« first day (2064 days earlier)      last day (3152 days later) » 

01:56
@MattE.Эллен hmm... Very metonymic...al
Sounds weird
Maybe if you're pointing at a cup of water that is full. Otherwise it sounds bizarrely obstetrical
 
1 hour later…
03:07
@Cerberus Here’s another of those interesting French accents:
 
2 hours later…
05:00
Which dialect of English does the business world speak?
05:24
@tchrist It was apparently in 1735: babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/…
 
4 hours later…
NVZ
NVZ
09:13
@andrewleach hello
Mods, anyone here?
My "spam" flag was declined on this answer, why?: english.stackexchange.com/questions/334619/…
09:33
@NVZ Strictly speaking, that isn't spam. It's nonsense. The mods would probably have preferred that you flag it as "not an answer" instead.
NVZ
NVZ
IMHO, this should be "spam" because that's how most sites classify it as.
An answer that talks about good stuff, makes a comment, etc. but not actually answering the question can be "NAA"
This is, IMHO, a very poor design by SE.
@NVZ No, spam is, very specifically, an attempt to sell a product. This is a pretty classic example of "not an answer". It isn't selling anything, so not spam, but is also not even trying to answer, therefore NAA
@tchrist Wow, that's quite something. I have the feeling it's a maghrebian speaking for some reason.
NVZ
NVZ
thank you. :)
10:25
Gentlemen, my greetings!
English is beauty. She is, I insist.
10:58
What's the meaning of "daddy" in following sentence? Is that a sarcasm right?
- who's your daddy?
- daddy is talking know.
Yes Shafizadeh, that'd qualify as sarcasm
Also, Eid Mubarak
@Shafizadeh
ah ok thx
daddy is talking *now
or know daddy is talking
or, daddy is talking, know that
11:18
@Shafizadeh how is it sarcasm?
"who's your daddy?" sounds like a reference to porn. it's not using a phrase or word to mean the opposite in a mocking way
"daddy is talking now" sounds patronising, not sarcastic
11:38
@MattE.Эллен Not only. It could be any kind of one-upmanship.
@terdon not only what?
> Who's your daddy? is a slang expression that, in one use, takes the form of a rhetorical question. It is commonly used as a boastful claim of dominance over the intended listener.[1] The phrase itself stands out as a noteworthy lyric from the 1968 song "Time of the Season", by The Zombies: "What's your name? Who's your daddy? Is he rich like me?" (The lyrics, however, refer to the person's literal father as evidenced by the following lines which question her upbringing.)
@MattE.Эллен Not only porn.
Sure, the phrase often has sexual undertones as in sugar daddy, but not exclusively.
@terdon sure, but that's it's current place in culture
back when I was in school it's connotation was mostly as a reference to the film "Scum", but that was a long time ago
which was about being in prison
11:41
@MattE.Эллен Hmm. That really sin't the first thing that comes to mind for me. I think of it as more of a humorous line. The sort of thing I'd say, for example, if I were to score an impressive point in ping pong or whatever: "wham! Who's your daddy"? Kinda like "Who da man?"
But yeah, the sexual thing is certainly part of it. A large part of it.
@terdon for me the phrase has always felt weird.
with the exception of trying to help children find their fathers
:) Duh!
Well yeah, it isn't something I'd say in all seriousness either. I just don't necessarily associate it with porn, is all.
With some kind of dominan/subservient, probably sexual relationship, yes. Just not porn by definition.
user208178
what about "sugar mommy"?
user208178
11:56
okay don't answer that.
@terdon probably means I watch too much porn
@MattE.Эллен I am so very disappointed in you.
:P
12:35
@tchrist That's probably supposed to sound like Middle French?
Apparently.
13:22
MornIng EvEryBody I ApPear BeFore this AuGust AsSemBly ToDay ReAlIzIng that I am BeSet with a TrouBleSome DisOrDer agaInst which I am MySelf UtTerLy PowErLess WhereFore I must needs SoLicIt ExTerNal RemEDy from such learNèd and SenSiTive ScholArs as YourSelVes.
It ApPears that no MatTer how hard I try I CanNot shed my ConTempt and DisApProval for that PheNomenon of AtTenTionSeekIng MarKetIng mavens WhereBy they RanDomLy paste ToGethEr words to CreAte new TheORetICalLy CatchiEr PerChance uniquier ComPounds of EfFecTiveLy RanDomLy ArRanged CapITalIzionS.
ParTicULar VexOm is when said MarKetIng mavens SubSeQuentLy DeMand that we AdHere to their SillYSeaSon DicTa WhenEvEr we OurSelves EnDeavOur to RenDer InTo type their AnNoyIng MaSuClatEd words BroKen by DeLibErAte DeCiSion ConTrary to the EsTabLished OrThoGraphIc PrinCiPles.
Hello guys, I just want to confirm, is "Can I consult to you my problem" grammatically correct?
No, it is not correct. The verb consult does not work that way.
I see. do you have an alternative way of saying that? sorry english is not my first language
What do you wish to say?
May I please consult with you about my problem?
I'm trying to ask an expert about my problem and ask her advice
13:26
May I discuss my problem with you?
I see. that's not the effect of what i'm trying to look I think. What If I wanted to ask for her advice instead?
Because she's a consultant and i'm trying to get her opinion about my problem
The direct object of consult is a person.
You consult a doctor regarding your trouble.
You can also consult a dictionary looking for the correct spelling or sense of some word.
I see. got it! thank you!
That has example sentences.
@Pennf0lio You’re welcome. Good luck.
Noun: consult ‎(plural consults)
  1. (obsolete) The act of consulting or deliberating; consultation; also, the result of consultation; determination; decision.
  2. The council broke; And all grave consults dissolved in smoke. -John Dryden.
  3. (obsolete) A council; a meeting for consultation.
  4. A consult of coquettes. -Jonathan Swift.
  5. (obsolete) Agreement; concert.
  6. (US) A visit, e.g. to a doctor; a consultation.
Verb: consult ‎(third-person singular simple present consults, present participle consulting, simple past and past participle consulted)
  1. (intransitive) To seek the opinion or advice of another; to take counsel; to deliberate together; to confer.
  2. Let us consult upon to-morrow's business. -William Shakespeare
  3. All the laws of England have been made by the kings of England, consulting with the nobility and commons. - Thomas Hobbes.
  4. (intransitive) To advise or offer expertise.
  5. (intransitive) To work as a consultant or contractor rather than as a full-time employee of a firm.
(8 more not shown…)
 
1 hour later…
14:34
Is this context correct?
There is few kinds of links which validate something. For example when you create an account into a website, that website sends you an activating-link. You have to check your inbox and click on the email to activate your account.
As you know, that email isn't valid forever, it will be expired after a while. Why? What's the benefit of expiring links? In other word, what's wrong with keeping them valid until user uses them?
how can a context be incorrect?
@MattE.Эллен wrong English grammar
ah, so it's the grammar that could be incorrect
"There is few kinds" -> is should be are
:)
@MattE.Эллен oh .. you are right
grammatical context?
14:37
"into a website" -> should be on, not into
@MattE.Эллен ah ok ..
"until user uses them" -> "until the user uses them"
otherwise it seems fine to me.
@MattE.Эллен thank you very much. your advises were good :-)
no probs :)
@MattE.Эллен Oh just one thing, is this sentence correct as the title? "Why should I expire validator links after a while?"
14:40
@stack yes
good
@MattE.Эллен Really? Expire is a transitive verb now? I will expire this as opposed to I will make this expire?
@terdon don't drink expired milk
etc
it's fine
@MattE.Эллен Sure, but "time will expire this milk"?
it will be expired after a while?
I think in the context of computer jargon it's ok
14:49
Wow. It seems really off to me.
like, there are many ways you could improve the sentence, but it didn't seem like a big jump to have expire be transitive
I need to expire these links programmatically
I believe you, I've just never seen that and it certainly doesn't scan for me.
would you baulk at, say, "I need to logout these users automatically"?
Sorry to asking a lot. That's almost the last one for today :-) .. Is this correct?
"If the user is able to guess the validation code, surely he can do that within a normal being-valid-time (ex: 1 day). So no difference between a limit-valid-time link and a link which is valid forever."
@MattE.Эллен No, but that's because (I think) I parse that as "log out". Granted, I'd probably say that "I need to log these users out automatically".
14:52
@stack "a link with time-limited validity"
@stack how about: "If the user is able to guess the validation code, surely they can do so before the expiry date (e.g. 1 day). So there is no difference between a link that expires and one which is valid forever."
Although I fail to see your logic. That the user can guess something doesn't imply that they can do so in a specified length of time. I could guess your PIN, but probably not in a day. If you give me a few months though...
@terdon's pin is 1111
Damn!
I knew my psychic powers weren't just a fluke!
15:18
wow! That's my pin too!
Except in the reverse order
Is it true that SE chat masks your pin by asterisks if you type it here?
yes, but it only masks your pin. if you type someone else's then it's visible
Ahh I see.
Let me try it.
****
It works!
7382
Yeah.
user208178
15:41
****
user208178
nice.
16:02
@MattE.Эллен Ah
@terdon thank you pal :-)
Hi. I'm practicing with an English tutorial book named "Passages" and I came to a question which is as so: "Complete sentences with (not) had to , was (not) supposed to, should(not) have, or (not) needed to and the correct form of the verb parentheses."

I'm wondering, what does (not) had to mean?
I have never ever heard (not) had to before whole my life.
it means you need to complete sentences with either "had to" or "not had to"
And is the negative form of had to : Didn't have to + infinitive. correct?
I would say maybe. "I had had to eat for a week" vs "I had not had to eat for a week" is also a possibility
16:26
10
Q: What is the word for individuals who unwittingly post very similar questions asking for the same words, without doing any previous research?

Mari-Lou AMany newcomers on EL&U post very similar single-word-requests, all asking for more or less the same words. The two main categories appear to be asking about verbosity and thriftiness. What is the word for: Users who don't do any previous research and unwittingly post similar questions on Q&...

Really? I go home for, what, ten hours, and what do you do?
sigh
passive aggression. such a productive use of time
Was she looking for meta?
Ah. I like it when you get succinct.
it's possibly more appropriate there, but it seems like a genuine request for a single word
:D
> This may seem like a facetious single-word-request, but I really want to know if such a word exists. Failing that, an idiom or pithy expression that can substitute my description will do very nicely. I would use this word or concise phrase whenever the topic of single-word-requests crops up on EL&U meta.
16:31
We used to have a close reason called "peeving disguised as a question"
There is a problem with the question though, which is the assumption that something can make people stop asking questions that other people had. The fact that people have questions that are the same as other people is the entire reason we have this site.
Yup.
And for SWR FAQs I have to wonder if there isn't some difficulty in formulating the question such that Google can answer it.
But in any case I think the word for someone who asks an FAQ is faqqer
@MattE.Эллен Thank you so much.
or maybe FAQ'er
16:37
@GforOevOerD no probs :)
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I hardly know'er!
Sorry, cheap shot, couldn't resist.
Should we migrate this to ELL? Does it pass the crap test? I'm leaning towards no.
I wonder if we have a canonical answer for that sort of question we could close this as a dupe of instead.
I know JR wouldn't mind, but I think WendiKidd would
6
Q: "I played two music" vs. "I played two pieces of music"

Ed. BrazilI have a Canadian friend who sometimes helps me improve my English. A few days ago she sent me a list of some words (nouns) which the plural form is the same of the singular. One of these words was "music". I said to her that I didn't know that "music" don't need the "s" at the end to function as...

I think that one covers it
16:48
Hm. It doesn't really discuss the use of a as an article with music or uncountable nouns in general.
it covers music being an uncountable noun
plus @Cerberus' answer covers uncountable nouns in general
@MattE.Эллен yes, but it doesn't address the article, which is what the other Q asks about.
Someone who doesn't know about mass nouns and articles isn't going to get there from cerb's (excellent) answer
44
Q: Are there any simple rules for choosing the definite vs. indefinite (vs. none) article?

sergI can’t for the life of me figure out where to use a and where to use the — and where there is no article at all. Is there a simple rule of thumb to memorize? The standard rule you always hear: “If a person knows which item you are talking about then use "the" . . . doesn’t clear things u...

true. I'll just close it as lacking reseach
This question looks like it addresses it but doesn't either
@MattE.Эллен That was my thought too.
16:52
articles are tricky for NNS. we should have a set of canonical Qs and As for these, I think.
yeah they should too. Though I have to admit i'm not convinced the split was a good idea.
25
Q: Why don't we use the indefinite article with 'software'?

JezGenerally, one doesn't use the indefinite article with a noun because it's plural, but sometimes you get nouns where, for some reason, the indefinite article isn't used even though the noun is singular. I would never say 'a software', though it seems to be a singular noun, and I've heard it said...

@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 The split was necessary not for the topics necessarily (although there is some argument for that) but for the chance for ELLs to have a nurturing community, which EL&U didn't seem to be able to provide
and now it doesn't have to try, so it needs to find something else to feel elitist about. enter SWRs
@MattE.Эллен well, I don't want to debate it. I may try to find or craft a good QnA for article use.
cool cool
I look forward to it!
have either of you tried lang-8.com ?
I've had a brief play. It's in some ways better and some ways worse than ELL or EL&U chat
IMO it has a better structure for the questions, but it's got a crappy interface
17:10
@MattE.Эллен That's correct .. it is related to the porn.
@MattE.Эллен years ago, I tried it. Haven't been back.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 fair enough
17:26
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Peeving disguised as a question is still off topic. The associated close reason is "primarily opinion-based".
@Shafizadeh so it's not sarcastic?
@MattE.Эллен Well, the root of sarcasm is the Greek σάρκα which means flesh, so the two might not be mutually exclusive :P
Someone who works at a school but not teaches, does the paper/computer work, keeps and arranges the grades etc, what is their job called?
... prepares report cards, etc
17:51
@terdon huh. interesting!
> 1570s, sarcasmus, from Late Latin sarcasmus, from late Greek sarkasmos "a sneer, jest, taunt, mockery," from sarkazein "to speak bitterly, sneer," literally "to strip off the flesh," from sarx (genitive sarkos) "flesh," properly "piece of meat," from PIE root *twerk- "to cut" (source also of Avestan thwares "to cut"). Current form of the English word is from 1610s. For nuances of usage, see humor (n.).
@Færd administrator
@MattE.Эллен Thank you. You're British, right?
Holy convergent evolution Batman! "from PIE root -twerk- "to cut"" seriously?
17:53
@MattE.Эллен I was wondering, would you call something like this a schedule? Or is it nothing other than a timetable for you?
yes, I could call it a schedule, or a programme
What about a timetable at an airport?
I probably wouldn't call that a schedule
Okay. Thanks.
no probs :)
@terdon lol
17:56
The plot thickens, etymonline actually has an entry for twerk:
> "to dance in a way that simulates the body's action in copulation," by 2005, alteration of twurk, which seems to have originated in the Atlanta, Georgia, strip club and hip-hop scene and first came to wide attention in the Ying Yang Twins' 2000 song "Whistle While You Twurk," described as "an ode to strippers" ["Country Fried Soul, Adventures in Dirty South Hip-Hop"]. Probably ultimately imitative of something.
Related: Twerked; twerking. There is a verb twirk from 1599, "to pull, tug, twirl," what a man does with his mustache, but OED regards this as possibly a misprint of twirl.
I always assumed "twerk" was formed from some word ending in -t + work
@MattE.Эллен I thought administrators are important people who do management and decisive stuff.
Maybe I was wrong.
@Færd that too, but administration is all about moving paper around, not teaching
18:05
I see.
Oxford Dictionaries traces twerk back to the 1820s (twist + jerk)
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 No fewmets?
Wow.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 cool!
18:25
I'm still rooting for the PIE root.
@MattE.Эллен It seems to me kinda sensual.
@Shafizadeh OK, but what has that got to do with sarcasm?
I mean I wouldn't call it sensual. Sexual, but not sensual
@MattE.Эллен I thought that's a sarcasm, but now I understand that's a thing which is related to sex
@Shafizadeh Simply put, sarcasm is saying one thing but meaning the opposite. For example "Yes, I love it when you step on my foot, please do it again".
@Shafizadeh ah, ok :D. As @terdon says.
18:48
@terdon Not necessarily sarcasm.
Fair enough.
sarcasm is 90% tone of voice
that's why it doesn't work online
in text only chat rooms
Mhm.
@MattE.Эллен Yeah, right.
:D
My generalisations are never over generalisations
18:57
Give me a definite text-only sarcasm then. :)
Never mind. my request was irrelevant. I misunderstood something.
19:57
@MattE.Эллен what's with the attitude?
@Færd I've heard that there have been attempts to make an emoticon for sarcasm, but none of them really work.
@Mitch What could be. I haven't seen what in a while.
@Færd that looks like someone is trying to touch their toes but strangely has feet for hands.
@MattE.Эллен snerk
Sorry I was just snorting back some mucus.
user208178
20:12
@Mitch not an emoticon but some people use "/s"
@Mitch Eww, backward feet.
Sarcasm is not mistaken for anything else when it is done properly.
 
1 hour later…
21:41
10
Q: What is the word for individuals who unwittingly post very similar questions asking for the same words, without doing any previous research?

Mari-Lou AMany newcomers on EL&U post very similar single-word-requests, all asking for more or less the same words. The two main categories appear to be asking about verbosity and thriftiness. What is the word for: Users who don't do any previous research and unwittingly post similar questions on Q&...

Stop ... me ... from ... asking ... a ... similar ... question.
@MετάEd No, actually, I don't think I will. I'll just get popcorn instead.
Why is this voted up? That's not a rhetorical question, what I mean is: "So, we know the voting patterns on ELU are insane, bizarre, utterly-freakin'-bat-shit. What can we learn from this particular example about the Why of the matter?" One theory I have is that if you simply post any complicated sounding word you get votes; perhaps this is an example of that. — Joe Blow 8 hours ago
for once I agree with Joe
@MattE.Эллен Strange feeling, that.
well, the "why does this have upvotes?" portion anyway
Although, I kind of like the coining of a new word for this. Inasmuch as I can be said to like the question at all.
22:12
@terdon Dammit.
22:25
@MattE.Эллен Hah, well said. By "it" you mean EL&U, I presume.
22:41
@Cerberus yes :D
@MattE.Эллен What will they pick after swr.stackexchange.com goes live?
@Cerberus hmmmm. I can't think off the top of my head what gets the next most scorn
Perhaps questions about English.
lol
possibly questions about preposition use, or maybe apostrophes
22:59
Hmm don't those already "belong" on ELL?
@MετάEd What do you mean by that?
Or What the hell do you mean by that?
@MattE.Эллен preposterophes
2
@Cerberus perhaps! my work here is done :D
@Cerberus I vote for bringing back usenet, where it would be just as easy to create an alt.english.usage.swr
wait...that's what reddit is for.
@MattE.Эллен You've done well, young padawan. Or is it grasshopper?
roasted. chocolate covered, a little peanutty taste.
@Mitch I'm not edible
@Mitch catastrositions
user208178
hello @MattE.Эллен @Mitch I hope you guys are well.
23:09
Hi @Arrowfar. I hope you're well, too
user208178
yes I'm fine, thanks!
@MattE.Эллен WHy is it on regular ELU and not meta, I don't know. It should totally be moved to meta
@MattE.Эллен OK. If that makes you feel more comfortable.
@Arrowfar Sick, sick, sick.
user208178
oh I forgot to share something. reddit profiles everyone. check this out:
I'm totally kidding.
user208178
user208178
23:12
I don't even remember writing all that ^_^
At this very moment I'm having the worst of, not 1st world problems, but rather 1/2 world problems.
user208178
@Mitch :)
The swimming pool I'm in, has the water really nice temperature, but the part that is in the air is slightly cooler.
Happy times ruined.
@Mitch because it's apparently a real SWR. it's not a question about how the site should be run, but a word she wants to use. She's asking for localised jargon, but I'm not sure it's so localised it should be moved to meta
but maybe.
people can vote to move it there
user208178
@Mitch I see. Are you on your vacations?
23:14
@Arrowfar ooh! like TV? Like forensic pathologists trying to figure out the personality of a serial killer?
user208178
lol
@Arrowfar well, don't worry, the stormtroopers won't be rappeling through your windows.
What will happen is you'll start getting packages from Amazon that you didn't order but you're actually glad you have.
And then a super exorbitant bill in the mail.
user208178
nooo I'm no shoes poor.
user208178
;)
@Arrowfar No. I'm visiting family.
hahhahahah.
user208178
23:18
ah nice.
that's so western to say
user208178
yeah, I have been reading a lot so English is getting better.
user208178
well, they have an algorithm that can profile people based on what they write in comments/questions etc.
user208178
on reddit I mean.
I tell people that visiting family, as good as it is to see people you used to live with or spent years knawing, it's not as fun as when you are on a vacation with friends. Because with family, you have to talk to them.
@Arrowfar considers avoiding reddit altogether
user208178
23:20
yeah heh.
would take a concerted effort to start using reddit in order to have the consideration to avoid it
WHy do I need reddit to do that? @Cerberus has already figured me out. When I say something mean, he already knows that I didn't mean to be mean but messed up a joke. Or that I was actually mean. Well, he would know the difference.
@Arrowfar intellectually, reddit seems like the perfect next step for usenet. Except when I look at it by some reference, I never feel like anything useful is being said.
I fel compelled to make snarky comments on MariLou's question...let me go read the comments there...
@Mitch I would indeed.
23:37
@Cerberus Get off my wavelength, you effing prescriptivist.
Ooh...I can make that insult worse... conversational prescriptivist.
@Mitch For some reason, I read that as though it were spoken by Daffy Duck.
I'm a proscriptivist, I don't tell people they should or shou'nt say things. I tell them there are somethings they are just forbidden to say.
praescribes you
Proscription (Latin: proscriptio) is, in current usage, a "decree of condemnation to death or banishment" (OED) and can be used in a political context to refer to state-approved murder or banishment. The term originated in Ancient Rome, where it included public identification and official condemnation of declared enemies of the state. It has been used broadly since to describe similar governmental and political actions, with varying degrees of nuance, including the en masse suppression of ideologies and elimination of political rivals or personal enemies. In addition to its recurrences during the...
@terdon The effect is that more chilling when the laser beam is about to cut the chain to drop you into the alligator-shark tank
@Cerberus Surely you meant præscribes you.
23:40
@Cerberus yeah, that!
@Mitch :)
@terdon Ah, I sort of encourage ligatures, but I don't use them myself.
I wouldn't even know how to properly write the Dutch ligature ij.
@Cerberus ??? there's a ligature for that?
augh! why are accents so hard to type? I don't want to have to install some g_d'd keyboard, and I can't remember all those g_d'd ascii codes!
@Mitch It would be weird not to write ij attached in Dutch manuscript.
And the entire letter should always be capitalised if at all, never Ij.
So I saw some tweet about some woman complaining that she couldn't write her name in Gaelic because the form that she was writing in didn't allow accents (which are necessary in Irish (you know, for accent).
23:46
Poor woman.
And my first impression was "shut the front door, you're lucky the English haven't used you all up for the kidney in steak and kidney pie"
eg "how dare you complain about stupid accents which aren't even spelling wise in minimal pairs (at least I don't think so, I think it just helps with pronunciation)
@Cerberus don't most variable width fonts automatically do ligatures, like for 'fl' or 'fi'? Hm... this one doesn't even do it.
what is the world coming to?
@Mitch I don't know.
we're plummeting headlong into the future, with self driving cars, universal translators, probably someone has a handheld transporter system in beta, and we can't get ligatures right without thinking?
Sad!

« first day (2064 days earlier)      last day (3152 days later) »