« first day (3946 days earlier)      last day (1270 days later) » 

00:01
@Cerberus Indeed so. He's speaking in a deliberately recognizable "redneck" accent, so rural/mountain/uncollegiate Appalachian/Great-Smoky-Mountains accent, probably Tennessean. He does not use the special features of that dialect that outsiders wouldn't be familiar with.
Why not?
Why isn't he? Who knows? Perhaps because he's a comedian who wants to be widely understood.
Appalachian English is American English native to the Appalachian mountain region of the Eastern United States. Historically, the term "Appalachian dialect" refers to a local English variety of southern Appalachia, also known as Smoky Mountain English or Southern Mountain English in American linguistics. This variety is both influential upon and influenced by the Southern U.S. regional dialect, which has become predominant in central and southern Appalachia today, while a Western Pennsylvania regional dialect has become predominant in northern Appalachia, according to the 2006 Atlas of Nor...
It's not preserved Elizabethan. But it is unusual.
Now listen to this guy, and notice how different it is:
He does not sound like those people.
Some of those folks you really have to listen to in order to be sure what they've said.
@tchrist The first man visible in the video?
Remarkable diphthongs.
@Cerberus The first audible, certainly. But you should listen to more of it.
His accent is thicker, but the sound quality is also much poorer, and his mouth is barely or not at all visible.
Those things make it difficult to compare.
But, yes, it is a much thicker accent than the one in Rob's video.
When the man sitting on a chair explained what a certain mountain-talk expression meant, the original was easily intelligible to me (I'll see you over yonder), but not his translation.
Oh, I see there are subtitles.
00:12
Heh, yeah.
And the translation has the name of a place.
So that's not fair.
In Waynesville.
Yup.
Wahnzvl.
We still get daily ELU question from foreigners thinking that people actually pronounce the literal IPA sounds.
I think you'd find various Dutch dialects harder to understand than even this, as do I.
They'd melt down.
Or maybe they don't mean their questions quite so literally.
It depends.
00:17
Their "airish" sounds like Irish.
"Sody pop".
The subtitles are mostly in standard English though.
The comedian has his own goals.
> Appalachian accents also differ markedly from the standard, such as in words ending in “oh” sounds, such as “holler” (hollow), “winder” (window), ‘tater” (potato), or “ah” ending words, such as “sody-pop” (soda-pop), “chaney” (china).
@tchrist Yes, that was my takeaway. He probably is a legitimate redneck, but I think he lays it on more theatrically, and in channels that have worn grooves in the general ear more than most dialectical speakers would.
> American language attitudes show a marked disrespect and prejudice for marked dialects like Appalachian English.
Yes, that's why he's doing it. Because under our skin without thinking it screams "poor, white, rural = hick" and we think less of the speaker.
00:34
He wants you to know that not all of those people are crazy and ignorant?
Correct.
That's how I interpreted the name of the channel or video.
Liberal Redneck.
I've listened to some Kerkraads, the dialect of a certain town in Dutch Limburg.
I cannot understand it.
Only some words.
Like 'presentatie' or 'reageren'.
Isn't it some other kind of Low German than Dutch proper?
It's probably somewhere in between, but with lots of slurring over varoous consonants and vowels.
No, I'm thinking of Belgium, never mind.
00:36
Yes, it is pretty close to the local German dialects, I think.
Just as are the dialects of Flemish Limburg.
Dialect continua.
At any rate, it is much harder than even your Appalachian example, I think.
Yes, somewhat continuous, though the dialect can vary wildly between towns.
Right, it's not like English with extra heapings of Norwegian or something.
Probably more like Scots with lots of Norwegian influences?
This is an interesting hybrid accent.
00:39
@Cerberus Right, that's what I meant.
This is Cajun French.
They speak a creole mix of English and French.
@Robusto That's pretty easy to understand?
Also because he speaks clearly and the context is well structured.
@Cerberus Yeah, but it gets harder, especially when they mix the two languages.
@Robusto The French speaker is harder. And yes, he sometimes mixes a bit.
00:43
And what you find in New Orleans is a unique dialect of American English. They're in the Deep South, but they don't sound like other southerners.
@Robusto Haha nice.
I could follow it until he began scraping the pan.
Right now they sound all washed up.
@tchrist Well, yeah. But not as bad as Katrina.
@Cerberus Do something for a few minutes he said. Not sure his verb.
I didn't mean I could understand every word...
Much, much harder than the other video.
00:44
Right, but I got a lot of them once it starting to click.
Yes well.
We're not native French speakers either.
BTW, @Cerb, Cajun (in case you weren't aware) is from "Arcadian" ... French settlers in North America who were evicted and moved to Louisiana.
I think I read that, long ago.
Cerb is going to bite you for confusing Acadia with Arcadia.
Did I write "Arcadian"? I did.
Acadia. There, I said it.
I can't help what my fingers do.
Et in Arcadia ego.
00:47
> "Arcadia" is derived from the Arcadia district in Greece, which had the extended meanings of "refuge" or "idyllic place". Henry IV of France chartered a colony south of the St. Lawrence River between the 40th and 46th parallels in 1603, and he recognized it as La Cadie.[9] Samuel de Champlain fixed its present orthography with the r omitted
Funny.
Funny, because I used to vacation in Bar Harbor, visiting Acadia National Park.
> The settlers whose descendants became Acadians primarily came from the southwestern region of France, also known as Occitania, such as the rural areas of Poitou-Charentes and Aquitaine (Gascony).
Occitan? Gascon? Those will leave strange languedoc vestiges. It won't ever have been Parisian French.
Yeah.
And creoles are hard enough as they are.
01:06
Notice how he pronounces andouille as awnDOOey.
And the diphthong in bedroom ... bedROO-um
"an' ya cook dem awnyawn till dey pure*
"dat's hard ta did"
I'm getting hungry for gumbo now.
"what I'm gonna did"
The do -> did transference is interesting.
I despise okra.
I think all stressed vowels are subject to mutate from monophthongs down there.
01:24
I don't mind okra, if it's made properly. I have no problem with cajun food in Louisiana, dat fo' sho'.
Oh wow, "Lafourche Parish" is pronounced pronounced without the R.
Oh yeah, of course. Lafoosh.
@tchrist Do you mean a double pronunciation?
Right, I meant [lɐˈfuʃ] not [peiʃ]. :)
The don't have a lot of syllable-final R's down there. Many are complete arrhotics.
"... because I didn't know how ta said it."
Howdy sate tha time?
How'd he say it that time?
01:31
The past form as infinitive is an interesting feature.
About 10 seconds after the linked time.
He says "blackstop" instead of "blacktop" ...
Reminds me of the Germanic lexicalization of preterite-presents into modals, like ought and many more.
@Robusto Notice his French still has fully rolled R's, so from before the modern weakening.
Yes.
He's a hoot. Almost only ever "soft" ch as 'twere sh per French.
He can say chuck but not chicken. :)
Yeah. Shicken.
It's shickening. ^_^
Oh yeah, he uses an inflected infinitive, kinda.
01:41
I think only with strong verbs, though.
This is cool.
I found the Holter monitor quite uncomfy.
@CowperKettle Automated cooling? :)
@tchrist Not yet
@CowperKettle That's too much information.
Although I wish there was clothing with cooling.
Probably it's impossible.
@Robusto Why not? An AI could then inform you well in advance if you have any problems with your heart.
01:44
> She went on to describe a mechanism that was hidden underneath these heavy wool outfits to keep the actors from overheating. “When we were shooting things in a hot country when they had all of those things, they had this pump,” she said. “This pump that had its own little generator that was attached into the costumes that used to pump cold water into these pipes and cool them all down. So they'd be underneath these huge [costumes] with this weird kind of cooling system.”
@CowperKettle Yeah, I don't need that much information. I have enough things to worry about.
The AI will worry.
Or you could even upload it to the government, so that it could worry instead.
@CowperKettle I think it will be all over Facebook instead, and used to try to sell you drugs and vitamins and the like.
Russia announced it will fund its own bloggers on RuTube, a state-sponsored alternative to YouTube.
Meanwhile it has been slapping bigger and bigger fines on foreign IT companies.
I wonder if Putin will have the guts to ban YouTube in the next three weeks.
@CowperKettle Haha, I think the only ones who will watch it are civil servants looking to advance.
01:48
It's three weeks to the election.
@Robusto Who knows? With a big amount of money, and if YouTube is banned..
Yeah, you never know. But most savvy people will still be able to get YouTube, right?
Yes, those who know how to set up a VPN link
02:00
@CowperKettle Does he even worry about what people think? He's going to fix the election anyway, right?
02:15
One wonders about that.
I think massive street protests scare him the most.
Those happened in 2010, didn't they?
He is jealous of China.
Then again, China has seen tremendous economic growth, which makes such large protests much less likely.
@Robusto Even Joseph Stalin worried a lot about that. At the height of repressions, we went out in public to state that the KGB were too zealous, after which the head of the KGB was dismissed and shot. And for a time the repressions were slackened. He was careful to stage the collectivization as coming not directly from him.
Nikolai (Nikolay) Ivanovich Yezhov (Russian: Николай Иванович Ежов, IPA: [nʲɪkɐˈɫaj ɪˈvanəvʲɪt͡ɕ (j)ɪˈʐof]; 1 May 1895 – 4 February 1940) was a Soviet secret police official under Joseph Stalin who was head of the NKVD from 1936 to 1938, during the height of the Great Purge. Yezhov organized mass arrests, torture and executions during the Great Purge but fell from Stalin's favour and was arrested, confessing after torture to a range of anti-Soviet activity. He was executed in 1940 along with others, except Stalin, who were blamed for the Purge. == Early life and career == Yezhov was born either...
Yezhov carried out the most "dangerous" part of repressions, and was shot as being over-zealous.
To present Stalin in a better light.
02:33
@CowperKettle Not sure that worked out all that well for him.
> The judge sent the prison a new inmate that afternoon.
 
1 hour later…
 
3 hours later…
06:41
US departs from Afghanistan today.
On 28th , all internet + communication connections were cut down in panjhsir.
Yes, that's bad. They are on their own.
 
2 hours later…
08:17
A squirrel king is a collection of squirrels whose tails have tangled together, making them unable to separate themselves. It is similar to a phenomenon recorded in rats, the rat king, of rats with tails tangled together. A squirrel king starts as a litter of young in the same nest, whose tails become knotted together by nesting materials, and/or by tree sap gluing the tails together, particularly if the young squirrels have been gnawing bark of the tree that their nest is in, letting sap flow. If the squirrels are not separated, when they try to come out of their nest, they may fall to the ground...
@CowperKettle Taliban has attacked panjshir Will full power
As US exits.
@CowperKettle Both sides have suffered injuries .
Yes, it's very bad
@CowperKettle Yes. I feel so bad.
 
2 hours later…
11:01
Here goes the notion that moderate wine consumption is protective. This study had an advanced design.
11:52
@CowperKettle yeah, that notion has always been the wine industry trying to get people to drink wine.
might as well believe wine counts as one of your "five a day" or however many fruit and veg portions we're meant to eat per day
12:52
@CowperKettle Now do Tokyo and Canada.
@CowperKettle The idea that it should be protective was debunked long ago, though.
Humans: we can basically tollerate ingesting this poison, so long as we enjoy it
Capitalism: that means it's good for you
13:16
Socialism:
> The circumstances under which the Biden withdrawal had to happen doubled as a devastating indictment of the policies pursued by his three predecessors, which together cost roughly $2,000,000,000,000 (it’s worth writing out all those zeros) and managed to build nothing in the political or military spheres that could survive for even a season without further American cash and military supervision.
>
Before this summer, in other words, it was possible to read all the grim inspector general reports and document dumps on Afghanistan, count yourself a cynic about the war effort and still imagine that America got something for all that spending, no matter how much was spent on Potemkin installations or siphoned off by pederast warlords or recirculated to Northern Virginia contractors.
> If after 20 years of effort and $2,000,000,000,000, the theocratic alternative to liberalism actually takes over a country faster than in its initial conquest, that’s a sign that our moral achievements were outweighed by the moral costs of corruption, incompetence and drone campaigns.
13:34
@CowperKettle lol
@MattE.Эллен The hand of Socialism offering you a preparatory apéritif after you've already begun your repast comes with a concealed knife up its sleeve? Just say no-no.
14:04
@Robusto At least it gave people twenty years of relative freedom and somewhat rapid development, in some spheres. Enough for a child to grow up in.
Sorry, but I don't see that that game was worth the candle.
My point is that the quotation seems to ignore that.
It is not mentioned.
@tchrist I'll have a McCarthy with cheese
14:28
@Cerberus So your point is something like "Apart from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the show?"
You speak in riddles.
2
You may not have been present, but I have said before that I doubted whether the invasion of Afghanistan was a good idea.
It may have had some elements of value in the beginning, but the writer's point is that it was a colossal clusterfuck: at the very best it was poorly planned, poorly executed, and its shortcomings were papered over with specious propaganda.
No argument there.
14:54
And imagine if we had taken the $2 trillion and spent it on, say, universal healthcare for Americans—something the rest of the developed world has enjoyed for some time now—instead of thrashing around like an elephant in a swamp, enriching evil people and doing nothing of any value that could not be undone without constant military effort and wasteful spending.
BTW, about the "Mrs. Lincoln" trope: This refers to Abraham LIncoln's wife, whose husband was assassinated at Ford's Theater while viewing a production of the play "Our American Cousin." So to ask Mrs. Lincoln, in spite of that, how she liked the play is an example of willfully missing an obvious point.
I suppose that doesn't translate into Dutch.
15:17
I remember that I signed a collective letter against starting the war in Iraq. Because I watched BBC Worldservice TV and read the news in English, and it was so clear that there was no weapons of mass destruction there.
But I felt happy when the Saddam was toppled and people went out and beat his statue with their slippers.
I feel maybe it's some development that we can't grasp. Like people in the Roman Republic could not grasp that the Republic grew so big that it was mutating towards a quasi-monarchy.
Maybe the US military complex grew so big that sometimes it causes these wars. But maybe not. One needs to read up a lot.
@CowperKettle The invasion of Iraq was seen as very different from the invasion of Afghanistan. The latter was supported, at least in words, by most UN countries. Invading Iraq was only supported diplomatically by ... UK?
@Robusto An alternative could have been to spend much, much less than that, and only spend it on the maintenance of American troops to halt the progress of the Taliban.
And keep that budget separate from any aid to civilians in Afghanistan.
The 10,000 soldiers required to keep the peace (to some degree...) in Afghanistan would not have been super expensive to the American army.
As to WMD, it was clear to the US (and it should have been clear to the rest of the world) that the US had explicitly -supplied- Iraq with WMD (which is itself a bizarre term ... maybe just lots of military aid?) or the means to create 'WMD' in order to combat Iran. But yes, it was obvious to everyone else that by 2003 Iraq no longer had those means.
@Cerberus I don't know anything but wasn't 'halting the progress of the Taliban' what cost so much?
@Mitch Yes, it was fairly obvious.
@Mitch and even then only by the government. not by the people
15:31
@Mitch No, I believe what cost so much was funnelling endless sums of money into many Afghan 'institutions' that simply wasted it on corruption and recruiting an ineffective Afghan army, etc. etc.
The American troops themselves were not that expensive by comparison.
@MattE.Эллен Right... it was only -some- of the American populace that was pro-invasion of Iraq.
@Cerberus Oh. OK.
Keeping the Taliban at bay should have been done exclusively by Western troops, not by a failing Afghan army with Western money.
But remind me of that the next time the US invades another country so I can position myself as a 'defense contractor'.
@Mitch it's still kind of hilarious in the "wtf" kinda way that literally a million people walked up to the government and said "don't do it" and that meant nothing
@Cerberus OK I know this is quite a leap of geopolitical thinking but bear me out... work out with the Taliban some way of getting them to be part of NATO.
15:33
To some extent, Afghanistan was aequivalent to a colonial protectorate. Perhaps they should have moved it up to a full colonial government, if they had really wanted to change the country. But that would have been more expensive than simply maintaining Western troops.
@MattE.Эллен walking outside is for losers
@Mitch I think it should be the army itself that spends the money, not private companies.
@Mitch Quite a leap!
@Mitch apparently :D
@Cerberus you'd need rockets on your motorcycle to make that leap
and a parachute
but also have a grandstand for people to watch
What about an ordinary bicycle?
15:35
and fireworks
@Cerberus OK that's taking it too far.
Aww.
OK...if you're going with a bicycle go all the way and go tricycle.
or unicycle
Why not!
Or a millicycle?
from experience, I'd say rockets on a unicycle would not work
What happened?
15:36
@Cerberus then you end up with the Puerto Rico situation, which by all accounts isn't very good.
@Cerberus Physisc
@MattE.Эллен The American Samoa situation worked out great because we got Dwayne Johnson out of it.
@Mitch what if one is pointed up and the other is pointed down?
hmm... one could say that the Puerto Rican situation worked out well because JLo
I remember a time in my life when I heard JLo's name -all the time- yet didn't know who she was or what she even looked like.
I call that time of my life...
"most of my life"
@MattE.Эллен calculates...
@MattE.Эллен Where is Jasper when we need him the most?
@Cerberus It's the army that is spending the money... to those private companies.
15:42
@MattE.Эллен Much better than the situation under the Taliban.
@Mitch That is never good.
@Mitch The army should be spending it on its own people.
US liberals don't realize how much the defense spending in the US is a big support of the US economy - jobs, infusion of money, etc.
'realize' may not be the right word.
recognize?
'want it to be the case'
"Of the economy" → "of huge, rich companies".
If we could only channel young men's aggression into non-military, more constructive pursuits like video games or Cross-fit.
@Cerberus trickle down has always been a joke, but private defense contracting does employee a lot of people and tech progress and indirectly those tech companies. It doesn't trickle down to good health care or inner city poverty.
Yes, and it enriches those parties.
And makes the army dependent on them.
@Cerberus oh sure.
15:47
Where it should have its own personnel and knowledge.
@Cerberus well...physics put a man on the moon which certainly spawned the entire science-fiction-entertainment industrial complex. Which for the most part isn't an awful thing.
Elon Musk may be kind of jerk but
Physics also spawned the universe.
Say what you will about the Nazis but
I will, thanks.
@Cerberus And look what that led to
15:49
Indeed.
@Cerberus disagree. the universe spawned physics
@MattE.Эллен Let's say physics was the midwife that helped spawn itself, would that work for you?
In reality, Chaos spawned the universe.
Or was it that Chaos spawned Kronos and Rhea?
Something must have existed always, because the Universe could not spring just out of nothing.
16:04
So suggests Aristotle.
But then how did this something ever come into existence?
And why did it create other things?
16:32
@Cerberus it's pretty obvious that the God of ®%¥£π√ did all that and the rest of you are just making up stories
16:46
@Mitch The inscriptions in your temple must look interesting.
@Cerberus Never, it has always existed
17:16
@CowperKettle How is it possible for something to exist always?
@Cerberus Since something exists right now, and something could not have sprung out of nothing, therefore something has existed always
Trump has always existed, it's only that his particles were spread over the Universe, some of them in form of energy waves.
@CowperKettle But I could formulate an alternative argument.
Since no thing can have existed always, something must have come into existence out of nothing; therefore, things can come into existence out of nothing.
Why "no thing can have existed always"?
It's too complex for my mind.
@CowperKettle I meant that it is not possible for a thing to have existed always. I took that as an axiom, an evident truth.
To subvert your argument, which uses different axioms.
@CowperKettle And for anyone's, probably!
17:45
@Cerberus They are the emojis of future
Literally.
They are the new set of emojis planned for the next release.
17:57
Highly useful.
18:49
@CowperKettle That was the iconic photo op from the whole Iraq debacle. I'm currently reading Fiasco, and while I knew the Iraq war was poorly planned and executed not only on the basis of no evidence of WMD but in spite of ample evidence to the contrary, I really had no idea how bad the situation was.
Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq (2006) is a book by Washington Post Pentagon correspondent Thomas E. Ricks. Fiasco deals with the history of the Iraq War from the planning phase to combat operations to 2006 and argues that the war was badly planned and executed. Ricks based the book in part on interviews with military personnel involved in the planning and execution of the war. In 2009, Ricks published a sequel The Gamble: General David Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2006–2008. Fiasco was a finalist for the 2007 Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction....
Ricks reveals that there was never an actual war plan as generals would understand it. It was Donald Rumsfeld's staff putting together PowerPoint presentations that were mostly wishful thinking.
And General Tommy Franks, the leader of the invasion, apparently had no idea what the difference was between strategy and tactics. When asked what his strategy was for the war, he described to the interviewer a tactical situation.
@Robusto How could such a man have become general?
Neither he nor the Bush administration had any idea what to do once the knee-jerk goal of "toppling Sadaam" was accomplished. They expected that was an end to everything, and as we've seen that was the big problem.
@Cerberus I don't know. Maybe because he sucked the right dicks in the Bush administration?
One usually expects a certain military competence in generals of the American army.
Well, we used to have that, back in WWII.
Their advice on military matters is usually better than that of e.g. ministers, even now.
18:55
Then again, we had George Marshall running the show back then.
@Cerberus In a YouTube video I watched (which prompted me to buy Ricks's book), he makes the case that since WWII generals have been loath to relieve other generals of command when such was warranted.
Why not earlier?
Such a thing must be highly unpleasant always?
> The talent of the strategist is to identify the decisive point and to concentrate everything on it, removing forces from secondary fronts and ignoring lesser objectives.— Carl von Clausewitz
The Greek tragedians would have a field day studying the hubris of America and its generals in the aftermath of WWII.
"We're the most powerful nation in the world!" has been their mantra, and they've used it as an all-purpose substitute for reason, introspection, logic, understanding, compassion, and just plain caution in the face of unknown circumstances.
And we keep doing that over and over again, learning no lessons from it. Our ignorant, self-serving politicians and our get-in-line, ass-covering military commanders who kiss the asses of those politicians care nothing for the mistakes of the past and rush forward to repeat them, ad infinitum.
> Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. —George Santayana
19:13
Such a posterior fixation.
19:25
There also is a terrible aversion to hearing the truth. Another symptom of tragedy.
20:13
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in link text in answer, potentially bad ns for domain in answer, potentially bad keyword in answer (83): Very unusual meaning of "abortion" by dijyw on english.SE
2
A: Is this particular take on the Serenity Prayer grammatically correct?

Renier Wijnen This is what I ended up going with, a more poetic version: "Dona mihi animi aequitatem, ut quae mutare non possim, clementer feram; ac fortitudinem, ut quae mutare possim, mutem; ac sapientiam, ut haec ab illis discernam."

I hate to tell you this, but it looks like the artist put mature instead of mutare in the fourth line. — brianpck 7 hours ago
20:31
@Cerberus The time to proofread a tattoo is before you get inked.
Indeed.
But the tattooer may make a mistake.
@Cerberus Then if he deviates from the proofread text it's on him to make it right.
But tattoos cannot be made right...
Then at least you could get some monetary compensation.
@Cerberus trademarked
I knew copyright was a religion, nobody believed me
20:49
I suppose it is, to some people.
One that must be banished from society.
 
3 hours later…
23:57
@Mitch I see you're posting des crudités again.

« first day (3946 days earlier)      last day (1270 days later) »