@CowperKettle “After administering oxygenated perfluorocarbon enemas to anaesthetised mice with intact rectal linings, the researchers put them in chambers with a restricted oxygen supply, to see what would happen.” Today I learned that Bruce Willis needs to remake The Abyss.
> Military service, where active duty can last up to 24 months, is compulsory for males aged between 18 and 49, although a person can volunteer from the age of 15. There is no alternative to military service in Iran and conscientious objection is not recognised.
OMG. From the age of 15? O_O
Insane.
I personally would increase the minimum age to 24 or 25
In the Russian army, there is a lot of brutal hazing. People are commiting suicides due to severe beatings and intimidation by other soldiers, or take up arms and kill other soldiers. The army is like a prison.
But a nation that keeps yelling at the world and considers itself constantly threatened can't not have compulsory military service. I know Israel and probably China also have it
@CowperKettle Oh, I doubt it's anything that dramatic here, maybe because everyone has to serve at one time or another
It often just mostly means compulsory service as a chef in some police station or something
My schoolmate went absent without leave in Tyumen in 1995, and visited my flat there together with his army friend. He said he had accidentally broken the windshield of a crane car he was operating. His officer told him to go AWOL, steal a new windshield in the night, and bring it to back.
In the Russian army in the 1990s the service lasted 2 years. The second year soldiers were called "old men" and the first year soldiers were kind of their slaves.
The first year soldiers were sent to beg in the streets, then go and buy illegal weed in the suburbs for the old soldiers, and bring it back to the barracks.
My dad recalled how a bunch of old soldiers from Central Asia were going down the corridor, coming into each barrack and heavily beating up every first-year soldier.
Hamas has built tunnels with more than 100 entries. A whole network. And has fired thousands of rockets. Had it spent all this money on schools and hospitals for Palestinians, that would have improved their lives significantly.
Yekaterinburg has hit a record high temperature for a third time in a week. Today is officially the hottest-ever 16 May, at 32°C e1.ru/text/spring/2021/05/16/69917063
@M.A.R. A protein is a long chain of amino acids (think of them as constitutents of a protein). The amino acids interact with each other and all the interactions together determine properties of the protein. Here, the contribution refers to how much an amino acid contributes towards the protein's stability. It can be expressed as a numerical quantity.
"the difference between predicted stability contribution in the reference and mutant proteins is Z" is the full sentence
I think there should be an article before "predicted".
@M.A.R. Yes, I was wondering about the same. We can think of contribution as one aggregate numerical value or as a bunch of interactions that together contribute towards stability.
@Yashas either form works, but if you're ever looking to beautify your writing, not having so many trailing adjectives is usually recommended
@Yashas even then the singular form wouldn't be wrong, some author might want to treat all them as a single item (the aggregate)
I think this example should be plain and unambiguous to the reader, so adding the 'of's isn't more beautiful or anything.
@Yashas better yet, why not "the difference in the contribution of X (aminoacids) to the stability of the reference and mutant proteins is predicted to be Z"
@Yashas I do not think it is good to omit the source of the contribution. "The contributions of A to X and Y differ by D." Plural is the right way, as the natural parsing of the English tells you.
Where young women lived in with a family and took care of the babies and did some chores in exchange for a chance to acclimate to the culture and learn the language.
I think, if you make an effort, you can learn the language without any of those things, just by talking to other people every day and studying, and taking some courses.
The big advantage is that you can move without learning any Dutch first, as you will be able to function in society with just English.
It will be hard to find a white-collar job, without speaking Dutch, but I think there are quite a few companies where you can get by just speaking English.
I have friends who live in Germany or France and they haven't learnt the language.
I wouldn't miss the chance though. But they're getting along fine.
I was trying to work on the various political and economic aspects of granting citizenship to some of our Afghan immigrants as my thesis. Professors are not interested.
I'm afraid I'll have to compromise and work on something that's not a question that's genuinely bugging me.
But I should throw in some econ if I want to switch to political economy later.
@Færd I'm sure they are! Especially if they don't plan to stay for more than a few years, it's OK. But many people end up staying longer and regret not learning the language (sooner).
@Færd That would probably be very well received here!
@Cerberus I know, right? Migration an interesting subject.
You could get at surprising results:
> When we randomly match a high- with a low-educated immigrant from the same country, more than one-quarter of time the low-educated immigrant has a higher hourly wage
> Immigrants thus exhibit a 80% higher entrance rate into entrepreneurship. Moreover, immigrants do not just start many small firms; rather, they start more firms of every size.