I.e. you say "so and so is right-wing", as opposed to "so and so is nuts".
And "left" is so vague that one can use it for a uselessly broad array of things.
Eric Blair had a lot of good things to say about the abuse of language for political ends, but he used "left" and "right" too. That was as early as the 1930s.
> Socialism is a political, social and economic philosophy encompassing a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership[1][2][3] of the means of production[4][5][6][7] and workers' self-management of enterprises.
For once, they seem to have got something approximately right.
The current extant version as mostly Syndicalism, I think.
@FaheemMitha Sure...I'm just telling you how people use it. Socialism is often considered a synonym of communism. But also socialism is also used simply as a scary word to conservatives for higher taxes for non-military purposes. It's just how lots of people use the term whether they are following bookish definitions or not.
@FaheemMitha The free-market treatment of health care finance in the US has unfortunately led to uncontrollable rent seeking by intermediaries like health insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies.
IN the sense that, if I were black (or rather, specifically, African-American) I wouldn't want to emigrate to Russia or China. It might be slightly better in UK/France/Germany but for each different reasons, but that slight difference might not be worth the move.
@FaheemMitha Iceland. People always think that Iceland is so great.
> Youth drinking is nowadays least prevalent in Iceland and Norway, followed by Sweden and Finland. Denmark serves as the ‘Nordic exception’. It is the only Nordic country where adolescent drinking is above the European average. Still, adolescent drinking has also declined in Denmark, although less than in other Nordic countries.
> The share of adolescents [in 2015] who had been intoxicated during the last 30 days was 32% in Denmark, 13% in Finland, 10% in the Faroe Islands, 9% in Sweden, 8% in Norway, and 3% in Iceland.
he wins, people follow rules, he continues for 4 more years and continues the ruining of US govt. He loses, he throws a stink (or worse calls for all those far-right people to take up arms).
@tchrist last 30 days? oh 2015. But still. I've heard that drinking problems have gone up considerably in the past 6 months
Even without the reins of power fully vested in the Tyrant Prince of Orange, everything that gave birth to him will remain, a festering cancer upon the nation.
@FaheemMitha The right-leaning judges will do conservative style things like turn back abortion or give more rights to unimprisonable corporations. But they won't start a civil war.
> Since the onset of COVID-19, there has been a surfeit of commentary arguing that 2020 will have transformative effects on world politics....A review of how the novel coronavirus has affected the distribution of power and interest in its first six months suggests that COVID-19 will not have transformative effects on world politics. Absent a profound ex post shift in hegemonic ideas, 2020 is unlikely to be an inflection point.
Assertions (available for both enhanced basic and enhanced extended REs)
In addition to `^' and `$' (the assertions that match the null string at the
beginning and end of line, respectively), the following assertions become
available:
\< Matches the null string at the beginning of a word. This is equiv-
alent to `[[:<:]]'.
\> Matches the null string at the end of a word. This is equivalent
to `[[:>:]]'.
\b Matches the null string at a word boundary (either the beginning or
There are two special cases= of bracket expressions: the bracket expressions
`[[:<:]]' and `[[:>:]]' match the null string at the beginning and end of a
word respectively. A word is defined as a sequence of word characters which
is neither preceded nor followed by word characters. A word character is an
alnum character (as defined by ctype(3)) or an underscore. This is an exten-
sion, compatible with but not specified by IEEE Std 1003.2 (``POSIX.2''), and
should be used with caution in software intended to be portable to other sys-
1 (?: # EITHER THIS PAIR IS TRUE:
2 (?<= \w ) # yes word-char right before this
3 # and also
4 (?! \w ) # no word-char right after this
5 | # OR ELSE THIS PAIR IS TRUE:
6 (?<! \w ) # no word-char right before this
7 # and also
8 (?= \w ) # yes word-char right after this
9 )
There, that's what \b means.
It's always a combination of a lookbehind assertion and a lookahead assertion, where the first case is a positive lookbehind and a negative lookahead, and in the second case it's a negative lookbehind and a positive lookahead.
So a\b matches when the letter a is NOT followed by another word character.
But =\b matches when the = IS INDEED followed by a word character.
Because a is a word character so a right boundary after it says there must not be another word char immediately to its right.
But = is NOT a word-char, so a right boundary after it says there MUST be a word char immediately to its right.
People become infinitely confused about these zero-width assertions involving boundaries and nonboundaries, because their behavior is not uniform. They depend on the type a character -- either word or nonword -- they're right next to.
@FaheemMitha Trees falling in the school for the deaf's forest.
Feel free. Let me know how that works out for you.
A regex is a linear sequence of rules that are evaluated left to right in a string that is also handled left to right. Most rules consume at least one character from the input, but zero-width assertions consume zero characters.
So as a rule, a matches one character just as a+ matches one or more repetitions of a single character and thus is one or more characters in length.
The lookarounds never consume anything in the string. They are always zero width by definition.
Just like ^ is a zero-width assertion that is true only when there are no characters to its left in the string. Hence, at the beginning.
Most of these fancy lookaround assertions make it impossible to solve in exponential time.
Which is already quite bad enough, thank you very much.
That means you can't use a deterministic finite automaton to solve them, nor a nondeterministic one either.
Prince of Orange (or Princess of Orange if the holder is female) is a title originally associated with the sovereign Principality of Orange, in what is now southern France.
The title "Prince of Orange" was created in 1163 by the Emperor Frederick Barbarossa, by elevating the county of Orange to a principality, in order to bolster his support in that area in his conflict with the Papacy. The title and land passed to the French noble houses of Baux, in 1173, and of Chalons, in 1393, before arriving with Rene of Nassau in 1530. The principality then passed to a Dutch nobleman, Rene’s cousin William...
> The current users of the title are Princess Catharina-Amalia of the Netherlands (Orange-Nassau), ...
@FaheemMitha it's relatively consistently used by economists and people who know what they're talking about. It's very inconsistently used by millions of people that far outnumber the economists as either "Eeeeevil Russia" or "I'm not a socialist!"