« first day (1327 days earlier)      last day (3890 days later) » 

20:03
I don't the r is localised there...
@tchrist I've now commented on that question. I don't mind being accountable.
@AndrewLeach Thanks. I had initially been going to suggest a meta question, but he hasn’t the reps.
Plus, honestly, this question has nearly innumerable dupes.
I guess I am becoming a little short with askers who show no effort.
@tchrist You don't say...
Finding duplicates is an art. I'd be happy to mark it as a question having a duplicate instead.
;)
@AndrewLeach It is. Especially when terms like "a" are involved.
20:09
As you say, there are a Saganplex of such questions out there, and we would be completely deluged were we to incorridge them.
Maybe one of the things I should do is start a master list of duplicate targets split up by common form
@MrHen Other than the Frequent page?
@tchrist Yes
Other than the frequent page
@AndrewLeach It's easier to create duplicates.
More of a "reverse-lookup" tool for duplicates
20:11
I’ve talked about this before, but it has gone nowhere.
@Mitch Yes, as askers demonstrate on a more-than-daily basis :-(
Very short questions tend to be very low quality ones that tend to generate very low quality answers, and so do not add value to the site by helping future visitors.
It's a pity the How to ask a good question is so buried in the Help. english.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask
Yep.
That too.
@MrHen Do you know whether it is possible to search for posts with attached moderator notes in SEDE?
Who do you think these girls are?
20:21
How about the Crown Princess of the Netherlands and her sisters?
The ones wearing the horrible plastic sports shirts, with the logo of a commercial fraudulous bank? Ding!
Such decadence.
but if she had a set of wings man i know she could fly
You don't know what I got.
I suggest we not use tags at all; they proliferate like cockroaches and serve very little purpose. As for Ms. Bear's remarks, she's absolutely dead-on correct. And where else would "propriety" ever come from, but those who themselves act properly? Look up "ingroup language" and "outgroup language" — jlawler May 21 at 22:29
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 That's a bingo.
Also a pingo.
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Also, I don't think I've stumped you yet. makes note to keep trying
20:27
@Robusto I think you have.
Maybe not.
@tchrist Yeah, probably
@MrHen I’d rather like to both burninate and blacklist the tag.
@tchrist You'll get no complaint from me.
Aww, why are you all picking on that nice old lady?
@Robusto Who is "we"?
20:31
@MrHen The ones pickin' on me grammy.
@Robusto Bummer, I missed the grammy bashing? :(
@Cerberus and the one on the right, wearing cutoff jean shorts, a sign of American capitalist bourgeois corruption.
6
Q: The plan for [grammar]

JSBձոգչThe tag grammar is one of our most highly-used tags, though it is, unfortunately, so vague as to be nearly useless. I submit the following proposal as a way to break up this tag into something useful. Following nohat's answer, questions about the grammatical acceptability of a particular senten...

More than two years later, ni nada.
My hunch is that the primary use for is because people aren't expecting
20:44
@Mitch Haha, those aren't cut-off jeans!
And, while it is true that jeans are perhaps less fitting for a princess, they are so common among all kinds of people here that it is difficult to scold her.
@Cerberus wha?? what are they? also what is the evil bank her sister is endorsing?
The Rabobank.
It is slightly less evil than some other banks, but they did take part in the Libor/Euribor frauds.
And they have been paying their directors excessive bonuses and stuff.
21:06
The Robberbank
rabo is an anagram of boar
coincidence?
anagram is an anagram of anagram.
Mitch is an anagram
That's how awesome I am.
21:08
@AndrewLeach I almost wonder whether we shouldn’t include the blurb about prior research in the Ask Question dialogue: “Have you thoroughly searched for an answer before asking your question? Sharing your research helps everyone. Tell us what you found and why it didn’t meet your needs. This demonstrates that you’ve taken the time to try to help yourself, it saves us from reiterating obvious answers, and above all, it helps you get a more specific and relevant answer!”
I wouldn't have guessed
@MattЭллен You don't need to guess because it is so obviously true.
@Mitch anagram != acronym
I guess so
@tchrist Yes. That would be a site-wide thing, presumably -- although none the worse for that.
21:11
@AndrewLeach Well, it could be site-specific to ELU, but I do think it would help.
Droll.
@Matt what do you say about that you and I write a quarternion tomorrow?
I still only have VS 2010
OK, sounds like fun :D
21:29
#good times, it is for this
hej Jez
good night :)
Good night. And to everyone else. I wonder why today has been tiring.
Jez
Jez
hi johan
 
1 hour later…
22:50
I just did a clean install of my OS. I feel good.
@Jez Hello, do you use Firefox?
Jez
Jez
no i use Seamonkey
Oh, right, OK.
Do you use a portable version? @Jez
Jez
Jez
nope
0
Q: A simple proposal towards improving question quality

tchristEncouraging Better Questions I would like to encourage the asking of better, more substantial questions. Every day we receive many brief, low-quality questions that are unlikely to elicit anything but low-quality answers which are equally unlikely to be of any help to future visitors of our sit...

@Jez okay.
user116848
23:07
Hi everybody :)
@tchrist I think I believe that if a banner were presented these askers when they went to ask their question reading lacks a to.
@Alraxite I will present you a bill upon completion of this exercise.
user116848
So is this sentence grammatical? (Let's say John is deceased) "If John did hide the car may be he would park it in a place where nobody would go looking" (So is this sentence grammatical for a dead person)
I would say no: he would have parked it, or, more likely, he parked it.
user116848
Hi Cerbs
user116848
23:14
So "would" is wrong here?
Hi.
I would say yes, colloquial at best.
user116848
okay
@tchrist +1. Anytime I see a question phrased like "Is this correct usage?" I want to fold, spindle, and mutilate someone's IBM punch card.
room topic changed to English Language & Usage: Restrooms are for paying customers only. (no tags)
3
user116848
@Cerberus But here same situation then why only "would" (The person being spoken of is dead here too) springfieldspringfield.co.uk/… (Search for this line " If he were looking for a place to hide that ledger maybe he would put it where he thought no one would go looking".
@Arrowfar If he did hide...he would have parked it, but if he were looking for a place...he would put it.
If + simple past = about the past, so the main clause needs would have or simple past; if + past subjunctive = about the present, so the main clause needs would.
user116848
23:24
Oh, so you are saying that he hadn't put the ledger yet?
@Cerberus If I wanted to go home, I would simply go home.
If I'd wanted to go home, I would simply have gone home.
@Arrowfar Not yet: no, rather, not at all. If + past subjunctive (if he were looking...) is about an hypothetical or untrue description of the present.
user116848
@Robusto Yah I know about the three conditionals but here (the person is dead) that's the confusion
@Robusto Yes, that's what I'm saying...
If I want to go home, I will simply go home.
Then we're in agreement.
user116848
23:27
What about conditional for 'dead' person?
Look not at the situation, but at the actual tense that is used in the if clause.
user116848
I see
5
Q: Subtraction of a negative number

wcsWhy subtraction of a negative number from a positive number is addition? Eg: $a - (-b) = a + b$ When looking through the number scale I am unable to relate this, please kindly clarify ?

Holy moly.
Looks like Maths don't have gen-ref.
Who says words can't mean more than one thing? There are words in English that are their own antonyms, depending on context. Consider fast and cleave, for example. There are others. — Robusto 34 secs ago
It's not even gen-ref, it's by-def.
23:30
Haha very nice.
@Robusto that particular OP sure elucidates gargantuan conversation interspersed with ah screw it I can't write like that even when I try.
So there are math pineapples too?
@RegDwigнt I was noticing the same thing. It's like seeing a salmon dressed in black tie, kind of.
Salmon à la mode.
Salmon à la math.
Salmon à le Meth Damon.
23:34
Salmon inheres within.
Yes, yes, "à le". That's a middle doigt at the Latins.
Vulgar Latins.
See you at the Brandenburg Vulgate.
Vulgate Dentagard?
Bilabial dentifrice.
@RegDwigнt au?
23:35
@tchrist due read aun.
Scandalous.
Germany will be kicking some French ass pretty soon.
Impudic.
@RegDwigнt What a shocker. I can't recall them ever doing that before.
@RegDwigнt Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
23:36
The match agains Algérie just ended, and I am exhausted.
@Robusto well I'm not quite as methusalad as you, so I in pointe of facte cannot, but see your point I do.
Easy, James Joyce.
James Joyce is never easy.
You must be misspelling Hummingway.
Last time it was on the news, France beat Germany...
Yeah yeah we all know you don't have a TV.
And the time before that.
Thanks to the entente cordiale.
23:40
Yeah yeah we all know TV didn't exist back then.
@RegDwigнt What’s that now?
The other day I learned that Joyce met Yeats when Joyce was about 20. He asked Yeats his age, and Yeats told him (47? I don't recall). Whereupon Joyce said it was too bad, he was too old for Joyce to help him.
And just look where they are now!
Bushwick can't sleep.
Death, the great equalizer.
Death is just nature's way of telling you to slow down.
With forty virgins.
23:42
Down from my usual 72, yeah?
It's the age.
Don't wanna risk a heart attack in paradise.
Surely, though, if there were such a thing as paradise, wouldn't it be so good that you wouldn't even want sex? And if you did want sex, wouldn't you want it with someone more practiced in the art than, say, a virgin?
(And of course the religious man's response would be, 40 means "a great lot of", while 72 is just a measly 72 and not a single one more.)
See, they're just not thinking this stuff through.
@RegDwigнt That is the biblical interpretation of 40, yes. It rained for 40 days and 40 nights, the Israelites were in the desert for 40 years, etc.
That's because the people who were supposed to be thinking this stuff through are long dead themselves.
23:45
Some Chris Guest for y'all.
And not even six feet deep. Think more like petroleum.
@Robusto I knew Ali Baba and the 40 thieves would get no love from you.
@RegDwigнt Not to mention the 40-oz. beer bottle size.
Yup, unmentioned as always.
40 (forty) is the natural number following 39 and preceding 41. Despite being related to the word "four" (4), 40 is spelled "forty", and not "fourty". The reason is that etymologically (also in accents without the horse–hoarse merger) the words have different vowels. "Forty" containing a contraction in the same way that "fifty" contains a contraction of "five". In mathematics Forty and fourty is a composite number, an octagonal number, and as the sum of the first four pentagonal numbers, it is a pentagonal pyramidal number. Adding up some subsets of its divisors (e.g., 1, 4, 5, 10 and...
Nice photo.
A good hair day for a change.
> Despite being related to the word "four" (4), 40 is spelled "forty", and not "fourty".
23:48
I wonder just how many decades this sentence will hold.
Also, how many Wikiwars will be fought over it before it finally changes.
More interesting is this:
> The reason is that etymologically (also in accents without the horse–hoarse merger) the words have different vowels.
What a gem.
Yeah, as we all know, English spelling is phonetic.
Totally the reason.
So they're different words because they have different vowels. I guess for and four and fore are different for the same reason. Hey, it works!
I submit that bar is not the same as car, either.
23:50
But think about this: who would take it upon himself to define 40 in a wiki article? What sort of person does that?
Wait, lemme patent it before submitting.
I call tar and far.
Har!
@Robusto I sort of hope it was one of the many bots, but seeing how it's a very low number I know the hope is in vain.
Also, mar and war.
My tartar is very farfar.
The warwara at the Marmara.
23:52
war is not the same as oar, either.
And of course the barbarians are the varvarians in Russian.
Yeah. Russians, more than anyone, require two "b" sounds. Fuckin' A!
And two "v" sounds, too.
user116848
@Robusto I understood the condition part. Just want to ask if we can use thinks instead of thought in this sentence: " If he were looking for a place to hide that ledger maybe he would put it where he thought no one would go looking".
Now you're splitting hairs.
Have you met my friend, Al? Al Veolar?
23:53
No, splitting a hair would result in a Y. I am not skilled enough to achieve a clear V.
@Robusto that's Al Di Veolar to you.
Al di Meolar, you mean.
John's McLaughing at you.
I can't go on. Too tired.
I need a li'l bit of recuperando.
A Poco de Lucia, eh?
user116848
You guys saw my question?
23:56
They're too busy making good bad puns.
Poco de Cimmaron.
@Arrowfar I would not use thinks there at gunpoint.
God, how I despised people who were Poco fans. Still do.
I would also not use it not at gunpoint.
But thankfully the question was at Rob so I can just ignore it.
That's how I work these things out.
23:58
@Robusto Ah, thanks, I thought you liked that.
@Robusto oh come on now. Do the Pocomotion.
@terdon Can't you tell the difference between a YouTube post and an ironic YouTube post? Pfft. No wonder your team lost yesterday.
Seriously, Costa Rica? They don't even have a player named Socrates.
@Robusto an ironic YouTube post will have comments underneath it saying how ironic it is.
Irony? That's like bronzey and goldy only made of iron right?
@RegDwigнt Looking at the comments is cheating.
23:59
@Robusto Sokratis, actually. An impostor.
Cheating death by aneurism.
@terdon Ask @MattЭллен. He'll tell you it's all aluminium.

« first day (1327 days earlier)      last day (3890 days later) »