Um, yeah, mostly. I mean, my mom was there, but of all the possibilities I envisioned, she took the most predictable route.
Plus, my food was well-received.
:D
I made spinach lasagna and stew beef chili.
My children were perfect little angels.
Until the last ten minutes of the drive back, when the little one decided he'd had enough of being in the car and was just going to cry and cry until somebody let him out.
Spinach lasagna. This particular variant (because I do them a little differently every time) had fresh baby spinach chopped and mixed with ricotta cheese and lots of fresh grated garlic (maybe four or five cloves?).
Then some green onions. I think I used three. Sliced red and yellow sweet peppers, diced carrot, black beans, diced tomatoes, and a little can of tomato sauce.
Well, you could. It would probably help. The peppers might get really mushy though.
I have simmered it, then cooled it, then re-heated it with similar effect. In maybe six hours? Between making it in the morning and eating it for dinner.
And I learned on the radio that today is "Mistress day", that is, the day when you take your mistress out for dinner, etc, because you can't do it tomorrow on account of your wife would notice.
So many aspects of V-day bug me. Like, parents are compelled to provide their children with sufficient valentines cards so that they can give them out to their classmates. And later on, when valentine's day takes on that "romantic" sense, then you feel pressure if you're single and don't have a date, or whatever. and THEN, when you DO have someone in your life, suddenly there's this arbitrary expectation to perform some kind of ritual. bah
Well, just because the stores try to sell goods during that time doesn't meant they invented it. And just because a message originates in a marketing campaign doesn't mean people don't believe it.
is there any better way to say usage time? Cuz i have used it many times in my essay.I want same meaning but different words . does "time of use" have same meaning with "usage time" i am not sure about it.Any help will be welcome?
A guy I worked with was a confirmed bachelor. He refused to get married, and frequented prostitutes instead. I asked him why, and he said, "If you're not paying money, you're paying too much."
I have no problem with my husband hiring a professional to provide services for him. As long as money changes hands, the nature of the relationship (or rather lack thereof) is clear.
@Kitḫ Yes. In many cases (my own excluded), you get someone who manages every detail of your life, nags you about it, wins every argument by virtue of being able to go longer without sex than you can, and so on.
If you are paying money for an emotional relationship, then you are better off hiring a therapist.
@Cerberus Diseases? The idea? I don't know what you mean.
@Robusto Well, of course that is who you would get if you think that you have to buy a relationship. You will get someone who thinks that they should be paid for being in a relationship.
@Cerberus My desire for sex has hit an all-time low for my entire life. It has been this way for months and shows no signs of turning around. Should my husband not have sex anymore because I have a problem? That doesn't seem fair. Also, that's what they make condoms for.
@Cerberus "young and/or dumb" does not preclude "could possibly be interested in". Especially if there's sex involved. The brain does strange things, starts inventing feelings, etc.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 What I meant was, perhaps many people are vulnerable in that way. I personally can't imagine overlooking things like a lack of education etc., so I don't know what it is like.
@Cerberus That's like saying "any given Sunday is a day you can watch football." It's the Superbowl of having crazy sex days. And I'm going to miss it.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 I just mean that it could only happen with people that were marriage material at all, and I would know that beforehand, so it would never be only physical.
@Robusto As in surgically altered to be indistinguishable from a man.
@Cerberus here is an article where they discuss "high-end" prostitutes which are totally different from street-walkers and are generally more intelligent, educated, etc than might be expected.
> I almost get the impression, both from reading about Allie and other prostitutes in Superfreakonomics and from communicating with Maggie, that high-class prostitutes like Allie and Maggie have more in common with college professors, corporate executives, or poets than with the more affordable and visible members of their profession.
@Cerberus Well, whatever. My point is not that all high-end prostitutes are like that. My point is that there ARE some prostitutes like that. Thus it is possible to meet one. I make no claims as to what the probability is.
Women never listen. They just can't talk about their emotions.
> For some reason most people seem to be born without the part of the brain that understands pointers. Pointers require a complex form of doubly-indirected thinking that some people just can’t do, and it’s pretty crucial to good programming.
I get annoyed by men talking about women owing them something because they took them to dinner or something. They tend to be the same men that get offended when a woman tries to pay for dinner, which leads me to believe that they want this kind of arrangement.
@Cerberus Read what Jean Piaget says about the stages of development in children. The final one is called "formal operational" and it's one that I think most people never reach, which includes many kinds of abstract thought.
@Kitḫ Hmm I agree; the social convention does not entail their owing these guys anything. The being offended part is probably just bruised ego, because they think she doesn't accept because she doesn't like them or doesn't trust them.
@Cerberus I think it's more of a "If you pay for dinner, that means you don't want to have sex with me, because if I pay for dinner then you should have sex with me."
Since the whole dinner thing is just for the purpose of having sex, instead of trying to establish a relationship.