« first day (2131 days earlier)      last day (3085 days later) » 

00:00
@tchrist You'd think if he couldn't stand anymore, he'd be sitting rather than once sat. Also I suppose you mean that twit seems like a past tense form of tweet? I suppose that makes some sense and I may have heard that before, although now that I'm reading the dictionaries, it seems that they all prefer tweeted.
A twit whose time is past is merely a twat.
@tchrist How rude! ;-)
Strong verbs for strong times.
@tchrist Gratias!
De nieve.
00:06
Qua lingua?
Não Portugês?
It’s a joke.
IT di niente of nothing => ES de nieve of snow.
So long as it rhymes, it counts. :)
Iam videbatur nix.
Yet ever hope aeternal springs.
Lift thine eyes towards the mountains whence cometh snow.
Mozart is going to kill me.
Felix, too.
Sometimes I wish I had a 10k sock.
It’s hard to see things normally now.
Just create a sock?
Or I could lend you eyes.
It would take too much work to build it up to 10k.
But you could.
I’ll remember that.
00:20
Camera Latina tibi placuerit.
Dum vivit.
in CONLOQVIVM, 2 mins ago, by Joonas Ilmavirta
Dependet de modo, quo potentiam loquendi definis, sed dixerim me septem fere linguis loqui posse.
It hurts my head too much. :)
I mean, it’s fun, I grant you.
If only Cthulhu were running for president, nobody would have to settle for the lesser evil.
in CONLOQVIVM, 58 secs ago, by Joonas Ilmavirta
Amicus quidam meus thesaurum Catalano-Latinum habebat.
Non solum de Latina loquimur!
Now that's fine bootie for you.
Probably buried by corsairs off the Barbary Coast.
Who kept more Europeans in slavery than were blacks in North America?
I’m not sure that you can compare the Phoenician, Greek, and Roman slaver cultures with that of the American plantations.
Roman “Italy” had about the same number of slaves by raw count as the American South did at Emancipation. However, the former was a greater proportion.
> This slave trading by the Moors/Jews of Spain lasted for almost 800 years and involved an estimated 4 million European boys and girls.
And then of course there were the “indentured servants”.
Troubling.
00:48
@tchrist Oh, are you sure about those numbers?
It is true that the Romans had many slaves.
As did anyone in those times.
@Cerberus Like 3.9 million in both cases.
And no, I’m hardly certain.
It’s only the internet.
Everyone had slaves.
And what are the poor now?
What freedom do they have?
What constitutes a slave?
That’s a reasonable question, but I don’t believe the poor qualify.
> India has the most slaves of any country, at roughly 18.4 million.[9] China is second with 3.4 million slaves, followed by Pakistan (2.1 million), Bangladesh (1.5 million), and Uzbekistan (1.2 million). By percentages of the population living in slavery, North Korea tops with 4.4% (about 1.1 million people out of 25 million), followed by Uzbekistan (4% of its population), Cambodia (1.6%), India, (1.4%) and Qatar (1.4%).
Contemporary slavery, also known as modern slavery, refers to the institutions of slavery that continue to exist in the present day. Estimates of the number of slaves today range from around 21 million-29 million to 46 million. Modern slavery is a multibillion-dollar industry with estimates of up to $35 billion generated annually. The United Nations estimates that roughly 27 to 30 million individuals are currently caught in the slave trade industry. India has the most slaves of any country, at roughly 18.4 million. China is second with 3.4 million slaves, followed by Pakistan (2.1 million),...
> The governments with the strongest response to modern slavery are the Netherlands, the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Australia, Portugal, Croatia, Spain, Belgium and Norway.[9]
In contrast, the governments taking the least action against it are North Korea, Iran, Eritrea, Equatorial Guinea, Hong Kong, Central African Republic, Papua New Guinea, Guinea, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Sudan.[9]
Slavery in ancient Rome played an important role in society and the economy. Besides manual labor, slaves performed many domestic services, and might be employed at highly skilled jobs and professions. Accountants and physicians were often slaves. Greek slaves in particular might be highly educated. Unskilled slaves, or those sentenced to slavery as punishment, worked on farms, in mines, and at mills. Their living conditions were brutal, and their lives short. Slaves were considered property under Roman law and had no legal personhood. Unlike Roman citizens, they could be subjected to corporal...
I think a slave cannot have freedom of movement by law.
That is perhaps his essence?
Or what else is?
Of course he must also serve.
Slaves exist as a means of extracting work without pay.
00:57
Au pairs?
Volunteers?
You cannot make those work.
Are we SE's slaves?
Why not?
You want it done; they do it.
Yes, I think forced labour constitutes slavery.
Is there another kind?
01:00
Some labour is voluntary.
> Some states require, as with Arizona, all able-bodied inmates to work.
How convenient.
Penal labor in the United States, when intended as a form of slavery or involuntary servitude, is explicitly allowed by the 13th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This form of legal slavery is only allowed when used as punishment for committing a crime. The 13th Amendment states that "neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." Unconvicted detainees awaiting trial cannot be forced to participate in forced rehabilitative labor programs...
I wonder why people use the word "inmate". It sounds like a euphemism?
A terrible one, almost Orwellian.
Dickensian, actually.
> 1580s, "one allowed to live in a house rented by another" (usually for a consideration), from in (adj.) "inside" + mate (n.) "companion." OED suggests the first element is perhaps originally inn. Sense of "one confined to an institution" is first attested 1834.
Dickens 1834?
So ugly.
Oh, I didn't mean he wrote it. Just that it's from his bleak time.
01:06
Bleak indeed.
My family employed many poor labourers in the 19th century.
I wonder how bad it was.
Which family would that be? I have some 100 direct ancestors from the 19th century.
It is not uncommon to engage the poor in labor; less common by far to engage the affluent.
@Cerberus we are all uninmate?
@tchrist Only 100? I have ... _2^... 25 years per generation...4 gens per 100 years ...
1M ancestors around the norman conquest
The 19th century.
(yes, primarily Anglo-Irish)
wait...checking math...
@tchrist Oh, my mother's family.
01:14
> “And I am bored to death with it. Bored to death with this place, bored to death with my life, bored to death with myself.”
1K per 500 years
so 1M ancestors 1K years ago
> Fog everywhere. Fog up the river, where it flows among green aits and meadows; fog down the river, where it rolls defiled among the tiers of shipping and the waterside pollutions of a great (and dirty) city. Fog on the Essex marshes, fog on the Kentish heights. Fog creeping into the cabooses of collier-brigs; fog lying out on the yards, and hovering in the rigging of great ships; fog drooping on the gunwales of barges and small boats.
1B 1500 y ago
@Mitch You have many fewer.
I'm not accounting for (unknown) interbreeding
1 T 2000 y ago
If I lived on Easter Island maybe
> “If the world go wrong, it was, in some off-hand manner, never meant to go right.”
Ó Portela vem à janela
Ó Portela vem à janela
Que o povo fica contente
Por ouvir de novo a tua voz tão quente
Yes?
You’ll get depressed you know.
Assim pedia toda a gente lá na aldeia
Que se juntava mesmo em frente a sua casa
Sofrendo aquele; quem espera desespera
Pelo rouxinol que não mais abria a asa
blames the rossignols for all of this
user227867
01:45
@Tonepoet It is now at 40 votes. It is finished.
@JasperLoy Neat!
@JasperLoy closes, deletes.
user227867
deletes account soon
Hmm, are you sure? Isn't there like a badge for 40 votes on a question? XP
@tchrist Ahh that must be the same word.
I only learned the Portuguese word what I came across that song.
The French word I knew, but barely. The sound.
01:48
Spanish has ruiseñor there.
Not well enough to conex it.
Sounds like a noisy old man?
Noun: luscinia f ‎(genitive lusciniae); first declension
  1. nightingale
 
5 hours later…
06:26
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in answer, repeating characters in answer: Words or terms for kinds of knowledge or thinking by Karabi Baruah on english.stackexchange.com
 
2 hours later…
08:55
"He does not drink, nor he smiles." Could someone explain me why is this sentence wrong ?
I tried to correct it by phrasing it as "He does not drink, nor does he smile".
I am not sure if its correct or not. I am also not aware of any rule that first statement is voilition
 
2 hours later…
user233358
11:09
@JasperLoy why so soon? wait a few weeks and we'll delete our accounts together ;)
user227867
@Arrowfar We will see!
user233358
Howdy!
12:22
Hi
can anyone Guide Me How to Rearrrange the Sentences in the English
 
3 hours later…
15:54
Strange little things I find on our meta.
16:44
Go, tchrist, save our tags :)
17:00
@tchrist Hah, I didn't know Apple was British.
@Cerberus That's Shrovis-Bishopthorpe, insularly speaking.
@Helmar I doubt that is possible.
Although Tavasco is Mejicano.
@tchrist That makes your effort even more commendable ;)
17:35
@Cerberus Pop Latin quiz! Why did the erstwhile Jewish zealot Saul of Tarsus change his name to from Saul to Paul upon his apostolic enlightenment?
I thought of this because the first thing that popped into my head for Helmar’s question was the ES/PT paulatinamente, which has everything to do with St Paul but nothing to do with Minneapolis despite its Greeky name.
user227867
17:50
I think Subway sandwiches are delicious and nutritious.
user227867
I had a McDonald's chicken salad. It was both expensive and horrible.
user227867
Did you know there is a Dictionary Society of North America?
@Cerberus I find it curious that the French lost cujus and so had to create dont from de unde.
Although dont is now a bit broader than cujus.
Ping me ad libitum for I am elsewhere.
M-J
M-J
18:27
Hi all.
Tell the truth
Is "Tell" a transitive verb in this sentence
Apparently yes it is but i am not sure or not able to imagine who is receiving action in this sentence
M-J
M-J
@Tarun Hi Tarun.
@M-J Hi. I hope you are doing good.
M-J
M-J
Hi, thanks. Someone was praising her dog on a website and then someone commented this, which I can't understand, would you please help me?
A man in your life may not share your passion *cough* so to speak for your adorable pooch…
Given the choice, I think I know who will win. Hint: the loser can drive his car home?
the last two lines are the mentioned comment.
The dog wins
M-J
M-J
18:39
I'm sorry, What is a passion cough at all?!
It's an interjection a visual one, imagine someone coughing at that moment in the sentence.
M-J
M-J
I can imagine it, but what is the purpose of it?
@Tarun I think it's monotransitive, not sure it needs another object
@M-J Belittling her passion for the dog
@Helmar How should one differentiate a mono tranistive verb with non transitive verb as in both case we dont have an object receiving an action.
M-J
M-J
@Helmar Okay! I got it! Now what is the second line about?
18:47
@Tarun Phew, I think as soon as you have an object it's transitive, if you have none it's non-transitive
M-J
M-J
Ah, I got it! Thanks Helmar.
You're welcome
@Tarun But I'm not really an expert on the matter
A lot of verbs can be used either way anyways.
@Helmar But "She seems happy" is intransitive.
yes
Sure, the adjective is no object
@Helmar "John become a soldier"
18:58
"a soldier" is a predicative nominal
That's not an object either
@Helmar I think i need to read about predicative nominal but yes it looks like an object as it answers the question of "become what"
The same as happy is an predicative adjective
@Helmar Could you please brief why cant we classify predicative nominal as object.
Eh, I think we are moving into the territory where I should mention again, that I don't consider myself to be an expert on that topic. Predicatives describe something about objects or subjects.
With become you don't have an object, because it's still John
You only have added some sort of further property to John.
Become is a copula verb which takes predicatives.
John shoots a soldier. <- Now it's an object
19:16
Thank you so much @Helmar I understand your point about predicative nominal. Predicative nominal describing an Subject.
"The child had fallen sick" << Again here i think "sick ( predicative adjective) describing the Subject.
"The ass continued braying. " << I am confused about this sentence. Why continued is transitive verb. Who is receiving action here.
hm, I guess braying as gerund is the object. What did the ass continue? The braying.
@Helmar I thought the reason we didn't do lit. crit. here isn't because they'd be questions we aren't interested in the subject but rather, because it's a bad fit for stack exchange in general due to the lack of a good evidentiary basis for the topic.
@Tonepoet The SE is still being shaped. I don't see it as litcrit more as questions around books.
Especially with books written in another language, there is a lot of stuff one might be interested in.
19:33
@Helmar Hmm, I'll have to take a look around there later to give more commentary on the subject.
An object receives the action of the verb that is acted on by its subject. This relationship can be inverted by recasting in passive voice. This is not possible with copular verbs, which is why their complements are not considered objects per se.
If John became father to that child, you cannot rephrase that into some sort of passive form like Father to that child was become John.
Or rather, it means something else.
Consider a similar thing in Jerry appeared a fake.
Or Johnny turned traitor.
It's not as though the traitor were turned by Johnny. That means something else.
Only transitive verbs take objects in a certain strict sense.
But English still expects even a predicate nominal to be in object case, so "He became her thanks to poor lighting".
I feel like I’m talking to myself.
Do you really?
I do, yes.
Now you do :D
Who's that now?
Oh right, that’s him again.
Because English is not Latin.
Who’s that picture of?
Wait, that’s me!
If Yoda says, A Jedi he has become, that's transitive, because I can rephrase it, correct?
No.
That's merely fronting the complement.
This English does in order to draw especially attention to it.
19:48
Would have been to easy ;)
Do you see what I did there?
I can't see anything
Augh! I've gone blind!
You moved the 'this' up
Right: I put the verb’s complement at the front of the sentence not the end.
These things I know to be true.
Sam I am.
Huh, that rhymes
19:51
These truths we hold self-evident.
to be?
or not
I meant, isn't there a to be missing in your constitution?
Oh well, it isn't in that order, either.
Luke Luck likes lakes.
Luke's duck likes lakes.
Luke Luck licks lakes.
Luck's duck licks lakes.

Duck takes licks in lakes Luke Luck likes.
Luke Luck takes licks in lakes duck likes.
Chicks with bricks come.
Chicks with blocks come.
Chicks with bricks and blocks and clocks come.
When tweetle beetles fight,
it's called a tweetle beetle battle.

And when they battle in a puddle,
it's a tweetle beetle puddle battle.

AND when tweetle beetles battle with paddles in a puddle,
they call it a tweetle beetle puddle paddle battle.

AND...

When beetles battle beetles in a puddle paddle battle
and the beetle battle puddle is a puddle in a bottle...
...they call this a tweetle beetle bottle puddle paddle battle muddle.

AND...

When beetles fight these battles in a bottle with their paddles
Try reciting this aloud as trochaic tetrameter:

  basal    basil    bezel    bezzle   bozal    buzzle   casal   causal
  chisel   clausal  cresol   cresyll  crizzle  crozzle  dazzle  deasil
  diesel   drazel   drizzle  easel    eusol    fizzle   foozle  frazzle
  frizzle  fusil    ghazul   gozill   Grizel   grizzle  guzzle  haysel
  hazel    hazzle   housal   housel   Kyzyl    lazul    measle  mesal
  mesel    mizzle   Mosul    mousle   musal    muzzle   mysell  nasal
  nozzle   nuzzle   pausal   phrasal  pizzle   puzzle   quisle  reesle
This is rather fun for native speakers.
It may be puzzling to others. :)
My pseudonym would be more accurately applied to tchrist.
20:03
But sir! you cry, you're one word shy; to scan it needs revisal.
The one, it's clear, which *must* appear is good old Theodor Geisel.
@Tonepoet Someday you'll have forgotten me.
@tchrist I don't recollect what that quote is from, but I think the polite response would be "I doubt I could ever forget you tchrist." However with that having been said, if television has taught me anything it's that a good bump on the ol' noggin can make somebody forget everything, at least until they're bumped on the noggin again.
@tchrist Oh I remember that. I think Palestine's on the list, as well as Tibet.
Also:
I just saw that my tagging guideline was tweeted. How does a question get that honor?
Someone tweets it.
I mean the ELU.SE twitter account did it. Is it an automated process, do the mods do it?
20:24
I'm not sure how it works.
24
Q: How does the twitter bot work?

Jeffrey LinI heard that there was a twitter bot which automatically posted questions and asked for questions for specific questions on every site. How do they work? Is there an algorithm for doing this or is it purely random? I know that it doesn't tweet closed questions, but that's it.

@tchrist That's kind of brilliant!
Hm, a lot of guesswork
@terdon Thank you.
Also, it doesn't seem to be such an attention boost. The post has 122 views total, but the bot has only 700 followers, so that's to be expected
20:28
Some of us hate that twitter bot. . .
Haha.
:D
Until five minutes ago I had no idea that there was such a thing ;)
@terdon I wrote a terribly fancy regex that grepped the OED IPA for the pattern I wanted for the pronunciation.
@tchrist Good. I feel better now, I was wondering how the hell you managed to do that :)
magic
perl
wizardry
@tchrist True. After all, any sufficiently advanced regular expression is indistinguishable from magic.
regex, the swiss army knife of computing :)
Did somebody ping me?
@Tonepoet no
;)
20:33
@Tonepoet Yes, that Tom Lehrer video I posted was in reply to yours
Waah, I just got six Revival badges, I guess the badge service was active
@terdon "These are the only ones of which the news has come to Harvard, and there may be many others but they haven't been discarvard." That is an excellent disclaimer.
20:47
Isn't it though?
@tchrist 'Tis cu'ious indeed.
/kjujəs/
21:02
Ésta es la persona cuyo nombre le he robado a ella.
Esta é a pessoa cujo nome tenho roubado dela.
Celle-ci est la personne dont le nom je l'ai volé à elle.
Questa è la persona il cui nome ho rubato da lei.
Strange combination of prepositions for stealing something from someone: a or de.
Steal a number?
As in, acquire a phone number?
Oh, nóm.
I presume you did not write dont...que in earnest?
Nope.
Just pasted.
I don't think that's right.
I don't unerstand why it put it there.
Dont is a relative pronoun: it replaces de que/qui.
So no dont que.
21:12
But I chose a masculine singular thing (name) so I didn’t have to worry about agreement in the participle.
At least it didn't sound right to me.
No, I've never seen dont with que.
Ah, you have removed it, I see it now.
Never been comfortable with dont.
I'm still not sure what the sentence means.
21:14
This is the person whose name I stole from them.
Okay, so there are three people.
No, damn it.
This is hard to do in English.
"Them"?
Can you explain what it means?
ella is the pronoun that agrees with persona.
It isn’t necessarily its human’s sex.
But dont already refers to personne.
And what does "steal" mean here?
21:15
Well, Spanish likes redundant datives when the third person singular is involved.
I stole that person's name. Somehow.
My intuition only speaks French.
I can clip the redundancy.
Does "steal" mean simply "acquire, find out"?
No, fraud or identity theft or masquerade.
Ah, OK.
I'm not sure that works in French, but who knows.
21:17
This is the person whose name I stole from them/that person.
I didn't write it in English to start with, so I'm stumbling a bit.
And is it ceci or celle-ci?
Celle-ci seems more agreeable.
I was thinking about that.
And would you really use personne, when you know who it is?
Because I couldn't figure out why it wouldn't be cette-ci, so gave up.
This isn't the negative personne.
This is the individual whose name I stole from them.
C'est lui dont j'ai volé le nom.
But you know who it is, you're pointing out who it is.
Or:
21:20
This is who I stole the name from?
I wanted whose name.
C'est son nom que j'ai volé.
Don't say don't. :)
Don't trust my French.
@terdon French!
Oops, autocorrect.
I'm just not sure I'd use personne in "this is who did x", but I could be wrong.
Perhaps if you're pointing to a veiled person?
Someone of unknown sex.
21:23
The gender goes with "person".
With the word "person".
It doesn't matter what sex the human is.
I was not pondering that.
But whether to use the word person at all.
I know how it works.
Just like das Mädchen und seine Freudin.
Well, you can say "individual" instead of "person", but that's a bit off-putting.
Not a nice word.
22:01
Hundreds of thousands of Catalans want independence.
It's interesting how strongly people feel about this.
22:26
@Cerberus Where will they go then, Sardinia?
They will go home and become independent?
The president of the region has said that he will hold a referendum next year.
But Madrid has said many times that it will not accept such a referendum.
If they do not leave Spain then they will remain Spanish.
But they may leave her.
You cannot carve up a peninsula.
And to be honest, this is not legal.
The paeninsula is already so carved.
What is another bite?
22:37
One bite can kill.
Lorin just brought in a dangerously large rattlesnake. Randy has not been seen all day, and he was acting all strange yesterday. I hope he wasn't bitten.
@Cerberus And what language will the Catalans speak to do anything in the world? Catalan? No.
Yes, Catalan, of course.
It's their thing.
Rattlesnakes sound scary.
They should.
I'm quite worried about Randy now. I should have paid him more attention yesterday when he was acting weird, but I did make sure he was eating. He could have gotten bitten, or any number of other things.
And I've got Lorin under close observation. He sure is cleaning one paw a lot.
It's dreadfully hot and windy here today.
Yesterday was cooler.
90
Hmm I'd expect the venom to act fairly quickly?
You'd have known, and he wouldn't have left the house.
I'm preparing for a heatwave too.
Thank God summer will be over next week.
@Cerberus I wish I'd examined him more carefully.
23:01
Damn it the rattler scrawled out of the container while my back was turned and now I can't find it.
Ugh.
@tchrist I'm sure he'd not have gone out after a serious bite, and you'd have noticed him going crazy!
I'm thinking I'd best get boots and long trousers on.
Ugh.
It has escaped inside the house?
@Cerberus I noticed him seeming sickish.
@Cerberus YES
Scary.
23:04
I used the wrong lid, tried to find the right one, but it was gone already.
How did you handle it?
I know it's within a few yards of me. The room is not immense and the snake could not have left it.
@tchrist Still, a bite is very painful. You'd have noticed mewing and limping. And he wouldn't have left the house.
Poke under furniture with a stick?
I think that's probably right. But he could be dangerously dehydrated or have some other kind of sickness.
But then he wouldn't have left either?
23:05
Lorin's not acting bit.
He'll be alright!
Good.
23:57
How is everyone doing tonight? :)

« first day (2131 days earlier)      last day (3085 days later) »