Here is some proper grammar for you pussies. How do you think its going to feel when you hear the click..? Before you get a chance to say a peep it will be curtains. Cant stop it. It's gonna happen. you should have stopped her..
@MattЭллен Seems a bit stodgy, that idea. The hip thing is musical chairs with all the counties, and when the music stops whoever doesn’t have a Seat gets to have their own queen.
Had a skunky referendum in 7 counties to have a tax to pay for a dumb stadium. Boulder County voted against it. But that same election there was also a referendum for a corner chunk of our county with two others to secede and make their own county. They voted for us to pay and they also voted for themselves to secede. Which both passed. I was highly unamused.
Since they were no longer part of the 7 counties who had to pay, despite being in the middle of us all, they didn’t have to pay. So they voted to have other people pay their bills.
My usage, as I put it in a post some time ago,
In this medium, where writing and typography has to express speech and sounds, I use italics and boldface like this:
I use plain italics only for citing examples and titles. Never for emphasis.
I use boldface for emphasis. These are ...
They should have used an all-yellow flag or something. With a red hammer and sickle in a corner. Yeah. That'd totally give them one identity. For a full seven decades at least.
it is bluffing. plain and simple. you are trying to trick someone into thinking you're in one position when you're in another to get them to play the way you want
There are only two artful ways to lie: one is to tell a half-truth, and takes no skill. The other is to tell the entire truth in such a way that people believe you are lying.
And therefore the only skillful way to lie is to tell the complete truth.
Your goal is achieved if no one believes that truth.
@RegDwigнt Most people do that to one extent or another. They make up their own version of reality and then insist on believing it. Others do so merely to stay alive.
your argument is that one set of people who feel one way about something feel differently to a completely different set of people, about a different thing
The Germans have always wanted reunification, and were distraught that their country was partitioned. There was even a public sculpture when I was in Hamburg in 1977.
solidarity under attack is a very differnt thing. again, you can't compare the situations. We are not under attack. Regardless what the Tories want us to believe about terrorists
The Scots have always resented the fact that the Union was necessary to bail them out of their own economic disaster. They're still independently-minded, and this is the chance to show it.
Of course, another Union might follow dissolution...
The parents of those kids could have resented the forced consolidation. They would have taught their children to wave the flag in public but spit on it afterwards.
@Jez The main difference is that there was no mother country that occupied/assimilated them. "France" was a new thing, being forged. "England" on the other hand was not.
@Jez There's a huge difference. If you're Scottish and have been occupied by your traditional enemies, you're in a very different situation than if you're Norman and have been coerced into forming a new nation state. It's the difference between being subsumed into an existing structure or becoming part of a new one.
@Jez Yes but the circumstances of nation-building are not necessarily the same. The UK is not exactly the model of perfect historic unity without struggle.
@Cerberus True about nation state. I meant the idea. You had the kingdom of England and that invaded and occupied Scotland. In France, you had one fiefdom occupying the rest but building a country not an Empire. There is next to no practical difference but a huge one psychologically.
@Jez In that I've met many Scots who consider themselves British. The UK was clever enough to allow certain cosmetic liberties (things like a different currency, judicial system and national teams). This allowed the Scots to feel both Scottish and British.
@Cerberus No! It's a matter of style. England already was a kingdom with defined borders. France was not. The entire region was in flux. In the Br case, you clearly had one nation state (anachronistic though the thought may be) invading another. That leaves a bitter taste.
Anyway, as a Canadian who lives in a really young country, no matter how you describe countries, I was surprised to be told that people in Salzburg don't really consider themselves "Austrian".
@terdon I'm not entirely sure I see a difference here. Paris sends an army to occupy, say, part of the Provence. There is fighting, but Paris wins. Occasionally revolts take place.
@Cerberus It's one thing to be "regionalist". Like, I could make a strong case for Toronto seceding from Ontario. But to claim that Salzburg isn't part of Austria?! It has been for over 100 years! City-states are a thing of the past! Certainly in my hemisphere. It seems so quaint.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Well, saying Salzburg is no part of Austria is just silly regionalist rhetoric. It is not a very meaningful statement. Anyone from, say, Limburg could say it is no part of the Netherlands. Or someone from Twente, Zeeland, Friesland...