@tchrist I find it hard to pity you given that you added the tag yourself: Adding any tags to the feed was rather unwise considering what is commonly referred to as sturgeon's law, and adding a contentious tag that you personally hate probably doesn't even help. It's made all the harder by the fact that this sadomasochism seems entirely self imposed, since I trust you have the ability to remove the tag from the feed as well.
Questions whose expected answers are nothing but dictionary spam should be terminated with extreme prejudice. Period.
Those are not "answers" in the SE sense. Most SWRs ask for nothing but that, and are content with nothing but that. I'm not. I think it impoverishes our site.
There are infinitely many possible questions from people who don't know words for X, particularly non-native speakers or people with third-grade vocabularies. These are not requests that will ever help future visitors to our site.
We're casting fishes before swine, not educating new fishermen.
I really want a way to suppress the voice-overs on news reports that have excerpts from people speaking non-English when I want to hear the actual words.
It's the prejudice part I'm really worried about, but really much of the problem is that people just don't care to choose the right word if something close enough suffices. Much of the reason I'm here personally is because I have a desire to reshape my vocabulary to choose just the right words and eschew what merely seems right.
However, it doesn't seem as if there are so many like minded people here, so my interest in the main website wanes considerably.
@tchrist You'd think it would be by seeing word choice and usage listed among the list of on-topic subjects, and seeing that there is a vocabulary tag (which is terribly defined and often misused as a result [much like the grammar tag]).
I think one of these days I'll get around to reading some good literature though, and hopefully reading through at least one of my dictionaries. I think the first edition of the concise oxford dictionary makes a good enough candidate for that particular task, so long as I cross-reference it against Webster's.
@tchrist Perhaps it is a little more obsessive than it is practical. I'll never have a need to ever even know more than 75,000 words at the very most, and all but three thousand of those will not be used on such a regular basis anyway. However, not everything has to be a practical endeavor and if I ever do succeed in my task, perhaps I can actually do something about bad answers to S.W.Rs. by actually knowing which of these words is actually the best selection, if any are.
Regardless, i think knowing how to choose just the right words for a given situation is quite an important art, and I need to know what options are available in the first place in order to know just how to do that.
@Cerberus Sigh, I fear it is all too useful actually. Did you know that cute is basically a contraction of acute, and basically means sharp in a literal sense of the word? It wasn't a word in the first edition of Webster's dictionary (1828), but it acquired a slang meaning in 1834 according to the O.E.D., before it was recorded by Webster in its literal sense in 1844. I've been wondering just how I should treat the word ever since learning that.
Well, maybe it was 1841 when Webster recorded the literal sense. I keep on forgetting that the second edition was first printed in that year because it's the 1844 printing that's so much more important historically speaking, because it is his final revision, the dictionary of choice for Emily Dickinson, and probably the version Merriam-Webster used as the basis for their own lineage of dictionaries.
@Cerberus Dictionaries are dumb. If you know the word, they only confirm things you already know. If you don't, they don't give the nuance that tells you what it really means.
Someone who deliberately sets someone up. Some of whose actions can be described as "a dick move." Someone who habitually commits base acts that hurt other people. Someone whom one would not trust if one knew them.
Scoundrel no longer has the same ring it did a century ago.
Asshole is way too g...
@Feeds People like to say douche or douchebag these days, but I'd rather have them use scoundrel so I'm not going to suggest it.
That reminds me though, I do have to update one of my answers eventually.
If anybody does care to spite me though, then they'd do very well to look under the O.E.D. 2nd edition's (1989) entry of douche, which contains the douche-bag subentry and American Speech's definition of the term from 1967 " Amer. Speech 42 228 Douche bag, n. phr., an unattractive co-ed. By extension, any individual whom the speaker desires to deprecate."
That reminds me, I do have to update one of my other answers accordingly. The O.E.D. is the only dictionary from any year in the 1980s to record its slang usage.
The strange thing is that the A.H.D. didn't even record it until the fifth edition. I surely thought they would've done so by the fourth, given that Merriam-Webster already followed suit in '93, and the word was starting to become especially popular around 2000-2004ish.
"Is it like people working on personal projects and talking about it or all of us working on one big project?" The italics part looks unwieldy. How do I fix it or make it a proper question?
@Ahmed I think different people will use different tones while speaking. In practice, tone is not so standard. In theory, the books will tell you one or two variations only.
A non English question. People tell me there are some places in the world with lead in the air which makes people go angry or crazy and do crazy things. Has anyone heard anything like that too?
@JohanLarsson When I get bald or shave my head people offer me a comb. Does that ever happen to you? I hate people.
Oh I meant to write when I get bald on purpose. Right now, I have long hair and a beard, and I am getting tired of my long hair. Some people are calling me Jesus due to my looks.
In my native language - Bulgarian - the closest cognate to the word "informatively" - информативно (informativno) has a very specific and strong connotation. For example:
Izvinete, informativno da vi pitam, kolko struva tova?
I'm likely to translate like this:
Excuse me, I'd like to ask...
'shorter' could be seen as one way of bing 'lesser' (= just not as good)
@Ahmed You get the god you came with. I think it would be weird if the god of the dwarves wasn't on the short side, whatever his transmogrification powers are (also this god is obviously a dude because Tolkien never made female dwarves).
@Ahmed an explanation will be just repeating with emphasis. If you're totally perfect, perfect in every way, having no flaws whatsoever, then that is excessive, too much, nothing can be improved, which is a lack and therefore a flaw itself.
Therefore the concept of perfection is internally inconsistent I can see bridges starting to fail from here.
I wonder if "racism" can be used to refer to discrimination against people from other regions within the same country. According to the Oxford dictionary, the definition of "racism" is:
Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief t...
@JasperLoy It's especially confusing when someone tires to sell you "buffalo wings". One of those weird mystery foods like "chicken fingers" and "jumbo shrimp" or "head cheese"
@MartinAJ do you mean "energy"? and "full-energy" doesn't sound very idiomatic to me. What does it mean?
I dunno, I imagine it'd just be like a bad-tasting mouth full of corn-syrup or molasses, that is, it's not like it'd bond your mouth closed right away. You'd have time to wash it down with a coke.
@Cerberus "Windows" is not a monolithic thing. But sure, nothing stops Microsoft from building in features that allow it to bypass its own firewall. will it? I dunno.
@Færd Um. What is confusing about Trump outright inciting violence against protesters at his rallies? About him having a history of being sued by the government for racist policies at the buildings he owned? About him boasting about grabbing women by the pussy (his words) and because he's a star they let you get away with it?
@Færd probably (can't say for sure when I'm not an American resident) people didn't take the warner bros' advice because there was this feeling that Democrats, and generally people who run the government, don't care about the middle class/the poor
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 That's not what I meant to say. I just wanted to say they're not the only ones who are guilty here. And if you can't empathize with them, you can't educate them, and this shitty vicious cycle won't stop.
the 4th machine, and old one, has two bugs that I've noticed. 1: the dell webcams cause Windows to crash. I had to disconnect them. 2. same machine: the network adapter doesn't work on cold boot. I have to hit the reset button after it powers up. That only started happening recently, long after I switched to Windows 10... it could be related to an update in Windows or just be failing hardware.
@Cerberus I configure my taskbar not to show the input methods, but every time I restart the computer it still shows the input methods. So far, I had to restart my computer three times because it just froze. There was an update that failed for two months, and I had to manually download it to apply it two months later, and I didn't even know until I checked the update history.
@KitZ.Fox No. I'll be more popular on facebook when it becomes our desktop operating system (next year), and uses an AGI (artificial general intelligence) to extract all my life's information from a cheek swab (year after)
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Good to know! My father's printer was apparently incompatible with X, so it stopped working and even the repair shop said nothing could be done.
Well, I searched my friends for Mitch and it suggested 'maybe you mean this Mitch' and I thought 'maybe I do mean that Mitch', and then I looked and was like 'oh but I don't know what Mitch looks like'. But then there was another thing that I was like, oh I think that's a Mitch thing, but then I wasn't friends with that Mitch and I suddenly felt like I had wandered into his living room. You know?
Anyway most of the "phoning home" that Windows 10 does is in service to features that it has. It's not much worse than what, say, my Android phone does.
I did try using yahoo search and bing search, but they are really not as useful as google search. However, you do get some results not found in google.
Looking for a word that encompasses
Lack of awareness, lack of common sense, lack of perspective.
To describe a person's actions that haven't any idea of their surroundings, consequences or affect on other people.
@KitZ.Fox It'd be super weird if I were there and opened the chat room. And we'd both stand there and stare at each other. Eventually one of us would say 'Hey'. Then the other would say 'Hey' too. Then the other would say 'I just went to the bathroom and forgot to wash my hands.' and then slip out quickly. Wait...that's even more awkward.