« first day (2666 days earlier)      last day (2552 days later) » 
00:00 - 01:0001:00 - 00:00

00:00
Your best bet is to go and ask the people whether they consider themselves Middle Eastern or not.
Iraqis would, for sure.
I use my language according to its own conventions, not to some other language's conventions.
Maybe the people in China call the period around the birth of Christ the Middle Ages.
But I won't.
People get to name the regions they inhabit.
In Dutch media, you will find "Middle East" used for "Near East" as well.
But I would consider it a mistake, possibly an Americanism.
Or an Anglicism. I don't know.
Well, turns out it's not.
@Færd In their own language, sure. But not in someone else's language.
00:04
But we need to understand each other when we want to talk about things.
So you're saying Iraqi's imported this mistake from English?
Or is it older?
@Færd As always, we have translators for that...
@Cerberus I don't know about it's origins. And I don't concede that it's a mistake.
If you can find a valid reason and a long tradition, I may concede it's not a mistake.
It surely has a Western origin. Somehow or other.
Whose east are we anyway.
And it's a mistake in the European tradition...
00:07
Do you speak for all Europe?
@Færd Well, you could say the important continents are Africa and Eurasia. And you could draw a line north from the northern part of the east-African coast.
To divide the known world in twain. Known as it was in ancient times.
@Færd At least for Dutch and English, I feel confident enough.
Let's conjure some of our English apparitions.
I'm not sure whether that could prove anything though.
Forget it.
I'm Middle Eastern, because I live at the CENTER OF THE EASTERN WORLD. And I won't have it otherwise!
I think the origin of the terms 'Near East' and 'Middle East' and 'Far East' is established beyond doubt, if one wishes to use those terms. And also that they make some sort of sense as a system.
@Færd Then you are not Middle Eastern, but Middle!
Edited.
Well, I think your country is traditionally called Middle Eastern, so, sure.
00:13
@Cerberus Be that as it may, I'm not sure we have to stick to the original meanings if the dominant meanings in the political and geographical discourse of today implies otherwise.
I think the Far East usually begins with India.
@Færd I think we do if otherwise the terms would be counter-intuitive and conflicting with tradition. A living tradition.
Don't give in to popularity contests as an argument!
There are many living traditions.
It's counter-intuitive and weird to have a Middle East but no Near East, and to use the term Middle East where traditionally the logical term Near East was used, and which is still used by plenty of people.
@Cerberus I don't see significant differences between what has been popular in the recent past and what in the distant past. Your way of reasoning cuts both ways.
Names don't evolve so logically.
A long tradition is venerable. And sticking with it prevents confusion and conflicting usage.
00:17
They call aboriginal Americans Indians. How 'bout that.
I don't though.
And, in this case, traditional usage is logical, while this recent deviation is very illogical.
@Færd Had I lived in the 16th century, I would certainly have objected to that!
But it's a tradition with a long history now.
So maybe I'll give up my battle against wrong use of 'Middle East' in a century or two. But not today.
And it makes zero sense.
At least it isn't a break with tradition.
00:19
Hahahahaha
There was no more logical word in use before 'Indians' was applied.
You crack me up!
I don't mean to disrespect you. Just laughing.
'Indians' didn't start to replace a more logical 'Americans' around the 17th century, or something.
But, yes, of course it's wildly inconsistent, and confusing.
But it was based on the fallacy that that land was India.
Of course.
00:21
So it was a breach from the tradition that only the people of India got to be called Indians.
But the mistake is at least understandable. And they had no other word at the time.
3 mins ago, by Cerberus
@Færd Had I lived in the 16th century, I would certainly have objected to that!
I don't constrain myself to now.
Also when people say "Asians" they mean "Orientals."
You're a multi-temporal being?
In a way!
00:23
@skullpatrol Both of those words can be used in many ways!
Hi folks.
Hello.
So, linguistic geography discussions?
Hi @skullpatrol.
Hello.
00:31
I suspect terms like Middle East are European inventions.
Like many other things.
@FaheemMitha Add history too.
@FaheemMitha Me too.
Iran, for example, is not more East of something than it is West of something.
@Færd I thought you would.
Hi @Færd. Still awake?
Cerb suggested another explanation:
25 mins ago, by Cerberus
@Færd Well, you could say the important continents are Africa and Eurasia. And you could draw a line north from the northern part of the east-African coast.
I woke up, and have been unable to get back to sleep.
I don't think it's correct.
@FaheemMitha Yeah.
I slept extensively during the day.
I can't sleeo now.
00:33
@Færd That happens to me too.
@Færd What isn't?
That we are called Easterners because we are east of Africa.
But I don't know.
I'm just saying the division kind of makes sense even if you don't place Europe at the centre of the world.
@Færd Ah. Well, like I said, I suspect all this terminology comes from Europe, in any case.
But rather the eastern coastline of the Mediterranean (which is also a continuation, in a way, of the eastern coast of Africa)'.
And actually would not be that hard to establish, probably.
00:35
@Cerberus OK.
Yeah, I guess it's not too hard to see into the origins of these terms.
Since Europeans consider that a country doesn't exist till they name it, and, preferably rape it for a while.
@FaheemMitha Yes, the terminology is European.
@FaheemMitha :))
Well, historically, anyway.
But it might as well have been e.g. Syriac or Egyptian: it would make sense to them.
00:36
I suppose it's possible even for Europe to grow up.
Whereas it wouldn't make sense for e.g. India.
@FaheemMitha gasp Who are you??
Ebla (Arabic: إبلا‎, modern: تل مرديخ, Tell Mardikh), was one of the earliest kingdoms in Syria. Its remains constitute a tell located about 55 km (34 mi) southwest of Aleppo near the village of Mardikh. Ebla was an important center throughout the third millennium BC and in the first half of the second millennium BC. Its discovery proved the Levant was a center of ancient, centralized civilization equal to Egypt and Mesopotamia, and ruled out the view that the latter two were the only important centers in the Near East during the early Bronze Age. The first Eblaite kingdom has been described as...
India is generally considered to be part of the East too.
@Færd Look, I happened to be reading this article, where Near East is used properly.
Which is not rare at all, thankfully.
@Cerberus What?
1 min ago, by Faheem Mitha
I suppose it's possible even for Europe to grow up.
I'm not used to your saying things like this!
00:38
But I don't think it's generally considered to be part of the Middle East.
Indeed not.
@Cerberus Oh. Well, I certainly think things like that.
The Middle East is more like Iran and Afghanistan.
I don't necessarily say everything I think.
phew
00:40
@Cerberus Well, Iran, anyway.
I don't think these arbitrary labels are worth giving much thought to.
They are just convenient for people who want to slice up the world and put it in boxes.
@Cerberus Now that you're so staunchly adhering to your European traditions, let me go and find some other non-Eurocentric terminology in accordance with an ages-old tradition of my homeland.
But I'm too shiftless to do that, alas.
It's really just one world. People ought to try to remember that.
Per Carl Sagan's "pale blue dot" passage, which someone referred me to recently, possibly here.
You need to name different regions differently. Or you'll get lost.
Only it doesn't have to be X-centric.
@Færd I suppose.
@FaheemMitha Then better not use them at all.
00:45
@Færd What makes you think there is any such terminology?
@Cerberus I increasingly try not to.
@Færd I'd love to hear such a tradition! But it should be noted that the wrong use of Middle East is also Western.
@FaheemMitha Good, good.
E.g. terms like Left and Right. Increasingly they don't strike me as useful or even very meaningful.
@FaheemMitha We had geographers of our own, I suppose.
I actually think I don't use those terms very much.
Though everyone uses them. In political discourse, I mean.
@Cerberus Which terms?
00:46
I normally say e.g. Muslim countries, East Asia, the Indian Subcontinent, when speaking of regions.
@Færd Of course. But did they try to name the world?
@FaheemMitha Near East etc.
@Cerberus Ah, right.
Whichever term seems most appropriate.
Ultimately it doesn't matter, of course.
I guess I use the term Middle East sometimes.
00:47
@FaheemMitha At least the nearby regions the did. I was talking about Asia.
@Færd ok
I just hate novel inconsistencies that clash with other terms that are still in use.
I think Asia Minor is a cute term, though, as in Magna Graecia.
When people use terms like Middle East they often just mean Arab countries.
@FaheemMitha Arab is also ambiguous...
@Cerberus Probably another European construction.
00:49
@FaheemMitha No, why?
@Cerberus Have you read Edward Said's "Orientalism"? I haven't.
@FaheemMitha Partly because many are ignorant of the fact that Iranians don't all speak Arabic.
@Cerberus Ok. That was just speculation.
@Færd For example. Yes.
@Cerberus How so?
Arab can mean of the Arabic paeninsula, or of the Arab-speaking cultural region.
00:50
I wonder how many Americans would disagree with the statement - Iran is an Arab country. Someone should do a poll.
@Cerberus Ah.
You would usually say Arabic for the paeninsula and Arab for the language, I think, but still.
There is plenty of room for confusion.
@Færd I don't believe anyone I know would think people spoke Arabic in Iran.
@Cerberus I never saw the language called Arab.
Right, but as in, Arab countries?
What are those?
Arabia
00:52
@Cerberus I see the word Arab is actually quite old - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_(etymology)
@Cerberus Oh many commoners do all the time.
>
noun
1.
a member of a Semitic people inhabiting Arabia and other countries of the Middle East.
2.
a member of any Arabic-speaking people.
3.
Arabian horse.
4.
Also called Arabber [ey-rab-er] (Show IPA). Sometimes Offensive. a street peddler.
5.
Archaic: Sometimes Offensive. street arab.

adjective
6.
of or relating to Arabs.
7.
Arabian.
8.
Arabic.
Look how confusing.
@Cerberus You must have an unusually literate social circle.
Not especially? Just educated.
Maybe I'm overestimating some people.
Anyway, Arab is definitely not a European word.
00:53
It's like thinking that Turks speak Arabic.
@Cerberus I'm sure lots of people would be willing to believe that too.
Well, I don't know those people.
I think ignorance about other countries is probably quite extreme internationally.
My own knowledge is extremely sketchy, for example.
Quite possibly, but surely not among your friends and family!
Though knowing stuff, especially stuff not relevant to ones survival, isn't exactly a priority for most people.
@Cerberus Hmm.
00:55
@Færd That map is not appropraite for 'asia' (its label) or 'the orient' (which includes much more)
People I know from universities are usually quite knowledgeable. But outside that, no.
@Cerberus The first two senses reveal that Arab is an umbrella word for some people speaking Arabic. They (the two senses) differ in their extents.
Higher education is worth something, I think. At least, such has been my experience.
@Mitch OK.
It just matched my notion.
Here's the more important question... is Morocco in the Near East? If not what is its label (for arguments sake I'm going to not allow 'Maghreb').
It was part of the ottoman empire at some point (I'm sure!)
00:58
I don;t know about Morocco.
@Færd I'd mostly agree with you except I wouldn't include India
Yeah.
I guess 'prient' = 'east asia' for us
but I realize that 'orient' is much more than that
Are you familiar with 'Orientalism' by Edward Said?
@Mitch Is that a word?
@Mitch Nope.
@Færd Yes, but there are more senses...
00:59
@Mitch I mentioned that here 20 minutes ago.
00:00 - 01:0001:00 - 00:00

« first day (2666 days earlier)      last day (2552 days later) »