« first day (666 days earlier)      last day (4553 days later) » 

00:22
@tchrist fill my eyes / with that color vision / no disguise / for that color vision
00:42
howdy @simchona
01:17
@ΜετάEd Our efforts have not been in vain!
Hello roomies.
I'm...in a certain condition.
You can do anything with me.
rolls Cerb; takes cash and large gold watch
lets it happens without protest
thinks twice...takes shirt
then pants
but doesn't have gold watch, alas
ties shoes together
01:19
shirt and pants—gladly
puts fake gold watch back on Cerb
shoes are already off after taking off pants
puts shirt on legs, pants on arms
No cheating!
unties shoes, puts back on feet, ties back together
01:20
legs too fat for shirt, chest too broad for trousers
tries to wake cerb to get him to try to walk
stumbles
falls
lands on faces
doesn't even notice
crowd of eight year olds laughs uncontrollably
couldn't care less about crowd
I was barely able to cycle home.
Well, it went OK.
But it wasn't supposed to.
I'm guessing alcohol was part of the difficulty?
01:22
It...might have.
or was it uphill both ways?
No, no. This is Flatland you're talking to.
wait you're in the flattest of flat lands, right? not the far south where I've heard there's a hill.
No hills.
meaning a rise of about a foot after a mile.
01:23
All flat.
You are a stripe changing shape.
stand on your toes see forever.]
The highest point, in the far south, is 300 metres above sea level.
No suck luck here.
No, I am sneezing. I blame typos on involuntary reflexes.
Can't drunkards be exempt from chat delays?
@Cerberus I don't want to know what that means.
01:25
We have no hills to function as excuses.
@Cerberus there's no excuse that's not good enough for chat delays.
Only the flat wastes.
Thanks!!
how about swamps as an excuse?
Swamps have been laid dry.
Is that even English?
No excuses!
01:26
Lay dry?
how about construction? is that n the way?
A dry lay is something else.
Gross.
I have done that too, by the way.
Just now.
Beaches suck.
@Cerberus It's not right, but it didn't sound wrong.
01:26
@Mitch N?
Things can be laid bare.
it was grammatical, but doesn't make immediate semantic sense, but made sense anyway.
But not laid dry.
@Mitch How would you say it? "Reclaim"? That sound awfully euphemistic.
I don't know why.
01:27
@Cerberus "is that in the way?"
Swamps have been drained dry.
with or without the dry.
@Mitch Then...I'm afraid my mind can't grasp what you were saying.
yeah, the more common collocations would be 'the swamp was reclaimed' or 'the swamp was drained'.
Yes, drained.
I would have said drained.
If you weren’t.
01:28
But I didn't care.
laid, drained, kinda sound a like enough. not an eggcorn but closeenough.
Let it be known to posterity that I did notice the discrepancy!
Whose posterior are we talking here?
@Mitch Laid...
@tchrist That's private.
@Cerberus noted
01:29
But let's say it was not left untouched.
untooshed
Heh.
But it was occupied.
So it was let go.
@Cerberus posterior or privates..either way.
Wait your turn, or crowd in. Always a dilemma.
@Mitch Haha....no comment.
01:30
Oh I understand now.
@tchrist I am a gentleman. My honour!
It’s the witching hour.
I doubt any on-her was involved here.
The idea.
@Cerberus in your english, do you refer euphemistically to genitalia as 'privates'?
Package.
01:31
Probably not.
Junk.
Boybits.
then what (if anything)
Tackle.
I would rather prefer a euphemism that was either sillier or less common.
@tchrist haven't heard that one. +1
01:32
Stephen Fry has some juicy ones.
Like "down under". I know it's not much better. But at least there is some irony.
irony? how?
It is somewhat jocular.
Because he has the down of a young chick there.
Pah.
Speak for yourself.
01:33
that's triple entendre
Stubble, then.
Too complicated at this hour.
kinda itchy
Ain’t it just?
Meanwhile, I'm hungry.
01:34
Rule #2.
I should like something to eat now.
Rule 1/3: If you’re tired, sleep.
which rule book?
oh... so zen
Rule 2/3: If you’re hungry, eat.
I deny any rules.
01:35
even that one.
Biorules are insurmountable.
Yes.
is rule #3 about #1 and #2?
No.
Rule #3/3: If you’re horny, <INSERT CENSORED ITEM>.
Wash when done.
I'm making up a new #3, just for the eight year olds.
01:36
Gentlemen.
If you’re thirsty, drink.
Keep it civil!
So much for doing anything with you.
@tchrist I did not, and I'm proud of it.
@tchrist You know.
I thought you did drink.
01:38
Oh, I did.
You did and did not.
But I didn't do what I could have.
I think he’s referring to rule 3.
I would never.
Refer?
01:39
I said, "you're not allowed to", so we didn't have "tea" at my place.
Or reefer?
No teapartiers for you!
Party is a strong word.
So is tea if you do it right.
I suppose.
But it wouldn't have been right.
that is good tea!
01:40
Don’t you have needs to attend to?
I could arrange for them to be met otherwise.
You said you were hungry, but are still here.
eating crisps
mmm... crisps? are those fried potato slices?
Very.
01:43
do you speak English with a rhotic or non-rhotic way?
What do you think?
"Fried potato slices"?
RP is the norm.
non-rhotic would be my guess, but I don't know.
Ding!
01:43
Wisibly.
But I might insert r's when I'm sloppy.
Germans that I've known seem to go either way (RP or AmE)
What other way is there?
oh because Dutch is mostly rhotic?
There is no such distinction.
It only exists in English.
01:44
Like Jonathan Woss, no doubt.
between rhotic and not?
Hence wisibly.
That.
no such distinction in Dutch?
None.
01:45
so some words you pronounce the 'r' at the end and some not?
There are just distinctions between different kinds of r's.
Would suh caya foah some cwumpets?
which would result in what I just said?
Vewy wisible.
@Mitch Not really. Although southerners do pronounce the r in a way that we do not consider an r any more.
That is not the right dialect, of course.
@Mitch Not as in English.
01:47
wikipedia (yes, I know) doesn't say outright that dutch is rhotic but tends to show the words ending in 'r' have that sound explicitly. but then maybe that's just what you're saying.
@Mitch It's very complicated.
We have so many r's.
But none are swallowed as in RP.
OK
Some sound like the French r, some like Italian r, some like American r.
even at the ends of words?
01:49
Not even there.
so no r's at the ends of words?
Though southerners turn it almost into a /x/ at the end of a syllable.
@Mitch My r at the end of a syllable is like a very weak American r.
You may be assured that I speak the Right accent.
He’s voting for Willard.
Listen to the r at the end of heer.
@tchrist tout s'explique
01:51
Ah, Français!
I had never heard (of) voss before
La langue la plus belle!
Woss.
Jonathan Woss.
wouldnt that be considered a speech...um...defect?
Be vewy quite! We’we hunting wabbits!
01:52
shakes heads
@Cerberus nah...they just act that way and everybody believes it.
I need more food!
@Mitch But...but...I believe it!
It’s a very good illustration of the right and wrong way to talk.
Chinese on the other hand is not particularly beautiful especially when sung.
I have this bad feeling that English is ugly to non-English speakers.
but I can't hear it. it sounds fine. excpet when Americans (or English) try to speak French.
@Mitch Not quite. It sounds OK.
@Mitch But, yes, Englishmen trying to speak a foreign language but without properly learning the pronunciation sound worse than anything ever heard before.
01:57
@Cerberus yes, a slight 'r' but definitely there.

« first day (666 days earlier)      last day (4553 days later) »