> Sweden carried out a record number of new coronavirus tests last week with only 1.2% coming back positive, the health agency said on Tuesday, the lowest rate since the pandemic began at a time when countries across Europe are seeing surges in infections.
@Mitch Thank you. And I'm also reasonably sure that I didn't disappear from the Universe, and pop back in. Though these days, who can tell what's true.
Some days I feel like I'm living in Mark Twain's novel "The Mysterious Stranger".
@CowperKettle I've got pretty good evidence that our local municipality (the BMC), who are basically incompetent corrupt scum, are testing people, saying they are COVID-19 positive when they're not, and putting them in quarantine. Oh, and refusing to give people their test results.
I wrote to a few outlets about this, but was ignored.
I wonder who would win in a Russia vs India contest.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), also known as Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), (formerly the Bombay Municipal Corporation) is the governing civic body of Mumbai, the capital city of Maharashtra. It is India's richest municipal corporation.The MCGM's annual budget exceeds that of some of India's smaller states. It was established under the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888. MCGM is responsible for the civic infrastructure and administration of the city and some suburbs. In 2015, Trushna Vishwasrao became the first female corporator to serve as its leader.
=...
The Mumbai Metro is a rapid transit system serving the city of Mumbai, Maharashtra, and the wider metropolitan region. The system is designed to reduce traffic congestion in the city, and supplement the overcrowded Mumbai Suburban Railway (colloquially called local trains) network. It is being built in three phases over a 15-year period, with overall completion expected in 2025. When completed, the core system will comprise eight high-capacity metro railway lines, spanning a total of 235 kilometres (146 mi) (24% underground, the rest elevated, with a minuscule portion built at-grade), and serviced...
Backstory: the current fascist ruler of India is very close to the Gujarati billionaires, Ambani and Adani. And is apparently busy giving away India to them in bits and pieces.
The Reliance Group is now India's largest corporation by market capital. Its stock zoomed recently, in the middle of the pandemic. While half of India doesn't have enough to eat. This is called development.
@CowperKettle Interesting. In Russia's recent history?
@FaheemMitha The so-called shaman who was traveling on foot to Moscow in order to perform a magical ceremony to "expel" Putin was put under psychiatric care a couple of times.
Алекса́ндр Проко́пьевич Га́бышев (род. 22 ноября 1968, Якутская АССР, РСФСР, СССР) — российский общественный деятель, оппозиционер, называющий себя шаманом-воином. В 2019 году организовал публичную общественную акцию протеста в форме пешего марша по маршруту от Якутска до Москвы.
12 мая 2020 года принудительно госпитализирован в Якутский республиканский психоневрологический диспансер. 25 июня 2020 года международная правозащитная организация «Мемориал» объявила его политзаключённым.
== Биография ==
=== Происхождение ===
Александр Габышев родился 22 ноября 1968 года. Учился на историческ...
Alexander Gabyshev, a self-proclaimed "shaman"
He is not insane, it's just his political position.
The authorities got afraid because in each town he passed on his way, people were gathering in crowds to support him.
A couple of dozen people joined him.
And they were accosted by the police numerous times under different pretexts, in order to intimidate them and disperse them. Which made the shaman more popular.
@FaheemMitha My friend is a Moscow psychiatrist, and he think it was illegal. In Russia, one could be involuntarily hospitalized only if there is convincing proof of immediate danger to himself or to others.
He was clearly not in a state of psychosis, hence no danger to himself.
He was not presenting any immediate danger to other people.
The laws were quite creatively bent in order to get him hospitalized.
@FaheemMitha I wonder if the aliens' language would be so mature it'd have idioms for idioms, whether they wouldn't use meaningful sentences in speech at all, or the sentences would be too long and quickly uttered for humans to comprehend
I'm having a sore throat since morning, and I'm doing everything at a crawling pace. I'm basically trying to repeat the words in Anki, and it has taken me an hour and I'm still only 50% done.
While my region, Sverdlovsk Oblast, is known for being relatively liberal, Tatarstan is known as being blatantly corrupt and "owned" by a single family clan.
The election figures from Tatarstan are constantly denounced as blatanly fraudulent.
Word of the minute: whiffling (Sometimes to whiffle, a bird flies briefly with its body turned upside down but with its neck and head twisted 180 degrees around in a normal position.)
@Cerberus so just now for the first time in my life I realized I don't know the difference between hebt and heeft. Is it "hebt u een link naar het stuk" or is it "heeft u een link naar het stuk". I feel like it can be either, but then what the fuck is the difference.
@Cerberus I don't know if you are aware of the Prashant Bhushan contempt cases (maybe I mentioned it here), but if you didn't, it's quite something.
So this guy wrote a couple of tweets making critical remarks about the judicary. And a decade ago he wrote an article about how half the recent Chief Justices were corrupt (probably an underestimate, if anything).
So the Supreme Court (who apparently has nothing better to do, with enormous numbers of cases piling up), decided to prosecute him.
In many countries, this would simply be impossible, or at least wildly unconstitutional, because of separation of powers. But these idiots were using a British-era law.
The fact that it was a law passed by one of the largest and most brutal criminal organizations in history to help them keep a captive population subjugated wasn't enough of a clue that they might be doing something wrong.
Oops, sorry, meant to address that to @CowperKettle. @Cerberus please ignore.
The case that was just complated was about the tweets. They demanded an apology, but Mr. Bhushan declined to provide one. So they they fined him Rs. 1. Around USD 0.01, give or take.
I don't know what kind of international coverage this is getting, but it certainly deserves to get it.
Now they're about to have another case about what he said in 2009.
@FaheemMitha There's too much loaded with 'aliens'. Most likely any animal that has the intelligence to plan a hunt together by communicating will also have semantic shifting of symbols, which is the source of literal vs figurative meanings.
Packs of wolves, -at this moment- are having prayer meetings before they go off to kill a moose. And the one dog at the back of the pack who is not really into the whole disembowelling thing feels a little low because he thinks the other dogs don't think he's cool.
Interesting that I remember almost everything about the original Blade Runner and virtually nothing from the sequel. Part of that may be age, but not the major part.
Same. I think that's just basic cognitive psych.1) we've had many more years of thinking and repeating things from the 1st, and 2) assuming they are of same quality and ... cogency? the first one is literally more primal (and the subject of the 2nd is just extra details.
a comparable but different example would be Star Wars/Empire Strikes Back. ESB is (arguably) the esthetically better movie, but as to plot to 1st one is more... outstanding just because it came first and ... well that's pretty tautological.
I'm trying to make my point by repeating my words more distinctly in my own head.
The first Star Wars was just more fun. As soon as it became a hit, George Lucas began padding the script with self-satisfied "Star Wars Universe" hagiography. I liked it better when the whole franchise was an underdog.
And while it was tolerable with ESB and RotJ, once it got to Phantom Menace the whole thing was simply unwatchable for me.
I was sitting in the theater saying the next lines to my wife before they happened.
And oh yeah, that's really not the princess.
And oh yeah, who the fuck decided that it would be fun to watch a bunch of elected officials arguing?
And oh yeah, who decided Jar Jar Binks was going to add just the right touch of seasoning to that ugly stew?
It's like the Pythagorean theorem is so obvious, but if you want a proof, I can give it to you, but it turns out I'm jus saying the theorem over again.
@Robusto It's really hard to tell what's fiction and what's not.
I think we probably have a harder time remembering movies these days simply because there are so fucking many of them now. I saw Blade Runner in a theater, but I haven't seen anything in a theater since I have had a huge flat-screen TV and my choice of Netflix, HBO, Amazon Prime and whatever the hell else.
I used to go to the movies at most once a week, but now it's hard not to see something every day.
There didn't used to be such a thing as binge-watching.
Movie theaters were ---dying---slowly losing customers long before 2020. But some movies are still being made where the big screen really makes it great.
LIke Dunkirk (or 1917) or ... well... I'm sure some other non killing movie.
@Mitch I think it's a big leap to assume that animals have a language. I don't know what the current status of that is, but the last I heard the jury was still out. And surely you need some sort of stable natural language to have idiomatic usage, because it's the froth on the top.
I was just speculating that human style idiomatic usage isn't an inevitable byproduct of sapience.
Or, more precisely, the natural languages employed by a sapient being for communication.
@FaheemMitha Oh the jury is in and the great majority of animals, even mammals, have nothing anywhere close to humans.
But some animals can communicate with what could be called single sign gestures.
And words are not thoughts.
and the gestures, like words, are somewhat arbitrary.
and so that arbitrariness can slip.
@FaheemMitha And I'm just disagreeing. That how language is created in animals is a very slow non-logical process. It's not some error-correcting Hamming Code, designed mathematically.
@Mitch I wasn't aware that had been definitively determined.
The sort of idiomatic usage I'm thinking of does involve the precision of a precisely defined language, relatively speaking. As in, a written one. With dictionaries, and rules of grammar and the suchlike.
I wasn't talking about slippage per se. That would be more akin to the state of the English language before Johnson's dictionary sort-of stabilized the language, or so I've heard.
So variant spellings and even variant word usage were legion.
Animals don't have a written language, or an alphabet, and can't encode their communications in a series of 0s and 1s if they so desire.
@Mitch That sounds like something out of SF. I've heard animals don't intentionally practice cruelty, but I don't know if that is delusion, wishful thinking, or something else.
@RegDwigнt Exactly: normally, one would expect the third person verb with U, like ga je weg? / gaat hij weg? → gaat U weg? (there is no doubt it must be heeft). However, with the verb zijn, U bent is strongly preferred by almost everyone: U is sounds provincial or possibly archaic. So it would be logical to use is, but alas. With hebt/heeft, the form heeft is possible, so let's choose the most logical form.
@FaheemMitha Exactly.
When you see a cat play with its prey, it looks cruel enough.
@FaheemMitha There has been years of research in animal cognition and communication. only a handful of gorillas and chimpanzees, after many years of training, have been able to learn a large handful of sign language, which for these animals is mostly nouns (which means it is difficult for nonhuman animals to figure out how to do what humans do. But that doesn't mean that animals don't have their own way.
But similarly many years of research have gone into understand native animal communication, and similarly nothing anywhere near the complexity of human language has been found. But -that-'s not to say that we might miss a lot (maybe all those weird clicks dolphins are doing are recitations of the dolphin versions of Homer's Odyssey). So pretty conclusively animals can't do language (except maybe at the fringes).
There seems to be some evidence that dolphins do communicate. But the specifics are murky. Though it would need a specialist to say where the matter stands.
@FaheemMitha THat's a fine sentiment but 'lots and lots of research' and coming up with very little is considered a good way to show that something probably doesn't exist.
@Mitch I don't know how much research has been done, or what kind of research it was. And they may be looking for something different than the reality.
Perhaps they communicate in ways that are hard for humans to recognize.
@FaheemMitha What does 'pin it down' mean? If it means to talk -about- language, sure, consistent spelling helps with communicating by reading. But something magical didn't happen to the English language the day the Johnson's book was published. Do you think Sanskrit popped into existence out of the chaotic void when Panini wrote his grammar?
@FaheemMitha That's what communication is for, so that someone else can figure out things and then tell you, rather than having to do all the work yourself.
For example, Austen's novels were published around 200 years ago. But it's striking how close they are to Modern English. Go back 200 years further, and the language is definitely different. 200 years earlier, and it's almost incomprehensible.
@FaheemMitha OK. But that just goes right back to spelling. Only spelling was made a bit more consistent by one particularly well publicized dictionary plus a lot of public school teaching. But again, spelling is not language.
@FaheemMitha I wouldn't expect it to be a high priority for you. That's why to get any info on a subject without having to do all that extra work, you'd have to trust what others say about it.
I was just trying to make a point about how humans use language. I use a lot of idioms myself, but I guess it's always struck me as a bit odd that humans do. Just... idiosyncratic. Also, unnecessary.
One can imagine a world where people don't.
@Mitch People really don't know that much about animals either.
Probably Jane Goodall knows something about primates, but she's probably also the exception.
@Mitch It's not that I don't trust what you said. But it's hard to prove a negative.
And really science doesn't know much about anything, especially complicated things like animals. It mostly just tells us about our limitations.
It does fairly well with elementary particles and suchlike, though.
And the elements that they make up.
Beyond that it's increasingly iffy.
I should point out that 20 years of a math background (or whatever it was), it calculated to make one a sceptic, leaving natural leanings out of the equation.
Math is full of things that look like they should be true, but aren't. And that's within the confines of an axiomatic system.
For a long time people thought series that were divergent were actually convergent. For example.
Synecdoche has always struck me as a bit curious, personally. I feel no personal inclination to refer to things in this manner, but apparently many do.
@Mitch I do know what high probability means. That doesn't actually prove anything. It's just a statistical statement. Note that probability zero events can still happen.
Moscow Mayor Sergey Sobyanin, 30 July: "We expect the figures to stay in a corridor of 650 to 700 new cases per day" Novaya Gazeta (a major newspaper that is not under Putin's censorship), 22 August: "Were the corona figures forged?"
This high-profile publication shook the authorities into producing a more realistic curve.
That Romanization is odd. Hamd is a single word meaning praise. Allah is the Islamic God. Li is a sort of preposition meaning "for". Alhamdu-lillah, praise be Allah. "Al" is a definite article or particle or something. But it works like "the".
At precisely the same instant, the first two of these are in Mountain Time and the third is in Pacific Time: #1: In Denver, it is now 2020-09-10 16:24:09 -0600 (MDT). #2: In Phoenix, it is now 2020-09-10 15:24:09 -0700 (MST). #3: In Los Angeles, it is now 2020-09-10 15:24:09 -0700 (PDT). Which of those three are the ‘same time’ as each other? The two in Mountain Time, even though one has 16:24:09 and the other has 15:24:09? The two that think it’s 15:24:09 even though one is in MST and the other in PDT? All three of them? None of them? Still think ‘Standard’ is dispensable⁈ 😈 — tchrist ♦13 mins ago