Space: 1999 is a British science-fiction television programme that ran for two series from 1975 to 1977. In the opening episode, set in the year 1999, nuclear waste stored on the Moon's far side explodes, knocking the Moon out of orbit and sending it, as well as the 311 inhabitants of Moonbase Alpha, hurtling uncontrollably into space. Space: 1999 was the last production by the partnership of Gerry and Sylvia Anderson, who divorced in 1980, and was the most expensive series produced for British television up to that time. The first series was co-produced by ITC Entertainment and Italian broadcaster...
@Cerberus That is possible (and also has happened in my experience both in asking and answering) but we don't have a good idea of the statistics over all questions/answers.
@Cerberus That is 1) extreme and 2) obviously wrong because you can choose to sort by activity rather than votes.
@Cerberus In my limited experience (confirmation bias and all that) most such late answers are 1) either someone answering poorly with information already provided, 2) a totally new user (rep 1) with a very ignorable answer (usually deletable), or 3) extremely rarely an interesting answer (and if memory serves almost always by Sven Yarg).
@Cerberus All of Araucaria's points are possibly relevant to the existing voting system ('candidates' can appear over long periods of time) and pose lots of legitimate problems (even the ones you mentioned that I just responded to). But is 'accepting an answer' the _only possible way to combat that problem? Obviously not since choosing other orderings (which are already. part of the choices a user can make) already exist.
How can a questioner, who is often barely able to articulate their own question, able to be a competent enough judge. All. they're doing is judging for themselves. Votes are the judgements of everybody else... who else is going to see the question and answers? More voters.
There are lots of problems with the voting system, but pinning an answer by the OP is pretty irrelevant to presenting a better answer to the community.
Oh... if the OP has 'accepted' an answer, they can't change their mind with new answers. Once accepted, it stays accepted (unless that particular answer is edited and only then the OP can change acceptance).
The Maxims of Ptahhotep or Instruction of Ptahhotep is an ancient Egyptian literary composition composed by the Vizier Ptahhotep around 2375–2350 BC, during the rule of King Djedkare Isesi of the Fifth Dynasty. The text was discovered in Thebes in 1847 by Egyptologist M. Prisse d'Avennes. The Instructions of Ptahhotep are considered didactic wisdom literature belonging to the genre of sebayt. There are four copies of the Instructions, and the only complete version, Papyrus Prisse, is located in the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris. According to William Kelly Simpson, some scholars debate that the...
@Cerberus I was very surprised at its existence when I first found it. set it to sort by activity, eventually got annoyed by it and then changed it to sort by vote. But this is all a matter of UX patterns that require statistical study, and are not principles of democracy as it seems Araucaria is claiming.
@Cerberus You still have the choice, it's not forcing you to see things a certain way. If given the choice I would choose 'don't force the accepted answer above everything else, just mark it as accepted whereever it lies in the default ordering.
There is also an appeal to complexity here. It is more complex to think about "Where do we put the 'accepted' answer? in a sorted list than it is to sort them all by user chosen preferred. sorting method and just put a 'accepted' star next to that one where ever it lies.
So you're saying the designers of the system should make a decision for all users and make the default be 'sort by votes' -and- put the accepted item at the top (after moving it out of the sorted list).
@Cerberus Oh sure, I don't think it is a big deal to have it at. the top. I find it annoying when the OP doesn't realize that there is a better answer, but not enough to consider requesting a change or even thinking idly 'Gosh it'd be nicer to change it to how I like it'.
But in designing the system, it is much easier to sort everything by whatever criterion and add a tick mark to note the accepted answer than it is to 'put accepted at top, then sort everything else by whatever criterion'.
It might be nice if the asker were to receive a special message if another answer has twice as many votes as the accepted answer, so that he might reconsider.
@Cerberus To me that's a fallacy of irrelevance (which means it is sometimes a fallacy but sometimes not). "It's already done this complex way so it's easy". That can lead to more complex and hard to understand errors later
It might be a justification for -continuing- the practice if it is an entrenched behavior (like in the US where it is just (or at least used to be just) a procedure that was just always done).
But why would you ever think of doing it in the first place. Some magical God being comes down and says "If all you guys start cutting this little piece off, you won't. get cancer so often" most would say "uh...I think I'll risk it"
@Cerberus Exactly. Many of Araucaria's points are not truths but should be investigated by data.
@Cerberus or, in this analogy, don't do complicated things with accepted answers
Some tribe is forcibly removing some frontal teech in their children, after a breakout of tetanus. It was a salutory practice that allowed some patients to survive, but grew entrenched into a ritual. I heard that in some audiobook, because that has become my ritual. Listening to audiobooks.
> there exist several points which may suggest some relation between [China and Japan], such as the basic similarities in the age at commencement of ablation, the prevalence of extraction of under incisors from the Late Jomon period in western Japan and the existence of the same type of ablation in the peoples of nearly the same period in China. Especially, as the abrupt increase of extraction of the upper lateral incisors in the people of the Yayoi period, such as Doigahama, who show morphological resemblances with the neolithic people of northern China, may suggest the influence of Chine…
@Mitch My professor of Ancient History always told me that we shouldn't suppose that ancient customs had a rational purpose.