@alphabet yes that's what I was trying to get at to show @CowperKettle the difference. You just don't have apartment highrises like that in a similar commercial area (Boston, Chicago, LA, any US area)
Unless I'm wrong of course.
The Boston clip you gave... Could be a counterexample... But I think that it is too dense to compare with Tyumen
@Mitch Exactly; the difference is that in Boston the buildings are more densely packed, without big gaps between them, and they're 4-5 stories, not 10-20.
More importantly, I just had a square of 100% chocolate.
At first it tasted a little bitter and metallic, and then I passed through the candy-cane forest, dove into the jub-jub cave, traipsed the line at infinity, and a small glass of milk finished it off.
My 27-year experience of Boston & Environs was of a general air of shabbiness. Things were old and getting older, and even if they were well kept up they still had a rundown air to them.
@Mitch Most of Chicago is not made up of apartment high-rises. The most common living quarters are two- and three-flat apartment buildings, plus three-story courtyard buildings that can house 18 individual dwellings.
@Mitch ^ This is an example of common-wall two-flats on the Near North Side. I happened to live in the one on the left, 2nd floor, quite a while ago when the neighborhood was largely Puerto Rican. I saw a guy shot outside my window there.
Here's a six-flat courtyard.
I lived there as well for a time.
And an 18- or 24-flat. I can't genuinely tell from the picture.
I lived in one of those from birth to about 3-1/2
@Mitch Yeah, but it's a really looooong one. And you have to wait in it for a loooooong time.
@Robusto MM is on the north Bank of the east-west part of the Chicago River and I only remember there are mostly highrise apartments for living around there, not the two story apartments in your picture.
That one is Newport between Halsted and Sheffield. It's an east-west street at 3400 north, midway between Belmont and Addison (quite close to Wrigley Field).
All of Lincoln Park has been completely gentrified. I could have bought the two-flat on Seminary for $29,000 way back when. Now I don't think you could touch it for a million.
I upped the dose of lamotrigine, and had a dream in which I was inside a Czech children's movie about how some people could fly, if they had a piece of paper with a special spell, which they needed to pronounce; or had a magic object, like a pair of glasses.
The movie was about the Soviet times, but it was shot in the 1990s
@Laurel You must realize that five decades ago I could live on $165 a month working part-time while going to school full-time. That included rent, food, and transportation. You could buy a beer for 50¢ in the city, a pitcher for $2. If you went outside the city you could get a beer for a quarter and a picked egg for 10¢. It was a simpler time, at least monetarily. So $29K seemed like an unimaginable sum.
@Robusto It's not just inflation, of course. $165 in 1974 dollars is $1068 today. Imagine spending that much on rent now and still having money left over.
$29K then is about $191K now. Nowhere near median house prices in the Boston area today.
> L'art, c'est la gloire et la joie. Dans la tempête il flamboie ; Il éclaire le ciel bleu. L'art, splendeur universelle, Au front du peuple étincelle, Comme l'astre au front de Dieu.
> Штука — се радість і слава, Блискавка в бурю іскрява, Промінь небесний у мглі; Штука — се ясність всесвітня, Стежка народів завітна, Зірка на божім чолі.
@CowperKettle they don't like nihilists or alarmists. This Hagens guy looks like he believes in dirty and gross things such as western science and environment and stuff.
@Robusto $165 is an unimaginably small number for me lol. I have a friend who pays 2k a month for rent for a tiny apartment (maybe 700 sqft?), and she's not even in "the city" or any city at all
I'm the only person my age I know who owns something (a condo) and doesn't work at some sort of financial institution
@Vikas If you're an American (or rather just someone working for an American company being paid like an American) you can live in India like you're upper class even if you're making a lower middle class salary by American standards
@CowperKettle It's not a bad place, it's just that nothing about it says "$2k/mo apartment" to me. She has a bedroom, a bathroom, a laundry area, and a wide open kitchen/living room/dining room, plus a balcony
The other thing is, she still has to drive to work and most other places she would want to go. There are restaurants on the first floor, but the one we went to seems to be like one level in price above Applebees or whatever so it's not even that great to go to lol
But I guess there is a bar there so we could get wasted enough to forget the cost of the apartment for the night and be able to walk back
Housing prices in many places are out of control, some more than others, but it's pretty much across the board
We saw a homeless person a few blocks from my friend's apartment and I said that they might have a job (or several) and still not be able to afford to not be homeless :(
Officially it's like $7/hr, but I don't think anybody is getting that. Maybe ag workers, I don't know. But most places are paying probably $12 to $18 per hour at least.
Hourly wages can be approximated at $20k = $10/hr. 10 * 40 * 50 (wages * 40 hours * 50 weeks).
@Laurel In theory, if your (tipped) minimum wage plus the amount you get in tips is less than the normal minimum wage, your employer is required to make up the difference, so you still get paid at least the usual minimum wage. (In theory.)
I am also seeing lot of Indian websites saying pickle contains B12. I couldn't find a single pickle so far on Amazon that contains B12. And some even claim it contains vitamin D. Bullshit?
@Laurel Right, so did you see those answers in comments in that term you just answered on ELL (appear numbered). I tried to tell him and look at what he said there. It's too much. There are cases when it's ok but not in this one, imo.
@Lambie I mean, I pretended to not see it when I was posting my answer lol
The tricky thing is that comment (and flag) culture varies by site. And on ELU/ELL it's widely seen as acceptable to leave an answer in the comments if you think the question should be closed (or think it will be closed).
Which is what seems to have happened here.
Unrelated, but it looks like close/reopen cycles are still happening: english.stackexchange.com/posts/618429/timeline. @alphabet, you voted to close this so I'm pinging you. Not sure where my thoughts on this are yet
Yes, the close thing is true but ELL has too many close questions. And I happen to know it's because most of the answerers don't speak another language so they have trouble seeing it from the POV of a learner.
Yes, I do mean that. //I have never seen maltreat IN my LIFE. Even if it "exists". Sounds so French or Spanish to me: maltraiter and maltratar. It comes from the French in English, I would expect.
While I really think OP on ELL should have explained what references they checked, when I looked it up I didn't think the answer was trivial to get from the dictionary considering that 1) the quoted sentence was kinda complicated grammar wise and 2) even after removing all those extraneous parts, the expression did not match what I found in the dictionary because the verb was different
But, unfortunately, there's not a good way to edit that into the ELL question, since I would have to put words in OP's mouth in a way that I'm not really comfortable with, since the answer IS in the dictionary if you're proficient enough to read it
@Lambie That question on ELU could really have used some context at least
@Lambie I wasn't talking about from the dictionary, which I doubt has anything too useful. I mean why they're asking. Do they want to use a word in their own writing, for example? The type of answer I'd write for that is much different (perhaps a frame challenge) than if they were asking after seeing the word in a book
@Laurel I agree with Joachim's comments on that one. If there are subtle nuanced differences in meaning, a dictionary would capture them. Posters on ELL in particular sometimes invent arbitrary nuanced distinctions between words based on their own intuitions, but those answers are purely a matter of personal taste and opinion.
@Laurel The dictionary entry quoted in the comments may or may not have been suitable for OP, but that's not really relevant to the close vote IMHO, since there are other dictionaries.
@alphabet I guess the counter argument to that is that words that I know have a distinct nuance have basically the same definition and are listed as synonymous in dictionaries. Check it out yourself
@Laurel Strongly disagree. Your perception of these nuances is very likely not shared with other native speakers. It's not a reliable source.
@Lambie Case in point: I think of "maltreat" as a fairly common word and wouldn't be the least bit surprised to hear it. Intuition works like that; it differs too much between speakers to be considered reliable.
@alphabet Aha, but that's why "difference between X and Y" can be good questions. However, the answers are often poor because people write mere opinions or cherry pick. However, you can use a tool like COCA to get a more objective answer
@Laurel Ah. That question seems suitable for ELL (but maybe not ELU), since a non-native speaker might not realize that "numbered" is a separate word from "to number" and thus might have difficulty figuring it out from a dictionary.
@Laurel Ah. The OP didn't ask about frequency, though; granted, to me the word seems so commonplace that I wouldn't have even bothered to consider that issue.
@alphabet Yep, that's my thought exactly. On ELU, I expect people to be able to read longer dictionary entries and be able to combine more pieces (appear + half of the idiom)
@alphabet Well, I didn't talk about frequency per se either. You can use their collocates feature to uncover some interesting patterns
@Laurel Yeah. There was an interesting ELU post about the phrase "have no truck with looking back" that confused me for a while (from context it sounded like "truck" meant the vehicle) which I think was absolutely suitable for ELU despite "have no truck with" being in the dictionary.
@Laurel Eh, I don't think an objective interpretation of that would even be achievable, much less discovered in the answers, and the salient differences between the words are covered in a much reliable source (a dictionary) anyway.
@alphabet I think you've never seen a good answer using the collocates data to answer a somewhat subjective question. For example, I was trying to use COCA to answer "does X have racist connotations?" but I never actually got to post the answer sadly
@Laurel Subjective questions are inherently unsuitable for this site, and (unlike your example regarding racism) I don't think an objective answer is possible here.
The answer to the racism question was yes, though the etymology of the word would give no indication of that (ie, it's not a racial slur and is used sometimes in a way that's not related to race)
@alphabet "There is no real difference" would also be an answer
@alphabet I guess the evidence that three and four are not the same comes from the data that shows that they collocate with each other. Probably. You didn't do a collocate search and neither did I, and I wonder which one of us the data would really agree with
I've thought about this quite a bit and this is definitely an issue that I've thought of too, just maybe more for an example like couch/loveseat where the difference is more subtle
@Mitch I don't doubt that individuals may have opinions about such differences, but I don't think they usually generalize enough to be considered reliable sources of information that would be useful for OPs.
Dictionary entries, even from the best ones, are geared for concision and being 'not wrong', and aren't expressly designed to distinguish with other words.
So I think any kind of 'what's the difference between...' is not always answerable by a dictionary. And even if it is, it may be too subtle in the definitions.
@Laurel This is a general problem that shows up in machine learning; "increase" and "decrease," despite being antonyms, are used in similar contexts since things that can increase can usually also decrease and vice versa.
@Mitch So what reliable source could answer it? Maybe extensive and careful corpus research, I guess, but even then I'm skeptical.
Just because (I'm not speaking to you) the answer is obvious to you doesn't mean it's not a good question. Let somebody answer it, it doesn't hurt you -or- the site..
In this case it's the opposite issue; to me it seems obvious that the question, if not answered by a dictionary, is impossible to answer in a way that isn't opinion-based.
And a mighty sing'lar and pretty place it is, as ever I saw in all the days of my life!" said Captain Jorgan, looking up at it.
The term is mentioned in the first line of Charles Dickens's A Message from the Sea. I know that it's an archaic word but I can't find it in any dictionary.
Here's a thing: stop closing questions. If you get the urge to close a question there are some things you can do 1) edit the question to make it better 2) answer the question implied rather than the literal one given. That's what advice columnists do. 3) too much trouble? leave it alone and let somebody else try to answer it.
@Mitch I hope you realize how absurd "stop closing questions" is. I don't want a repeat of that Wendy's question. I think you mean "stop closing questions as opinion based" which is a lot more reasonable
@Mitch pfft. Pffffft. Back in my day when we googled something we tried to decipher the squiggly and sharp shapes to understand the messages the past had left for the future. Now it's all to go to TikTok or YouTube shorts
Outline of my TED talk: - the Sokal Hoax 1996 - a paper intentionally written as a hodgepodge of postmodernist phrasings unknowingly accepted for publication - '75% of all medical paper results false' Ioannidis 2005 the start of the replicability crisis - Chinese and Indian no-peer-review 'academic' journals proliferate - computer generated paper unknowingly accepted for publication in a CS journal 2005 - "More than 120 bogus scientific articles have been published in peer-reviewed publications) from 2008 to 2013" (2014)
But the organization of vetting for academic papers (journals and conference papers) should prevent a large change in scale for what academics accept. The papers still have to go through people and the scale of that hasn't changed. Will the AI-produced papers fool the reviewers more now? Possibly, and maybe moreso in the humanities, but not by a lot.
There -will- be a glut of papers on the web by sources that aren't well known. Things like H-index for individuals and impact factor for a journal should make people more likely to listen to papers written by real people.
But that won't stop people who don't know what's going on (journalists, randos on the web who 'do their own research') from being substitute hypemen for charlatanry, like the ivermectin-Mr. Pillow guy.
A possible fallible intermediary gatekeeper might be science journallsts who have two competing self interests: 1) reliability (so that people will trust them and want to read them, and 2) popularity (eg science clickbait, if it yells it sells)
I think most of the scandal will come from academics getting tenure because of their publication record and then Ben Ackman doing a deep colonic on their past and finding out everything was computer generated.
Ben Ackman essentially got Claudine Gay (president of Harvard) to resign this way, for having plagiarized some passages in her PhD.