« first day (2135 days earlier)      last day (3082 days later) » 
03:00 - 17:0017:00 - 22:00

03:33
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive answer detected: What does the verb "nig" mean? by a deleted user on english.stackexchange.com
user227867
@Tonepoet I just realised how terrible the printed OALD is. It does not give any example sentences for 'abase' and 'abashed' but gives two useless examples for 'abbey', 'Westminister Abbey' and 'ruined abbey'. I now wonder why it is a world bestseller.
@WillHunting My personal opinion is that Oxford's rep. relies mostly upon prestige at this point in time.
I wish we could give Sven a real badge of honor. He’s a rare gem.
user227867
@tchrist I think if we give him one badge, we have to give you two.
@Tonepoet The OED’s prestige is earned. The rest is open to debate.
user227867
03:49
Maybe if OUP made the 20 volume OED cheaper, more people would buy the set and they would make more money.
No serial admiring allowed, but just take a gander at what a great boon he is to the site!
He has three and forty Necromancer badges!
user227867
43 is the bus I take to the hospital.
@tchrist The O.E.D. is great at doing what it's meant to do, but right now we're talking about N.O.A.D.
@WillHunting We call those ambulances in English, Jasper.
user227867
@Tonepoet Maybe you were talking about NOAD, but I was talking about OALD.
03:52
E2MANYNYMS
user227867
@Tonepoet What do you think of buying a new copy of the MW Unabridged? It is slightly cheaper than the Shorter OED.
@WillHunting It's considered a descriptivist dictionary and the bulk of it hasn't been updated since 1961, so it's out of date. A more prescriptivist approach would be to buy the Second New International Dictionary.
@WillHunting Okay, I misread. O.A.L.D. is a learner's dictionary and it does its job well enough. I think it does a better job of defining the word doubt than any other dictionary we presently have as well.
user227867
@Tonepoet As a learner's dictionary it should give example sentences for harder words, not trivial examples. That is why I was shocked.
@WillHunting That's debatable perhaps. I think the job is to give somebody a basic understanding of what most speakers mean. Westminster Abbey is probably a more common context.
Once you get the gist of the core vocabulary, then you can upgrade to something more accurate.
user227867
@Tonepoet I think I will buy the ODE. I will do it tonight. =P
04:04
Also, however well Oxford defines the word doubt, I think all of the recent dictionaries are inadequate in regard to the countable form. I've been meaning to answer some questions regarding the purportedly "Indian usage" with some information regarding why it's not quite as exotic as it seems.
user227867
@Tonepoet I don't live in India, but it seems strange that doubt can be used to mean question.
user227867
@Tonepoet Anyway, I think I will conclude now that AHD is the best American dictionary. =P
It's not really that strange. Summarized, "A doubt" is a reason for feeling doubt, so if you're asked what that doubt is, you'll often reply in the form of a question that not only describes the doubt, but gives your correspondent a chance to answer your confusion.
We use "a joy" similarly, and there's a very interesting page in the Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia, amongst all of the other resources I've seen.
I joined E.L.L. for the express purpose of answering one question regarding it but I haven't gotten around to that yet.
I'll email you a link to the page.
I give up. Why in the world do you kids say email for mail?
It’s beginning to bother me at work.
user227867
Hmm, isn't email the e version of mail?
04:13
It's a fad.
@tchrist I'm the wrong person to ask @tchrist . If it were up to me, we'd write E. mail.
The word mail works perfectly well for all uses.
I rather disapprove of all e-anythings.
user227867
I prefer email to mail and E. mail, FWIW.
Why would you use the e- for this?
Do you really think people don't know what you're talking about?
Or that you don't?
user227867
To distinguish clearly and immediately that it is not paper mail?
04:14
Disbelieve.
user227867
Of course, in this case, the context is clear.
user227867
But simply adding an e in front makes things immediately very clear.
Jasper, have you ever written something to Tonepoet through an alternate medium which isn't this one?
user227867
Nope.
Tonepoet, have you ever written Jasper anything using something other than SE?
user227867
04:16
Yes, using email.
"I sent you some mail."

"Oh really, when should I be expecting it? Is it a package of some sort? I'll have to be at home when it arrives if it is, otherwise It'll get stolen."

"What, you didn't get it already? I just sent it to your computer's inbox."
I disbelieve.
You may have typed something, but you cannot have written it.
Otherwise you would have had to have sent him a scan of your handwriting.
user227867
LOL
And if you feel that the context makes clear which one it is for this case, I cannot understand all the esilliness obsessionating.
Perhaps you merely ewrote him.
Or somebody pretending to be him.
You really just ewrote ehim an eletter.
user227867
Hmm, now we have another word to think about, namely 'write'.
04:19
@tchrist E. it. =P
I believe I’ve now esaid enough to get eyou guys thinking about matters of serious import ehere.
> Why art thou so oddly yclept, so whimsically named - oh, got it, you play the HARP.
> It also leads to pronouncing two double consonants when you speak the word; cl and pt. Yclept means named as in ‘I have a dog yclept Rover.’
> a lady yclept Eleanora
If you wish to argue based upon other provided senses though, I'll be perfectly glad to accept the position that it's an illegitimate use of the word when applying to typing and use E. Write here from now on...
NVZ
NVZ
04:37
@tchrist what's a good time for mass retagging? I'd like to edit a lot of posts and do retags, but don't wish to flood the "active" feed. So when is the user activity the lowest?
Also "5. To compose or produce, as an author." is also relevant but checking the definition of author may come a little too close to playing god for my comfort.
@NVZ Is there an existing meta post on this?
The e in email is just too precious to xist.
@NVZ What do you propose?
@tchrist I prefer new words with new meanings to old words taking on new meanings quite significantly. Unnecessary disambiguation is harmless.
@Tonepoet What's the difference between your written signature and your printed name?
@Tonepoet It does not mean anything new. It is spurious.
It is a marketing rebranding of an old thing with a new name. Doesn't that bother you?
04:56
@tchrist The difference in method produces a perceptibly different result. I much prefer specifying email than "snail mail" by quite a bit.
What's the difference between a pen and a pencil?
You are not optimizing for the common case. You should.
Huffman failure, here.
@tchrist Language is not a programming code. I can't delete relevant history.
New concepts need new words if we're going to differentiate.
I see no justification for the eexistence of this fad word, and I refuse to use it.
You seem to manage to say send perfectly well. But you of couse meant Esend!
You sent nothing that you did not mail.
You can send something through any method available to you in this sense of the word: "2. To cause to be conveyed or transmitted; as, to send letters or dispatches from one country to another."
Mail is different though "1. To inclose in a wrapper and direct to a post office. We say, letters were mailed for Philadelphia."
SMTP envelopes.
05:10
The fact that it's something entirely different is why we say e-mail instead of just mail. It achieves the same effect as mail, but reflects the difference in method.
I think not.
@tchrist Do you have a better theory?
Marketing.
I've used computers for mail for almost 40 years. This word is a dumb fad that adds nothing but a useless syllable in the attempt to sound trendy.
It is nothing new
It appeared AFTER AOL's notorious "You've got mail!"
Notice no e-.
@tchrist Isn't that a proof against your point? It should've been "You've got e-mail!" if it was A.O.L's. marketers trying to force it into the public consciousness. Who's the head of this conspiracy?
If anything, use of the word "mail" sounds snappier and more familiar. What marketer would make their name more cumbersome unless there was some need?
Distinction.
No other verb associated with the computer has an e prefix. No other noun. Why?????
05:22
The eMac, short for education Mac, is a Macintosh desktop computer made by Apple Inc. It was originally aimed at the education market, but was later made available as a cheaper mass market alternative to Apple's second-generation LCD display iMac G4. The eMac was pulled from retail on October 12, 2005 and was sold exclusively to educational institutions thereafter. It was discontinued by Apple on July 5, 2006 and replaced by a cheaper, low-end iMac that, like the eMac, was originally sold exclusively to educational institutions. The eMac design closely resembles the first-generation iMac. Compared...
We use normal nouns and verbs for everything but for the muggles' sole foray into our realm.
I will not speak as they who couldn't write a mail program to save their lives do about the things which are in my domain.
Also I actually do think there were other e- words where e- meant electronic, but they didn't become relevant enough to our daily lives to enter the common vocabulary...
Well, actually:
An electronic book (or e-book) is a book- or periodical publication made available in digital form, consisting of text, images, or both, readable on computers or other electronic devices. Although sometimes defined as "an electronic version of a printed book", some e-books exist without a printed equivalent. Commercially produced and sold e-books are usually intended to be read on dedicated e-reader devices. However, almost any sophisticated computer device that features a controllable viewing screen can also be used to read e-books, including desktop computers, laptops, tablets and smartphones...
@tchrist Next up is the e-grimoire. ;-)
NVZ
NVZ
05:41
@tchrist I don't know. I think I'll just stick to flooding the feed every now and then. :)
Anyway, if it's any consolation @tchrist, at least they're not calling it cybermail or, even worse, virtual mail.
NVZ
NVZ
@Tonepoet who are 'they'?
NVZ
NVZ
@Tonepoet looks like it's none of my e-business. :)
05:59
Heh, I linked to the wrong comment.
06:14
@WillHunting I have every documented word in the English Language, as of 1934, in my lap. They're heavy.
NVZ
NVZ
@Tonepoet e-lap?
@NVZ Oh no, in printed form. The original compact O.E.D. covers first edition and the first 1933 supplement. I also have the India Paper version of Webster's New International Dictionary, Second Edition which was originally printed in 1934 (there's also an addenda section with additional words, but not very many).
NVZ
NVZ
Well, lap could mean laptop. I thought so.
@Tonepoet Printed books cannot be in your lap, can they? ;)
@NVZ Prepositions are the worst words in the language: "IN, in many cases, is equivalent to on. This use of the word is frequent in the Scriptures; as, let fowls multiply in the earth. This use is more frequent in England than in America. We generally use on, in all similar phrases."
Nevertheless it's a good point I suppose. On is perfectly fine and probably more accurate.
 
3 hours later…
user227867
09:24
@Tonepoet Amazing. As heavy as my burdens.
09:46
@WillHunting The good news then, is that those burdens can be lifted altogether!
 
2 hours later…
11:23
@NagarajanShanmuganathan no. Matheism means your God is the word "but". Would you really like being called a buttheist? — RegDwigнt ♦ 27 secs ago
@Cerberus @terdon
@RegDwigнt :) Heh, good one!
Yeah srsly. Liek ppl shud lern greak or sumthen.
αλλά hu akbar.
That's a good name for a bar, actually: The Alahu Ak
11:32
Yeah it would be the bomb.
Ouch
Although, there used to be a bar in Marseille, which was opposite the largest prison of the region and was called Ici mieux qu'en face (better here than across the street)
I would just call that my bar opposite anything. Preferably another bar.
Yahtzee Croshaw, the gaming journalist of Zero Punctuation fame, used to have a bar in Brisbane where you could play all kinds of video games for free. It was called The Mana Bar.
NVZ
NVZ
12:19
What are some common placeholder names like John, Jane, etc?
Ok, no need. Googled em.
Willie, Willie, Harry, Stee
Harry, Dick, John, Harry three;
One, two, three Neds, Richard two
Harrys four, five, six... then who?
Edwards four, five, Dick the bad,
Harrys twain and Ned the Lad;
Mary, Bessie, James the Vain,
Charlie, Charlie, James again...
William and Mary, Anna Gloria,
Four Georges, William and Victoria.
NVZ
NVZ
Wow, thanks, @RegDwigнt
Edward seven next, and then
George the fifth in 1910.
NVZ
NVZ
Shukran. :)
Np habibi.
12:24
@terdon "Hold on for just a moment! I became 99.9% done with your drink in just two minutes! I just need to drive to go to the store and buy the cherry to put on top. I should be back within the hour! Oh, I'm sorry for the delay, I got stuck in traffic for four hours, had to wait in the line for one, and popped my tire on the way back, so I needed to call a tow truck."
It looks like you're ordering a beer. Do you need help with that?
@RegDwigнt Also as long as we're discussing video game bars:
user227867
12:39
The truth is that I am still deciding on which dictionary to get. =P @Tonepoet
NVZ
NVZ
This is fun! :D
OED records too as a valid verb (a form of tew, one definition of which is To fatigue or tire with hard work). So fill your boots and say Looking forward to seeing you two too to too you.FumbleFingers 29 mins ago
user227867
@NVZ Will I get flamed for saying OED is the worst dictionary?
NVZ
NVZ
@WillHunting Depends, are you inflammable? ;P
user227867
Am I valuable or invaluable?
NVZ
NVZ
@WillHunting First, are you referring to your body or your soul as "I"?
12:45
@Tonepoet I have every undocumented word in every language, as of ever, in my head. And it weighs not a gram more than before. Executive summary: you suck at storage.
user227867
@RegDwigнt I prefer to suck Mentos.
@NVZ It's a personal pronoun and a person is both. >_>
NVZ
NVZ
@RegDwigнt And I have a pen that can write any language in the world that ever existed. :P
I'm a personal pronoun. You're a personal noobnoun.
NVZ
NVZ
@RegDwigнt Stop nouning stuff.
12:50
NOU. n.
Ewwww!
NVZ
NVZ
@Tonepoet Well... That escalated quickly!
user227867
You ain't seen nothin' yet.
> I

r
e
a
l
l
y

d
o
n
t

w
a
n
t

t
o
NVZ
NVZ
12:53
@WillHunting Oh, my.
> s
e
e

t
h
a
t
,

l
e
t
s

j
u
s
t

g
e
t

r
i
d

o
f

i
t
.
NVZ
NVZ
@terdon Thank you for saving the day!
@terdon protip: next time just search the transcript for "russell".
Mar 24 at 23:08, by RegDwigнt
Mar 2 '11 at 13:43, by Robusto
2 hours ago, by RegDwight
Feb 18 at 10:59, by Robusto
13 hours ago, by Robusto
27 secs ago, by RegDwight
2 hours ago, by RegDwight
yesterday, by RegDwight
Feb 7 at 15:38, by RegDwight
In the foundations of mathematics, Russell's paradox (also known as Russell's antinomy), discovered by Bertrand Russell in 1901, showed that the naive set theory created by Georg Cantor leads to a contradiction. The same paradox had been discovered a year before by Ernst Zermelo but he did not publish the idea, which remained known only to Hilbert, Husserl and other members of the University of Göttingen. Let R be the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. If R qualifies as a member of itself, it would contradict its own definition as a set containing sets that are not member...
NVZ
NVZ
I eat paradoxes for breakfast.
12:56
Learn English. What you eat is paradoxen.
NVZ
NVZ
@RegDwigнt Nope, that I eat for lunch.
Time moves slow, somedays.
Oh no, not the lunch mob again.
My back is sooooo itchy right now.
I told you not to sleep on chilis.
Cockroaches.
Corn flakes.
13:06
> You are pretty chipper for a guy who found out they died for nothing.
Thus perished he from our language.
blames comics
tell that to Wizards of the Coast
then number of "he or she"s on their cards....
Dear Wizards of the Coast,
I blame comics.
Sincerely,
Reginald Kenneth Dwight.
@MattE.Эллен That's because all their cards are lettered by bisexuals.
13:13
As I happened to comment just a couple hours ago elsewhere on the Internet, I am not from the US so I have no idea what a comics is and don't give a rat's arse about finding out. However, if even Um, err, I can!s themselves start blaming comics, I have to say comics must be the worst.
@terdon It's from the tattoo healing, so I can't, but thanks, that looks cool.
@tchrist I look forward to the first "he and she" rules text
I blame feminazis. They don't even deserve that name, FFS. Proper nazis had he right at the beginning of their leader's name!
13:20
Heil the world, make it a better place. For me and for you and the entire aryan race.
Arya was our Eve.
Note how there's "good evening" but no "good adaming". That's sexist.
I demand compensation.
Godamning is old school.
Fo real, straight outta Compton.
13:52
@RegDwigнt I actually had the opportunity to read that issue online because there was an ebay auction that had page previews. It was a huge deal at the time. The plot of it makes just about as much sense as the video suggests, so I guess you really can judge a book by its cover. =P
> Imagine the wonder people must have experienced, picking up a copy of that iconic magazine back then.
Um. None at all whatsoever? Because it was not iconic at that point? And nobody had heard of this idiotman before?
I knew it!
You're no Russian!
You’re a Stoot!
Stoot is Russian for a misspelled stool. Also, English for a misspelled stool.
Dot your Is and cross your Ls
I am not dotty.
Dotty is walking the yellow-brick road.
14:02
Totes.
@RegDwigнt I guess "now iconic" would be better, although the information is implied. Also no, they had not, it was his debut.
@Tonepoet my issue is not that iconic makes no sense. My issue is that the sentiment as a whole makes no sense.
"Imagine the wonder people must have experienced, picking up a copy of some completely non-iconic dross." is not really fixing the issue, it's only enhancing it.
And it's only made worse by the very next sentence,
> Little did they know how rare their copies were to become.
Well quite.
So. Um. You're admitting no wonder at all because little they knew.
Nobody said wonder though.
I am imagining someone said wonder when they said "imagine the wonder". But I might be imagining it.
Ah, you're right.
14:09
Yeah, I agree. If they didn't know it was rare, why would they have wonder about it?
Anyway let's drop this I'm interested in the stoot thing way more.
M-W tells me stoot is stout is brave and strong.
Why am I brave and strong? Because no Russian?
I thought all true Russians were brave and strong.
My actual first name does mean "brave and strong defender of the people" or some such, so yeah. Guess I'm a stoot alright.
I am not a misspelled stool tho.
@KitZ.Fox Well here's the thing, it was wildly popular. A quarter million copies of a comic selling in 1938 sounds tremendous after all things are considered.
But like Reg said--it wasn't iconic yet. It was a novelty, sure, but novelties aren't wondrous.
14:11
Imagine the wonder of buying the exact same thing a quarter million other people have bought. Think different.
NVZ
NVZ
@KitZ.Fox Only if all Russians are Putins. {grabs popcorn}
Some Russians are Ras, others On the Ritz.
@NVZ that's offensive to the honorable Russian stereotype.
In fact from early baby age every Russian learns to count starting with "Ras,..".
Which is doubly peculiar since the word for "one" is "odin".
Yes the norse god.
So clearly putin's machinations are so stronk they predate even putin.
@KitZ.Fox It's a valid use of the word in a different sense other than what Reg. was implying which is what caught me off guard I suppose. It's not curiousness per-se. "New, unusual, strange, great, extraordinary or not well understood" sound like apt. descriptors.
NVZ
NVZ
14:16
2
Q: What is the essence of the dispute between Wolfe and Chomsky?

WS2I read the report in Sunday's Observer concerning the dispute between Tom Wolfe (author Kingdom of Speech) and Noam Chomsky (professor emeritus Massachusetts Institute of Technology) over their divergent views on the origins of human speech. Whilst Chomsky maintains that people are born with a "...

Yes yes. Absolutely. Wonder as in "what the fuck is this nonsense".
@Tonepoet hmm. Ok. I see what you're saying.
But I'm not sure that's bettering things.
It's not a great word for that.
Anyway. Had you told me just this morning that I'd be discussing superman all day, I'd've told you to go visit the cuckoo farm.
Which is a wondrous idiom I have only just invented.
Please buy a million of it.
And now please stand by as I reboot my mind.
Ah. Much better now.
14:19
@RegDwigнt If you told me this morning that I'd be looking in a thesaurus for an alternative for the word "wonder" in the sense of curiousness I'd have probably asked "Why is that?" myself. =P
NVZ
NVZ
@RegDwigнt What do we call "one who makes idioms"? Idiomator?
That's what ELU does to you. All day long you will be asking why, and never once saying because.
@NVZ I am a benevolent idiocrator. Dunno about others.
NVZ
NVZ
@RegDwigнt Because?
Wonderment.
See. Even when you're saying it, you're not saying it. You're asking it. Such much is your despair. Very lot.
NVZ
NVZ
14:22
@RegDwigнt you don't say.
I say I say I say: Turtle Powah!
NVZ
NVZ
@KitZ.Fox What did the fox say?
NVZ
NVZ
@Tonepoet that was torture.
@Tonepoet shall we write poetry? 2 lines about a random thing? You start, I'll follow.
I'm not a poet and I know it.
14:32
I will draw a line and toe it.
NVZ
NVZ
@Tonepoet well, that is true. Everything you write is about you.
My son is having dental work done right now.
NVZ
NVZ
@KitZ.Fox And I'm getting no work done right now.
Are you not doing it while inhaling nitrous oxide gas?
14:57
Yes, he is.
NVZ
NVZ
15:09
I breathe. Therefore I am.
I just got a notification on phone, "@NVZ I disagree... (and more words)". Suddenly it disappeared. And now there's no trace of such a notification on the site. This is killing me... the curiosity.
Who could have disagreed with me and not let me read the comment?.. :(
Only the Shadow knows.
@NVZ Maybe the reason the deleted it is because they don't disagree anymore!
Would you consider tits vulgar?
Informal, sure, but vulgar?
Did your rep. go up after the deletion?
NVZ
NVZ
@Tonepoet You talkin to me?
No rep changes visible.
15:17
@NVZ Yeah.
@terdon It's rude enough.
3
Q: A snappy and inoffensive alternative for "calm your tits"

aparente001I need a non-sexist, non-sexualized aternative instead of "Calm your tits." Clarification: The question comes from the parent of a pre-teen with Tourette Syndrome. The parent (me) needs some alternatives that will appeal to said pre-teen, but which will be less offensive to the parent, in the ...

@Tonepoet Rude is one thing, vulgar another.
@terdon Dictionaries usually don't graduate between degrees of rudeness with their usage labels.
NVZ
NVZ
@Tonepoet this made me laugh uncontrollably.. ;) Shall I calm my tits? Nope. Don't answer that.
@NVZ Nah, you should just take it easy. Cough... cough...
@Tonepoet So I saw, the ones I checked consider it "vulgar slang" which is the same designation they give to truly vulgar words like cock or cunt and the like. To me, tits is several levels down from that.
NVZ
NVZ
15:20
@terdon I should close your question here as "POB" ;)
That's why it's in chat.
@NVZ haha. I was going to bring that up, because it is an interesting topic for discussion.
But nobody cares.
@terdon Cock and cunt aren't even on the same level, in part because cock is technically a euphemism referring to a bird.
@Tonepoet That's incuntrovertible
@Tonepoet No no, birds are chicks not blokes.
15:21
@Tonepoet Tsk. I am referring to the other sense. Obviously.
And how is cock a euphemism?
@tchrist Bricks and blokes and chicks and birds
@Mitch These are a few of my favorite things!
>male chicken," Old English cocc "male bird," Old French coc (12c., Modern French coq), Old Norse kokkr, all of echoic origin. Old English cocc was a nickname for "one who strutted like a cock," thus a common term in the Middle Ages for a pert boy, used of scullions, apprentices, servants, etc.

A common personal name till c. 1500, it was affixed to Christian names as a pet diminutive, as in Wilcox, Hitchcock, etc. Slang sense of "penis" is attested since 1610s (but compare pillicock "penis," from c. 1300); cock-teaser is from 1891. A cocker spaniel (1823) was trained to start woodcocks. Co
NVZ
NVZ
So shouldn't we consider bird vulgar? Uhm.. Don't give me the bird.
Everything is vulgar to somebody: bird, chick, tits, and all of English
@terdon What does the O.E.D. have to say about use of the word penis in the past?
15:25
Don't have it here
I was assuming that was the dictionary you referenced. Hmm...
@Tonepoet See capon.
I'd like to get back to tits though. Would you all consider it vulgar (as opposed to "casual" or "rude" or whatever)
@Tonepoet That was etymonline.com
Ah, the good ol' Online Etymology Dictionary.
NVZ
NVZ
@terdon I'd consider it vulgar in an office environment, though.
15:27
Sure, but not in casual conversation.
I'd say it's less offensive even than shit.
Especially when used in idiomatic expressions like arse over tit
NVZ
NVZ
@terdon Disagree. Shit is sooo everywhere. It's lost its vulgarness(?)
@NVZ Thrice wrong. FLAGS
Yeah. So's tit.
But I might say tit in a conversation where I'd not use shit.
@NVZ No, that's not quite right. It's used so much because it's vulgar.
If it was suddenly deigned inoffensive nobody would be using the word shit for much other than dung.
NVZ
NVZ
There's this thing about vulgar words -- they lose their impact when overused.
15:32
@NVZ I don't disagree that it has grown trite, but the intention is still there.
@NVZ vulgarity
@NVZ vulgar vulgar vulgar
nope. still vulgar
@MattE.Эллен would you call tits vulgar? Among my friends, of both sexes, it is very commonly used as a synonym of breasts.
@terdon it is more vulgar than breasts but less vulgar than cock
and you all use this in common everyday speech all the time?
15:35
@MattE.Эллен But it would still register on the vulgarity scale for you? I'd put it down as somewhere around as vulgar as damn.
define 'degree of vulgarity'. cubic centimeters of blood rushing to a nun's face?
I mean, it's all subjective, so...
@Mitch That'll do
When she vampirically rips out the guts of her victims?
oops...mixed conversations
Here are some interesting historic notes. I have a dictionary of American Slang that attests use in reference to teats began in 1947. The Merriam-Webster's New International Dictionary, 2nd Edition, actually has a sense of the word as a term of disrespect towards a woman or girl. Since this is not in the addenda section, I'm presuming that usage dates back to at least 1934, before it was used in reference to breasts.
15:37
ODO changed!
how odd
The Teton Range is a mountain range of the Rocky Mountains in North America. A north-south range, it is mostly on Wyoming's eastern side of the Idaho state line. It is south of Yellowstone National Park. Most of the east slope of the range is in Grand Teton National Park. Early French Voyageurs used the name les trois tétons (the three nipples). It is likely that the Shoshone people once called the whole range Teewinot, meaning "many pinnacles". The principal summits of the central massif, sometimes referred to as the Cathedral Group, are Grand Teton 13,775 feet (4,199 m), Mount Owen 12,928 feet...
@MattE.Эллен That's why I always reference printed works, and never vote for the online reliant ones...
@Tonepoet you're just reading someone else's words. you have to have feeling. Literally, in your face or on your chest.
@Tonepoet why reference something that can be corrected, when you can reference something that's wrong forever!
@tchrist See? Not vulgar!
Tetilla is a regional cheese made in Galicia, in north-western Spain. It is a common element in Galician cuisine, often used as a dessert. It has had Denominación de Origen certification since 1993 and European DOP certification since 1996. Originally produced in small towns along the border between the provinces of A Coruña and Pontevedra such as Arzúa, Melide, Curtis or Sobrado dos Monxes, it is now produced throughout Galicia. It is made with milk from three breeds of cattle: imported Friesian and Parda Alpina (Braunvieh), and the local Rubia Gallega of Galicia. The name tetilla (Galician for...
NVZ
NVZ
15:40
@terdon Quick question. Are we talking about the mentioning of tits (breasts or nipples or something) or calling someone by that word?
@terdon Nipples.
Breasts. Calling someone a tit isn't even remotely vulgar.
@Mitch I'm the wrong person to ask about that, as sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.
@Tonepoet Oh yeah? Try dropping that dictionary of yours on your foot and then tell me that.
15:43
It is somewhat embarrassing to call a tit a booby. Every one gets uncomfortable then.
@terdon That's the stick content of the dictionary hurting me, rather than the inky word content. =P
NVZ
NVZ
Quick question. Are we all men? Is there a woman here? What do women feel about this word's vulgarity?
@terdon That's how that dude died in the Crucible, they crushed him slowly by placing volume after volume of the full OED on his chest.
@Mitch But not vice versa?
Live by the word, die by the word.
15:45
@Mitch Your words do lie heavy on my chest.
Appendix C is what did him in in the end.
Mortal appendicitis.
By coincidence it was the appendix of vulgarities uttered on publication of the first edition.
NVZ
NVZ
@terdon words don't lie, people do.
words lie when they go to sleep
15:46
NRA! NRA! NRA!
NVZ
NVZ
"It's only words, and words are all I haaaave..."
@MattE.Эллен An update isn't necessarily right, even if the updater believes it to be a correction. Besides that possibility, part of the reason for citation is that people might not trust your personal opinion: If an answer isn't corroborated by the source material, then readers have a right to distrust if you accurately portrayed it.
@NVZ Stat verba pristina nomine, verbina nuda tenemus
@Tonepoet if the source material is updated and that makes the answer wrong, then the answer is wrong, no? So that's a good thing.
♪ Stat verba domine, verbina teneeeemus ♪
15:52
@MattE.Эллен How does it make an answer wrong if the reference material gets updated?
@Tonepoet well, that's what you suggested. "If an answer isn't corroborated by the source material, then readers have a right to distrust if you accurately portrayed it."
if the answer just made stuff up and referenced something unrelated, then it was always wrong
@MattE.Эллен Polls are idiotic too. THere's not even a reference to check with a person if they were choose sanely, even if they knew the right answer.
You can make stuff up with words or with a vote.
other people, man
@MattE.Эллен Trust and correctness are two entirely different things. Haven't you ever heard the story of The Little Boy Who Cried Wolf?
@Tonepoet Not that it's relevant or anything, but that was a made-up story.
0
Q: TO BE or THERE IS?

carlus ventura francosI have come across this sentence on a BBC webpage: Deep in the southern United States, in the thickly forested border of Tennessee and North Carolina, is a road that seems drawn by a doodler. and I would like to know why the author didn't say "there is a road" instead of "is a road". Would it ...

Screamers.
You must be some kind of Aesopian.
Your sad devotion to that ancient religion has not helped you conjure up the ... tries to clear throat...
@Mitch What's an Aesop? Is that what you do with pancakes and syrup?
@Tonepoet oh yeah. It's a crazy story. Society should really learn to accept that men can have emotions, too
16:01
@tchrist That seems like a perfectly good question for ELL
16:16
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Shortened URL in body: Indefinite article with uncountable nouns by S Jay on english.stackexchange.com
I do hate link shortners
Yeah
16:51
-2
Q: What is the name of the fallacy of thinking that cynicism is a sign of being smart?

Mohammad SaneiSome people think cynicism and belief in conspiracy theories shows one's high intelligence, while not being so proves one is ingenuous and naive. What is the fallacy in this kind of reasoning called?

What is the name of the fallacy of thinking either that things have names or else that fallacies matter but not both?
That's the Fancy Fantasy Fallacy for $100.
03:00 - 17:0017:00 - 22:00

« first day (2135 days earlier)      last day (3082 days later) »