« first day (1370 days earlier)      last day (3555 days later) » 

3:00 PM
@tchrist quite
 
@Arrowfar I have this theory that Orientals are much more worried about formality than are Occidentals.
 
user116848
@tchrist I see :)
 
user116848
I am from Pakistan BTW
 
So saying “a formal context” to us either sounds strange or doesn’t tell us enough. Explain the exact situation.
@Arrowfar That makes sense. It is in my experience most often subcontinentals who ask about formal contexts.
You have to tell us the situation so we can know whether it makes sense there.
Since you and we have different ideas of formality.
 
@tchrist I agree.
 
user116848
3:03 PM
I usually hear "flirty flirt" in movies etc. so I thought can it be used in a formal sense, not that I have any formal context in front of me. Just the example that I told you.
 
@Cerberus The prim and proper Puritan lurking in my cultural closet recoils at the entire premise, but I suspect more harm would be done — and is — if it were illiberalized than if it were not.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 What you can do is forbid those aspects of it that you can control, like off-line advertising.
 
@Arrowfar I have never heard flirty flirt, so cannot expertly opine.
 
Just as with smoking and other drugs.
@tchrist Yes.
 
user116848
@tchrist Oh, I see. Thanks
 
3:04 PM
Then again, is it really so bad if you sell sex? I mean, it's just a physical act.
 
but Jesus
 
Wept.
 
yes, the baby Jesus
 
Working in an Amazon warehouse is more harmful to your mind and body, perhaps.
 
And cast no stones.
 
3:05 PM
:<
 
I remember the parable of Jesus and the sex workers. He flipped all the beds over. The matresses were filthy.
 
If you just have sex for half an hour, which is not an inherently unpleasant activity, you earn what it would otherwise take you ten hours of toiling to get?
 
the little beeaaby Jeesus…
 
I can’t hear your cherubic lullabyebyes.
 
Haha.
 
3:07 PM
@Cerberus The invisible hand would naturally steer towards such a course.
 
@GeorgePompidou Not yet!
@tchrist What?
 
it is okay if you are. I will speak with the beebboo Jesus and get it sorted out.
 
Thanks!!
 
Sorted out? What does that mean? Sounds very ominous.
 
@Cerberus Economic optimizations. Who would not wish to work at 20x his previous rate, if none be harmed?
 
3:08 PM
Yes.
 
I must go and see the knee surgeon now.
 
I imagine prostitution must feel a bit like a one-night stand that you weren't really enthusiastic about but went through with anyway.
 
I hope he tells me no cutting shall be necessary.
 
Good luck!
Has your knee improved at all?
 
No, it has not.
 
3:10 PM
Alas.
 
It has if anything gotten worse.
 
OK then go.
 
maybe this whole time Autohotkey was just Dutch slang for lurking the street corners half naked waiting for some business
2
 
@Cerberus It's not just a physical act. And not all physical acts are equivalent. But the bigger problem is that many sex workers are actually slaves and would rather be doing something else, but they are forced to continue by their pimps.
 
anyone know why everyone in America thinks the Amish people in Pennsylvania speak Dutch? in my experience they all literally speak Swiss German.
and even more Swiss.
 
3:11 PM
Because the word "Dutch" really means German.
 
Pennsylvanian Dutch
 
@GeorgePompidou because Deutsch sounds like "dutch"
wow, jinxes all around
 
No other language used the word Deutsch for the language of the Netherlands.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 that's true. and Schwyeitzscherdüütsch even more so.
 
Only English.
 
3:12 PM
The Pennsylvania Dutch (Pennsilfaanisch Deitsch) are a cultural group formed by early German-speaking immigrants to Pennsylvania and their descendants. This early wave of settlers, which would eventually coalesce to form the Pennsylvania Dutch, began in the late 17th century and concluded in the late 18th century. The majority of these immigrants originated in what is today southwestern Germany, i.e. Rhineland-Palatinate and Baden-Württemberg; other prominent groups were Alsatians, Swiss, and French Protestants. Historically they have spoken the dialect of German known as Pennsylvania German or...
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Well, it is a physical act. If you have no feelings for the other party, it is not that much more...
Of course there is the problem about prostitutes being forced. That that is a problem of practice, not principle.
 
huh. I've never heard them speaking Dutch in the weekends I used to spend in rural PA when my dad worked there.
but I guess that explains it.
 
@Cerberus but it puts you in a more vulnerable position than, say, serving drinks
 
@Cerberus Well, except that for lots of people, sex is extremely unpleasant if they have no feelings for the other party. As opposed to, say, shaking hands.
 
@MattЭллен Well, in a way, but the client is also put in a very vulnerable position. If you go to a brothel, and the prostitute throws a scene, the client will lose.
 
3:14 PM
@Cerberus true (probably)
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 But not as opposed to hurting your back every day in 11-hour shifts in an Amazon warehouse.
 
and I suppose other things too.
yes but with Amazon warehouse you make more people happy.
sex is just selfish compared to that.
 
@MattЭллен So I'm talking about a situation here where the prostitute is safe and not forced and stuff.
 
user116848
@Cerberus you work in Amazon warehouse?
 
@Cerberus There are workplace safety laws meant to prevent injuries like that. There aren't so much workplace safety laws meant to prevent the emotional trauma of being, essentially, raped for money.
 
3:16 PM
@Cerberus I meant (probably) as in I have no experience with such things :D
 
@GeorgePompidou Are you really happy when you have wasted money on another useless piece of plastic crap?
@Arrowfar No.
 
@Cerberus you're asking me if I'm happy being a daily recipient of the thing I ordered two days ago on Amazon Prime?
yes, I am. really really happy.
 
@Cerberus careful now. Some of us have invested large sums of money buying plastic stuff.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Then rape is not always bad, if that is rape...
 
also, some of the things I buy are made of metal.
the last thing I bought of spruce wood.
 
3:17 PM
@MattЭллен Uhuh...
 
eat you some soup, Cerberus.
 
@GeorgePompidou They're corrupting your soul!
 
user116848
@Cerberus So someone here does?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 My apologies! Lego excepted, of course.
 
@Cerberus um. You're getting it backwards. Any prostitute who does not want to be a prostitute is being raped. That's my point. She is not consenting to that sex, because she is forced to be a prostitute. It is not just a physical act.
 
3:17 PM
@Arrowfar Not that I know.
 
user116848
I see
 
@Arrowfar do you though?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Possibly, but that's not what I'm talking about.
I'm talking about whether the act itself is really so horrible.
 
user116848
@GeorgePompidou No. But I couldn't follow the Amazon warehouse joke
 
And I am as always advocating for the Devil.
If you force people to do some other kind of labour for you, that's also bad for them. But it is unrelated to the kind of labour.
 
3:19 PM
@Arrowfar it's a metaphor for unpleasant labour that doesn't pay well
 
@Cerberus What I'm trying to point out is that sex work is unique among "physical acts" in that it involves, for the majority of people, a huge emotional component. Most people do not want to do it. Just calling it "a physical act" handwaves away the problem.
 
user116848
@MattЭллен I see. hah
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Still, enough people do it who are not forced or coerced.
 
@Cerberus Well, I agree that people should be allowed to choose to do it if they want. Why not? They can decide if they like it and do it if they do or not. But most prostitutes are not doing it because they want to.
 
I assume it doesn't pay well, I don't know the pay scales at amazon
 
3:20 PM
@Cerberus I don't think so. If "enough" did, there wouldn't be a slave trade.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 But that's not my point.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Enough as in, more than a few people.
I have spoken to them.
 
@Cerberus Let's just agree, then, that if the prostitute wants to be a prostitute then there should be nothing preventing him/her from doing so, since nobody is being harmed.
 
Yes.
But that wasn't what I was exploring.
 
user116848
But what about all the diseases then?
 
user116848
STDs
 
3:22 PM
If a person wants to be addicted to eating fatty food and become very fat, then we probably shouldn't prevent him from doing so. But that doesn't mean it isn't very harmful.
 
@Cerberus well, intentional self-harm. People should be free to harm themselves.
 
@Arrowfar Yes, that is one issue. They can and often do use protection.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 But the question is, is voluntary prostitution harmful?
 
people pay more for unprotected sex, according to the economist article
 
And I'm arguing that it doesn't have to be.
@MattЭллен Yes, naturally...
But it's probably less risky than car racing or mountain climbing.
 
@Cerberus harmful to whom?
 
3:24 PM
But let's assume protected sex, then.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 To the prostitute.
 
user116848
I love watching mountain climbing
 
that's a thing?
 
Ew.
A dirty metaphor.
 
mountains climb very high.
 
I don't get it.
 
3:25 PM
right up to the sky, in some cases
 
user116848
I don't mean it as a metaphor. I mean the real mountain.
 
@Cerberus Surely there are some harms possible. STDs. bad clients. assault. robbery.
 
user116848
May be I shouldn't have said it in this sex discussion :)
 
@Arrowfar I'm just teasing you.
 
but then there's nothing to hold onto, so they fall back down again
 
user116848
3:26 PM
haha
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 But those things are not inherent in prostitution. You could, say, have all clients tested, use protection, have safe, guarded brothels.
If done well, prostitution need not be more risky than other kinds of sex.
 
@Cerberus yeah. well, I already said above that I didn't think anybody was being harmed, normally.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Oh, OK. Some people think one is.
 
assault can happen in any job. Take people who work on trains, or at stations. they have put up notices now reminding people that abusers will be prosecuted, that's how often it happens
 
everything Cerberus says in this conversation is conducive to him being an experienced prostitute.
2
 
3:28 PM
@MattЭллен yeah we have those notices in our buses here. It disgusts me that people have to be told that it's not okay to spit on or hit the bus drivers.
 
stops ripping on him
 
@GeorgePompidou I do it during my 10-minute lunch break and my 10-minute dinner break at Amazon.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 what? I thought that's what the buses were for
 
And my 2-minute peeing break.
 
3:29 PM
what do people do on the bus then
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Or, rather, some people will always display criminal behaviour, and the signs are useless.
 
@Cerberus do Amazon workers work 23 hours and 38 minutes a day? that would explain why my packages get here before I even order them sometimes.
Amazon Prime is the literal tits.
 
@Cerberus well, that too.
 
@GeorgePompidou They have 11-hour shifts, I read. So no.
 
loves Amazon
 
3:31 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I rather see it as a sign of the times that people think a sign will help!
 
@GeorgePompidou they sell more than just books
 
you don't say?
 
@Cerberus Actually I wonder if the signs maybe do help a little. Sometimes otherwise well-behaved people lose control, and maybe a gentle reminder helps them stay civil.
 
It's just like television programmes about crime: because people watch them, they think crime is more and more prevalent, even though the opposite is true.
 
@GeorgePompidou they're not just literal
 
3:32 PM
so I can order more boobies on Amazon too?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I highly doubt it. What reasonable person would attack train personnel?
 
the fun just never stops since I subscribed to this Prime membership.
@Cerberus drunk people?
 
Signs telling you to stand up for old people may help.
 
@GeorgePompidou the tits carry the books, the boobies carry the televisions. they have hawks for delivering DVDs and CDs
 
@Cerberus People who have otherwise reached some kind of limit on their self-control.
 
3:33 PM
clothes are, of course, delivered by moths
 
@GeorgePompidou Are they reasonable? Will they change their minds after glancing at a sign?
 
@MattЭллен what is a DVDs and CDs?
@Cerberus no, you're right.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 If they have self-control, then they won't attack people. If they don't, will they heed a sign?
 
@GeorgePompidou things old folks use for storage
 
user116848
Jarvis isn't here for sometime
 
3:34 PM
@MattЭллен huh.
 
@Cerberus Look. The sign is advertising; it's propaganda. Just like any other form of advertising and propaganda. I'm sure it has some effect. How much? who knows. Maybe the effect is to raise the consciousness of other people to have them call out such bad behaviour when they see it, or otherwise lower the status of the people who do that.
 
user116848
 
user116848
I found this very funny :)
 
user116848
And sexy
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I don't know. Maybe it might give people ideas.
 
3:37 PM
@Cerberus well, maybe.
 
Sgn: "Don't say "cutie pie" to the waiters! Ever! I repeat: don't call them cutie pie!!"
What do you think people will do?
 
@Cerberus That's different, though.
 
Especially people who were thinking about something else entirely.
 
Let me just say that I didn't know how common driver assault was on Toronto Transit until they put up those signs. So it has, at least, made me aware of a problem.
 
huh. reading now about the Amazon warehouse workers law suit. I hope they didn't succeed… I'm addicted to getting my orders unreasonably quickly.
 
3:38 PM
If the sign is about "spitting", people may think, "hey, that sounds like fun, I hadn't thought of that".
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yes, that could be a function.
 
@Cerberus well, it surely IS a function. But sometimes people need to be reminded just what IS bad behaviour. Like my children: sometimes they do things that are inappropriate and I have to tell them to stop, to consider what they are doing,etc. Some adults are like that too.
 
Yes.
 
user116848
@Cerberus What's wrong with saying "cutie pie"? Is it offensive? I think it's very cute
 
@Cerberus I'm sure most people don't learn of a new way to assault someone and then think "I need to put that into action"
 
So it depends on whether there are people who didn't know that assaulting the staff was bad behaviour.
@Arrowfar Well, it depends. In a professional relationship, waiters may not appreciate it.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Not a new way, just a reminder of all the interesting things they could do to kill their boredom or express their frustration with society, their life, etc.
 
3:42 PM
@Cerberus Not "didn't know". "needed reminding".
I mean, how is it any different from reminding people not to litter, or to give up their seat for someone who needs it more?
 
Sure, it may have some effect for those kinds of behaviour, like not lifting your bags from the seat next to you if people are coming into your wagon.
 
These are things that should be automatic for polite people who are considerate of others.
 
Signs against littering, I don't know, we don't have those. Doubtful.
4 mins ago, by Cerberus
So it depends on whether there are people who didn't know that assaulting the staff was bad behaviour.
 
@Cerberus we have them EVERYWHERE. like, every disposable coffee cup says not to litter.
every garbage can.
 
haha. the Dutch are marginally less retarded than North Americans I think.
 
3:45 PM
People may not know that giving up your seat is required polite behaviour. People WILL know that not assaulting the staff is required behaviour.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Has there been any research?
 
@Cerberus how would I know.
 
@GeorgePompidou Hah, never hope!
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Just asking.
I'm just not sure.
If you flood people with warning signs, what is the effect?
 
But Canada has a reputation for being tidy. When they film here, and pretend that our cities are actually American cities, they first throw trash all over the streets.
@Cerberus subtle brainwashing?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Haha, seriously?
 
3:47 PM
anyone did some Clojure here? I passed an interview where they seem to like it
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Holland is also said to be tidier than, say, France. And Sweden is tidier than Holland. But isn't that more about how much the state spends on public spaces, rather than inherent attitudes? Of course the state is less concerned with the common weal in America...
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I don't know. Dubious.
 
@Cerberus It's about lots of things, probably. But inherent attitudes plays into it, because the state cannot keep the streets clean on its own. People have to do their part. And when you look at places like China, where there has not been a culture of not-littering, and compare to other places, you see how much that matters.
 
What is the term for what is tidy concerning fine particles and gas?
 
@nosmoking I've never used it.
 
@nosmoking a horse.
 
3:52 PM
@nosmoking what do you mean by this?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 gas-friendly
emit few gas
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Sure, there will be many factors. But I do believe in the broken-windows theory with respect to littering: if you see rubbish, you will add yours. If the Chinese government started cleaning up the streets, that alone would make people drop less rubbish.
 
@Cerberus Yeah, it is certainly part of it.
But probably they'd have to keep the streets clean for years, combined with a public education campaign, before they started seeing a culture change
There are some signs though, that clearly don't work.
Like "no smoking" signs
 
Heh.
 
There is a mall nearby that has "no smoking" signs all around the outside, including signs that say "no smoking within 9m of this entrance", etc. I ALWAYS see smokers standing there, right under the signs, smoking.
They get so tetchy when I tell them off.
 
3:56 PM
I kind of sympathise with them...
 
Like I'm the jerk.
 
Well...
 
FUCK YOU! You're smoking right under the sign!
 
They clearly think the sign is unreasonable.
 
That's because they are smokers.
The world is their ashtray.
 
3:56 PM
And does the mall even have jurisdiction outside?
 
Oh I need the sign as avatar
 
Look, I hate smoking. But is it really such a big problem if people smoke near the entrance?
 
The entrance is set in from the sidewalk, so probably yes.
 
A short waft of smoke never killed anyone...
 
@Cerberus Yes. because of the way the airflow works, when someone opens the door, all the smoke is sucked inside.
 
3:57 PM
Is it really that much?
 
@Cerberus So what? The stench of shit never killed anyone, yet we don't want people shitting on the sidewalk either.
Stepping in shit never killed anyone.
 
Smoke is not as foul as poop.
 
Yet we expect people to pick up their dog's shit too.
 
many things don't kill, but drive you crazy
 
And we have exhaust fumes in the air everywhere anyway.
 
3:58 PM
I prefer walking in poop than walking in smoke, but that's me
 
If you have to inhale smoke for more than a couple of seconds, then you clearly have a case. But if it's really short?
@nosmoking Haha, indeed.
 
@Cerberus and we have bylaws against idling, and zones where idling is strictly forbidden, due to air intakes. And also car emission laws.
@Cerberus Why should I have to at all? They can go two steps further and smoke on the sidewalk and it's perfectly their right.
 

« first day (1370 days earlier)      last day (3555 days later) »