« first day (119 days earlier)      last day (5098 days later) » 

23:00
No, I guess not.
I meant Martha, but methinks you doth protest too much.
I imagine that most of Manhattan is imported from all over the world?
Next time her sister comes by, we should all talk dirty to her and pretend it was normal. Or maybe not.
Manhattan is the upscale part of the city, if I remember correctly. Lots of families who have been there since the Dutch.
Really? I thought it was full of yuppies and such?
(Is "yup" still current, by the way?)
Yup.
23:03
In Amsterdam, we have about 75% that are not really from around here.
But yuppies are kind of dated, although everyone knows 'em when they sees 'em.
Right.
@Cerberus They came for the marijuana, I presume.
That what do we call 'em nowadays? Apple users?
@Mich: Hehe, no, that would be the British tourists; but they never stay long enough to notice their own barf littering the streets.
<= Using a Mac at this moment.
23:04
I knew it!
I'd rather chew off my own foot, but that's ok, I am fine with that.
Also have Win XP, Win 7 and Ubuntu available through VMWare Fusion on the very same Mac, btw.
@Cerberus Might want to rephrase that a bit.
Hmm? Rephrase what?
I'm one of those Mac users who actually likes doing things in Unix, btw.
I'm what you would call a "sudo-user" :)
Okay, then perhaps you are one of the GOOD Mac users...
sudo?
As in pseudo?
23:06
make me a sandwich.
@Cerberus Unless you're really fine with eating your own body parts, of course.
Make me a palindrome, we are at EL&U.
xkcd oneboxes here and even brings the title text with it.
Oh no! On, Ho!
JINX
You owe me a coke.
Oh snap.
Well done. You are a quick learner, I see.
But I don't see no freakin' title.
So this must be a Unix joke.
23:08
Mouse over
Ah. That's what we call a tooltip. :P
Alt text?
But you're right, the attribute is the "title" attribute.
I got yelled at for calling it the alt text once. :P
No, IE doesn't show "alt" as tooltip.
23:09
Haha.
Firefox does, though, doesn't it?
Still waiting for my coke.
I'm sorry, this is a drug-free room.
My son got me this T-shirt for Christmas:
I never understood what the finer distinctions were. I get the text, whatever it is, in a tooltip yes; but I remember I had to install some Greasemonkey script years ago to get it, so that must be somewhat new in FF.
Nice.
23:11
@Robusto We've been there before.
That's cuz I'm a RegEx freakin' master.
Feb 2 at 19:07, by Robusto
This one is my fave: http://xkcd.com/208/ ... my son even got me the T-shirt for Christmas! And I wear it proudly.
I prefer "regex ninja", myself.
I think everybody's been in xkcd's you-know.
@RegDwight BTW, RegDwight is an example of a negative look-behind.
2
23:12
Any time I see that all I can think of is this: "Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use regular expressions." Now they have two problems."
@RegDwight You are the Grace Note of this room, aren't you.
@Robusto Shouldn't that be a positive look-behind?
@MichaelMyers Well, not today.
I'll make my own comments here, thank you very much
51 mins ago, by Michael Myers
@RD01 I hereby dub thee Honorary Grace Note for the Day.
I wish we got more questions.
23:13
I'm unsure of the meaning, but I was assured it was a good thing.
@RD01 Some people, when confronted with a regex, think "I know, I'll quote Jamie Zawinski." Now they have three problems.
Perhaps I should ask one myself. But what?
@Cerberus We have a lot, actually. It's just that we also have more users these days.
@michael Indeed!
(?<!@RegDwight).+
23:14
@Reg: Yeah we just have too many knowledgeable users with too much time.
God there are so many things I should be doing.
I'm pretty sure I saw the second version somewhere but I can't remember where.
10
Q: What does the JWZ regex quote mean?

Paul BiggarWhat does Jamie Zawinski's quote mean exactly? Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use regular expressions." Now they have two problems. I've always had trouble understanding what he was getting at.

And now it is nearly quitting time and I haven't gotten enough done to quit yet. Time for me to go.
I wrote my own HTML formatter using RegExp and Javascript, so don't mess with me, baby. Oh, and it works.
@RegDwight You should really hang out in the lounge more. Please?
23:16
Formatter? or Parser.
Feb 17 at 19:07, by RegDwight
I'm on all sites 24/7.
Feb 25 at 16:40, by RegDwight
I can't be on every site 25/8!
@RD01 — Formatter. If I need parsing I'll use a parser. This is for when I just need to reindent markup. You know.
But it is smart enough to handle non-closing tags and all that.
Thank the gods. I'd hate to need to see a link to the mother of all answers again :)
Are there geeks who enjoy advice columns about manners and such?
It would seem an antithetical interest.
@Cerberus — Are there geeks who enjoy advice columns would narrow it down sufficiently, I should think.
23:19
I'm sure there are manners geeks out there somewhere.
@RD01 They're too polite to talk about it.
Which means THEY'RE NOT FRICKIN' GEEKS.
@Rob: Yeah I was trying to exclude "advice columns" as in tech blogs.
Badum bum!
I think I have succeeded in falling in no specific category.
Nerd rage and etiquette don't exactly go hand in hand.
23:21
Right.
I suck at programming so I think I am not a real geek. And I like social events and going out and stuff.
Am I a freak?
@Robusto Now get your vocabulary straight. Are them geeks or are them nerds?
@Cerberus — There is still hope for you. You can become a dental hygienist.
I try to stick with geek because it sounds friendlier...
@RegDwight — A native speaker would know that the two things are the same.
@Rob: Haha what the...? That stinks.
Lies!
23:23
@RegDwight Who cares what Mickey Mouse thinks?
That chart is by a native speaker, and approved by thousands of native speakers.
Nice.
I think I have seen it before; but I don't recall ever encountering a dweeb...
Geeks can be socially inept.
Nah-uh!
Look at @RegDwight: Smart, obsessed, and hopelessly inept when it comes to socializing.
Haha that one is cute.
Hey I say Reg's doing quite well in socializing; he posts very friendly backlinks.
There are three kinds of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
23:25
25 secs ago, by Cerberus
Hey I say Reg's doing quite well in socializing; he posts very friendly backlinks.
See? He is contributing, that is a social skill.
That's not a skill at all.
14 mins ago, by Robusto
@RegDwight BTW, RegDwight is an example of a negative look-behind.
@Cerberus "Gibblegobble burtasyub nicetrump. – Master Of Disaster Aug 26 '10 at 1:31". That's a contribution, too.
He is a bit like a serial killer, mailing letters cut out of newspapers: he is communicating, in his own way.
Right...
Does anyone happen to play Bridge?
23:27
OK, I forgot to mention. By socializing I don't mean chatting on the computer in English.SE chat.
What? But then, what else?
I mean going out and talking to people IRL.
I know it's scary ...
But that's real socializing.
Oh you mean, those sacks of water and bones outside...
I play Euchre. If you live in the state of Michigan for any period of time it is mandatory to learn Euchre.
And ... and ... talking to women!
23:28
Hey, don't star that image! Go upvote my answer instead, it's CW!
46
A: "Geek" vs. "Nerd"

RegDwightVonC's answer is more to the point, but I just can't resist the urge to post this Venn diagram, so I'm marking this CW: Image credit.

Euchre, I have heard of that... what is it like?
Women...
Dating sucks sometimes.
Only if it's good.
It's similar to Hearts or Spades but with teams and stuff, and other stuff.
Why doesn't everyone have a traffic light attached to his forehead?
@Robusto Thwack. Where's @Martha, anyhow?
23:29
Sucking is overrated, but never mind.
She is probably doing stuff with her sister.
Not my point.
So this is communicating huh...
Well, you mentioned bridge!
23:32
Huh wait, okay I'll click your video...
The video has nothing to do with bridge. Except in the musical sense, perhaps.
Well, here's my rebuttal to your video:
Oh... well those hands are OK.
@Robusto Your rebuttals are never available in my country.
Man were are you?
23:34
They are available in my back yard ... oh, wait — you haven't invaded that yet.
Not Russia?
He's like in Libya or something.
Hehe.
North Korea.
Probably Lybia then.
23:35
@RegDwight Thank you.
Hey!
Which reminds me: are Libya and Dubya related?
@Martha Not at all.
Who do we have here? Please tell me you play Bridge?
I play bridge about as well as Jon Skeet plays professional basketball.
23:37
Eh... damn your native references!
142
Board and Card Gamesboardgames.stackexchange.com

Beta Q&A site for people who like playing board games, designing board games or modifying the rules of existing board games. Card games, too, because some games really can be classified as both.

Currently in public beta.

Sounds like a bridge site, to me.
^ Negative Look-Behind in action!
Hmm thanks.
@Cerberus I was, indeed, talking to my sister on the phone a little while ago. Then we had to hang up because the niece was in danger of, um, running out of room in the diaper.
I love the backhanded slap at card games. Uh, we'll include card games too. I guess.
23:37
Or negative lookaround.
@Martha: I knew it! Man everybody's getting babies these days...
2 days ago, by Martha
user image
Right. I was just about to post that video of double-entendre drawings, and then Martha kills my momentum.
Thanks Martha.
Yeah.
23:42
(really)
Haha.
OK, I'm outta here.
See? Momentum killed. Luft raus.
Nooooooo not the baby again.
@Cerberus Too little, too late.
23:43
Incidentally, thanks for the boardgame link; there are a few Bridge questions on it that are pretty great, such as weak vs. strong 1NT openings.
Yeah sorry. Babies scare me. Adulthood and all.
@Cerberus Really? It was really more of a joke. I only follow a few tags that don't have anything to do with cards.
Adult dressed as babies scare me too.
@Cerberus Aw, she's not scary at all.
Yup. I never realized that I was playing American style.
Edible, yes. Scary, no.
23:45
Scary! People with babies must lead responsible, settled lives! Nooo!
Wow I suddenly get a huge urge to play Bridge again. Is there porn for Bridge?
There is porn for everything.
But, see, she's not my baby. When she starts getting too stinky, I can say, "here, have her back".
@Cerberus Rule 34.
Fat fingers.
Good point. Babies for a few hours are ok.
@Reg: Right, I actually get an internet meme! I am proud of myself.
Eltern werden ist nicht schwer, Eltern sein dagegen sehr.
23:48
Haha right.
Nice.
Okay I bid 3NT. Computer going downnn....
Ta Ta
@Cerberus I read through that 1NT question a few times and now I feel like I don't understand English anymore.
Bye!
@Reg: Aww why not? Did you play Bridge or not?
I can't even begin to spell it.
If not, you should learn it; it is rather popular among those interested in mathematics and programming.
It is the best game I have ever played so far.
23:53
@Cerberus I never got a chance. You need many people.
Possibly even including Civilization.
You can learn on the computer (though yes it is more fun with real people).
I have never played Skat, either.
Skat is an early 19th century trick-taking card game devised in Germany. Along with Doppelkopf it is the most popular card game in Germany and Silesia. Skat features prominently in Günter Grass's novel The Tin Drum and leads a trail connecting the plot. It is also played by many soldiers in Remarque's novel All Quiet on the Western Front, and was a favorite game of Richard Strauss, who included a hand in his opera Intermezzo. History Skat was developed by the members of the Brommesche Tarok-Gesellschaft between 1810 and 1817 in Altenburg, in what is now the Federated State of Thuring...
Isn't that like Euchre?
I believe that is a simplified version of Bridge?
You make tricks, but you don't bid for a contract?
@Cerberus If that is a simplified version of Bridge, then I quit. Like, life.
23:55
Well perhaps I didn't get what Skat is, lemme read more...
That certainly does sound similar to Euchre.
I am a big fan of Euchre
Moi aussi.
I am a big fan of all and any games, but there are usually only two of us, me and my wife.
Okay Skat is rather different from what I thought it was.
23:57
Forever alone, together
But the essential part from Bridge is missing, the bidding for a contract.
@Kosmonaut Waiting for the Miracle
Bidding for a contract sounds like something I should be paid to do.
The beauty of Bridge is that the rules are quite simple if you play it at the lowest level.
If I could play it alone, I would.
23:57
I play everything at the lowest level.
@Kos: Answering questions about language is, too.
No you don't.
I am paid to answer questions about language.
I am hardly at an intermediate level with Bridge, but that is fine; it can be great fun after maybe a few hours.
And yet you do it here unpaid!
Just learn Bridge whenever the opportunity arises; you will not regret it.

« first day (119 days earlier)      last day (5098 days later) »