« first day (578 days earlier)      last day (4640 days later) » 

14:00
Hi!
Is "cube" a euphemism for something?
@MattЭллен Are you saying you like fat chicks?
@KitFox I don't think so. Strong but slim
Mmm.
14:00
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Oh. Bummer.
@KitFox I'm not saying that. :D
Catlike features? Or round and more doggy?
Or birdlike? Oh, I like me some birdlike...
Haha.
@KitFox yeah, she might be a bit bird like. Or maybe squirrel like
hehehe, I don't think she'd like me describing her as a squirrel
Oh. Well, that's a bit different.
14:02
Yeah that doesn't sound very nice!
Reminds me of a Martha I used to know.
squirrels are cute!
How about antelope?
I like squirrels! they're adorable
@Cerberus yeah, springbok is appropriate
Springbok?? Is that even an English word? It certainly doesn't sound very elegant in Dutch. A goat.
14:03
@KitFox but some larger ladies do have an appeal
@Cerberus It's the South African national animal. It's a type of antelope
Well, to each his own I suppose.
:P
hey, I'm not fat :D
Yesterday a friend theorized that fashion designers want anorexic models because they view them as no more than coat hangers, not because they're pretty.
Aside from his coloring, my husband is very different from my usual type.
14:05
That's funny.
oh, but that's a male
We only use the word metaphorically I think.
It is a Dutch word.
@KitFox My mother says that about my father too.
@Cerberus What, male?
@Cerberus And also Afrikaans
@KitFox Springbok.
@MattЭллен Sure, but that is a kind of Dutch.
14:06
@Cerberus I know :D that's why I mentioned it. Also
3 mins ago, by Matt Эллен
@Cerberus It's the South African national animal. It's a type of antelope
wants to have sexual relations with women resembling gazelle
where Afrikaans is one of the native languages
Yeah it's nice.
@KitFox then you would like my friend. I'm not sure she'd be down with it, though.
You could each try her.
14:08
devout muslim
26 mins ago, by KitFox
My husband says I flirt like a frat boy.
Eh haha.
Devout muslim + female frat boy...hmmm.
That would be a new subgenre.
Not new.
I mean, sure it would!
I read a muslim woman's fortune once in college.
Boy, I had no idea what a big deal that was.
@KitFox did it end in an interesting factoid?
thinks for a minute
Not like that, no.
So, a big deal?
Hm, devout muslim, eh? It's a "go to hell" kind of sin in Islam for a muslim woman to marry a non-muslim. (and naturally it's a serious sin to have sex before marriage too)
14:11
@MrShinyandNew安宇 well, not that devout, given her dating history.
She had a male muslim friend accompany her, swore us both to secrecy on pain of death, and snuck us into her room and locked the door and made us whisper.
unless those guys were secret muslims
This has led to the interesting situation of a relatively large number of men simply declaring "I am muslim", since that is basically all it takes to be counted as a muslim. (Muslims are not really permitted to question another's true muslimishness). These are called "Cupid's muslims".
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Not for all people who call themselves muslims.
14:14
@KitFox are you still sworn to secrecy? Can you tell us the future you saw for her?
There are probably millions of people seeing themselves as muslims who would marry a non-muslim.
I would marry a non-muslim! Oh wait.
You're so liberal.
@MattЭллен I can tell you that the devil did not get her, which she was afraid of to the point where I insisted that the whole thing was made up.
@Cerberus Um, it's clearly spelled out in the Koran.
14:16
At least, he didn't get her then.
@KitFox eeep!
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Did you make that up?
@MattЭллен I mean, she thought the devil would get her for having her fortune read. She wanted to know whether some boy liked her or something.
@Cerberus First: it's not a sin for male muslims to marry non-muslims.
@KitFox that's what I thought :) Oh, boys! tch. such bother.
14:17
Second: For any female muslims who don't believe in their own religion strongly enough that they care about that prohibition, fine: that doesn't change the fact that the Koran clearly says their doom is "the Fire"
@Gigili no, I can give you a reference if you want
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Haven't we had this discussion before? The large, very large majority of people who see themselves as Christians, Muslims, and Jews choose to disregard the literal interpretation of certain passages in their holy books, if only because there are always contradictions within each book. But also for many other reasons, or for no reason at all. I believe Vitaly insisted on not calling such people "Muslims" etc., or was that you?
@MrShinyandNew安宇 I know enough about my own religion, thanks.
gasps
...want your fortune read?
I don't care what stupid people think about it.
Hello!
14:18
@KitFox who me?
@Gigili No, I mean about the cupid's muslims part. see here: skepchick.org/2012/03/islam-101-the-very-basics
Um. brb
@Cerberus I would call those people "cafeteria religion-name-here", i.e. "cafeteria muslims"
They just pick and choose the parts they like.
@Cerberus Wasn't me.
@Cerberus and I dispute your assertion that the vast majority of muslims don't take seriously the prohibition of marriage to non-muslims.
14:20
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Then I think there would exist no true Christians, Jews, or Muslims according to your rather ahistorical definition.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 I did not say that.
@Vitaly Oh OK.
7 mins ago, by Cerberus
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Not for all people who call themselves muslims.
A religion is normally not considered to be equivalent to the most literal interpretation of a certain version of its holy book by historians.
If I marry a non-atheist, does that make me not a true atheist?
@MrShinyandNew安宇 That is not the same.
I said "not all".
I don't know about the numbers, but I expect a sizable minority.
@MattЭллен It means that you will have to go on a pilgrimage to the Temple of Atheism in St. Petersburg.
And go through a rather painful catharsis.
I'm not going to get into this discussion today. I am pretty sure that the majority of adherents to a religion at least take seriously the mortal sins of that religion.
14:24
@MattЭллен Involving your experience of situations where God will not come to your rescue, in order to quench your hope and faith.
@Cerberus will I be cleansed of religion? how will that leave me feeling about my theoretical beloved?
@MrShinyandNew安宇 This does not contradict what I said.
@Cerberus I'm not going to argue this any further with you.
And I think your definition/view of religion is rather different from that of historians.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 OK.
@MattЭллен Well...I think it's OK as long as you have followed the atheist rituals?
@Cerberus I'm not going to argue with your imagined view of my definition of religion.
14:26
Good.
I just couldn't let your statement unchallenged, because I disagree; but I am not really in the mood for a discussion about this either.
@Cerberus oh dear. I've not been the atheist church... uh... ever
WTF is going on with my data?
Temple!
moans
It's not a church.
How dare you!
14:27
@KitFox is it replicating out of control?
Go wash your tongue with unholy water.
@Cerberus gosh! sorry.
I don't understand atheism.
Or maybe just plain tap water.
@KitFox Its mysteries are difficult to contemplate. You are not alone.
@MattЭллен Sort of. Or maybe not. And how did this user circumvent my control validation?
@Cerberus I don't mean about contemplation. I mean, like I don't understand oxidative metabolism. It's just something I do without thinking about.
14:29
@Cerberus I got some filtered water from the dispenser
Hey! I got a Notable Question badge.
@KitFox Ah OK, fair enough.
punches computer brb
@MattЭллен Hmm I'm not sure this superstitious filtering is allowed.
14:32
@Cerberus I find it odd that you challenged my statement about non-muslim-marriage being a mortal sin but then agreed that for the most part most religious adherents at least take the mortal sins seriously.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 I didn't say I agreed: I just did not challenge it.
@Cerberus Well, whatever man. I don't need your stupid atheist rules! This filtered water tastes good!
@Cerberus so you disagree, then, that most religious people take the mortal sins seriously?
I don't have data about this, mainly because most muslimas will not be in a situation where they have to decide on marrying a non-muslim.
you guys remind me of peter and the chicken. I'm not sure which is which
14:35
@MrShinyandNew安宇 That question is a bit too broad.
I just said that many muslimas will marry and have in fact married non-muslims.
As to their numbers, I don't know.
I may even have a muslima great-grandmother.
@Cerberus I am simply curious as to what you believe. Do you think that the majority (let's call "majority" 70% or more) of people who claim to follow a certain religion such as christianity, islam or judaism take the mortal sins seriously? the sins where their holy book explicitly prescribes enternal damnation as a punishment?
Indonesian.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 I don't know: I would first have to know what "take seriously" means, and what these mortal sins are.
@Cerberus And how many of them required their husband to declare "I am a muslim" before getting married? That's just about literally all that is required to squeak through that particular law.
I know, and that is a fair point. But I believe a great many men in history have not had to do this upon marrying a self-proclaimed muslima.
Probably also because the muslima wouldn't take much comfort in this declaration, because she would feel that it was a bit meaningless, no matter what the Q'uran says.
14:40
@Cerberus I suspect that the number of men who don't even pretend to convert to islam, and yet marry women who remain muslim, is small. Perhaps they abandon their religion or they convert. They are perhaps muslim in the same sense that I am Catholic.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Anything is possible.
But have you looked into Indonesian muslims?
Oh, I remember: I have had a similar discussion with Jez.
Who held that people who do not follow certain precepts that he sees as central to Christianity as Christians (Jez is a staugn atheist).
@Cerberus I have not looked into "Indonesian muslims" specifically. Anyway the rules don't change. Almost all varieties, despite whatever disagreements they have about the hadith or the other accessory teachings, they all agree that the Koran is sacred and true and the final word.
Who determines these rules?
an atheist, it's the only fair way
@Cerberus Lots of Christians feel the same way. There is the one true way and anyone who doesn't follow that way isn't a true Christian.
@Cerberus They are rather plainly spelled out in the Koran.
14:44
@MattЭллен Actually it seems many atheists are like that!
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Indeed. And each has his own "true" ways.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 So you say. I disagree. 1. There are people who interpret the Q'uran in different ways. 2. They pick the passages that they like. 3. They are ignorant about what the Q'uran says to some degree.
@Cerberus Of all the major religions, the muslims are probably least ignorant about their holy book
But I thought you didn't want to discuss this.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Possibly so, but still.
@Cerberus This is different than the previous discussion
14:46
I do not see it that way.
It is the central point.
A religion is not a single consistent interpretation of a holy book: it is can be so much more, and less.
There isn't even a single satisfying definition of religion.
I personally prefer to consider it as similar to a nation.
religion noun one of the things that I don't have.
hee he
Cerberus is right about religion, though
It is very hard to define what it is, except that we generally count people as belonging to a nation who say and feel that they belong to it.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 This is one of the central tenets of Christianity.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 You should check out the fundamentalist Christians. They are usually at least as knowledgeable about the Bible as Muslims are about the Koran. I mean, if you only ever read one book, I guess you know it pretty well.
@Robusto well.... kind of. there are a quite a lot of different ways of defining "the one true way", ranging from a narrow doctrinal subscription to having ever been baptized with the proper formula
14:51
@Robusto yes but fundamentalist christians are a minority, and furthermore most of them still don't read the whole bible. Memorizing the entire koran is part of muslim education.
But the point is, however you get in, the idea is that you have found The Way.
I don't think most Turks or Indonesians even understand all of their holy book.
Jesus said "I am the Way and the Truth and the Light." Christians take that sort of thing to heart.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 i very much doubt that anything more than a tiny minority of muslims actually memorize the entire koran
@Robusto agreed
@Cerberus But I wasn't talking about "religion" in general, I was talking about Islam, and how the Koran prohibits a muslim woman from marrying a non-muslim or else she goes to the Fire.
14:53
Actually I think the Turks read the Qur'an in Turkish?
Also, isn't the Koran written in a form of Arabic that most modern Muslims don't even understand? I'm not arguing this, just wondering.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 I was trying to nuance this point.
@Robusto Yes and no
@Robusto Classical Arabic is mutually intelligible with Modern Standard Arabic, though they are not quite the same.
@Robusto I think so, but they are mostly taught to understand it, and it is not that different from written modern Arabic.
14:55
however, Modern Standard Arabic is not actually anybody's native language, as the local "Arabic" languages throughout the arabic world are actually descendents of Arabic proper, and are not mutually intelligible with each other or with Standard Arabic without special education
@JSBձոգչ But not with the various kinds of spoken Arabic.
The Koran is written in classical arabic, which is also used as "Standard Arabic". Anyone who is "educated" (in Arabic-speaking countries, anyway) learns their local arabic language (dialect?) and also learns standard arabic. Standard arabic is used for, eg, newspapers and newscasts.
The clue is that spoken Arabic ≠ written Arabic.
People often speak both languages in overlapping ways though, and some people are not aware of the fact that they are code-switching between two languages.
@Cerberus local arabic dialects can be written, no problem.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 But that's not what is used in newspapers.
14:56
@MrShinyandNew安宇 right. a lot of people think of their local dialect as simply being "bad" or "informal" standard arabic.
@JSBձոգչ yeah
Didn't Atatürk order Imams to read from the Qur'an in Turkish?
the linguistic recognition of local varieties of arabic as languages in their own right is not something that has yet caught on in the arabic world
That would be anathema to many other muslims.
@Cerberus if he did, it didn't catch on
14:57
Oh.
takes painkillers
@Cerberus There is disagreement about whether translating the Koran is permitted or not.
s'up @KitFox?
Getting a headache from all this discussion.
14:58
@MrShinyandNew安宇 my understanding is that it's generally allowed for educational purposes, but such translations cannot be used in services and are not considered to be the "real" Koran
(in contrast to translations of the Bible throughout Christianity)
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Yeah.
@JSBձոգչ Some people feel more strongly that it is not even permitted that far. But yeah, translations of the koran are easy enough to come by.
(and the various buddhist texts. AFAIK only Judaism has a similar insistence on Hebrew in services)
> The Mufti of North Turkey gave a fatwa to the effect that Turkish people may recite the Qur’an in Turkish instead of Arabic during Prayer, since they do not speak or understand Arabic.

« first day (578 days earlier)      last day (4640 days later) »