« first day (458 days earlier)      last day (4760 days later) » 

05:00
@Cerberus Exactly!
Jinx!
@DavidWallace Yes! If he were ESL but he made a real effort to try to ask good questions, I could forgive mistakes like capitalization
True. FWIW, the Aussie-SL game really was exciting!
So it's not that his two questions are essentially against the "rules", but the judges just need a break.
That's "True" to Cerberus.
05:01
Hmm what do you mean by those quotation marks?
@Jasper Back to the Future was awesome! You're crazy.
Hi!
Isn't that an old film?
Hello!
Yes. Well, 1985 isn't that old.
@Cerberus, are you asking me (re the quote marks) or someone else?
Ah, I thought you had just come back from watching it in a cinema or something.
@DavidWallace You!
Oh, wait, you were mimicking mine.
05:03
This person does not get it.
OK, several lines ago, I said "True" in response to your comment about begging this person to change his questions. Simchona made a comment just before my "True", so it looked like I was answering Simchona, not answering you. My later comment was to clarify whom I was talking to; and I used the quote marks because I was quoting myself.
@Mahnax Nope. Not at all.
@Mahnax We've been talking about him.
@Cerberus Perhaps I should have perused the transcript.
@DavidWallace Oh, baby Jesus! I was slow and sloppy, my apologies.
@Mahnax Nahh I don't want to be the only one who never does.
05:04
@Cerberus I usually do.
@Cerberus, don't mench. It's a bit tricky when there are three or so threads of conversation, and it's hard to track who is responding to what.
But I guess I'll be part of your club today.
Ehh so do I! It was a test, a test!
Hahaha.
Nice try.
05:05
@DavidWallace Yup, and my other two heads were thinking of food too.
@Cerberus I have treats
jumps up against Sim
holds treats above head
snake neck hair grabs it and eats it
No feeding the snakes!
Damn.
05:07
@Cerb Would you like a....
throws another treat into Chatzy
Yay!
@Mahnax Ohh I love it!
@Cerberus The puppy we have goes wild for these things.
D'oh!
05:08
@Mahnax - what country are those sold in?
But is that really cheaper than a real bone with meat on it?
@DavidWallace Canada, and probably the USA.
Dunno. I don't have a dog.
Yay we have a New Zealander!
@Cerberus I have my doubts, but it's "safer".
05:09
My antipode!
@Cerberus “Where! Where!” — Haha.
@Mahnax Huh, how are bones unsafe?
@Cerberus I have no idea.
@Vitaly Yeah I was lured there by Sim, but she failed to deliver...
It kind of looks like an Azaria joke. Anyone know what I mean?
05:09
The other Chatzy, Cerb
@Cerberus isn't there another room or something
@DavidWallace Hmm no idea?
@simchona Ahhh.
Jinx, you two.
There's another one? Wow. Nobody tells me anything around here.
OK, I think it was 1980; somewhere in central Australia, a baby died. Her mother was acccused of murdering her. But the parents always claimed that the baby was killed by a dingo.
It prompted a wave of bad jokes around Australia and NZ about dingoes eating babies.
@DavidWallace Ohhhh man!!! My friends and I make jokes about that all the time.
05:11
@DavidWallace The band in Buffy the Vampire Slayer was "Dingo Ate My Baby"
I think it made it into an episode of Seinfeld.
So I see a dog treat called "dingo" and I expect the writing at the side to say "made with real babies".
Found it!
@DavidWallace Oh, hehe.
@Cerberus — Speaking of Chatzy, we are 140 ahead in the current defense war at 1h left. Let me know if you are going to snipe.
05:14
@Mahnax Hmm that isn't an Australian accent, is it?
@Vitaly Ah OK.
@Cerberus Nope, but it's a darn terrible mockery.
I'll spend a bar then, lest I forget; I should be in bed in an hour.
@Mahnax Ah OK.
Good.
@Cerberus Yep.
Yeah, why do non-Antipodeans do such a terrible job of imitating Australian and New Zealand accents?
Even Anthony Hopkins in The Fastest Indian didn't sound particularly authentic to me.
Are our dulcet tones really that hard?
05:17
If I do say so myself, I can imitate an Australian accent half-decently.
Will someone read the comments here and tell me if I can stop banging my head against the wall?
And you're from Canada?
@DavidWallace Yessir.
@simchona - maybe the headline was "Chase a crooked shadow", and that's all there was?
@simchona You can stop banging your head against the wall. I'll take over from here.
05:19
@DavidWallace He said its "the speaking tree" or something.
To be honest, I'd probably do a poo job of imitating a Canadian accent. I'd probably sound Irish or something.
@simchona; yeah, I didn't get the speaking tree reference.
@DavidWallace Canadians don't have a truly noticeable accent.
You mean, their accent is not noticeable to other Canadians? Did you omit the smiley?
@DavidWallace I'm American. The accent is barely noticeable to me.
Canadians speak very similarly to Americans, except if the Canadian in question is from Newfoundland or Quebec.
@DavidWallace The smiley?
05:22
Yes, I have difficulty distinguishing Canadians from Americans. I find myself listening for specific vowels, like the one in "out", to try and spot the difference.
@DavidWallace "Pasta" and "sorry"
How do you say them, @Sim?
Paw-sta and saw-rry?
Pretty much.
Interesting.
I suppose if an American or Canadian were trying to distinguish MY accent from that of an Australian, they'd wait for me to say something like "fish".
But sounding like an American is not the same as having no accent.
Everybody has an accent!
That's why I put the remark about the smiley.
05:25
@DavidWallace I suppose.
@David What time is it in New Zealand?
0
Q: Poetic Devices or Figurative Language in the song "You can't stop the beat" - Hairspray?

randomphpThis is very important for me and will be very grateful to who ever is able to help me out. I need someone to point out the poetic devices/literary devices/figurative language in the song titled "You can't stop the beat" from Hairspray. The Lyrics are: You can't stop an avalanche as it races dow...

Close.
@simchona Yep.
@Mahnax You do have a boot.
@Cerberus We don't actually say that!
@DavidWallace Agreed.
Americans have an American accent. Only British has no accent.
@Mahnax I've heard it plenty of times.
05:32
@Cerberus kis (8), gri (10), пит (7)
When I started paying attention to it.
To a Canadian, Canadians don't have accents.
Unless, of course, you're from Quebec or Newfoundland.
@Cerberus Where?
That's because their ears are plugged.
@Mahnax Everywhere.
On Youtube.
@Vitaly Hmm...is it an uncommon word again?
@Cerberus Bleh. Whatever, then.
Kismet, kiss, kisser...
Gribus, griezel, grimas, grifheid, grind/grint, gril, gringo, griesmeel...
05:34
@Cerberus it's a name for a species, yes
Grit.
@Vitaly One whose name I would know?
@Cerberus no idea :P
Well, I'm off for awhile. Bye!
Bye!
@Vitaly Hmm then probably not...
@Cerberus kiskadee, Grietjebie, питанга
05:37
Never heard of any of those words.
De grote kiskadie (Pitangus sulphuratus), in Suriname om zijn roep bekend als Grietjebie, is een insectenetende (sub)tropische zangvogel uit de familie van de tirannen. De grote kiskadie broedt in open bebost terrein, inclusief bouwland en rond menselijke bewoning, vanaf het zuiden van Texas tot Uruguay en centraal Argentinië en op Trinidad. Beschrijving De volwassen grote kiskadie is circa 22 centimeter groot en weegt circa 63 gram. De kop is zwart met een witte oogstreep. De rug, vleugels en staart zijn bruin, de borst is helder geel. De snavel is kort en dik. De roep is een luid g...
I certainly came in at an odd time.
"Known in Surinam as Grietjebie".
Hi!
English seems to have deteriorated while my back was turned.
Into Dutch.
No, it has been upgraded!
05:40
6 hours ago, by RegDwight Ѭſ道
No hazoodling your bloempz in this chat.
P.S. @Vit: I give up, I lost all but one game.
I'd better stay out of it.
But you did win one game!
That reminds me, I'm working on a video about spelling reform.
British have dozens of accents.
If anyone has any input to argue.
05:41
Yes, but being a net loss on active is not worth the trouble. Not worth anything, actually.
@JonPurdy Oh! Are you arguing for or against? Or not at all?
Bother, Mahnax and simchona have both left. I was hoping someone would explain to me how I can distinguish Americans and Canadians by their pronunciation of "sorry".
I remember you were hesitant about it last time.
@Cerberus … Oh. I thought you were talking about the word game.
@DavidWallace I think you would have a really hard time.
@Vitaly ...
@Cerberus Some both but slightly for.
05:44
Well, the main thing I would say about it is that it is never going to happen, because people don't want it.
Fair enough.
The second thing is, who would organize it?
OK, it's just that Simchona suggested "pasta" and "sorry" as words I could listen for, if I wanted to tell whether someone was Canadian or American.
Hmm...
The problem is that “spelling reform” is kind of an XY problem. The real problem is that the Latin alphabet isn’t natively suitable for English.
05:45
I figured "sorry" would be more common than "pasta", and therefore more worthwhile understanding the difference of.
So spelling reform would be solving Y when the cause is X.
True.
Sorry, that last sentence was clumsy, but I think it's clear what I meant.
Haha.
Yes.
I like saying what is what I meant though clumsy.
So you have a fan?
Or a competitor.
05:47
But the Latin alphabet could be made to do the work with digraphs.
I think text-speak is creating spelling reform all by itself. And is more likely to succeed than any sort of spelling reform mandated by a language body.,
That's what we've been doing for quite a bit of English history.
@JonPurdy You suddenly stopped making sense! Does that come with the aura of spelling reform?
@DavidWallace Yeah, probably, though its effects will be very long term, if any.
@Cerberus Yes, but usually because spelling-reform advocates insist on coming up with bad proposals, writing a whole article in them.
Then abandoning the project.
Haha.
05:49
Unless a new technology makes texting redundant before its evils have time to take hold.
If you had a central spelling authority, you could have it roll out the changes gradually.
I guess I mean obsolete.
That works here, to a degree.
Well, your and you're have more or less merged by way of ur because it was shorter than u r.
@DavidWallace Hmm but will text messages ever become obsolete?
05:50
At least so I contend.
There is an easy way to pass any English spelling reform. Just rewrite the English Wikipedia using the new spelling all by yourself.
@Cerberus - Gross! So I can write in "traditional spelling", "reformed spelling v1.0", v1.1, v2.0 and so on??
@DavidWallace You're supposed to write in the current spelling.
@DavidWallace That is usually what reform advocates propose, yeah.
It changes every 5–10 years.
05:51
@Cerberus, I mean, if I use something like Siri, I speak my text, rather than typing it. If the recipient also uses something like Siri, they hear their text. So what does it matter how the two Siris communicated to each other? Could just be in digitised sound.
By the way, to both of you, you can reply to a specific line by hovering over it, then clicking the tiny grey arrow on the right.
Ugh, mouse.
This is why I like IRC.
Get off my lawn.
@DavidWallace Well, but the thing about texting is that you can do it in silence. That is one of its main advantages.
@Cerberus what little arrow?
@DavidWallace Hover over my line.
05:53
@Cerberus, you mean something that's correctly spelt today has to be spelt differently tomorrow? And differently again next year?
@JonPurdy Yeah, I sort of agree. Perhaps there are hotkeys for it too.
How could anyone learn to spell under those circumstances?
@DavidWallace Yes. And it often flip-flops.
@DavidWallace Noöne can.
@Cerberus, OK, I see the arrow now. Need my eyes tested though.
It's usually less work than typing my name! Of which you only need the first three letters, by the way.
05:54
OK, suppose I have a Siri-like device that connects to my brain via electrodes. I think what I want to say, and the other person then thinks my thoughts.
@Cerberus That's what tab-completion is for, yeah.
So I should call you Cer?
And and another cool thing: if you press the up key on your keyboard while in an empty typing box, you can edit your previous lines.
Is that pronounced the same as Sir?
@JonPurdy True, you can do that too. But you don't need to.
@DavidWallace Yes, that could work. But you'd have to think in words, probably.
05:55
I can type "Cerberus" in a fraction of a second. Reaching for my mouse, going up to the right line, clicking on a tiny little arrow, then moving my hands back to the keyboard - I don't think so.
@DavidWallace You do not have to; but you may, and it is shorter. It will still ping me. @Dav
I'd get accused of sexual harassment on a regular basis.
Okay, well, sometimes it is easier to click the arrow than explain to which line you were replying.
@Cerberus Yeah, fair call.
Because I can hover over your reply and see which line of mine you replied to.
05:57
Umm, I mean if I had thought-text.
Ahh...well, the idea is that you could control which messages to send!
@DavidWallace As opposed to the current system, in which you may send messages involuntarily by blushing and stumbling!
@Cerberus I'm radically honest, so most of those messages are explicit in my conversations. :P
@JonPurdy Really?
Then what do you say when an attractive specimen of our species greets you?
Do you say, "hello; you attract me"?
Hey @Vit, shall I put your list of -cy/sy words in my answer?
Or would you rather post your own answer?
06:13
@Cerberus check them first. as i said, most of them are either obsolete alternative spellings (ycy = ysy = icy) or different words altogether. there's only one legit cy/sy pair.
@Vitaly I would add that information, of course.
@Cerberus Sometimes. Usually it’s more polite, because I have a certain amount of inherent politeness. “Hi, nice to meet you. I hope you don’t mind my saying, but I think you’re quite attractive.”
@Vitaly I would say something like, "the following alternative spellings have been recorded by dictionary editors, although most, if not all, are now considered spelling errors, prophecy/-sy being the only apparent exception. This illustrates how spelling fluctuated."
oh, and most of those aren't even verbs!
But I don’t meet a lot of people, and even fewer that I find particularly attractive. Being bisexual I suppose my main cue for attraction is personality.
06:16
@Vitaly No, but the main point there is indicating how fickly c/s spelling was in general.
Oh, ok.
There's something to do away with. C.
Except where it preserves a useful sound change.
@JonPurdy Hmm you really find so few people attractive?
Though I can't think of a good example right now.
@Vitaly And shall I mention your name?
I would, if I didn't suspect that you had objections.
@JonPurdy What do you mean?
06:18
@Cerberus No, just so few people that I’ve met lately. Mostly I’m attracted to very intelligent or skilled people.
No bodies?
@Cerberus I don't really care.
@Vitaly All right, then I will mention you.
I'm removing the non-Greek words anyway.
@Cerberus In a word where adding a common suffix changes the pronunciation from [k] to [s], for example. I'm really blanking on an actual example, but that doesn't mean it's altogether uncommon.
@Vit: See how I used the present continuous? I haven't started actually doing it.
@JonPurdy I don't think such words exist?
06:22
Oh noes!
Not with English suffixes.
@Cerberus Bodies are nice, but I don’t discriminate as much as some. General health is important, but other than that it really just depends on the person.
@JonPurdy I didn't mean for actually dating, but just noticing. If you're really direct, you would comment on anybody's looks even if you didn't know him at all.
Maybe I’m thinking in Romanian or something (merg→merge = [mɛrg]→[mɛrdʒɛ]).
Yes, that happens in Romance languages, but not in English, I believe.
Wherever we have that, it is due to suffixes that were added before the word was adopted as English.
06:24
@JonPurdy is radical honesty a superset of Crocker's rules?
Or perhaps also by analogy.
@Cerberus Let me clarify. I’m radically honest in that I always tell the truth, and say what’s on my mind. But I’m not a member of the “Radical Honesty” movement, which precludes being an awkward penguin, which I still am sometims.
@Vit: By the way, you have "synracy/syncrasy": I presume the first word should be "syncracy"?
@Cerberus yeah.
@Vitaly No, it’s the assertion that lying is a main cause of human strife, so you should give it up altogether for ethical reasons.
06:28
@JonPurdy Hmm I don't know that movement. But, when you say "what's on your mind", that doesn't mean you say whatever comes up whenever it comes up?
Or does it mean "when asked"?
@JonPurdy So you are still allowed to be offended whenever someone else, who is “radically honest”, says something that your mind finds offensive?
@Cerberus If I’m not interrupting. I don’t like to interrupt. But when asked, absolutely.
@Vitaly I can be offended by whatever I want. But I don’t remember a point in my life where I was legitimately offended except on a personal level, like a teacher unjustly punishing me based on a misunderstanding or what have you.
@Vitaly - it's more the converse.
@JonPurdy, so have you ever told someone on first meeting them that they attract you?
@DavidWallace Yeah. It hasn’t gone that well, but so what?
Yeah, seems counterproductive to me.
BUt to your credit, you're way braver than I.
06:35
@DavidWallace that was my impression too, yes, but i wanted to make sure.
Not at all. Once you know someone’s not interested in you, you can spend that much less time bothering with them romantically, and focus instead on other things.
Has it occurred to you that letting them know you're attracted to them may CAUSE them not to be interested in you?
A lot of bisexual guys, if they’re attracted to a guy and they’re not sure if he’s into men, will try to figure it out by observation or guessing or whatever. And that’s stupid. You should just ask. It’s so much simpler.
@DavidWallace Not really. I’m attractive enough that if someone’s not interested in me then I’m just not their type. If “their type” is “someone who doesn’t admit their attraction”, then yeah, I’m not.
@JonPurdy OK, I understand now.
@Cerberus hey, this is one area where my opinion differs from Yudkowsky's opinion, if you are interested. :P
06:39
It’s fun, though, and it’s simplified a lot of things for me. And got me out of a bad relationship and into a very good one.
@JonPurdy Haha, nice reasoning.
@Vitaly Oh! A unicum! Tell up!
@JonPurdy. Good for you. It still seems not right to me, but if it works for you, who am I to say otherwise?
@Cerberus hahaha. well, Yudkowsky states that the neural circuits we use to lie to others also censor our own thoughts, and so radical honesty offers an advantage over Crocker's rules, while I maintain that if you have the right kind of mental discipline to invoke Crocker's rules permanently, you shouldn't have too much of a trouble un-censoring your own thoughts
@DavidWallace Not right in what way? Logically or morally?
@JonPurdy But how about this. It is probably unpleasant for you, at least to some degree, to be rejected. The other person knows this. That's why he will really hate to have to do that. And, if forced to do so, he may feel awkward, and the whole atmosphere may become a bit awkward for you all.
06:42
I think that a hypothetical Jon Purdy who doesn't admit his attraction on first meeting would be attractive to a larger number of people than the real Jon Purdy.
@Vitaly Hmm I understand your reasoning; but why the choice between Crocker and radical honesty? Why not use both?
However, since (you say) you're in a very good relationship, I suppose that doesn't really matter to you.
@Cerberus - I mean if you had to adopt one or t'other, but not both.
@Cerberus In theory, yes, but not in practice. People find honesty startling, and it tends to create a certain intimacy in the conversation. It’s the same reason public speakers and teachers will swear a little, to catch you off guard and level the playing field. When you’re honest, people tend to be honest back, and there are no hard feelings.
@DavidWallace Jon has a point that he may not care to be attractive to those people, because they just do not appreciate his character.
@Cerberus - I completely didn't mean to make that last comment, about adopting one or other but not both. Something went awry in my thought processes.
06:44
@DavidWallace Hmm but why the choice?
Oh haha...
@Cerberus Yes, that. I am how I am, and I like to be liked for who I am.
Not who I’m imagined to be.
I meant to say "I think Vitaly means ... ". But "think Vitaly" disappeared between brain and keyboard.
@DavidWallace The brain–keyboard connection is often tenuous at best.
@Cerberus because RH is counter-advantageous. those awkward situations wouldn't serve my utility function too well.
@JonPurdy I don't know. It's not really about hard feelings, but rather about knowing you have displeased someone. I find that extremely uncomfortable.
@DavidWallace Shouda bought a brand brain-texting device.
06:47
Sure, but if you became the hypothetical Jon Purdy of which I spoke, you'd have more options. And you wouldn't care what those people thought of the currently-real Jon Purdy, because he wouldn't exist anymore.
@Cer LOL!
@DavidWallace Why do I care about options? Any reasonably attractive or charismatic person can go out and have sex with a new person every week if they want. I prefer a longer-term relationship, so I have to be more selective about compatibility. If I lied, even by omission, to spare someone’s feelings, then I’d be creating an unstable situation that would ultimately need to stabilise. And that’s precisely what happened in my last relationship.
Also, what if that person was someone that you had to see again and again, for example someone you worked with? Or a sister-in-law, or something. Is the risk of ongoing awkwardness worth it?
@Vitaly Ah OK. So being brutally honest all the time would cause you disadvantage. E. then says it is still necessary, because self-deception is the consequence of any other attitude, and that is worse. Then you say, no, the self-deception can be avoided. You bring forward the ability of applying Crocker's rules as evidence that it is possible.
@DavidWallace Yes, undoubtedly, because the awkwardness will be mitigated by my lack of giving a damn. Once I know someone isn’t attracted to me, I’m done. Frankly, it’s a turn-off to be turned down. And I don’t bear grudges.
And I would make that clear.
I am more like David, but I can theoretically appreciate Jon's point.
06:53
It’s happened to me before several times. “I think you’re a pretty attractive guy. Are you into men? No? Okay, it’s just easier to ask.”
Yes, so can I. But it seems a bit idealised to me.
@Jon do you get beaten up much when you say that?
But it works better if you really don't care; it is also easier for the other party to bear then.
@DavidWallace He probably moves in circles where people are civilized enough not to do that.
Or do you get "yes, I'm into men, but not ones who are as forward as you"?
@DavidWallace Nope. I’ve never been attacked for anything, much less my sexuality. And getting “beaten up” would probably mean death for me, because there’s not much to me. :P
@Cerberus Aye, thar.
@DavidWallace Then he can say back, "OK, that's exactly what I wanted to know".
06:56
@DavidWallace Now that’s interesting. I wouldn’t mind it, yeah, but somehow it doesn’t seem like that would arise, particularly because (in my experience) men are very ready to seek out romantic partners.
If being forward is very important to you, it makes sense that you might not want to date someone who does not accept it.
@Cerberus I don’t see what you mean?
@JonPurdy I don't mean to be mean, but I am usually put off if someone is too forward.
@JonPurdy Oops! I said "want" twice, instead of "not want" (corrected).
@Cerberus How forward is too forward? I’m not a leering pervert. I’m quiet, soft-spoken, and polite. But also honest.
If I were single (and I'm not) and a woman was that forward with me, I would be put off by their forwardness. My reponse would be polite but negative.

« first day (458 days earlier)      last day (4760 days later) »