« first day (603 days earlier)      last day (4614 days later) » 

00:19
1
Q: Exists there a language in which the patient of transitive verbs and the single argument of intransitive verbs are treated alike?

JarrodI am somewhat familiar with (not at all learned of)the morphosyntactic criteria by which many languages are classified--such as the system by which the grammatical abstractions of agent, argument, and patient are treated-- and descried of the criteria potency unto a numerosity of classes yborn o...

> yborn
@Robusto ^ What is that?
Not yborn, the whole question.
Sounds like pseudo-intellectual gibberish to me. He may have a question in there, but he's going out of his way to spout what he imagines is erudition, and failing at it badly.
He's a pretentious pineapple.
user19161
@Vitaly Oh, so hard to read.
user19161
@Robusto That double V actually looks like a fat W.
user19161
00:37
@Robusto The repeated use of pineapple in this room has led me to wonder, what fruit represents a non-pineapple?
@JasperLoy Richard Simmons?
I have coined a word today. My work here is done.
user19161
@KitFox This is deep. I need to think about what you mean.
user19161
@MetaEd What word?
Gynandrophobe.
00:48
@Vitaly It seems that the question be a joke.
@Vitaly Holy crap.
@JasperLoy pomegranate?
What kind of wine goes with ginger?
Probably a sweet white?
@Vitaly Actually, I recognise this style.
It was from this guy at English-test.net I think.
@Robusto He was Asian or something.
We tried to get him to use plain words, but we failed.
It could be someone else, but it looks very familiar.
He's used some very sophisticated sentence structures, but doesn't seem to know that "exists there" is no way to begin a question. So I call April Fool!
00:55
@Cerberus Why on Earth would he use yborn?
Seems steampunkish to me.
Have thesaurus, will travel.
@Vitaly Probably found it in a dictionary somewhere.
He used to do that.
Let me see if I can find an old question of his, but I think he was banned there.
He also uses absquatulation. He's reading his dictionary from both ends.
Exactly.
00:58
@HaveFunSlower Was.
A quick Google Books search returns this from 1846.
Pfft! I said "is no way", not "was never a way".
The patient of our ridicule may have done the same search.
I'm not supposed to quote from private conversations.
@Vitaly But look at this.
Different sentence structure. Not the same guy.
This was three years ago.
OK, might be the same guy.
Exists there a way to know for sure?
01:03
Not the same guy.
This was a reply to my request that he use simpler language because I couldn't understand a word of what he was saying.
@HaveFunSlower Exists there no way.
Methinks thou makest no error.
Whyever not?
@KitFox Why not?
I agree with Kit.
Thanks @J. M.!
01:07
@Cerberus The voices are distinct.
Let me post another answer of his, which was completely off topic, and it is very disturbing. Not that I care, but see:
@Vitaly It's an archaic construction, c. mid-1800s. Cf. Walter Scott: "Breathes there a man with soul so dead, who never to himself hath said, 'This is my own, my native land.'"
Hence my feeling that the OP is a steampunk fanboy.
@Robusto My point exactly.
Whenever folks want to get all pretentious on your ass, they break out the Wardour Street English.
01:09
This came totally out of the blue.
Cerberus, I believe the two passages that you quoted have the same author; but that this isn't the same as the author of the post with "exists there".
Hey, how do you remove stuff like that?
You have two minutes in which to click on the left arrow and select delete.
Else flag for moderator, but that's sure to bring unwanted attention.
Right click? How?
@HaveFunSlower Perhaps not.
Hover over the message. An arrow appears on the left.
01:12
Oh,I see. Cool.
And if you press the up key while your text box is empty, you can edit your lines.
How would you describe how a nice red wine clings to the glass?
For two minutes.
Describe it? Is that for your story?
viscosity?
@Cerberus Yes. Maybe I am spending too much time on this detail.
01:14
@Robusto Would you be able to tell apart Wardour-Street English and something written by a modern historian of English that used authentic eModE syntactic structures and vocabulary?
"Cling to the glass" sounds good to me.
A nice little metaphor.
@Vitaly It isn't a well-defined concept: it just means tacky.
That's why it was named after the street.
@Vitaly I wish I were that cool.
The problem with that guy is just that his syntax is broken.
It isn't older English, although he uses a few archaic phrases.
His syntax is broken?
Yes.
01:17
Maybe I should read it again.
Let me quote a sentence for you.
Perhaps you can parse it.
I can read it. The syntax seems fine to me.
> Namely I query pose as to the existence of a language per which the patient of transitive verbs is treated as is the agent of transitive verbs.
"I query pose"?
I agree with KitFox, apart from the "exists there". It's his vocab that's screwey.
What is that supposed to be?
01:19
His vocab isn't screwy either.
It's just antique.
"I query and pose", or "I pose a query"?
Namely, I pose a query.
By screwy I meant inappropriate.
It's not inappropriate. What's inappropriate about it?
How come some of the people here have faded looking symbols over on the right?
01:20
They aren't talking.
@KitFox "I query pose" sounds like proper syntax to you?
Can you analyse it, then?
@Cerberus It's antique.
But understandable.
Oh, so how long do I have to be quiet for my flower to fade and die?
Hence my assertion that the OP is a steampunk enthusiast.
@HaveFunSlower Dunno.
@KitFox Can you find any example anywhere?
Google? Ngrams?
And how would you analyse it?
01:22
I don't know. Probably, if I felt like looking for it.
Is "query" a verb, a noun?
A noun.
Before the verb, and without an article?
Yes.
sceptical look
01:23
How is "I query pose" different from "my heart with pleasure fills"?
"I a query pose", that would make sense.
steampunk steampunk steampunk read some Victorian novels.
But not "I query pose".
!!!
How do you do italics and bold?
01:24
If you ever find an example, I will be interested to see it.
**bold`**` *italics`*`
Do I look like some sort of expert? I'm a little fox for the love of Pete!
I can read it and understand it.
bold italics three *four* **five**
I don't know, you seemed positive.
It sounds old-fashioned, but not wrong.
Ah, cool! Again!
01:25
All right.
It sounds like someone who is trying to sound learned and old.
It sounds to me like someone who wants to sound formal but doesn't have a feel for the different shades of formality.
I'm trying to work out whether he called Mark Beadles inane in one of the comments.
Haha.
No, his syntax is definitely broken.
user19161
Maybe that's just his natural style? Only the person himself knows if he is being pretentious.
01:29
He seems to be using some kind of translation software where you can choose to replace a word with a synonym—except of course that many "synonyms" don't work in a different context.
Ooh, possibly. But that wouldn't explain "I'd fain betake myself" would it?
> I am somewhat familiar with (not at all learned of)the morphosyntactic criteria by which many languages are classified--such as the system by which the grammatical abstractions of agent, argument, and patient are treated-- and descried of the criteria potency unto a numerosity of classes yborn of this method of linguistic taxonomy.
I'm positive that he has written all that on his own.
I solemnly recognize this humble allowance of palaver
@HaveFunSlower That may be a fixed phrase in his software?
01:31
Then he needs a new programmer.
@Cerberus They had software in the 1700s?
@Vitaly Written, in a way, but with heavy help of some kind of software, or the wrong kind of thesaurus.
I thought he maybe meant "feign" till I looked it up.
@simchona No, but software has phrases from the 1700s.
Is that like the wrong sort of swallow?
01:33
First, he seems to use "descried of" as "familiar with" in this sentence (I can understand almost his entire sentence; it is fairly clear what he means). Which I think is impossible.
@HaveFunSlower Quoi?
And all the good things which an animal likes. Have the wrong sort of swallow or too many spikes. - winne the pooh
Secondly, he seems to have replaced valency with potency, which is incorrect; and the syntactic connection between criteria and potency is unclear. Is it meant to be a noun adjective? That is also impossible.
Is the wrong sort of thesaurus similar?
@Vitaly I agree.
And I was writing that when my chat blew up.
@Vitaly Yes, of course. The modern historian wouldn't use an archaic style except in the appropriate context.
01:35
KitFox - I hope you're not speaking French.
@Robusto I think Vitaly means an historical linguist who is trying to write in Early-Modern English.
I think there's meant to be a comma between criteria and potency.
Then how would you parse it? I don't see it.
@Cerberus Assuming it was a competent forgery, it should be indistinguishable from Early Modern English. It would not be hard to see a difference between that and the spoutings of a pretentious windbag.
I think what he means is "the criteria of valency" or something.
@Robusto Agreed.
All the more so since "Wardour-Street English" isn't a specific system of grammar.
01:39
You people are thrashing about over a word salad. There is no meaning to be found in that question.
It's just modern English with some tacky words and phrases.
@Robusto I actually understand it, mostly.
It is about linguistics.
He means he saw potency in the morphosyntactic criteria.
Haha.
I really think he means valency.
In his native language, the word may be something like potency.
The question must mean something, as Mark Beadles appears to have answered it satisfactorily.
Yes, Mark interpreted it as I would, except that he understood some things that I didn't.
01:40
Although the fact that he posted a comment, not an answer, may mean that he didn't think he answered it well enough.
@Cerberus Well, to each his own. I don't think it worth the effort to parse. If I'm going to spend time on something so occulted and arcane there had better be a reward at the end of it.
We should compose an answer, written in the same style as the question, and post it.
Hahahha.
Yes!
@Robusto I agree. Although the question is I believe fairly simple if you write it down in plain, correct English.
@HaveFunSlower Which calls to mind one of Dr. Johnson's musings: "No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money."
@Cerberus Then let it be so written.
Are you offering to pay me?
01:43
No. I'm saying I won't work for no pay.
Oh, that's not the same thing at all.
Or let it be as it is, to give us something to mock.
We have plenty to mock. We are rich beyond imagining in mockable things.
I suppose we do.
Anyway, me tired. Me go to bed. You all do what you wanna.
01:45
Permittance render I thee will unto thy bedde for to go.
@Robusto Good night, dreamy dream.
I didn't know you thought of Robusto that way.
Well, now you do.
Night.
I suppose he should have seen it coming.
in GIS, 4 hours ago, by Stephen Lead
user image
Maps are so nice.
The best thing since the absolute construction.
Or perhaps it was the other way around.
> I am against regulating net neutrality -- because it's obvious that the telcos will control that process and the regulations will favor them against the public -- but pretending that broadband infrastructure is really "privately owned" when so much of it involved tax-payer-funded subsidies and rights of way is being in denial. — techdirt.com/articles/20120705/10581919594/…
This is a bit odd.
How would telecos control net neutrality if a government enforces it?
01:59
The government will legislate that the telcos must control net neutrality. Nobody will enforce it until an issue arises, then much finger-pointing will ensue.
Why would the government not enforce it?
If only after complaints.
That should work fairly well.
Because they don't understand it.
Well, it would have to be some body of government that does understand it.
The EC, for example, recently presented a report on net neutrality in the EU.
Why would the government create such a body, when they can simply delegate all to the telcos?
Precisely for the reason you mention: because otherwise it would not be enforced?
02:03
Weird. When KitFox's icon and Simchona's icon are side by side like that, the leg-quarter of a cooked chicken appears in the middle.
Hmm.
Oww too late.
Do you think Simchona did that on purpose?
You know what she's like.
No, I have no idea what she's like. How would I know what she's like?
Eh I was joking.
02:05
and I'm taking your word for it that she's a she.
She is.
Pretty girl.
Oops there she is again.
@Cerberus I came back at the right time.
Kis pretty too btw.
@simchona You weren't supposed to see that!
She kiss pretty? What does that mean?
@Cerberus : you're cute too. Now what.
02:06
Now I shall have to make some discriminatory remark on women.
@HaveFunSlower What?
Your remark two lines above my last one ...
@simchona By the way, did you see that that Ukrainian guy was back? He was here a week ago or so.
@HaveFunSlower I am lost. I see no "kiss".
@Cerberus I didn't see him in chat, but I noticed he asked something
@simchona Ah OK.
How else should I parse that remark then?
02:08
@Cerberus this one
By the way, live dialogue from under my window: "Are you from Scotland?" — "No, I am from Canada."
and hello
@cornbreadninja Hello
@cornbreadninja Ohhh wait, that one.
Do we have an even guy/girl ratio for once?
02:09
Haha.
hello @simchona!
That was a typo.
So someone else is pretty?
@HaveFunSlower Kit is
Oh, did he mean KitFox?
02:10
Mhm.
She changes her name quite a bit, so I usually address her just as Kit
All is clear. Sorry. But "kiss pretty too" is more interesting.
Me talk pretty one day
Ohh yes I meant Kit. Jesus. I couldn't even read my own line.
me talk pretty
WHOA
@cornbreadninja Jinx.
02:11
I owe you the beverage of your choice, @simchona
@HaveFunSlower No, I'm just crazy.
brb, must put clay Clarendon lowercase 'a' in the oven
I pretty flower.
@HaveFunSlower Where are you located? (Too lazy to check profiles)
@HaveFunSlower You pretty slower.
02:14
@MattЭллен I stuck it to England best I could.
@cornbreadninja I stayed inside because of the heatwave.
I was celebratory in spirit.
@simchona gah; we should have. It's been 100+ every day for about 10.
didn't start shooting until about 9, and it was still above 90.
Sounds like Arizona. We're supposed to get that soon.
This week's forecast is basically "meltingly hot"
May your humidity stay low.
There would be a lot of dead where-I-live-ians if the humidity were much higher.
consarnit, I broke my 'g'. oh well, it missed the mark anyway.
You can swear just fine without it
02:18
lol
frets about suggestion regarding suspension-circumventer
@cornbreadninja Where?
1
A: What should we do about users circumventing suspensions?

cornbread ninjaCould the user be hellbanned, slowbanned, or errorbanned, or did these never come to be? The distinctions come about halfway down the page.

oh hooray; it received an upvote
@cornbreadninja Have another.
Either way, I'm 99% sure he was back today
02:22
I am humbled.
and because he didn't ask a duplicate question, the account is still there
@simchona oingo? no, that was yesterday
oingo boingo
Can't find that one now. Identicon is navy.
 
2 hours later…
04:35
@KitFox Legs.
 
3 hours later…
07:25
@MetaEd damnit I logged in just to say that!
@cornbreadninja jolly good sport, wot
Hi!
hi @Mahnax
I just used the "highlights" button. I don't think I will again
@MattЭллен What button?
the one on the right
Oh.
I never noticed it!
07:36
Indeed
I think it's new today
What does it do?
I see a few squiggles here and there.
cuts out chunks of the transcript
Oh, that it does.
it could be tailored to each person
Maybe. At any rate, I don't like it.
07:42
I guess maybe they've researched some sort of something. Or it's just an idea someone had time to implement. Who knows.
Yeah. I don't know, it seems silly.

« first day (603 days earlier)      last day (4614 days later) »