« first day (2065 days earlier)      last day (3152 days later) » 

user208178
00:12
ok nice chatting. It is 5:11 am here so I'll continue my other half sleep now.
user208178
@Mitch you are right. well it is fun too. also I use a pseudonym there just like here so I am anonymous.
user208178
Laters.
00:29
@Mitch get a mac
01:00
@tchrist embarrasses because has a mac
But that's exactly the problem. I have to install a new keyboard mapper or remember some codes. And I can never remember the codes.
Wait....sometimes I can hold down a key and get alternates with different accentsę
I have a big problem with "times in English". For example what's the different of these?
- To check the number of emails have sent
- To check the number of emails have been sent
- To check the number of emails were sent
- To check the number of emails are sent
@tchrist It is easier on Windows.
Just use Autohotkey.
@Stack You need that in all of those sentences.
You can't leave out that if that is the subject of the relative clause.
@Cerberus Like this? "To check the number of that emails have sent" ?
No, after emails.
Ah ..
01:07
> To check the number of emails that have sent. This means the emails are sending something, because have sent is active.
> To check the number of emails that have been sent. Perfect!
> To check the number of emails that were sent. Correct, but it means you're talking about the emails that were sent during a specific period of time—a period that you have already mentioned or that the reader knows of.
> ?To check the number of emails that are sent. This is incomplete; I would expect by someone if you use a form of be + past participle. Or I would expect an indication of frequency, like every Tuesday or yearly.
@Cerberus ohhh I see
@Cerberus English is your native?
well you are really good in it
Gracias.
@Cerberus this is Spanish?
01:14
Sí.
 
11 hours later…
12:30
@BiscuitBoy I noticed in your bio that your speak Tamil, so I thought I'd just drop in to say that there is an Area 51 proposal for a Tamil language SE, just thought you might want to follow that :)
13:17
@MετάEd to learn new shit. There's enough echo chambers on the Internet.
13:29
for some reason this works in Chrome but not Firefox
meta.english.stackexchange.com/questions/8136/… -- @Rath you have mastered most arts but certainly not the dont-engage art.
@MattE.Эллен What's it supposed to do? Shoot fast and slow SEGA bullets?
@TIPS yeah, it's a scrolling background
@MattE.Эллен Hmph, on FF, it turns on and off.
Just when I thought nothing would make me blink anymore.
13:52
@TIPS yeah. it's really annoying
I assume it's some problem with loading lots of different backgrounds
14:34
@RegDwigнt Dammit. Haven't I learned enough?
15:08
What has whack got to do with out of whack?
 
2 hours later…
 
4 hours later…
21:11
Sounds like an inglourious question.
AIEEE! A BALROG HAS COME! Now that I have your attention, please note that the number of items on the review queue is trending upward.
21:59
7
Q: One answer to a Q. is suited to ELL, but the other answer is suited to EL&U

TrevorDThis question: dogs, not cats -> why 'not' originated in EL&U, but was migrated to ELL. I agree that the original question and the first (my) answer are probably more appropriate to ELL than EL&U. But the second answer (from @NVZ) seems to me to be more appropriate for EL&U. Is there any way...

Comment cleanup needed on aisle 1.
 
1 hour later…
23:07
Is this correct?
> "You have sent lot of requests to reset your password (we've sent you emails for over limit). try it later"

« first day (2065 days earlier)      last day (3152 days later) »