> Store your tablets separately from your grandmother's
> The school says such a rule would violate “sincerely held religious beliefs” because they say humans were made in the image of God, and masks shield that image from being seen. michiganradio.org/post/…
@CowperKettle someone should tell these bozos if the same argument can apply to shoes and shorts, they should spent several seconds doing this horrid thing called thinking
I know it seems really harsh, but it is a requirement if we are to reach an agreement
Ill Person: wise elder, my stomach hurts. What should I do? Elder: have you tried Bismuth salts? Ill person: ah thank you. *walks off* Apprentice: will that work? Elder: We're going to find out soon!
James Phipps (1788 – 1853) was the first person given the experimental cowpox vaccine by Edward Jenner. Jenner knew of a local belief that dairy workers who had contracted a relatively mild infection called cowpox were immune to smallpox, and tested his theory on James Phipps.
== Early life and vaccination against smallpox ==
Phipps was born in Berkeley parish in Gloucestershire to a poor landless labourer working as Jenner's gardener. He was baptised in St Mary's parish church, Berkeley, when he was 4.
On 14 May 1796 he was selected by Jenner, who took "a healthy boy, about eight years old for...
I would be afraid to take an LSD tab, because LSD, it turns out, affects the dopamine system. On the other hand, psylocibine seems to avoid the dopamine system.
> Even after 14 months, those who reported mystical experiences scored on average 4 percentage points higher on the personality trait of Openness/Intellect; personality traits are normally stable across the lifespan for adults. (Wikipedia)
The research is small-scale.
It might turn out to be wishful thinking.
More research is needed.
Selection bias might affect the results. That is, patients enamoured with psychedelics by reading books, listening to music beforehand might cling to the notion that psychedelics are good. And such patients might be more likely to enroll.
One must read very closely the reports and pay attention to the way the patients were selected for the studies.
@Xanne oh...it's the '.m' in the URL, intended for display on a m obile (phone) viewer. I'm guessing the one-boxing algorithm must not account for it.
@CowperKettle It could be exuberance by non-experts (or by those who want to sell it). BUt it is not unreasonable to think that there is a plausible mechanism -and- not enough experimentation has been done because of the drug taboo.
But I've also heard contradictory things about it - namely one one hand the reduction in depression comes from a large dose, and on the other the reduction comes from a period of 'sub-clinical' (whatever that means) or much smaller doses (those that are not hallucinatory).
And then, supposing there is a substantiated mechanism, it'll probably only work for very specific kinds of depression.
@Mitch Yes, because depression is really a collection of different diseases. If you have an untypical BH4 deficiency-caused depression, no amount of psychedelics would get out out of it.
@Cerberus I think the wording of @CowperKettle's quote was intended to imply that even such a small percentage is huge in comparison to longitudinal personality measures: "personality traits are normally stable across the lifespan for adults." I take 'stable' to mean that they hardly change at all. They're not saying percentages, but one could say < 1%.
But this is a problem with all kinds of scientific communication. Precision anticorrelates with concision.
also practicality...sometimes you just have to say 'more' or 'a lot' or allude to a difference because you may not actually have numbers to compare.
@Cerberus Yes, that is way better than simple point estimates (like the mean or standard deviation). But again limited by communication medium and by actually having recorded that data to begin with.
@Cerberus Yes, that points to there being a sub population where there is.a direct causal effect, and for the rest of the population no causal effect at all.
@Cerberus Yes that seems like hardly something to bother with. But it could show signs of 1) a very short step of progress which can be be engineered to make further progress. eg heart transplants probably had a very very low life extension at the beginning (a month?) but further progress extended that time.
or 2) maybe that's only one piece of small improvement and many distinct improvements are needed for appreciable improvement.
I've heard that in medicine, these small improvements are really important, eg survivability of a procedure from 20% to 25% is really good.
In July 1184 Henry VI, King of Germany (later Holy Roman Emperor), held court at a Hoftag in Erfurt.
On the morning of 26 July, the combined weight of the assembled nobles caused the wooden second story floor of the assembly building to collapse and most of them fell through into the latrine cesspit below the ground floor, where about 60 of them drowned in liquid excrement.
This event is called Erfurter Latrinensturz (lit. 'Erfurt latrine fall') in several German sources.
== Background ==
A feud between Landgrave Louis III of Thuringia and Archbishop Conrad of Mainz which had existed since the...
One mathy thing... often you'll hear things like (I'm making it up) 'inhaling helium increases asphyxiation death by 100 times'. This is called relative risk. And you're pointing out that maybe you should consider absolute risk (asphyxiation deaths may be super rare to begin with, but of those most of those are from inhaling helium). It is a common miscommunication to only report relative risk. It usually only gives a shock value rather than telling you what to do.
Word of the day: head (ship's toilet) (The name derives from sailing ships in which the toilet area for the regular sailors was placed at the head or bow of the ship.)
> One exhibit is the BBC's guide to pronunciation from 1928. In it, it informs announcers that pristine rhymes with wine, respite is pronounced as if there were no e, combat is cumbat, finance was finn-ance. Even then some of the suggestions were becoming archaic. Not only is housewifery no longer pronounced huzzifry, it is almost entirely obsolete as a word.
I was googling for "huzzifry" because I had come across this pronunciation in an audiobook, "A History of Britain" by Simon Schama
@Mitch For chances, like one's chance of survival, yes, because they have an effect on the population level. But for something like an absolute increase in happiness of 4 per cent, that's different.