
> cavil cluck debug flail fling grave gripe groan growl issue press print quote raise scold shout snark sneer sound speak speel spiel spout stamp state trace utter whine write
> advise cackle denote depict detail format grouse impart inform kvetch letter mutter natter niggle output recant recite reckon record remark remind render report reveal scrawl signal sketch snitch splain squawk squeal yammer
> blather chatter comment counsel deliver display engrave explain express grumble imprint mention message observe outline prattle present proclaim recount reflect respond suggest
> annotate announce complain describe dispatch document enscript extromit illumine inscribe instruct proclaim remember splutter transfer transmit
> broadcast enlighten
illuminate
communicate remonstrate
> . ? ! > › >> » ⏵ d p w ʬ ␆ dd lg pp ack cmt dbg doc fmt mem msg rec rem comm cons desc diag memo mesg xfer xmit
-3
Q: Printing to a computer screen?

Craig BuchekI'm working on a programming language. I'm considering the best word to use to tell the computer to output to the screen — or a file, another program, or elsewhere. It seems the most common amongst programming languages is print: print "Hello, World" Other common words are write, echo, puts (put...

It's an odd question if nothing else.
Never metaphor you didn't like?
Holy wordbook horde idolatry.
Winsome loo sum.
 
3 hours later…
20:02
The Harvard undergraduate linguistics society is this young?
20:41
I guess Linguistics isn't as well established as I once thought.
20:56
So all these CaGEL-crazy people are English then?
I wanted to learn new stuff
But I never bothered after Lawler suggested it was contrived
Filled in where it was lacking with hoo-ha
I forgot the one book he suggested…
I probably can't find that comment
21:16
@HippoSawrUs More concretely, he wasn't very hot on the new terminologies they invented. He had less of a problem with the actual work apart from the naming of such.
@HippoSawrUs Mostly. Huddleston is English (UK). Pullum is apparently a dual UK–American, but he sometimes forgets what sorts of things are syntactically unsound to American ears.
Still, linguists and grammarians don't seem to get along in general.
Sorta like theorists and experimentalists in Physics.
How's that now? Are not linguists with morphosyntactic specialties "grammarians"? Or are you talking about people who try to boss you around or copyedit your prose?
Lawler considered himself a syntactician.
I think he started out as a mathematics major.
A (very) few publications do still employ staff to copyedit content into acceptably normalized forms. These are not linguists nor even grammarians sensu stricto.
Grammarians explain grammar.
They study it.
It's all about research investigations and refining or creating models that explain and predict it.
It doesn't have much to do with nuns slapping your wrist with a yardstick.
@tchrist Yup, that's a pedagogical decision.
@HippoSawrUs I might be able to find his recommendation for you if you could guess some content in his comment that I could search for. As a site moderator I have better tools for searching comments on my sites than you do (you don't have any, in fact).
I have to go walk in the blowing ice fog now, doing battle with the hoarfrost demons. I shall return.
22:15
@HippoSawrUs @tchrist “ >If you're in CS and you either have or have access to native intuitions, you can probably benefit from McCawley's approach. He has a syntax text and a semantics (logic) text; I recommend both. They'll be in your university library. –
John Lawler
Commented May 9, 2019 at 1:36 ”
@Xanne Thanks. Just stepped back in.

« first day (5168 days earlier)      last day (48 days later) »