« first day (637 days earlier)      last day (4580 days later) » 

19:00
But costs double in full colour.
I feel terrible.
What's happening?
@tchrist I do. Why do you really hate me?
I sit your cold?
What are you doing to my cold?
19:10
I was trying to crush it.
I thought perhaps the lack of a preposition might confuse it long enough.
I see.
@Cerberus and you, of all people. Working in palaeography and having no love lost between yourself and kerning. You must be trolling.
I am at home with my boys today and letting them run amok.
I'm pretending to exercise their logical reasoning.
@RegDwightАΑA If kerning is managing the space between letters, then, sure, you don't want weird spaces at bad places.
And free expression, and personal judgment.
19:12
@KitFox Good.
See, @tchrist, that's how you handle the dog.
The Singularity is imminent!
But mostly, I'm sitting here like a dolt, feeling miserable and trying to keep them alive.
Take an aspirin? A nap? Nose spray?
Also, I have a story stuck in my head.
19:13
Then brain spray.
@Cerberus A nap? Are you crazy?
You could pretend to be napping.
It's itching in there. It wants to come out.
Write it down, then make the next Writers assignment be all about it.
Sorry to hear you are under the weather.
19:14
@Cerberus I can't nap! I have children to mind!
@KitFox Yeah, that's always uncomfortable.
@RegDwightАΑA Well, the thought occurred to me, but next week's assignment and the two after that are already committed.
@KitFox If you just shove your assault rifles under the bed and turn off your in-house BBQ, I'm sure they can mind themselves?
@KitFox So you have three weeks for polish.
@Cerberus I just had to stop them from the fun game of jumping-on-my-brother's-head. So no.
19:15
Haha.
@KitFox I think that's what vodka and orange juice are for.
@RegDwightАΑA This one is going to take longer, I think.
Fun.
@ΜετάEd I'm fresh out of vodka. I do have some benadryl though.
@KitFox then how are the next three weeks' assignments relevant at all?
19:16
I dunno. Why are you asking me?
Oh I'm just making something. Looked like a conversation when I began.
Hahaha.
Sorry, I'm really barely competent to type, much less think or raise children.
@RegDwightАΑA hah! i totally would have, but i was too busy with actual work
silly, silly work
If DHHS came by today, I'm sure they'd put my babies in foster care immediately.
I like "why are you asking me?".
19:17
@Kit raising children is easy! just throw a few packages of oreo cookies into the cage every now and then
Or kittens.
OMG, i forgot the oreos
@JSBձոգչ your work should be more about death metal and less about work.
@RegDwightАΑA this is true
They were doing cash only at the grocery store this morning.
Slayer is hardly death metal.
Unless you are thinking cheesy-flavored death.
mmmm cheese
19:19
Don't make me post Rumtscho's Metal Chart.
mmmm rummy cheese
(not Slayer)
Freakin awesome.
19:20
Looks like LEGO.
brb
@RegDwightАΑA Yes.
My son just decided to listen to Elastica.
@JSBձոգչ youtube blocks it for me. So I went to godtube. How cool is that? GODtube. THAT song. It's like super awesome with awesome on top.
call me confused
19:21
I can't get it. The video is too messed up.
I'll call you confused at a later time.
@Cerberus Hilarious. Kind of impossible to match the key to the chart though.
@RegDwightАΑA "Did this video bless you?" LMAO
"Meet Christian singles."
Where's the German Death Polka? Or is that not considered metal?
19:23
i'm pretty sure this one will never redirect you to GodTube
@cornbreadninja "Comic Sans"
@KitFox German Polka, clearly, is Gothic Melodic Speed Death.
though it might redirect you to the 80's. if the 80's were AWESOME.
user19161
@JSBձոգչ I did not know about God tube. Is it a site for learning about Christianity?
@JasperLoy it's a site for Christians who are afraid of YouTube to show each other videos
19:25
@ΜετάEd Yeah, very inconvenient. It was probably done that way for stylistic reasons.
user19161
@JSBձոգչ Why are they scared of youtube? Is it too ungodly?
presumably
Have you ever seen this?
Taken by Spirit.
still loading....
The picture is a little bit large...
19:27
I never quite groked the grammar behind "you tube", but "God tube" takes the prize. Is that like imperative or what? "God, tube me real good!"
@Cerberus Yes, just as the overall shape was.
Yup.
@Cerberus needs more death metal
@JSBձոգչ Kill it.
@JSBձոգչ rocky. Lobstery, too.
1
Q: What's the word to describe that I "_____" your artwork

Sheldon LeeWhen I see a famous writer, I will say "hi, I read your book"(or "have read"? ). When I see a movie star, I will say "Hey, I watched your movie"(or "have watched"?). So, when I see a artist, what's the word in "hi, I _ your artwork"? maybe it's a photo, or a painting or a sculpture.

Hate. I hated your artwork.
user19161
19:31
@RegDwightАΑA No hating in this chat.
It's on the main site. I'm answering a question on the main site.
@tchrist Dude, I'm not telling you to...well, I don't want you to burn your books , and I don't follow your distinction between tchrist- and Mitch-citations or corroborate corroborations. I'm just telling you what has happened in the past here. Telling someone to 'just go to the library' isn't Gen Ref, it isn't helpful at all, and cut and paste's (or verbatim typed copies) from sources make for poor answers here.
By all means use these physical references, but if there's just the verbatim text then that's probably a bad answer. Because if it's a good answer then it's Gen Ref.
@RegDwightАΑA "the tube where you're the boob"
i.e. you publish
i don't want to be a boob
@ΜετάEd yes, after years and years of thinking about it (and I'm not exaggerating for once), that's the conclusion I arrived at. A place where you (pronoun, nominative case) tube (verb, present indicative, 2nd person plural).
But what about God tube, then?
19:36
@Cerberus hmm..looks like they cleaned up since last time. got rid of all the big boulders even a lot of the smaller ones.
Certainly it must be GodTubes. For He is 3rd Person.
@Mitch Oh, that's great. Right on track for the Great Infinite Parking Lot!
@RegDwightАΑA I think of it more as a noun, mostly, though. like the comedy channel, the you channel.
Did the originators say what they had in mind?
@RegDwightАΑA It need not even be a place.
@ΜετάEd well it is a noun now. Yes. Which is why you can now have knockofffs such as Redtube and Godtube without thinking about grammers.
19:38
You can name your website "Microsoft Sucks".
Yeah but I needed something to begin that sentence with.
And God Tube is probably just wordplay.
@RegDwightАΑA Why?
You tube (broadcast) [stuff]!
user19161
@Cerberus Well, actually I really like Microsoft.
@Cerberus I need that for all my sentences. Beginnings. Can't be valued high enough. Anyone can write an ending.
user19161
I think Windows and Office are great products.
19:39
@JasperLoy You're weird! You're a Linux!
user19161
Just that we have to pay for them of course.
@RegDwightАΑA Why is You not a beginning?
Hi, it's Stacy again.

I know there are lots of Tube sites. Here are the ones I already know.

YouTube
RedTube
RudeTube
FunnyTube

Out of curiosity, what others are there?
You may NOT wish to be as curious as Stacy.
BigTube.
@Mitch I'm trying to follow your conversation but I'm failing rather miserably. To me it looks like you're both on the same page.
19:40
TinyTube.
@tchrist RuTube.
Some of those look like <ADJ> + "tube".
But not for YOU or GOD.
Yeah, people misread the original construction?
Hm, is GAY TUBE a noun or adjective in the first word?
Go ahead.
I dare ya.
Gay is both, and a noun can be used as an adjective, so it doesn't matter.
19:42
I think it’s TUBE for GAYs.
@tchrist is there a difference?
HICK TUBE would be...?
burned at a stake?
And BOOB TUBE?
That's the only video.
19:44
Look, it's a Blueby!
Feb 17 '11 at 21:22, by RegDwight
His wife sat up in bed and looked at him coldly. "You are a booby," she said, "and I am going to have you put in the booby-hatch."
user19161
@RegDwightАΑA Looks like me!
@JasperLoy sorry to break the news to you, but: you wish.
It's the tube, like "boob tube" = the television. "You" tube means the tube where your own videos can be broadcast. God tube is where you get the God videos, Rude tube the rude videos, etc.
Once upon a time, at a technical publisher far far away, they finally got a manuscript submission from a female author. When it came time to choose the iconic animal to play on the cover, they chose the Blue-Footed Booby.
By "they", we mean the woman in charge of choosing such things.
And no one understood why this female author didn't want to be known as the author of the booby book.
Finally, they relented and changed the cover-critter.
And put a chick on it instead.
And thus was born. . . the Chick Book.
19:50
@tchrist oh dear
what kind of chick is that?
Ms Walsh is not very fond of being called dear, either, come to think of it.
user19161
@ΜετάEd Looks like a small ostrich.
Ratite, yes.
Ostrich, no.
The bird on the cover of Learning Perl/Tk is a juvenile emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). This large, flightless bird is found throughout the Australian bush steppes. The emu is one of the largest birds in existence, second only to its cousin the ostrich. Adult emus stand about 5 feet (1.5 m) high and weigh up to 120 pounds (55 kg). The grayish brown emu's small wings contain ony six or seven feathers. They are hidden by the long, hairlike rump plumage.
Big hairy rump.
There is a certain obliviousness here.
@tchrist I like how every title of theirs ends with an "oh really".
"Perl/Tk! ORLY?"
Speaking of which, what's the question here:
1
Q: Rejoinder: Capitalization and Punctuation

SusanIn an exchange where there are incomplete sentences in rejoinders, is the following punctuation correct? --Now are you? --Fine. --Do you want coffee? --Sure. How often do you use email? --Once a week. --Once a day. --Many times each day.

The third example is rather different from the first and the second.
> The animal featured on the cover of Perl Cookbook, Second Edition is a bighorn sheep. Mature males usually stay apart from the females and young. In these "bachelor flocks" the lower-ranking males often play the part of ewes and behave in a submissive manner toward the dominant males. The dominant male, in turn, behaves like a courting ram and mounts the lower-ranking male.
My co-author was NOT amused.
@RegDwightАΑA Let me look.
19:54
@Mitch now you've done it!
The third one is asking for bullits or radioboxen or what have you.
$ uninames quot dash
 ―  2015        HORIZONTAL BAR
        = quotation dash
        * long dash introducing quoted text
That’s what they must be thinking of.
Doesn’t happen much in English.
Does in other Western languages.
That's what I was thinking (happens all the time in Russian). But then along came the third example.
Which is lifted from some questionnaire or something.
Rather than dialogue.
Unlike things falsely compared.
@RegDwightАΑA now my empty cup tastes as sweet as the punch
20:02
Aiming for the non-sequitur of the day award?
@RegDwightАΑA 'then along came'
My brain finds songs in fewer matching words than that. :\
@cornbreadninja oh that. I don't know the lyrics, sorry. Also I was thinking Polly, not Mary.
@RegDwightАΑA never saw it.
It's okay. Doesn't hurt. I watched it for Philip Seymour Hoffman.
@RegDwightАΑA what about Happiness?
20:11
@cornbreadninja I think I saw like the second half on TV one day. Never came around to watch the entire thing. And don't remember anything. Which is a good thing when you still plan to watch the entire thing.
@RegDwightАΑA indeed.
20:25
hello @mootinator
@cornbreadninja Hi.
What brings you to chat today?
Aside from an internet connection.
@PopularDemand telling me I might enjoy a starred item.
more than one
20:26
Excellent.
@tchrist excellent
@tchrist I want to learn Perl almost exclusively so that I can ask you questions about it. The other reason being, of course, neu skillz.
@RegDwightАΑA More or less correct, and more more than less, save that ’twould be a scary world indeed wherein superuser omnipotence were required merely to grope a plain text file. For this the shell alone suffices, provided it be run in a terminal whose encoding is set to UTF-8.
Jez
Jez
@JasperLoy Huh? Which avatar? I haven't changed it
enjoys the casual, carefree approach to orthographic and syntactic rectitude enjoyed in chat vis-à-vis the main site
20:45
@tchrist +1 for the first subjunctive (unless you count save as a subjunctive?).
user19161
20:55
@Jez Are you trying to trick me?
Take the blue pill.
user19161
@mootinator You look a little like Jeff Atwood.
Jeff Atwood looks like the avatar he used from Code Complete?
user19161
@mootinator Well, I saw a real pic of him. But of course you are the younger, more handsome version.
Ah, thanks. ;) I think I also have less facial hair most of the time.
Jez
Jez
21:03
@JasperLoy I don't know what you're talking about. :-)
@Cerberus Yes, I was careful to use both subjunctives — meaning both be and were, and correctly. Save is here not a verb but (per the OED) a quasi-preposition and conjunction. Its first use in this sense dates from 1300 in Cursor Mundi, where it was still spelled sauf as though it were still French. Its tale is moderately interesting.
> Developed from safe a. 5, in imitation of the similar development in the use of the equivalent Fr. sauf. Already in OFr. the adj. sauf, fem. sauve, prefixed to a sb. in the absolute construction (= L. salvō, salvā: see safe a. 5) had often the sense ‘being excepted’, ...
> ... so that it became (like the analogous except ppl. adj. in Eng.) functionally equivalent to a prep., and was eventually treated as such, the masc. form sauf being used even before a fem. sb. Cf. Sp. salvo, Pr. sal.
> The β forms may partly represent the OFr. sauve in collocation with a fem. sb., and partly the ME. form of the plural adj. But the later exclusive use of the form save is probably due to the identification of the word with the imperative of the vb.: cf. except, which appears to have been similarly apprehended as an imperative.
> The use of a nominative after save (see 1 b) may perhaps be a trace of the originally adjectival character of the word; it is, however, to be noted that the same thing occurs with all the quasi-prepositional words of the same meaning, including even saving and excepting, which are in origin pr. pples. of transitive verbs.
@tchrist You mean save.
@Cerberus What, voicing in an end-of-word consonant is phonemic for you? Guess you aren’t German after all.
@tchrist Okay, so it is an abl. abs. I suppose the feminine French would explain the English v.
@tchrist Who are you, the Kaiser?
We do not take kindly to Großdeutschland here.
Gross notion, that.
21:10
@tchrist Only Dutchmen with a very bad accent will not pronounce those correctly in other languages.
@Cerberus On the internet, no one knows whether you’re a German Shepherd — or a Dutch one.
The same applies to your semi-aspirated onset voiceless occlusives.
Do we have shepherds?
Semi??
We haven’t yet discussed any languages with variable aspiration, such as those longer than occur in English.
Although those do of course exist.
There is h.
Hardly occlusive, now is it?
21:13
You just said "aspiration".
More stars.
Stars?
I was referring to the semi-ness of these so-called semi-aspirated onset voiceless occlusives, and questioned the same.
ad astra per aspera
Well, I mean to say that /h/ exhibits considerably stronger aspiration if my six ears are to be trusted.
Not the same thing.
21:16
Even though h does not aspire to such occlusivity as pʰ, kʰ, and tʰ possess.
{| cellpadding="1" align="right" style="border: 1px solid #88a; background-color: #f7f8ff; padding: 5px; font-size: 0.9em; margin: 0 0 15px 10px; " |- ! style="background-color: #ccf" | Voice onset time |- | style="border-bottom: 1px solid #ccf" | |- |+ Aspirated |- |0 Tenuis |- |− Voiced |} In phonetics, voice onset time, commonly abbreviated VOT, is a feature of the production of stop consonants. It is defined as the length of time that passes between the release of a stop consonant and the onset of voicing, the vibration of the vocal folds, or, according to other authors, periodicity. ...
Nor dʰ, bʰ, and gʰ.
Insofar as those may or may not exist. Read the article, pretty please.
moans
Do I have to?
I hate reading something without a purpose.
Without looking for something.
It is about the semi-ness of the aspiration of voiceless occlusive, and of voiceless ones, and how this differs significantly in different languages. It is very brief.
21:23
I read a few paragraphs.
What am I supposed to have learned that I didn't already know?
I wanted to know whether you were calling it semi-aspirated to distinguish it from Tlingit, Navajo, and Korean on one hand, and from Spanish and Japanese on the other.
Because everything I have ever read in English phonology apart from the referenced article always just says aspirated.
So that was the only touchstone I could find to connect to what you were saying about semi-ness of aspiration. English phonology just doesn’t talk about it that way.
I was trying to distinguish it from how I imagine Greek to have been aspirated.
And German, perhaps.
Kino definitely sounds more aspirated than keeping to me.
How do you perceive German to differ from English in its aspiration of consonants?
Oh.
Do you disagree?
No.
I don't have enough data.
21:33
English doesn't sound strongly aspirated to me.
It does to an Italian.
Just mildly. But it hard to liberate oneself of preconceptions.
@tchrist Dutch has much less aspiration there than English.
And yet English only sounds mildly aspirated to me.
Perhaps the VOT differs between English and German.
> For velar stops, tenuis [k] typically has a VOT of 20-30 ms, weakly aspirated [k] of some 50-60 ms, moderately aspirated [kʰ] averages 80–90 ms, and anything much over 100 ms would be considered strong aspiration.
Another thing: "aspirates" t in English sounds quite different from aspirated k. T almost sounds like ts. Isn't it even much like actual ts in some dialects?
> Because neither aspiration nor voicing is absolute, with intermediate degrees of both, the relative terms fortis and lenis are often used to describe a binary opposition between a series of consonants with higher (more positive) VOT, defined as fortis, and a second series with lower (more negative) VOT, defined as lenis. Of course, being relative, what fortis and lenis mean in one language will not in general correspond to what they mean in another.
21:36
Of course.
Nothing new there.
T like TS, eh?
Where?
Top?
It is not quite tsop.
What have I missed? oh.
But it's also less h-ish than cop.
I have never thought of it that way, and do not hear it.
21:37
Try saying csop and tsop.
Doesn't csop sound more absurd than tsop?
@cornbreadninja Hullo.
This.
I believe that what is going on is that the amount of aspiration with front-mouth stops is greater than that of back-mouth stops.
@Cerberus hell-o!
pop top vs cop
There's always room for hell-o
Oh hell yeah.
21:38
I “can’t” put an s after an onset stop.
I might manage the ts.
But ks would require an alien double articulation.
tse you later.
@tchrist I'm not sure. There is something velar about ordinary aspiration, isn't there? So it seems easier to do with the velar k. With t, something dental seems to creep into the aspiration for me.
I am imagining someone with a Manchester accent saying top.
There is no hissing whistle with top as there would be tsop.
21:41
And I might be hearing something even closer to ts in my mind's ear.
@tchrist I said it was not quite ts.
Actually, listen to Onslow.
Who sadly died a few days ago.
-1
Q: Meaning and usage of "she has her heart in the right place"

gpooI once read a phrase (or idiom) like He has his heart in the right place although the context seemed to be a bit harsh. My understanding is: in spite that he might have sound harsh, he mean well or he is doing the comment in good faith. Did I get it right? However, it seems to me the idi...

FFS
Listen to him saying two.
Wait.
When?
The time frame didn't make it.
Now it does.
user19161
@Cerberus That looks NSFW.
21:47
At what time point, precisely?
user19161
Well, just joking.
As soon as he speaks.
@JasperLoy It never is with Daisy and Onslow.
He says very nice when first he speaks at that clip point. He does not say two.
@tchrist You did click the second video link, didn't you?
Yes.
In mine, he says very nice at 1:26.
I need a time address.
21:50
Yes, he says nice first, then immediately continues to "not in two minutes..." or whatever he says.
He says no such thing.
It is at 1.40.
He says nothing further after very nice.
He exits.
You do know who Onslow is, don't you?
He is not that gentleman in black.
I had to include the full scene, so I didn't link to the exact moment where Onslow begins to speak.
At 1:43ish he says: oh nice, known ’im two minutes and ’ee’s bitin yer ’and
Doesn’t sound even vaguely essish to me.
But he certainly has a distinctive accent, as I’ve tried to indicate with eye-dialect.
21:54
Eye-dialect?
@tchrist What if you compare Onslow's two with RP two?
This one, then?
0
Q: Key to vs Key for

utxeee Key to exercises. Today I saw the quoted sentence when looking at the keys to exercises, and afterwards that sentence got me thinking why the preposition to is used here instead of for. The way I see it is that the key purpose is to match our answer with the correct one; hence, for woul...

You guys aren't still talking about publishing, right?
It's to in English and zum in German. What is it in Dutch, @Cer?
Come to think of it, it's к in Russian, too.
@RegDwightАΑA Toe/tot/te.
So it's either old as hell going back to Proto-Germanic, or an (old as hell) calque.
21:58
It can be "key for" if you are talking about doors. "This is the key for that door, and that is the key for this one." But you could also use to in that context as well.
@RegDwightАΑA Actually, is this about that question?
@Robusto same for German and Russian.
We would use tot there.
@Cerberus yes, sloetel tot?
Ah yes.
But it sounds old-fashioned.
Sleutel tot.
21:59
In Japanese it would still be no (of).
Normally we would say simply van.

« first day (637 days earlier)      last day (4580 days later) »