« first day (4136 days earlier)      last day (1082 days later) » 
00:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

00:00
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected, toxic answer detected (157): What does "don't be stupid" imply?‭ by Andreas‭ on english.SE
00:31
@Cerberus I should have waited a day before saying Friedman was wrong. Macdonald's has shut down in Russia and Ukraine now.
@CowperKettle I use Pl@ntNet.
Also on the fruit stands that are no longer operating in Tsarist Russia.
@tchrist coke too
@Mitch They don't want to operate in piranha states.
@Cerberus I'm quite unclear why they did that.
@tchrist A sad day for Russian cardiologists.
@tchrist Well, if it is America that gives the planes to Ukraine, it's not Poland doing it.
@Cerberus That's silly.
Poland hopes this will unburden them of some of the responsibility.
And some of the backlash.
Shared responsibility is no responsibility, remember?
00:42
@CowperKettle That's awfully generous of the UN to spare the feelings of aggressors in international conflicts.
As big companies do it.
When many people are responsible, nobody is.
But, yeah, it remains to be seen whether this will make any difference.
At any rate, they'd better do it fast.
The US so far has no response to the Polish action.
Oh, America refuses to do it.
Putin knows where the MiGs are from.
So it won't happen.
00:44
@RobustosupportsUkraine Unclear.
Not a refusal, per se, as far as I've seen, but just a "no comment."
Well, it was nice that Johnson tried this arrangement.
Yes, that.
> Het Amerikaanse ministerie van Defensie ziet niks in het voorstel van Polen om zijn MiG-29-toestellen via de VS ter beschikking te stellen aan Oekraïne, meldt persbureau Reuters. Oekraïense piloten kunnen goed met de door Rusland geproduceerde gevechtsvliegtuigen overweg, maar volgens het Pentagon is het plan waarbij Polen in ruil daarvoor Amerikaanse F16’s zou krijgen „niet haalbaar”.

Rusland zou de levering van de gevechtsvliegtuigen als een vijandige daad zien en de NAVO heeft eerder al aangegeven niet direct of indirect betrokken te willen raken bij gevechten tegen Rusland in Oekraï
This is a clear refusal.
I guess we're afraid of getting too involved in a conflict we're already up to our ass in.
00:45
"Impracticable".
Or "not attainable".
I guess the Yooks can't fly NATO planes.
Don't know how.
@Cerberus That must be a later story than I've read so far.
That would be even worse...
Sending American planes to Ukraine would be even more provocative.
@tchrist Any new warplane requires lots of training to operate effectively.
It's like learning a new programming language. You can fuck around with it to start with, lots of the principles are the same, but you can't really be effective unless you've put in the hours on it.
I know.
Neighbor's a civilian pilot (now).
00:50
I watched some preflights and take-offs and landings on some WWII aircraft, and even those were so complicated. I can't imagine the training for a modern warplane requires.
> It's the same as graduating for your driver's license. A driver knows the basics and can drive safely. To become a good driver however, it's necessary to drive regularly to get experienced in all aspects and situations. This applies for new F-16 pilots too.
> A new F-16 pilot in time will become – provided the pilot will finish all MQT stages successfully – an experienced and combat ready pilot. He or she will start as a wingman. When experienced enough and the squadron commander agrees, the pilot will start a training program which teaches him to lead two-ship and later on four-ship form
@RobustosupportsUkraine you mean Flight Simulator isn't enough?
What the Ukrainians would need is time. Which they don't have.
@Mitch You can always just quit the Flight Simulator and walk away.
Like an ejection seat just press a button
00:59
Yeah. That's not as much fun as it sounds.
Oh
Shame
Depending on how fast you're going you can be seriously injured.
The president of our cycling club was a Navy fighter pilot. He said ejection was really only an option if you knew you were going to die if you didn't.
On the plus side, modern ejection seats will save your ass at any altitude and airspeed (except they are more hazardous the faster you are going).
All this talk about reality is really a downer
Romanians seem to be treating the Ukrainian refugees OK
01:06
Are all of the Romanians Rom, I wonder?
That is where the Rom come from, right? I know there was a diaspora. But I'm too lazy to look it up right now.
Not the Roma
Roma != Rom?
@tchrist: We keep oscillating in and out of winter here. What's it like up where you are?
@RobustosupportsUkraine Same. Sunny with crocuses and dwarf iris blooming one day, 5 inches of snow the next.
@Mitch Romani ite domum.
@tchrist Poor Elmo. In over his head hand.
I read the Dune series decades ago. I don't know if I'd feel the same way about it now, but it was mesmerizing back then.
The movie is not bad
01:17
@RobustosupportsUkraine Elmo was Teleporno's Celeborn's grandfather, doncha know.
@RobustosupportsUkraine I was a teenager.
@tchrist It all makes sense now.
@tchrist Our readings of that were probably contemporaneous then.
Isn't doont how a Scotsman tells you to cut it the fuck out?
Aye.
That video is pretty funny.
> Stijn Mitzer, an Amsterdam-based analyst and his colleagues at Oryx, a blog, have studied imagery available on social-media sites to establish the number of proven Russian losses. These currently run to 11 fixed-wing aircraft, 11 helicopters and two drones. Ukraine’s government claims to have destroyed at least 39 planes and 40 helicopters, though these figures are unverified. By way of comparison, America lost 40 or so fixed-wing aircraft during the entire five-week air war with Iraq in 1991.
America lost 40 aeroplanes in the first Gulf War?
I would never have expected that many.
Doesn't sound right, but it might be.
> The Coalition lost a total of 75 aircraft—52 fixed-wing aircraft and 23 helicopters–during Desert Storm, with 39 fixed-wing aircraft and 5 helicopters lost in combat.[58] One coalition fighter was lost in air-air combat, a U.S. Navy F/A-18 piloted by Scott Speicher. Other Iraqi air to air claims surfaced over the years, all were disputed.[59][60]
One B-52G was lost while returning to its operating base on Diego Garcia, when it suffered a catastrophic electrical failure and crashed into the Indian Ocean killing 3 of the 6 crew members on board. The rest of the Coalition losses came from an
28 fixed-wing plus 15 helicopters is "40 or so" ... so yeah.
01:50
> US Credit Rating Agency Fitch says a sovereign default is “imminent” after it downgraded Russian government bonds to junk status.
"Sovereign default"?
Defaulting on Russia's national bonds?
As opposed to bonds of businesses?
@tchrist Default by a sovereign state?
Cf. sovereign debt.
A country's gross government debt (also called public debt, or sovereign debt) is the financial liabilities of the government sector.: 81  Changes in government debt over time reflect primarily borrowing due to past government deficits. A deficit occurs when a government's expenditures exceed revenues.: 79–82  Government debt may be owed to domestic residents, as well as to foreign residents. If owed to foreign residents, that quantity is included in the country's external debt.In 2020, the value of government debt worldwide was $87.4 US trillion, or 99% measured as a share of GDP. Government...
Or it means Russia will soon pay in sovereigns by default.
I wonder why he doesn't use all those billions in gold he's got laid up in store somewhere. Do bad things happen if Russia welshes on its sacred financial obligations?
From what I read, it will be difficult to sell lots of gold.
If Western countries/parties won't buy it.
And selling lots will immediately reduce its value.
01:59
@tchrist Those are his billions. Not Russia's. I can't see him incurring personal expense to save his country.
Some of the $600+ billion is in gold.
@tchrist Perhaps so. But I wonder why Fitch said this, when I read that Russia has enough liquidity to pay for the interest on its sovereign debt in the near future.
I know nothing.
(I'm only repeating what I have read in newspapers.)
Nobody knows. Apparently.
> Why it matters: If Russia defaults on its debt, it will play out differently than sovereign defaults of the past — and investors are watching for signs that it could ripple out into a broader market dislocation, as Russia's 1998 ruble debt default did.
02:04
It's the end of the world as we know it.
This whole confrontation is going to have unintended consequences.
There are things coming we simply can't know. But when they hit we will feel them.
I think of all those musicians in Lviv, and what their lives must be like now.
A while ago their focus was on being better musicians.
> If you’re hoping that the instability that Vladimir Putin’s war on Ukraine has wreaked on global markets and geopolitics has peaked, your hope is in vain. We haven’t seen anything yet. Wait until Putin fully grasps that his only choices left in Ukraine are how to lose — early and small and a little humiliated or late and big and deeply humiliated.
5 mins ago, by Robusto supports Ukraine
There are things coming we simply can't know. But when they hit we will feel them.
I agree.
> Incidentally, the way things are going on the ground in Ukraine right now, it is not out of the realm of possibility that Putin could actually lose early and big. I would not bet on it, but with every passing day that more and more Russian soldiers are killed in Ukraine, who knows what happens to the fighting spirit of the conscripts in the Russian Army being asked to fight a deadly urban war against fellow Slavs for a cause that was never really explained to them.
I believe Russia has 400,000 professional soldiers. So in the end she should be able to do without those conscripts?
@Cerberus His now-dead generals were professional soldiers.
I also wonder what percentage of soldiers at the eastern and southern fronts are conscripts.
@tchrist Higher officers are never conscripts, are they?
02:16
@Cerberus No officer is a conscript.
Yeah I wouldn't expect that.
My guess is that he sent the most experienced troops to the south, to blockade Ukraine from resupply from the sea.
@tchrist They used to be. In WWII some soldiers were drafted and sent to OCS right away after basic training.
After all, there is no danger of resupply from the north.
@RobustosupportsUkraine Odd.
It was a different time, a different war.
02:18
How could Ukraine be supplied from the sea?
Odessa. Mariupol.
And why couldn't Russian ships simply blockade Ukrainian ports?
@tchrist But supplied with what, from where?
From the World.
What if Putin blockades Ukraine ports?
Ukraine is supplied from abroad over land, in the west?
NATO's supplies are there.
02:20
The Black Sea leads to the middle one, and thence to the Ocean Sea.
But NATO ships won't be coming all the way from there.
We expect that Putin will get around to blocking off the borders to NATO.
He may try.
I hope someone is thinking of a way out for Putin
But blockading ports should be much easier.
02:21
ie to box him in and give him no way to save face
@Mitch Polonius is.
Or simply bombing any Ukrainian ships that come close.
> Given the resistance of Ukrainians everywhere to the Russian occupation, for Putin to “win” militarily on the ground his army will need to subdue every major city in Ukraine. That includes the capital, Kyiv — after probably weeks of urban warfare and massive civilian casualties. In short, it can be done only by Putin and his generals perpetrating war crimes not seen in Europe since Hitler. It will make Putin’s Russia a permanent international pariah.
Like all these embargoes seem... permanent?
From what I read, Kiev has supplies for 10 to 14 days.
Robusto will accuse me of genocide, but I wonder why Putin wouldn't simply cut utilities and wait until supplies run out.
@Mitch They can be used in negotiations, as bargaining chips.
@Cerberus I know you still like me. :-)
02:23
I don't. You're a devil.
We live in a world where nobody is allowed to help anybody Russia decides to destroy.
@Cerberus But I'm a cute devil.
:60603875Even if somehow Russia starts doing everyting right (pulls out, war reparations, submit perpetrators to the Hague), Russia and Russians will be pariahs for a long time.
@RobustosupportsUkraine No flirting in this chat.
@tchrist Awww, mom.
02:24
@Cerberus companies pulling out wil be hard to reinstate (but that's not a government embargo sure)
@Mitch Yes, this whole war will have greatly accelerated the decline of Russia.
No foreign forces may come to aid anybody whom Russia decides to consume.
@Mitch Right, well, but they could agree to go back?
@tchrist: I've been reading that Boebert (Boobert?) is getting flak from her constituency at home for her SOTU antics.
@tchrist Assuming Russia will not consume China or NATO countries.
02:26
THIS IS NOT RIGHT
It is not right.
> “Come not between the Nazgûl and his prey! Or he will not slay thee in thy turn. He will bear thee away to the houses of lamentation, beyond all darkness, where thy flesh shall be devoured, and thy shrivelled mind be left naked to the Lidless Eye.” —Vladimir Putin
Or...not.
No help will come.
Ukraine will die alone.
= lest, apparently.
02:27
But consider, with the way things are going in Ukraine, how could Putin possibly attack Poland? Or one of the other NATO countries?
@tchrist Ukraine will be severely damaged alone.
Moldova is next.
Yes, I think you underestimate Ukraine's resolve.
But she will continue her resistance for longer than Putin can stay.
Is Georgia still a country?
02:28
I keep reading that the loss (or rather non-win) by Russia in the Russo-Japanese war (1905) was the primary cause (?) of the 1917 Revolution.
Everyone says Putin cannot hope to occupy all of Ukraine.
Georgia is indeed in danger.
Remember how you said what he was doing just didn't make sense?
(ie not as a Russia thing but as a general 'leadership losing a war will then lose the country'
That he couldn't possibly have a path that did not bring him and Russia great suffering?
It doesn't, partly because he grossly miscalculated.
02:29
@Mitch No. It was the cause of an uprising in 1906-ish. The problems in WWI were the cause of the Revolution.
A quick victory, beginning with the assassination of Zelensky, might have produced much better results for Putin.
> In the coming weeks it will become more and more obvious that our biggest problem with Putin in Ukraine is that he will refuse to lose early and small, and the only other outcome is that he will lose big and late. But because this is solely his war and he cannot admit defeat, he could keep doubling down in Ukraine until … until he contemplates using a nuclear weapon.
@RobustosupportsUkraine Well, a bunch of International Relations people I've been reading said the 1905 thing.
I just read something about that. Maybe I even linked it.
I would have said 'WWI troubles' too
02:30
@tchrist Against what or whom?
@Cerberus I wish I knew.
I don't really see what use atomics could have against Ukrainian resistance.
He has lots of tactical nukes in the 10s of kiloton range.
They can be useful against concentrated enemy forces?
@Cerberus BUt by that logic, I don't really see what use invading Ukraine is for.
02:31
Yes, only that.
But Ukraine hardly has those.
That is, I doubt whether atomics used against some Ukrainian force would really chance the ultimate outcome of the war.
He really cannot win, and I know he refuses to lose. So now what?
> The Russian national tradition is unforgiving of military setbacks. Virtually every major defeat has resulted in radical change. The Crimean War (1853-1856) precipitated Emperor Alexander II’s liberal revolution from above. The Russo-Japanese War (1904-1905) brought about the First Russian Revolution.
The catastrophe of World War I resulted in Emperor Nicholas II’s abdication and the Bolshevik Revolution. And the war in Afghanistan became a key factor in Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev’s reforms.
02:32
As opposed to simply continuing his slow push.
@Mitch The revolution they're referring to is not the October Revolution, but the First Russian Revolution.
@tchrist I think he will either accept some sort of compromise, in which Ukraine promises never to join NATO, or he will continue until he has basically defeated all Ukrainian armies, but then he will have to retreat eventually as the occupation fails and resistance turns out to be unquenchable. He will then spin it as some kind of victory, the de-Nazification has been completed.
He can lay waste to Ukraine and call it peace. 200,000 soldiers will not be a sufficient occupying force. He needs many times that to hold the entire country. Forever. For they will never forget, never surrender, never stop working against him. Millions of people.
Yeah.
@RobustosupportsUkraine which one is the first one?
02:34
The one you're talking about that came after the Russo-Japanese war.
It didn't really take hold.
Oh
got it
that's confusing
they really need to clear all that up
But here's the thing: he cannot afford to keep a million soldiers there forever, or even 200k for the decades it would require. His is not a rich country, and soon it will be a dreadfully impoverished one as well. He cannot pay for an occupying force that's there long enough to make a difference.
Yeah.
Perhaps he thinks he can, after all, replace the government and only quell the largest protests in the cities.
Wouldn't it be great if he learned an important lesson about humanity and set about to change his ways and become a leader for the people?
Nah, just kidding.
By killing civilians and executing everyone who would only be imprisoned if it were in Russia.
02:38
@Cerberus We know that's his plan. We've intercepted the orders.
Send Kadyrov to lead Ukraine, perhaps...
@tchrist Yeah.
One of the most interesting bits of information we got from the Ukrainian government is that they got help from inside the FSB.
It could be a lie, but I doubt it.
Does anyone know more about a resistance in Kherson?
I have only heard about peaceful protests.
And the city fell without (many) street fights.
Where are all the mollies?
Someone needs to convince him of embracing a Polonian solution to his problem. No, not the "neither a borrower nor a lender be" bit. I shall be brief: I mean the ²¹⁰Po bit.
@tchrist Polonius != Polonium.
I think few people will be harder to poison than Putin.
@RobustosupportsUkraine One is masculine. The other neuter.
02:44
You want his nephew to accidentally kill him behind a curtain?
He is paranoid for a reason.
@Mitch Bingo.
Besides, who will replace him?
Will he be worse?
What are the alternative leaders?
Will there be civil war?
02:45
Better two in the bush than a Putin in the hand.
Will I be happy?
BTW, the current Worldle is a no-brainer. I don't think anyone will need but a single guess.
@Cerberus I doubt Siberia wants to secede.
One of his siloviki?
@tchrist I would be a civil war inside Moscow.
Imagine if Kadyrov seized power.
Then we will cry for the gentleness of Putin.
If you expect to enjoy the fruits of a rules-based world, you have to play by its rules. Or else to North Korea with you.
02:47
But I do not think Kadyrov has the conexions.
One or more of Putin's siloviki would be more likely to step in.
what's a siloviki?
sounds like an alcoholic drink
Well, @Mitch, you're plum wrong there.
like kosher wine
In the Russian political lexicon, a silovik (Russian: силови́к, IPA: [sʲɪlɐˈvʲik]; plural: siloviki, Russian: силовики́, IPA: [sʲɪləvʲɪˈkʲi], lit. force men) is a politician who came into politics from the security, military, or similar services, often the officers of the former KGB, GRU, FSB, SVR, FSO, the Federal Drug Control Service, or other armed services who came into power. A similar term is "securocrat" (law enforcement and intelligence officer). Siloviki is also used as a collective noun to designate all troops and officers of all law enforcement agencies of Russia or Belarus, not ...
Putin has surrounded himself with these.
Slivovitz, slivovitza, slivovitsa, sliboviță, šljivovica, śliwowica, Schlivowitz, slivovice, slivovica or slivovka is a fruit spirit (or fruit brandy) made from damson plums, often referred to as plum spirit (or plum brandy). Slivovitz is produced in Central, Eastern and Southern Europe, both commercially and privately. Primary producers include Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Italy, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Ukraine. In the Balkans, slivovitz is considered a kind of rakia. In Central Europe it is considered a kind of pálinka...
And I know you were only making a joke.
In fact, I always know when you're making a joke.
Because you're always making a joke.
QED
02:51
@Cerberus Those are whom he should most fear, not the kleptic oligarchs he's parked his money with. They get close to him. And they have no way of escaping by moving abroad with their billions. These are not billionaires.
At least, that's what Fiona Hill believes.
@RobustosupportsUkraine Yes. a joke. I was making a joke. I knew all these things.
googles for Kadyrov
@tchrist From what I hear, they are very rich indeed.
But, yes, perhaps he should fear them.
holy shit he is more awful than Putin
@Mitch See, I enjoy being your straight man. So you can play off my apparent consternation or lack of understanding.
@Cerberus Not Deripaska rich.
Millions, not billions.
02:53
That is, it would be mighty difficult for anyone but them to remove Putin without dying oneself.
Exactly.
@tchrist Let it be hundreds of millions, then.
@RobustosupportsUkraine aw man... where is Jasper?
I'm pretty sure they are plenty rich.
@RobustosupportsUkraine also it's a great cover for when I actually don't know what's going on.
02:54
@Mitch Good straight-men are hard to find.
Syllipsimopodi bideni
330 million years old.
Oldest ancestor of the octopus, except with ten arms.
I really had no idea that there was a 1st Russian Revolution. I can reconstruct that at one point in my life I -must- have known about it, but at the moment I have no recollection at all of it.
Guess after whom he was named?
02:55
Ding.
Easier than Worldle.
I didn't quite get the connection, though.
he's old?
Is it just because Biden is 330 million years old?
he's pretty old
02:57
> Hill described sitting next to Putin at a dinner and watching him not eat or drink anything and not say much. "The one thing that I noticed is he's short-sighted — hey, you know, he's not the Superman that we think of," she said. Colbert asked if she thinks Putin is scared of his oligarchs, and she said not "so much as the people in his inner circle" who don't have yachts or French mansions but do care about not losing in Ukraine.

There's no obvious or acceptable off-ramp that would allow Putin to save face, Hill said. "I think honestly one of the few ways that we might be able to get to
@Mitch Wait, really?
> Ook voor Biden lijkt de vernoeming in eerste instantie weinig flatteus: de inktvis in kwestie is immers een stokoud fossiel, en bovendien een weekdier zonder ruggegraat. Toch benadrukken de auteurs dat ze de naam kozen „ter ere van de president”.
@tchrist Sure. Also I can't remember if it was Nicholas or Alexander or whether it was I, II, or III that abdicated 1917.
I remember ... nope, I forgot who that guy in the middle was
@tchrist I don't know why she thinks those siloviki aren't super rich.
03:00
kamensky?
@tchrist This is also what I am waiting for, Xi.
He is in no hurry.
@Cerberus Don't call me She.
But he may weigh in and play the hero eventually.
the guy between Nicholas ... II? and Lenin
in for like 40 weeks
@tchrist OK, Cixi.
Empress Dowager Cixi (Chinese: 慈禧太后; pinyin: Cíxǐ Tàihòu [tsʰɨ̌.ɕì tʰâi.xôu]; Manchu: Tsysi taiheo; formerly romanised as Empress Dowager T'zu-hsi; 29 November 1835 – 15 November 1908), of the Manchu Yehe Nara clan, was a Chinese noblewoman, concubine and later regent who effectively controlled the Chinese government in the late Qing dynasty for 47 years, from 1861 until her death in 1908. Selected as a concubine of the Xianfeng Emperor in her adolescence, she gave birth to a son, Zaichun, in 1856. After the Xianfeng Emperor's death in 1861, the young boy became the Tongzhi Emperor, and she...
03:01
the Shapour Bakhtiar of Russia
China has ten times Russia's economy.
Naturally.
The economy of Russia is the size of that of the Benelux.
Or was.
It has always been incredibly vulnerable, relying far too much of gas and oil exports.
Increasing grain prices may greatly increase of the costs of the meat industry.
Perhaps this will be good for our climate?
Kerensky. That was the interim prime minister
Then again, it may stimulate big farming companies to burn more of the Amazon.
Bolsonaro really needs to go ASAP.
@Cerberus Stop eating meat.
The world cannot take it.
Brits talk weird.
It is, of course, more complicated than that.
There isn't enough water.
== Latin == === Alternative forms === quam diū bene sē gesserint quamdiū sē bene gesserit (singular) === Phrase === quamdiū sē bene gesserint (Medieval Latin) (England, law, of an office) Held as long as the officeholder does not abuse the post (literally: “As long as they behave well”). ==== Related terms ==== dūrante benēplacitō === References === Jonathan Law and Elizabeth A. Martin (2014), “quamdiu se bene gesserint”, in A Dictionary of Law, 7th edition, Oxford University Press, →ISBN
 
1 hour later…
04:19
@CowperKettle Sacred the way any other hierodule’s behavior is inherently sacred.
0
A: Meaning of “on”

tchristYes, you can blow a whistle. And you can blow a noise somewhere or somehow or somewhen. But you cannot blow a noise a whistle, nor can you blow a whistle a noise. It’s certainly possible for blow to use two objects, but this is not one of those cases. The double-object case that works is when you...

@CowperKettle ^^^^^ To me, the asker of that question seems to have a Russian-sounding name, and probably male as well since I believe Dima from Greek Demetrios < Demeter is normally a boy's name in Russia. Is this so? I gave a bit of a technical answer because if I am right that the asker is Russian, or at least Slavic, then I have found that those sorts often have the background or inclination for a more grammar-based explanation than learners with less fancy mother tongues oft do.
"Dima Timofeev" in full is the asker's screen name.
@CowperKettle I bet Russian would use a noun inflected into the instrumental case, which English doesn't have. And I bet that's why he asked this.
Latin would have used its ablative case, which also derives from the PIE instrumental case for "with" or "on" that noun.
@CowperKettle That's a larger component of overall revenue than I would have imagined.
I don't think I've just said that right, but I hope you know what I mean. :)
That does sound worth reading.
05:01
How much have the gas prices gone up in your area?
Thanks pal :-)
05:27
> A Home Affairs Committee has urged the Indian government to ban VPN services across India for security reasons. Here is a look at why the committee is worried and how VPN can be used for both good and bad online.
Sounds like they're taking a page from the policy in China.
Maybe
06:06
@Vikas I use turbo VPN.
@S.M.T Okay. I use some free vpn extensions in browser itself. Whatever works.
06:24
Do you guys feel stress about time passing away every second. It’s like more than living , you’re dying every second.
It’s very stressful. Then , u start thinking how can I save my time ? How can I use it best way but , it’s like you’re not robot.
You have to rest , enjoy , sleep along with it. You can’t just study all time. Your brain gets tired.
06:37
What becomes hard is to live in the present moment.
 
1 hour later…
07:42
The similarity between a roll of cash register tape and people panic buying rolls of toilet paper come to mind.
 
1 hour later…
09:06
Hmm , Russia economy is going down.
2
Poland offered two fighter jets to Ukraine
 
5 hours later…
13:44
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at end of answer (61): Why "English" but not "Anglish"?‭ by Radagahst‭ on english.SE
 
1 hour later…
15:04
@tchrist Interesting. So that's where Herbert got that.
15:22
@CowperKettle This is perhaps a bit too fussy. If you're writing formally, use it. But if you're chatting or speaking informally, it makes no difference. Unless you're dating an English major and trying to speak "by the card," as Shakespeare put it.
@CowperKettle Yeah. It's the small "crimes" that get punished. What do you get for stealing billions, murdering thousands, and impoverishing a country? Why, you become a modern-day czar.
@S.M.T "There is no cure for the crushing irrationality of birth and death save to enjoy the interval."—George Santayana
Is this sentence correct?
> The framework I have a lot of experience with is Laravel.
15:45
@Shafizadeh Looks fine to me.
 
1 hour later…
16:55
Shackleton's ship Endurance has been located after more than a century.
Looks like the water is so cold there even the barnacles don't grow well. But there is definitely other sea life in the area.
@RobustosupportsUkraine Hope we can find missing Malaysia Flight 370 some day
18:02
Why didn't Putin take advantage of having Trump in office and invade at the end of 2020? or earlier? I don't think anything has really changed since then, but Trump would surely have been less cooperative with the rest of the world against Russia, right?
@Mitch Right.
Putin single handedly removed horrible food chain from his country. How smart is that . . . : Trump
😜
18:30
@Vikas I doubt whether Trump would really say that!
@Cerberus Haha. I didn't consider the fact he's from USA xD
19:15
@Mitch I saw that Bolton was saying that Putin was waiting for Trump to drop out of NATO
Now, how trustworthy that is, I dunno
@Vikas he's an obese, unhealthy individual, being proud of being obese and unhealthy. None of that pansy veggie crap from hippie losers
Sorry, internet acting up
haha
@CowperKettle this is so common that I think it's grammatical?
Treating "who" like, well, a pronoun, you fill with it the gap that it's supposed to fill.
19:33
Anyone here played Halo games?
19:51
@Vikas Jolly good sir, I think you may have misunderstood the purpose of this coterie. The sole purpose of the Multilayered discourse society is to entertain those debonair guests as to whom are of interest the finer and more intricate details of literature and all things inscribed on paper or stone or otherwise tablet. We do not partake of this hey-low gaym.
2
scoffs
wrinkles nose
scoffs again
@M.A.R. Oh sorry
Oh, your interest in lower arts may be forgiven on the grounds of your fine manners young fellow sips tea
Some serious English?
scoff: To speak about somebody/something in a way that shows you think that he/she/it is stupid or ridiculous
I am shocked! Shocked, I say! All Aenglisc is serious, even when employed by unsavory individuals who are not, per se, upstanding citizens
@Vikas mildly, gentlemanlily amused
20:27
@M.A.R. A gentleman lily. How quaint to find one in our MLDR.
21:19
@M.A.R. notices pinkie not extended to the appropriate degree
sniffs
adjusts one brow a smidgen
signs into law a practice that will force multiple future generations to senseless drudgery without killing them outright
unadjusts brow
Tennis, anyone?
@M.A.R. that sounds on brand for all three.
The probem with wishing them all in hell together is that they 1) wouldn't notice the change, and 2) probably enjoy it.
00:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

« first day (4136 days earlier)      last day (1082 days later) »