@Robusto that would have left me utterly clueless. At that point in my life I wasn't aware that you could put dots on an O. At best I would have taken that to mean the whole book was authored by Puff the Magic Dragon writing in his phantasy tongue.
@Robusto yeah I remembered it was a 747, but Boeing doesn't pay any of my bills and Airbus pays all of them, so I always product-place them every chance I get.
@MarkFoskey: Except in cases of severe requirements for brevity (and then usually only in print), editors and headline writers don't use a word simply because it's short. They use it because it's strong (which is what the OP asked for). They keep the strong words and cut the weak ones. And if avoid were stronger than shun, you may be sure avoid would have been used instead. But it wasn't, because it isn't. — Robusto2 mins ago
@RegDwigнt You really need a new hobby. You should ... I don't know ... take up the violin or something?
@RegDwigнt I really don't get the animosity toward that answer. It's like they think I'm dangerously wrong, that if anybody finds that answer useful it will mean the fall of Western Civilization.
@RegDwigнt As you should. You've been freeloading on a free press for a long time now. Time to pay up, deadbeat.
@RegDwigнt I thought that was more a guideline than a rule.
@Cerberus Yes, because I copied it directly and pasted it. I don't know where things went wrong, but they did. Maybe because of how Chrome handles character encoding (tools to deal with which have been removed, sad to say).
Google is turning into Microsoft. Time for an upstart company to come in and eat their lunch.
I might even say, I shun words that I can't spell. But as we've learned with @Rob's generous help, that would make me appear like a pineapple who's read the Bible.
Which is true of course but that's the whole point. I'm trying to be unkongito here.
@Cerberus did you mean speller or did you mean teller? I can't tell. Or I can't spell? Fuck, this language is hard.