« first day (2394 days earlier)      last day (2825 days later) » 

17:00
@terdon So would you let it go if you girlfriend slept with another guy terdon?
I mean just curious. =)
Time for me to go. Nice reconnecting with you all on chat!
@englishstudent If it hasn't affected the way she feels about me, yes of course. I would and I have.
I see.
I mean very nice.
I mean I have no words =)
Sexual fidelity was never an important issue for me.
17:04
@englishstudent whoa dude let's get back to something more quiet like politics
or tea.
I care who she shares her feelings with, her time, her inner world. Her body? Meh, whatever she shares will never be the same as I get after years of relationship and getting so close to someone.
holy cripes, tea
that shit'lll mess you up
Or Bill C-16. He's the worst. Always say let's split the check equally when he drank way more than everyone else.
@Mitch It's fine. Me and terdon are just having a heart to heart conversation.
I play that game at another level by the way. I am an ex model. Well, I still get calls from my manager at that medium sized clothing company that I worked. So meeting women isn't a problem, but still I'm a sensitive guy, if you know what I mean.
@Mitch You make it seem as if my practices are unprecedented. It's a fairly nominal form, esp. as you go further back in time. When I use spaces, that's because I'm using two separate abbreviations instead of one, and most commonly it's around the ampersand in emulation of company names like G. & C. Merriam Co.
17:07
@terdon One thing to consider, though, is that, for some people, there is a chance that physical intimacy leads to quick emotional intimacy.
There are three things you should never ever talk about in polite company. Religion, politics and the Great Pumpkin
@englishstudent I have no idea what that means.
Some people fall in love in what began as a mere physical thing.
THere are some things you just don't talk about not talking about them.
Those are things that are really not talked about.
17:08
And falling in love with someone else may endanger the other relationship.
For the record @MetaEd, I'm meta talking about them, not talking about them, so it's sort of ok
use-mention distinction
@Cerberus In which case the relationship has indeed changed. I will, however, submit that if such a change can happen, the relationship was long gone anyway. If you need to enforce fidelity in order to keep it alive, it isn't worth keeping alive.
Enforce, mind you. If it just comes naturally, that's a different matter.
I don't think it always works like that for everyone.
SBM
SBM
:|
17:10
Yeah, cultivating other sexual relationships is too time-consuming for me right now.
@Cerberus I dunno. I've never bought the whole "Stole his/her girl/boyfriend" narrative.
@KitZ.Fox We don't talk about that
I don't know what to think.
@KitZ.Fox That is to say, even if I could find hundred other women I would be heart broken if my girlfriend or wife ever left me.
@Mitch But we can talk about not talking about it.
17:11
But I don't find it ridiculous when people feel threatened by their spouse's affair.
@KitZ.Fox Personally, I've found I've just lost my interest as I grew older. I guess I no longer had as much to prove to myself. I am monogamous these days but because I don't really have any interest in being anything else.
@Cerberus Oh, of course not! It's anything but ridiculous!
@englishstudent So you are more interested in deep intimacy than shallow attraction. That's what you mean by "sensitive"?
It is a fact that many people leave their spouse for an affair. So can I be 100% sure that this won't happen to me?
Also, affair != cheating. An affair is a much deeper thing implying prolonged and repeated contact and associated lies.
Right.
But cheating can turn into an affair, it happens.
17:12
@KitZ.Fox Yeah. cool. cool.
So can I be sure that this won't happen in my spouse's case?
@terdon Yeah, it's not that I need to be monogamous, just the effort involved isn't worth it. I love my relationship and it fulfills me and I don't have time or interest for that kind of recreation.
Even if he or she did not intend for this to happen?
@Cerberus I don't think it's a fact at all. That's exactly my point. They leave because they're not happy and the affair gives them a push or an objective or a kick in the ass or whatever. But if the affair was happening, there were deeper problems in the relationship already.
@terdon Right. That.
17:13
@terdon That is a rather strong statement.
If you are lying to your spouse, then you have problems in your relationship.
Depending on how "deep" this problem should be.
Regardless of what you are lying about.
@Cerberus I don't think so. A strong statement is claiming that something is a fact :P
@terdon in the taxonomy of such things, an affair is one kind of cheating
17:14
What if your relationship is in a dull phase?
@Mitch Yes, an affair implies cheating but cheating does not imply an affair.
@KitZ.Fox Yeah, I like the physical aspect but I believe in being loyal to your partner or your spouse. Yeah, kind of like a deep intimacy. You are right.
@Cerberus Then that's a problem, isn't it?
What if you experience stress and bickering because of lack of sleep after the baby is born?
Then you're having problems.
All of these are problems. If your relationship is fine and dandy, you won't leave it "for" someone else.
17:15
@terdon Okay, but then such problems happen to almost everyone all the time, also often when one one spouse experiences them and the other had no clue.
Which you can work through if you're honest and don't lie about stuff.
You might sleep with someone else, sure, but why leave if you're already happy?
@Cerberus yeah. really.
@terdon Because your hormones are triggered?
hahaha
17:15
i've heard the first couple years after the first baby is born is the most likely time for the dad to leave.
@Cerberus OK, if one spouse has problems with the relationship and the other hasn't a clue then then the relationship has really serious problems.
I had to cheat on my spouse because I couldn't control my hormones.
You have sex, then have sex another time, and then you happen to fall madly in love, even though this person is wildly incompatible with you?
<eyeroll>
@Cerberus That's a great reason to sleep around. Not to leave a relationship.
@KitZ.Fox Woah! Escalate much? Who said anything about rape?
17:16
@terdon Fine.
People who fall in love often don't seem able to make 100% rational decisions with a view to the long term...
@KitZ.Fox I saw that
people aren't perfect
@terdon Same excuse rapists use.
@KitZ.Fox No, seriously, more like "I slept with them because myu hormones were triggered" why would rape ever need to be involved?
oh my god mom and dad are fighting again. also other dad.
17:18
@KitZ.Fox Um. So? Murderers can say they killed someone because they were blocking their sun. That's not an excuse for murder. but it's a perfectly good reason to get up and move.
@terdon Because I expect people to be able to control themselves, triggered hormones or not.
@KitZ.Fox Sure. So if you're my significant other and I have the stupidity to attempt to use that as an excuse, you should throw me out the window. I just don't see what rape has to do with it.
But sun blockage! How do you expect a person to control themselves in that circumstance?
@terdon murder does seem an excessive response.
I think it's possible for people who are in an otherwise healthy relationship, with good long-term prospects, to make a terrible mistake and break up because of a love affair—one that falls apart quickly, after which the ex-spouse bitterly regrets his decision.
17:19
So does rape!
dismemeberment I can see
@terdon It's the same excuse is all. I changed the original post.
I'm not saying that's always the case.
@Cerberus I don't. If they find themselves in that situation, where one is having a long term affair, lying to the other etc etc, then the relationship is not healthy by definition.
But I think "sex with someone else should never be a problem in a healthy relationship" is a bit too "easy". I think it's more complicated. It all depends. And there is the matter of chance.
17:21
The ex-spouse will regret it, sure, but that's i) 20-20 hindsight and ii) a different time, so a different set of emotions.
@Mitch Smaller shadows, yes.
@Cerberus Of course. I never said anything to the contrary.
@terdon Maybe it was healthy before she fell in love with someone else.
@Cerberus yes, I agree. nothing matches perfectly even in the best circumstances
People make mistakes.
17:21
I, personally, never put much importance on sexual fidelity. I could never take the idea of my girlfriend spending the night snuggled up with someone though.
@Cerberus True. I became friends with a married woman once, it ended badly for both of us, kind of. I mean I wasn't the cheater nor was she, but her husband didn't buy it. And it became worse.
@Mitch Agreed.
@KitZ.Fox hm good thinking. we can rationalize this to all sorts of ends.
@terdon Okay, so sex is fine, but snuggling up becomes too emotional?
@Cerberus I agree with your agreement with what I said.
17:22
@Mitch I agree³.
@Cerberus Yes. If it's "just physical" it simply doesn't compare to what they would be having with their partner with all the emotion and intimacy involved.
@Cerberus dangit. third order agreement is as excessive as murder.
Snuggling, on the other hand, is purely emotional and that is harder for me to deal with.
When your cat snuggles with you, he couldn't care less about the emotional attachment. If you were only a quarter size, he would eat your face off with no compunction.
also entrails.
@terdon But...have you never snuggled up with a casual partner, just for the one time?
17:25
yeah, snuggling is a bit lame don't you think?
It may be a nice feeling, but is it really that much "deeper"?
All this talk of dismemberment and entrails. Now I'm hungry.
I know!
@Mitch Maybe you can punish it with a square root.
I had left over pot roast for lunch
17:25
@Mitch Not always!
a dollop of horseradish
Do note that @terdon also mentioned a duration. It's hard to imagine snuggling up with somebody for hours on end.
@Cerberus Not if I was in a relationship.
@Cerberus But continually having sex doesn't necessarily mean you will fall in love. I mean I don't know about you but sex isn't always hysterical, I mean amazing, I mean unstoppable.
considering a top off of a mini-croissant
17:26
I could make tater tots.
I'd like to say I'm not bragging. But it'd be a bit misleading
Anyway, it's about intimacy with someone else.
cuz I am
@Tonepoet I'm thinking about sleeping in each others arms, actually. Not a 10 minute snuggle.
17:27
I have a minicroissant waiting for me.
Which is not necessarily a sex thing.
Exactly
also a maxi croissant, but that's just gilding the lily
And, conversely, sex is not necessarily all that intimate.
Right.
17:27
Sometimes sex isn't fun.
@terdon I'm having a bit of trouble imagining this sex-without-snuggling...
@terdon Right, I get that.
OK. I take that back.
@Cerberus if you add one more order, then yes.
Sharing how you feel about things is fundamental to building intimacy, which is why lying to your partner kills it.
17:28
@Cerberus I'm pretty sure yes on the face thing
@Cerberus You finish, you snuggle, then you get up and go home. You don't spend the night.
You welcome this person to your house, you touch bodies only for sexual gratification, then immediately roll over to the other side of the bed?
also entrails
@terdon Oh, so some snuggling is allowed!
@Mitch What's that called?
haha "bed"
17:29
@Cerberus Yes, I wrongly used it as a shorter form of "spending the night in each other's arms".
So spending the night is the essential part?
@KitZ.Fox hm... really? microwaved tater tots are often dissappointing. Not always. but oftten
@Cerberus Yes.
actual sleeping together and also eating together also builds intimacy.
I couldn't sleep if I had to snuggle with someone while I was trying to sleep.
17:30
It's an arbitrary distinction, I guess, but then so's sex. I just chose to draw my line there.
@Mitch Who said anything about microwaved?
@terdon Sure, that's fine.
Suum cuique.
(Even though that's not the right context.)
@Cerberus naw man you gotta do it like robots. purely transactional.
@Mitch Microwaves ruin anything that's supposed to be crisp or crusty, because the food always ends up somewhat soggy.
Some people who allow sex with others prefer for their spouse not to tell them when it happens.
17:31
You seem an expert =)
So it's not exactly secret, but it's more like...relieving oneself: they just don't need to see it or hear about the details.
Anyway, I have to hit the bed soon. So laters all.
@Tonepoet Not if you heat it long enough,
I assure you, it will be crisp after an hour at maximum power.
17:32
@englishstudent G'night.
@Cerberus technically I think it is either 'lifting', or 'quantifying over variables' or 'jump' (as in Turing jump). I'm sure there is a better name for it...
oh duh 'abstracting'
@Mitch That would be efficient indeed.
wait... that's not right is it?
@Mitch Uhh.
Really?
@Cerberus Okay, fine, so not literally always, but that's just trading one problem for another (and even worse) problem. =P
17:33
Hehe.
@Cerberus blood to arms would get cut off.
Exactly.
@Cerberus Yes. I think that's the best approach myself. I didn't used to, I used to advocate "complete honesty" until I eventually realized that I only wanted her to exculpate me. I've since realized that that's not her problem and it shouldn't be.
And you can't toss and turn. And you get woken up by the other person's movements.
@KitZ.Fox I just assumed. if you got an oven or toaster over then hell yeah
17:34
@terdon And she was fine with either?
@Cerberus de sextibus non dispudendum
Haha.
@Cerberus There was no specific "she" involved. Just how my position has changed over the years and under the influence of various people.
I also realized that I might not really want to know either.
Probably sexibus/sexubus.
@terdon Ah, OK.
I thought it was all with your current wife.
So my current rule is "if something happens, I don't want to know about it unless it has affected how you feel about our relationship".
If not, don't ask don't tell.
17:36
I have not yet decided what my position is.
@Cerberus you need an ACK/NAK protocol for starters.
I think most of the various positions have merits.
@Cerberus Oh, no, I'm actually in a "normal" monogamous relationship at the moment.
@Mitch That expensive?
@terdon Oh, I see.
So am I.
@Cerberus ugh like cats.
17:37
@terdon See I don't think I could not tell. It would feel like lying to not share something like that. Not that I would feel the need to share details or anything, but it would feel like a lie of omission.
@Mitch Cats, humans: what's the difference?
except humans wouldn't eat each others faces off if they were smaller. We're not animals.
Or did you presuppose bestiality.
@KitZ.Fox It does. And it is. But why do you need to tell? Is it for you or for him? I used to always tell myself it was for her, for honesty etc etc. I was forced to admit that it was in fact for me in order to make me feel better.
@Cerberus Latin rules. It's like they made them up
17:39
@Mitch Well no, we'd be too busy biting each-other's heads off, literally. =P
But if I'm the one who fucked up and broke the rules and regrets it, telling her would only serve to make her sad in the hope that she'd forgive me. That's selfish, pure and simple. I fucked up, so I need to learn to deal with that myself.
@terdon Because lying hurts intimacy and what I value most in my relationship with my partner is our intimacy.
@terdon or if it could conceivably transmit a disease to you.
@Mitch Not quite! A t in any form of sexus would not make sense, because there is no t in the stem.
@MetaEd OK yes, that is indeed another issue.
17:40
@terdon I think this deserves some qualification.
@Cerberus this ain't bitcoin! just simple interface negotiation. no encryption, no ledger.
@KitZ.Fox This.
@KitZ.Fox True. True. Still, I have reached the conclusion that, for me at least, it was always a wish for exculpation.
But exculpation may serve a legitimate purpose for the relationship.
Mind you, the simplest solution is not getting yourself into this sort of situation in the first place but that was beyond me for most of my life until my mid thirties.
17:41
I've never found it difficult to not cheat, at least up to now.
And the boundary of sex is quite clear.
And therefore easy.
If it's anal, it's not cheating.
You wish.
@Cerberus I always have. Which is why I've always tried to have open relationships. With specific rules, mind you, but with rules that do allow one-off flings.
17:42
Yeah, just a wish.
@terdon Of course.
For me, trusting others has been a central focus of my adult development and necessary to working through my depression. It's a lot of freaking work but it has been very worth it.
And I didn't mean to say that I did not desire to cheat!
Had it not been for the agreement I felt bound to, I would have done lots of things I haven't.
So it's part of the challenge to talk about things that are uncomfortable.
tears streaming down face
17:44
Or that seem meaningless yet are strangely hard to say.
after reading recent transcript
I think it's natural for at least the large majority of people to desire sex with other people while in a relationship.
@KitZ.Fox Trust is important to all of us. But trust doesn't require full disclosure of everything. It might indeed require disclosure of cheating, but not of everything. So not mentioning something isn't necessarily a lack of trust.
cats not involved
@Færd Interesting.
17:44
@terdon Maybe. For my one intimate partner, I don't think I agree with you there.
@terdon I think everything you do is to make you feel good. So that alone can't rule out being honest with your partner about things they value in their relationship with you.
Mitch has a strange obsession with cats that is entirely contrary to the strange obsession the rest of the internet has. =P
@RegDwigнt: Forgot to tell you, I've been playing HZD lately. Just short of The Proving atm. Interesting and fun, with a good story, but so far not a challenge. I may crank it up to hard soon if it doesn't change.
@terdon there are some things you just can't tell a person.
@KitZ.Fox No, I mean simple things. If you don't mention that you went for a jog yesterday, you're not lying. Obviously, cheating, being something that can affect the relationship is different, but in poinciple you don't need to share everything.
17:45
It's funny how talking about some things makes them suddenly unimportant and small.
@terdon Well duh.
Sometimes. Sometimes it makes them far more important than they should be.
It can easily go both ways.
@Mitch Oh, no! What happened?
But if I felt like I was avoiding mentioning that I had gone for a jog, that would signal something to me.
@Cerberus Does that mean you wanna hear more?
@Færd I think there is a lot of true altruism, that is well beyond both the self-serving feeling of pride in the act or in the expectation of return.
17:47
@KitZ.Fox Indeed. If you feel it, there's something wrong there.
@Cerberus Tears of laughter.
@Færd I should probably not answer...
should have specified.
I'm just saying that sometimes it might be better for you to suck it up, so to speak. When the only reason for telling would be to make you feel better.
I could have smashed my fingers with a hammer
17:47
@terdon Maybe. That hasn't been my experience.
but then I suppose I wouldn't be typing as much
@terdon Compare it with the thought, "my, her boobs really don't look as good as they did 20 years ago".
@terdon I can't think of a situation when I wouldn't want my partner to help me feel better.
It would be "honest" to share this thought with her.
@Mitch Unexpected of you, and interesting. Like what?
17:48
@Mitch Like what for example?
@Cerberus Your call.
And by not saying it, you're actively withholding information from her.
And yet, I don't think you need to share that.
Oh something like "That was me that farted, not the dog"
You just can't say that
@KitZ.Fox I can think of some where while I might want her to make me feel better, I might choose not to because in order for her to make me feel better, I would have to make her feel worse.
It's wrong
17:49
@Færd Umm now you're making me curious...?
@terdon Fair enough.
@Cerberus Honest, but pointless and hurtful, yes.
Yeah.
@Cerberus I'm only human.
17:50
@terdon Yeah, I don't see the point of sharing that kind of thought.
@Cerberus Oh you doubted that?
I seem to have lost the thread of the conversation a bit...
Too much flirting going on.
No problem. Me too.
17:51
thoughts don't have the same import as hearing someone say them
You look more like a bird.
@KitZ.Fox Exactly. I spent 2 years with a woman I found fascinating and was madly in love with. I always found her face to be gorgeous but her body wasn't the body type I find really attractive. That wasn't much of an issue because I found her attractive. So why would I go and tell her that I don't find her body beautiful?
@KitZ.Fox Seriously?
_I have to take that autism test again.
@terdon Similarly, it may not be flattering to tell her that you desired sex with someone else.
@terdon I don't see how that's a lie of omission though. Unless she asked you what you thought of her body and you avoided saying so.
17:52
YOu know the one where you have to guess emotion just by looking at pictures of people's eyes
@Cerberus Precisely.
it seems impossible, but some people can, inexplicable to themselves, do very well at it.
@terdon But, for having sex with a third person, I would somehow want a general fiat beforehand.
I ... did not do well.
@KitZ.Fox Well, I didn't bring it up. I chose not to share that thought with her. That's all. And I'd have been an utter asshole if I'd done anything else.
17:53
@Mitch I would probably suck at that too.
@Cerberus Yes, that's how I used to do it. Always lay down the ground rules.
@terdon Was it a thing that was very important to you?
Yeah.
@Cerberus naw it's surprising how well some people do, and they themselves don't know why.
@KitZ.Fox Not really, no. I just mention it as an example where honesty would not have been the best policy.
17:54
@Mitch Hmm.
it's like blindsight...it's somehow this weird statistical thing that you end up choosing the right one without being able to say anything or refer to any feeling why
@terdon Well, I don't see that as dishonest.
No, not dishonest. Just not full disclosure.
I am not saying I lied. Although had she asked me directly I would have probably hedged around the issue. Focusing on something I did find beautiful about her and there was no shortage of those.
If it were a thing that made you feel like you didn't want to be in that relationship and you didn't talk about it, that's dishonest. If you didn't like the color of her shirt but didn't really give a crap about whether she changed it, then it doesn't matter.
Is there anyone who would really want people/their partner to be completely honest with them?
17:55
Wait, this whole thing is weird. People are scary jealous with very good reason. Sure being open about things is a very intellectual strategy for dealing with it, compensating for it, but it's still there.
Of course there is a limit to what you share.
people aren't robots
or living in Brave New World.
yet.
haha.
gulp
@KitZ.Fox Yep. But there you go: if I've cheated but it has not affected how I feel about my relationship at all, why would it be better to say it?
@Færd Yes. They're called teenagers.
@terdon because it might not affect how you feel, but it could affect how she feels about it.
@terdon And they grow up and learn.
17:57
@KitZ.Fox Ah, but that is equally true of my example. If I had told her I didn't find her body particularly attractive, that would certainly have affected how she felt about our relationship.
because maybe she doesn't want to get blindsided by someone talking about how great you were in bed, and think they are liars, and then find out they are not.
minicroissant time
Oh hell, if there's a chance in a million she might find out from someone else, then of course I'd say!
Hearing it from another person is awful.
@Mitch It is possible!
17:58
dammit, my mobile.
@terdon Then you would always say.
@terdon There is always a chance...
Hmm. OK, I should rein in my hyperboles. If I thought there was a reasonable chance she might hear from someone else.
So I'm just peeping in to see how much we have covered about relationships.
But not talking about her body attractiveness is different because you are not doing anything about it.
17:59
@englishstudent peering, please.
nice discussion. Still, wow, aren't we fun.
peeking?

« first day (2394 days earlier)      last day (2825 days later) »