@Mitch Well, like some people say "fertile ash" because ash causes or promotes fertility - the growing of vegetation, because it contanis nutrients and when the ash is mixed with soil it helps enable the soil to produce vegetation. However, by the same token, one could refer to "fertile water", but nobody does.
(I personally would not use the term 'fertiile ash' because we don't for example speak of fertile water.. But some do use the term 'fertile ash')
so 'fertile water' would be an example that matches but that nobody uses
@barlop 'Fertile ash'? That's a new one on me. Both phrases sound strange.
Are you talking about phrases or about individual words? They feel different to me (as far as meaning goes). A phrase has extra stuff going on, like the idiomatic meaning vs literal, whether it is a set phrase or not, maybe other things.
@Cerberus phrase.. but note that I can think of unusual phrases that are a bit humorous like your deep fried oblong pieces of potato example , or somebody referring to their grandmother as the antic, but the logic is still clear.. Whereas the phrase "fertile water" kind of exposes the absurdness of "fertile ash" though people say the latter.. And it's not idiomatic..(so it's not like the english idiom 'kick the bucket' for dying), It is in line with a definition of fertile!
@Mitch well, fertile ash has the word fertile in a weird sense, but combined with the word ash. So I guess you could say it's a word(fertile) that i'm referring to, or a phrase (fertile ash). The weird definition is with fertile. And my point is you can equally say "fertile water", but nobody does. (though a google will show that people do say 'fertile ash'). My example is not idiomatic
This is just the future perfect construction, but how you are trying to use it does not make sense here. From
Wikipedia:
In English, the future perfect construction consists of a
future construction such as the auxiliary verb will (or
shall) or the going-to future and ...
@tchrist I think his sentence is fine. There are multiple ways of saying the same thing. His is one, emphasizing the 'later' as a future point in time looking backwards to a completed event. That's all. Seeing the other suggestions makes me think that the future perfect may be a little too 'fancy'.
In other news, people please try to stop making 'hygge' a thing. It's not a thing.
The word 'hygge' does not put me in a state of hygge.
@user14492 dispel is the idiomatic choice here, I believe.
Nobody really says allay. Like, ever.
The most common is address, of course, but that's not quite the meaning you're after.
COCA also has alleviate and assuage.
Less common are resolve and accomodate.
But yeah, you have quite a selection to pick from, actually.
@barlop I believe that is exactly the issue here. That ash contains nutrients. It has been used as fertilizer for tens of thousands of years. But water is not a fertilizer. It's just water. To make it fertile, you have to add stuff to it. Like ash, say.
We don't say "fertile water" for the same reason we don't say "fertile air" or "fertile sunshine". Even though a plant is just water plus air plus sunshine. You don't need a fertilizer, you don't even need soil.
You need six CO₂ and six H₂O, is all you need.
And so water and air are your absolute baseline. It goes without saying that there just is no fertility without either. And thus we don't say it.
But anyway, that is all justification in hindsight. At the end of the day, the only reason we don't say X is because we don't say it. We could start saying it today, or at some point in the future. Or maybe we did in the past. There is no real reason for something to be or not be idiomatic.
We actually do acknowledge water and air and sunshine, but we use more poetic language for that. Metaphors. Like literally, we use the word source for everything. That's how much homage we pay to water on a daily basis.
Yeah dispel is more common with worries, I would say.
Every stormy has its petrel.
@user14492 it's just passive vs active knowledge. You will recognize a million words on sight. But you couldn't write down a mere ten thousand right now. You'd struggle after half that many, actually.
That's normal.
And you can't fight it. My active knowledge is not better than yours. If anything it's worse. In fact I'd say it's definitely worse now. Because that's the one thing (and the only thing) I learned at the university. It doesn't matter what you know. You don't need to know anything at all. All you need to know is where to look it up.
And so I don't remember allay or alleviate and assuage, either. Or sausage, for that matter. I just remember Google, Wikipedia, and COCA. That is all I keep in my brain. The rest of it I devote to video games.
So yeah. Make a mental note of COCA, and the OneLook Reverse Dictionary. You'll find these very helpful.
@Mitch also, maybe I should start allaying my fears, because frankly that's the first time in my life I see this collocation. It makes perfect sense and might be perfectly common, but it's perfectly not anywhere common enough to have reached me even once in forty years.
The ones I see all the time are more like "donald trump" and "you tube". These register with me alright.
I read the motivational phrase " You are a precious and important person, only BECAUSE OF BEING YOURSELF", I want to know if it is written correctly of if it were better to say "You are a precious and important person, only FOR BEING YOURSELF"??
Thank you so much for helping me out.
"You are a useless and unimportant person, simply by virtue of existing."
That sounds more like it.
There are 8 billion people out there and literally not a single one of them is you. That is how little people want to be you. That is how rubbish you are.
If you were precious, you wouldn't need to open the Internet and read the phrase "you are precious", not even directed at you, in order to know that you are precious.
@RegDwigнt People feel bad about themselves because they only notice the bright happy people being funny and happy, and compare that to their inner boring colorless thoughts.
@Mitch but that's easy to fix. Just create an Instagram account and pretend to be bright and happy yourself. And let others whine how they are boring in comparison.
Post a picture of what you eat. Every day. Bam. You're bright and happy. Everyone else is an idiot prick. You get 1 million followers. All of them miserable and colorless. Profit.
@RegDwigнt Have you found that girl with the earrings? Anyway, I didn't know you had divorced until I read that post. I hope you find a new Maria soon.
@RegDwigнt I see. Thanks for reminding me. I have an idea. Maybe one day when my voice is good, I will record 20 songs and upload them all on the same day.
@Mitch people from Leipzig keep coming as well. They have nothing in Leipzig. Certainly no soup. Just fucking statues of fucking Bach, is all they have.
I also guess we've just broken a number of international laws by condoning homicide.
But that's okay, I just learned the other day that by tuning my piano to 439 Hz I was breaking the fucking Treaty of Versailles. Like, for realsies. Not even a joke or a meme. I've literally broken international law.
Here is the actual Treaty of Versailles from the Library of Congress: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/us-treaties/bevans/m-ust000002-0043.pdf Article 282, subsection 22. Page 171.
Because I tune my violin to 443 Hz, the First World War is still not over.