« first day (2132 days earlier)      last day (3085 days later) » 
01:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

01:38
@Cerberus Randy finally came back at dusk when I called for him. He's ok but standoffish. He answered with a yelp of surprise when I called which is unlike him. I think he thought I'd left town again.
01:51
He always gets all weird when I'm out of town. Separation anxiety or something. I'm keeping him close: the moon is too bright, the air too warm, the crickets chirping too fast.
02:07
@tchrist Yay!
@tchrist Glad it's turned out alright.
02:27
He's crying a lot to go out but I won't let him. It's still 75 out, which coincidentally is how full the moon is as well. When it's warm and bright like this he simply does not want to be inside.
I'm going to shut the office door and leave the balcony door over night and hope the rattler finds his way out in the dark.
03:17
Cats are usually smarter than to be bitten around by snakes.
This is Lorin's fourth rattlesnake this summer.
And biggest yet.
He is just a little kitty not a mongoose.
I don't understand how he's evaded getting bitten.
Has he been bitten before?
I guess it's no accident that he hasn't.
He's also caught two non-venemous snakes this summer . Last year it was the opposite ratio.
03:32
If they know that there are snakes living around they are naturally on alert.
I have about six city blocks' worth of prairie as my back yard. They hear them in the grass.
I think they can play with the scariest snakes quite confidently.
Although I don't know how old is your kitty.
I don't but they do.
You should be more concerned about yourself. :)
With all those snakes.
It's the little guy Lorin who brings home snakes and birds, even magpies and hummingbirds. And rabbits. Randy the larger of the twain brings home mice and voles. One of them even got a bat once.
They're both just turned three.
03:38
So they're agile creatures.
Apparently. Especially Lorin.
The first time I saw you talking about them I thought maybe they're your sons. :D
He brings home dragonflies and hawk moths constantly. How, I will never understand.
Haha. I worry as though they were.
Alive he brings them!
Now I can be grateful that we have only cockroaches to pester us here.
Once he brought a cicada. He didn't know what to do with it.
Lots of grasshoppers
03:44
Cool games.
Reminiscent of my childhood.
03:59
Aye
04:22
2
A: English Idiom for "the squirrel feeds itself arduously"

alwayslearningI am not sure if there's a proverb/idiom with the exact same meaning but I can suggest the following. Every little helps. You just took a baby step. A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. First step is always the hardest. Wiktionary: Alternative for...

The above references the following:
== English == === Alternative forms === every little bit helps === Proverb === every little helps (Britain) Even the smallest things are helpful when towards a goal....
That wiktionary entry claims: "1. (Britain) Even the smallest things are helpful when towards a goal."
I'm not sure that's BrE.
Not even the claim, with would require something between "when" and "towards".
Agreed
@Lawrence I can't help but feel that there's probably a direct equivalent that mentions a squirrel in English, because we're very familiar with the way squirrels stash away their food. We even have the word squirrelling because of it.
05:00
@Tonepoet In this case, I was referring to the phrasing of the answer, rather than the content of the question :) . About your point, although there is an objective similarity, squirrelling tends to have a positive connotation - to prepare provisions, rather than to hoard them. Talking about the squirrel's work doesn't convey something negative. I get the impression that the OP is looking for an idiom about tedious chores that are nevertheless important. E.g. "laundry is never done".
@Lawrence I wouldn't perceive the word hoarding as necessarily being negative. You've watched too many talk shows and not enough fiction. =P
Anyway part of the reason I mentioned it is because stashing stuff away is considered laborious. Surely you've heard of the Grasshopper and the Ant.
@Tonepoet Haha. The main 'talk shows' I watch these days take place right here on SE. :P
@Tonepoet When used as a verb, hoard tends to carry connotations of greed, compulsion (in the obsessive/compulsive sense) and the like. What positive connotations does hoard draw for you?
05:19
Did I say positive? It's just a fairly neutral word. The Wikipedia has a whole article on animal hoarding behavior, which is highly relevant to the context, esp. since you're suggesting that the word squirreling has more positive connotations for the same act, by the same agent. =P
@Tonepoet Strangely, until I read that question, I don't think I've considered the laborious nature of squirrelling. Perhaps it's that they make it seem so playful. As Mary Poppins has it, "In every job that must be done, there is an element of fun. You find the fun, and - SNAP - the job's a game!"
However if you do want positive connotations, one does not need to look much farther than the Kong's Banana Hoard. Look at how happy that big ol' ape is!
@Tonepoet I'll accept your word that you consider hoarding to be able to used as a neutral word; it's hard to prove this kind of neutrality. To me, if someone was said to be hoarding something, it's always negative, not even neutral. (Unless said in jest, but I'd expect that even then, it depends on juxtaposing a neutral/good action with a negative term.)
@Tonepoet That's why I specified the use of the term as a verb. :)
@Lawrence No dice: To have the noun, you must do the verb. =P
@Tonepoet As a noun, it probably gains some 'street cred' the same way that pirate terms do. They're ostensibly 'bad', but have become 'fashionable'.
05:26
The fact of the matter is that we are prejudiced against pirates and dragons. >_>
@Tonepoet Aye, and for good reason, yer (bleep) ! :P
@Lawrence What a load of hogwash! Do not buy into the lies, slander and propaganda! Didn't you know that Pirates prevent global warming? =P
@Tonepoet "The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster" is hardly a credible authority. :D
@Lawrence 'Tis the word of God ye pagan blasphemer. ;-)
@Tonepoet Are you singing a different tune, now? :P
I reckon the help pages need some work.
Maybe even the faux-squirrelling sort the other OP was talking about.
06:14
english.stackexchange.com/questions/348024/… anyone Guide me for how to Rearrange the Sentences in English,I am facing very Difficult in Rearrnging the Sentences,Anyone Guide me
user227867
06:36
@Tonepoet I would prefer Chambers not have the jocular definitions.
06:55
@JasperLoy Yeah, I understand. It undermines the rest of the definitions when you don't know for sure which ones are jokes and which ones aren't.
 
2 hours later…
M-J
M-J
08:41
@Lawrence Hi Lawrence, what is the meaning of "life cycle" in this title? <Marketing a product through the life cycle>.
09:33
@M-J Hi!
@M-J It looks like it's talking about the product life cycle. The major stages are introduction, growth, maturity and decline in the model referenced in the link.
@M-J It is a metaphor for the amount of time the product is intended to be offered for sale and supported by the company.
@M-J It's modeled after the biological life-cycle, which traces an organism's life from birth to death. (Or popularly, from being the result of reproduction to being a participant in reproduction.)
10:02
Checking in
Please go to cashier number 4 please
Is there a term for "Please go to"?
10:19
a term in what sense?
you could call it "the beginning of a request to go somewhere"
10:55
@Cunningham'sLawyer Courtesy? (Note: please doesn't normally twice in a sentence.)
11:31
@Lawrence Oh yeah. Thanks :)
@Cerberus do you actually know the Russian Die Antwoord, too? They occasionally collaborate.
@Lawrence I copy pasted it from an email. Should have added (sic)
@Cunningham'sLawyer No problem. :)
12:26
I never knew that check is such an oppressive word.
@Tonepoet I know how fond of that dictionary you are, but I'm afraid that's not a very comprehensive definition. It's missing at least one common meaning (that of checkmark).
> : a mark typically √ placed beside an item to show it has been noted, examined, or verified
Or is that actually the 1828 edition with no updates?
12:47
@terdon It's the 1828 edition with no updates. That's part of why I love it. I think you should say checkmark when you mean checkmark. =P
@Tonepoet No, check also means the same thing. I am more familiar with check than with checkmark in that context, actually.
Heh, the crappy dictionary in my browser doesn't even recognize checkmark.
What's the point of a dictionary if it hasn't been updated in almost 200 years?
Why not get a modern OED that has both historical and modern usage?
That's probably because it's more commonly spelled as two words. Only Collins Complete and Unabridged 12th edition recognizes the compounded form on The Free Dictionary by Farlex, meaning the American Heritage Dictionary 5th edition doesn't recognize it either.
Makes sense. Still, check is perfectly valid and often used like that.
I specifically wish to filter out modern usage as a sort of perversion of words, as far back as the language can still be considered our own. I think Noah Webster's influence on the language is as far back as we can realistically do that, given the half-succeeded spelling reform and significant prior changes in grammar. Some of the entries are also much better written. As an admittedly extreme case, you should read the entry for the word "of".
It reads more like a Stack Exchange answer than a dictionary entry.
@Tonepoet Oh wow, really? How do you define modern?
And what's the point of adhering to archaic standards that might no longer have any relevance to how the language is used today? Do you feel that the arbitrary point in time when Webster wrote his book somehow defines "correct" English?
Do you go around using the word ejaculate to mean to exclaim, for example? That's a valid usage but unlikely to help you communicate today.
12:58
@terdon Hmm, well part of it is because I think the language changed much less since he wrote the book than it did in the 200 years prior.
I doubt that, especially given the wealth of new words and expressions in the copmuter era, but even if true, what difference does that make?
Language is a living thing and constantly changing. Attempting to pin it at any particular point in time is doomed to fail and, in my opinion, quite pointless anyway.
Webster's dictionary is not the only one I consult. I welcome new words, once they pass a certain threshold of context specific usage, but the word is a tool of recollection so I prefer to retain their specific meanings. If I think a specific word is too especially troublesome, I'll avoid it altogether if I can. I'd say exclaim to mean exclaim.
I;m sure you look at others, I just don't understand why you would want to ignore modern usage. All that will do is eventually render you incapable of communicating.
And language is worse than useless if it doesn't allow communication.
@terdon I can agree with that sentiment, although our strategies for implementing it are quite different.
Your strategy seems to be "if a word meant X 200 years ago, I don't care how it is used today, I shall use it to mean X and X only". If so, it seems like a very ineffective approach to communication.
13:04
'Every little helps'? Does it a verb? Wiktionary the worst. Or does British English not verbs? — Mitch 1 min ago
We're all attached to the meanings words had when we were growing up and I too will often kick against change but, despite my kicks, change is inevitable and one must move with the times.
@terdon It fills a void for some people. Something to do. Something to show that you care.
@terdon Very effective for time travellers.
@terdon I'm not so attached to the meanings I learned as a child, otherwise I woudn't be resorting to a dictionary that existed long before I was born.
@terdon If the vast majority of the words did not retain their meanings it would be ineffective. However there is some merit to retaining a specific use. One is that it allows much more specific expression. I'll only ever use the word "pervert" to refer to moral corruption. I can use lewd or lewdster to fill the lexical gap. As new meanings are continually accepted, and more words fall into disuse, it becomes harder to be specific.
I like to joke that we'll only ever have different inflections of the word *uck at the end of the lingual evolution. >_>
13:13
@terdon There's a academy style group of people in charge of creating new words for Latin. Because you know they're all dead, but if they came back to life they'd have to tell someone:
Proin clibano ardens
@terdon haha. Thanks Tesco!
@Tonepoet That's perverse!
You've perverted the meaning of the focal!
@Mitch When did I say focal?
Every day I permute the attachment of focals to their sentiments. Og kens cen og blather.
It's like the Navajo wind walkers in WWII who used their own language as a code that no one else knew.
In order to destroy the Japanese, the Navajo sent each other their laundry lists.
@Mitch Indeed. :P
Wittgenstein claimed that there is no such thing as a private language. I think there is ample evidence that many people walking down the street have their own private language that no one else shares.
@Tonepoet I have nothing against retaining old meanings. I object to rejecting new ones. And while I've often heard the claim that new meanings somehow make it harder to be specific, I have yet to see any evidence for it.
@Mitch Read the note at the end, apparently several hundred years older than tesco
13:22
@terdon I object to all meaning. Meaning is overrated. Just point.
@Mitch There's truth at both ends of this. We each have our own idiolect, but there's a huge amount of overlap in many cases. The first explains (some?) misunderstandings, and the second, successful communications.
Broadly uniform classes (particularly within a locale) helps with the latter.
@terdon Every time somebody "misuses" a word is evidence for it. Except for the foreseers, we can only ever examine a word's propriety to its past usage. It's just a matter of how long ago we are willing to consider the past in order to make that judgement.
[1791 J. O'KEEFFE Wild Oats V. iii. 64 It is'n't much, but every little helps.
1840 MARRYAT Poor Jack xiii. 90 It's a very old saying, that every little helps.](http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=749#comment-11634)
@Tonepoet haha. I'm just messing with you.
@Tonepoet How so? First of all, who gets to decide what a "misused" word is? But, more importantly, if you add a new meaning to a word (what you call misuse), you are expanding the language and the possibility of poetry. Perhaps at the expense of specificity, granted, but still worth it. However, once that new meaning has taken over, the language is, once more, as specific as it was.
And it's the principle find fundamentally flawed. Your approach presumes the existence of the platonic ideal of language and every change is taking us away from it.
That's as wrong when it comes to language as it is when the same argument is used to describe the process of evolution as going from worse to better. Change is change. Sometimes good, sometimes bad.
There is a difficulty. Those who use a word in a new way may be misunderstood. And holding people to education reduces that misunderstanding. So the there really are mistakes. eg people who use imply for infer. It may be confusing for the learners, but it's that much worse for those who know.
13:28
Some new meanings and new words make the language more specific and beautiful. Others, less so. But you can't lump all change together as bad.
But you also can't say all change repeated is good. They can be repeated mistakes.
@Mitch True. A classic example is momentarily to mean "in a moment". However, as this latter usage is getting more and more common, it seems very likely that it will completely replace the original meaning of "for a moment". At that point, those of us using what we presumptuously dub the "correct" meaning will no longer be understood.
Stupid old people not getting with the times
And don't get me wrong. I bloody hate those things myself and don't actually use it. As far as I'm concerned, hopefully means "full of hope" and momentarily means "for a moment". I have just stopped trying to impose my views on others and have accepted that I'm on the losing side of the argument.
And a few years down the line, nobody will remember the words once had other meanings 'cause that's how she rolls, our language.
@terdon Maybe the guy that virtually everybody else pretends to be to lend themselves credibility. How many dictionaries use the name Webster now? It wasn't exactly an arbitrary choice.
13:34
?
The 10th edition of Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary has "The Voice of Authority" on the cover.
I don't understand what you're referring to.
Your question about who gets to decide.
So some prescriptivist who's been dead for two hundred years gets to dictate how we should speak today? That seems passing strange.
It's a great dictionary and all, but you can't stop time there.
That leads me to believe that you have a way of stopping time somewhere
13:38
@Mitch Shhhhhh!
:D
@Mitch Maybe it'd work better better if I picked 1755 instead of 1828, but then I'd have to spell music as musick. >_>
By the way, @Tonepoet, since I don't know where you're from, I should mention that I come from a culture that's often argumentative and have, in the past, gotten myself into trouble with people thinking we were fighting while I was having a very interesting discussion. So, to clarify, I find your position very interesting and you have arguments to back it up so I have nothing but respect for you. I just enjoy the argument (also, I think you're wrong :P).
There was this guy once on ELU, about 5 years ago, who had this agenda of 'fixing' English by using more anglo-saxonisms. They had a tendency to be more saxon than angle so it was hard to figure out wth he was talking about.
Actually, maybe that would be an improvement given how terrible pop. singers are!
@terdon That seems like me! ;-)
13:42
@terdon 'very interesting discussion' = 'bruises only; no blood drawn'
Good, I just didn't want there to be any misunderstandings. I was living in the UK quite a few years ago and had what I thought was a wonderful, animated political discussion. I was informed the next day that I was actually fighting with someone.
Noah Webster's half-successful spelling reform proposal was a bad idea. Johnson's strategy of "making no innovation without a reason sufficient to balance the inconvenience of change" was probably better from a consistency viewpoint. Then again, I guess Webster did suppose he had good reason. He was very concerned with making things easier to teach.
Spelling would indeed benefit by rules. It's the attempts to get meaning set in stone that I don't like.
Samuel Johnson seems to have wanted to do that too, if you read the entirety of The Plan for an English Dictionary he wrote above. He may have very well succeeded if his definitions were more accurate and Webster didn't meddle in the matter. One of the more significant things about Webster is that his efforts were set at a prime period. There weren't many other competitors in the lexicography field, aside from a plagiarist he had the misfortune of hiring as an aide.
Johnson also forgot to include sausage, the git!
It was the first though. That should count for something.
Hmm, I wonder if he actually had forgotten sausage.
I'd always assumed the writers of the show made that up.
uh..I think people had the idea and execution of dictionaries before Johnson
he just added some extra features, and it was more famous
@MetaEd yo mama is maybe a gray area.
14:00
Maybe I am a foreseer! =P
I didn't realize I was editing that. Oh well...
> the Blackadder episode may be quite perceptive about one of the problems that faces people who make dictionaries, its fidelity to history is limited (for instance, it has Jane Austen as Johnson's contemporary, sporting 'a beard like a rhododendron'), and it is responsible for a few funny ideas about Johnson, notably that he forgot to include in his magnum opus the word 'sausage' - which he didn't.
Read more at http://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/a-history-of-the-dictionary-dr-johnson-i-presume#YMBX3YTpHJ23M5l2.99
Oh well. . .
Blackadder is maybe a gay area.
So I see the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon is in action again. Just a couple hours earlier I watched some Blackadder outtakes, and now y'all's watching Blackadder, too.
@RegDwigнt The terrorist plot to repeat sightings.
It's worse. I'd actually posted that same video in another chatroom a couple of days ago.
Anyway where was I? Oh yeah, probably one of the major differences between Webster and other Lexicographers is that Webster had the advantage of being the prime authority in an emerging nation. He died just nine years before compulsory education was implemented by the U.S. state of Massachusetts. and Merriam-Webster's subsequent dictionaries weren't undergoing major revisions yet. Their 1847 dictionary is the same one rebranded.
14:05
I was eating cheetos the other day and holy crap this guy comes on TV with hair and skin like powdered cheddar flocking
Σαλάμι.
And then
@RegDwigнt No, that's not it.
It actually is. The poor Greeks are missing out. They think that all sausage is salami.
@Tonepoet ?? I don't get it. So what if he died nine years before?
Oh if only they knew.
14:08
@RegDwigнt and the English think all Japanese alcohol is sake
wait... it is
@tchrist thanks but no thanks. I prefer to recite it aloud in alexandrine. As I always do with all things.
@Mitch Asahi is not.
σαλίμι
@RegDwigнt You're so not English.
Neither are Kirin and Sapporo.
Also, that whiskey Bill Murray recommended in Lost In Translation is a beer as well. Which is no sake.
@Mitch Well one of the original reasons for compulsory education was to prevent such lingual perversions. It was compulsory attendance to grammar school specifically. I imagine people would have been reading Webster's dictionary there.
14:10
Isn't Kirin a creature type in Magic: The Gathering?
And IPA is a town in Polynesia
@MattE.Эллен no.
@RegDwigнt yes
FFS there I was saving your face, but no you have to insist to be labeled as a dork.
Orc
It's spelt Orc
14:12
Johann D'Ork.
@Tonepoet Webster was a prime authority by dying nine years before. If he had had the poor misfortune of surviving till the start of compulsory education, he'd still die eventually. That's biology.
@MattE.Эллен Actually they're just goblins.
Blin being Russian for pancake.
I'll just goblin you!
Go, blins!
A blini (sometimes spelled bliny) or, rarely, blin is a light, thin pancake, traditionally made from buckwheat flour and served with sour cream, butter, caviar, and other garnishes. It typically lacks a leavening agent. Some English dictionaries record usage of the forms blin as singular and blini or bliny as plural, which correspond to the originally Russian forms, but some dictionaries consider this usage so rare in English that they do not mention blin at all and only record the widespread modern regular usage of blini for the singular and blinis for the plural, for example the American Heritage...
"A blini"?
English people are retarded.
14:13
@Mitch I'm just establishing a timeline. His last act was finishing the appendix to the latest printing of his dictionary three days before.
It's a well-known phenomena.
I think you'll find it's everyone else who can't spell
Because their penii is too small.
@RegDwigнt I take great offense at that. Some of us are merely moronic
@Mitch you misspelled "all of the us is"
14:14
@RegDwigнt NOU
some of us is all of us
jes the too've us
@Tonepoet First he was born, then he died. Timelines will kill you in the end
@Mitch They won't if I drink Horai Elixir. >_>
@Tonepoet I think his last act was 'Argh! That's so painful!'
@RegDwigнt tum tum tiddly tum 'Me and my tapeworm' tiddly bee!
14:17
@RegDwigнt Have a biscotti.
@Mitch very super titties!
@tchrist Let's meet the hoi poloi at the La Alhambra
user227867
I will be deleting my account by the end of this week.
I just called to say I loathed you.
@JasperLoy ok.
14:19
@Mitch the la?
@RegDwigнt I know!
@Mitch Hmm, maybe. Anyway what made Webster the authority is what he did before. The American Dictionary of the English Language was just his magnum opus and representative of what his efforts actually achieved. It's the Grammatical Institute of the English Language that got him started, esp. that "blue backed speller" as everybody calls it (because the title was inconsistent).
Les the Humphries visited the la Alhambra to do some the algebra and talk about el the der Allah.
user227867
@RegDwigнt There is a musical about Bill Murray, called Martin Shkreli's Game, with lyrics written by Lauren Gundrum.
14:21
And la then...
@Tonepoet What is the face if the unborn Webster?
@JasperLoy I actually didn't know that.
user227867
@MattE.Эллен I hope you and Maria get married soon and live happily ever after.
@Tonepoet That's so cruel of them to call him that. 'Blue back' was the painful disease he died of.
Yay I learned something today. Unlike all of the US in all of its history.
user227867
14:22
@RegDwigнt She became a lyricist after leaving SE.
Wait. You mean it's the Lauren? Or rather, the la Uren?
@RegDwigнt la la la, la la la laaaa. la la la, la la la laaaa
14 notes. Guess the tune
user227867
14:23
@RegDwigнt You can see samples of her musical work at laurengundrum.com.
Yeah yeah it's okay I think she's fine when one person stalks her at a time.
Oh and also this:
Aug 4 '15 at 11:51, by Robusto
@RegDwigнt Just like poets: There are millions of people who write poetry, and hundreds who read it.
@RegDwigнt close!
wait for the chorus!
Sorry I am at work I am not watching the red pedobear.
oh sorry. NSFWBOWTYAI
Why is it that when he hits the piano keys it sounds like a guitar with xylophone? WHY DO AMERICANS LIE TO THEIR CHILDREN FROM SUCH YOUNG AGE ON?
14:28
not safe for working bears or working tigers you are interviewing
Not so fast, white boy, or what time you artichoke inhaling?
It's funny when Snufalupagus is about to sing his part, and he say's 'Stand back'. It's funny because you really have to stand way back. Ha ha. because he's so big. Get it? He's really big so you have to stand back pretty far.
No wonder all Americans play the guitar, but the only Americans who can play the piano are either blacks or jews.
user227867
I cannot play the piano, sad panda.
@RegDwigнt Nope, the other guys were closer.
If you could play a sad panda, that would be something.
I could play a sad panda for $3000.
not if you're not in the Screen Actors Guild!
writing out check
user227867
After I delete my account tomorrow, I will no longer return to SE in this lifetime. This will be my final account.
14:31
mailing check
@MattE.Эллен I will always be your guildy pleasure.
waits
Tom is out to buy smokes, sorry.
For $3000 I'd play an enraged panda! It would just be a very short and very percussive concert.
@JasperLoy how will you account for yourself?
14:31
Well?
Oh noes not the el Terdon with his the σαλάμι again.
@RegDwigнt Maybe it's not a piano. Maybe it's a harpsichord.
@MattE.Эллен By double entry bookkeeping!
rimshot
I don't get it.
@Tonepoet maybe it's a celesta.
user227867
@MattE.Эллен I hope you have my latest email, the one that begins with m.
14:32
Maybe it is a banana. That is beside the point.
The point is, it is not a piano.
user227867
Banana is my favourite fruit.
@JasperLoy I do
@JasperLoy You're my favourite fruit.
user227867
@MattE.Эллен She says 'I do' too, lol.
user227867
@RegDwigнt I cannot be eaten.
14:33
Whoosh.
@RegDwigнt my favorite fruit is mixed nuts.
kinda salty
@Mitch whatcha mean, well? I'm playing a sad panda as we speak. I play him hard.
Your money was well-invested.
Which probably explains why he's sad.
Poor panda.
You can't have your panda and eat it, too.
user227867
@Tonepoet I have finally decided to get the ODE. It is finished.
14:36
@JasperLoy Did you order it yet?
@terdon And you of all things keep quiet, just a second ago you were proposing to percuss him with a short salami. For money. Tsk tsk tsk.
user227867
@Tonepoet Not yet, but soon. I will probably get it from Book Depository.
@RegDwigнt What do you mean short!?
@RegDwigнt Sorry, I was pulling out a bad tooth. And I couldn't hear over the screaming. But now I can spit in two directions at once! Yay!
5 mins ago, by terdon
For $3000 I'd play an enraged panda! It would just be a very short and very percussive concert.
Oh sorry, very short. My bad.
user227867
14:37
@Tonepoet I would get AHD or NOAD if I were American.
@RegDwigнt You don't eat a panda like that all in one sitting
The concert would be short! The salami is, well, about average I guess. That's what my girlfriend says and I believe her!
@JasperLoy America is the best. Except for the exceptions.
@JasperLoy Tell me when the book is at your doorstep and it's too late to ship back. XP
user227867
14:39
@Mitch I think Merriam Webster is overrated.
user227867
@Tonepoet Don't forget me when I delete my account.
@JasperLoy I'll try not to do so.
Do note that I rarely use my email though.
@JasperLoy I used to have their big three volume version. It had a multilingual dictionary as an addendum. 7 languages + Swedish
@RegDwigнt Who said it was a piano?
user227867
@Mitch The problem with MW is that the unabridged has not been updated since 1961 and the collegiate does not have as many words as a full sized.
14:41
@Tonepoet I can tell from the pixels and from having seen a piano in my life.
@JasperLoy words after 1961 are just slang.
user227867
@Mitch Even the collegiate's last edition was in 2003, though there are minor revisions.
or tech.
Words after 1961 are just Apple propaganda.
or cultural references
user227867
14:42
This time, you all will be surprised that I shall not break my promise of not returning.
what I'm saying is... if you want a dictionary that will help with learning...
hm... dictionaries are overrated.
That's why they got replaced with dicpics.
user227867
I declare AHD as the most beautiful dictionary in the world. Get the fifth hardcover edition.
Boring.
Go talk to Susie Dent.
@RegDwigнt It sounds like Merriam Webster persuaded you to shill for their New International Dictionary, Third Edition when you say that. =P
user227867
14:44
I think the Oxford dictionaries are the ugliest in the world.
@JasperLoy The spine and cover? Or the font and indentation?
user227867
@Mitch The dust jackets and the covers.
@JasperLoy Oh.
@Tonepoet alas, no prophet is accepted in his own hometown. But do be warned. Apple will take away your power outlets, and make you pay for it.
user227867
I am very happy that I have contributed a 45 vote question to ELU during this account.
14:46
You will be powerless and poor. And an Apple fanboi. Better to just stab yourself to death now.
@RegDwigнt There was that one guy.
@RegDwigнt please use the phone jack in the new apple. it'll be cleaner that way
I'm sorry Dave I can't do that.
user227867
Recently I learnt the difference between USB earphone and earphone jack.
@RegDwigнt Actually it's too late for the last one. My first computer was a Performa 6116CD.
@JasperLoy ah, thinking of buying a new phone?
user227867
14:49
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 No, I was just looking at the holes different earphones go into in a computer.
ears. Those are the holes.
I miss Apple's rainbow colored logo.
@JasperLoy surely I'll only need one? maybe two if I keep one in the car?
five seems overkill
My first computer was a Compaq, and I still use it to this day. I bought it four years ago and it still works!
Unlike this fucken Google Chrome.
user227867
@MattE.Эллен I would like to mention that the paperback differs in content. It is severely abridged, not just missing the pics.
user227867
14:51
@RegDwigнt These days I use Firefox without any Flash.
user227867
I still can watch most online videos.
I would rather use NN 4.4 again that touch Firefox with a ten-foot pole held by someone else.
@RegDwigнt I feel almost sorry for you. You have probably never known the joy of a microswitch keyboard like the Apple Extended Keyboard II.
I am typing this in Firefox, I should know.
user227867
Whichever browser I use, it still freezes.
14:53
Too bad that used Apple Desktop Bus instead of U.S.B. Apple never made a U.S.B. keyboard that was as good as that.
user227867
Time for me to write a brand new browser.
@JasperLoy Isn't there a way to do that easily? some kind of modular set up where you can pick parts you want, like a webkit renderer here a javascript interpreter there?
@Tonepoet I have known the joy alright. You're probably way younger than me, and I've known all kinds of joys to which you're not even privy. I'm just saying I never paid for it.
Like, who buys a computer?
@RegDwigнt Unpaid privy joys. got it.
user227867
I wonder if SE will still exist in 10 years from now.
14:56
Much less a computer that admits it's really just a fruitcake.
user227867
Fruitcakes and mooncakes are two terrible cakes.
@JasperLoy usenet lasted forever..until it withered away from disuse. SE has a money making company behind it.
Cake Tahoe and Cake Michigan are horrible as well.
What does IBM do these days except run ads?
user227867
The worst cake is the one you produce in the bathroom.
14:58
they terrorise the countryside, looking for lesser cakes to absorb into themselves. when a fruitcake meets a mooncake carnage usually ensues, as one will fight the other for territory
@Mitch it makes sure that Ken Watanabe still has a living even though he's not done a thing in two decades.
@JasperLoy mooncake is not cake. They should rename it to 'dry crumbly brown tofu' then peope will be impressed that actually has a taste.
@MattE.Эллен like two kilkinney cakes
user227867
Now durians however are underrated. Really the smell may be weird, but the fruit is really nice.
user227867
Once you actually eat durian flesh, you will enjoy the taste and the smell.
01:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

« first day (2132 days earlier)      last day (3085 days later) »