« first day (1249 days earlier)      last day (3969 days later) » 
01:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

01:06
A Bonaire whiptail. Most of the wildlife we saw in Curaçao. There were a few birds, but we didn't see any hummingbirds.
@tchrist ^
It was pretty windy on the shore, though. Maybe you have to go inland to see those.
01:32
@Robusto Hello.
Are you still out there?
Nope. Home now.
Ahh OK.
How was your trip?
Great.
Good.
Was anything different from what you expected?
Hmm.
Not really. I didn't have a lot of preconceived notions.
01:34
OK.
I guess I was surprised that Willemstad was quite the little metropolis.
Is it?
Well, kind of.
I sort of thought the island would be sort of rain-foresty. It's more like a desert island.
Hmm I see.
I'm not sure I had any expectation about forests or deserts.
Only beaches.
How is it a metropolis?
Well, it had those.
That's the resort we stayed at. Baoase.
B + A (initials of the owners) + Oase (Dutch for Oasis, so I'm told)
There's a picture from the couch on the veranda.
I was trying to snap a picture of some little yellow-breasted birds, but they kept flitting out of frame.
There's the lagoon at night.
Nice restaurant on the beach there. But not as good as a French restaurant we discovered in Willemstad on the Concordiastrasse
That's as close as we got to a hummingbird.
@Cerberus BTW, I could figure out most of the Dutch I read in the signage there.
It really does seem to be halfway between German and English.
01:46
@Robusto Wow, all looks quite idyllic.
@Robusto That is exactly what it is hehe.
It was very relaxing. The island, not the language.
Concordiastrasse? Or -straat?
@Cerberus -straat. Heh, there I go interpolating German.
There was a German cruise ship docked downtown one day. Called "Mein Schiff" — no doubt a reference to the Kurt Weill song from Die Dreigroschenoper.
Ah I don't know it.
Only seen the Oper as a school play...
Heh, no, I'm wrong. It's not Die Dreigroschenoper. It's from a show called Lady in the Dark.
But I could be wrong about the association.
This seems like a better performance of that tune.
But I know a singer who really does it better than either of these.
01:54
Gosh you people stay up late.
Maybe it's because I used to be romantically involved with her and she used to sing it just for me as I played the accompaniment.
@tchrist Heh, it's shy of 10 p.m. here.
Indeed.
@Cerberus is the one who stays up late late.
BTW, the Barika Hel were all over the resort, and you could lure them if you put a glass of juice on an empty table. That's how they got their nickname "sugar thief" in Dutch (sulkerdiefje). (@Cerb can hook me up if I misspelled it)
What are those, bees?
No, the other half of the sexual awakening: birds.
01:59
Of what sort?
Oh, you mean bananaquits.
Yes.
@Robusto Ahh now we're talking!
Coereba flaveola
Latin for “flavored Cerberus puppies”.
@Robusto Suikerdiefje.
Haha.
Thank you.
02:01
I actually didn't know the name.
@tchrist Mmm, marzipan Cerberus puppies.
> Nevertheless, its precise relations remain unresolved, so the American Ornithologists’ Union classes it as a species incertae sedis.
Sounds like it doesn’t know where to sit down.
He said, sedulously.
In fact, they flit all over. Hard to get a picture.
A bird that feed off the seeds of sedition.
I think I need a sedative.
02:04
@Robusto I know, I’ve been to the Caribe.
@Cerberus: There's the pool that was right off our veranda.
Just walk down the stairs and you're swimming.
Again, idyllic.
We don't have that in the cold, boring north.
I know. That's why you stole islands from other folk.
The problem with the bananaquit is the same as with honeyeaters and sunbirds and the like: they aren’t good enough flyers to hover before the blossoms.
I left out the flowerpeckers.
Also taken from our veranda.
02:10
That’s virtually impossible to expose for in a way that represents what you actually saw.
Too many stops of delta.
Yep.
And too much movement. Especially when you raise a camera to shoot.
Easy in two shots from a tripod. Potentially possible with certain very high-end cameras.
The motion defeats the tripod idea. Maybe.
Well, you can't really frame it.
I guess you can set up a "trap" for them. Glass of nectar in front of a tripod, you already have the focus, trigger remotely.
Yes.
I’ve never been especially successful using trap-focus manually.
Well, of course the birds will not sit on the side of the glass you're focusing on.
02:15
I imagine that whatever you shot that with won’t let you pull up the shadows without noise. Or is already frozen into artifactual 8-bit jpegs.
Well.
Yep. No camera raw on the phone.
Oh, a phone. Never mind.
The laws of physics also take their toll.
Yes. Nature seems to side with them quite too often.
I was wondering about the exceptionally deep depth of field you have there. But when you magnify a teeny-weenie sensor’s capture, you have very little foreground–background separation.
And the full-well capacity of those small sensels isn’t deep enough to pull up any shadows without heisen-noise.
Well, the lens is the size of a pea. That means less light but more depth of field, I suppose.
02:18
Basically.
We're not going to get any 1.0 f-stop.
I'd be surprised if it was under f8.
Well...
The problem with that sort of aperture is that you get diffraction effects on such a small sensor.
Or lens.
Yeah. And all the spherical and chromatic aberration inherent in a refracting lens.
I suspect it is constant aperture, whatever that happens to end up being.
The purple–green CA is always notably bad on certain types of shots.
What’s your hardware?
The phone? LG G2.
I also took the last two shots with my Kindle HD 8.9.
02:23
Oh, I thought you were the one with one of those Blah-5s.
iPhone? No.
At times in my life I've dabbled with photography, but quickly realized I didn't want to make the investment in time and money (and more time) to do real photography.
Ah. OK. That's lower than I would have thought.
It has to be like that, or too much diffraction.
So lots of light will blow out the whites.
02:26
This is always true.
Just need a faster shutter.
I wonder why they don't list it.
It says “wide-aperture lens” in the product marketing.
Whatever that means.
Exactly.
It looks like about a 55-mm lens to my eye.
02:29
Found it.
It’s f/2.2, which is reasonably fast as these things go. But it needs to be.
> Front-facing 720p HD Camera. 8MP rear-facing camera with LED flash, Electronic Image Stabilization, and a wide-aperture 5P f/2.2 lens
Hmm.
I think it has a better picture than the phone. But that's not saying much.
I don’t know that that is constant-aperture.
@Robusto And there are too many possible variables to say why.
Yeah.
Lens, pixel-pitch, image stabilization, processing choices, etc etc etc.
I like a shorter lens for landscape shots.
My old 28-90 zoom was what I used most.
02:33
I don’t know what its 35mm equivalent focal length is.
Because I don’t know the diagonal of the sensor.
I don't either.
Well, viewing images on the tablet is great.
Still can’t find the dang sensor.
Ahah.
They won’t tell.
> Assuming that the camera captures images in the Kindle Fire HD's native resolution of 1280 x 800 pixels, that would be a whopping 1.0 megapixel—nothing worth writing home about.
> Amazon doesn't publish the resolution of this camera, and rather states that it is an "HD camera."
Heh.
HD covers a multitude of sins.
02:40
Only if it’s HDR.
And then only maybe.
But basically, this is a pinhole camera. :)
Yes.
Camera obscura.
antiqua
I mean, it isn’t quite, but you still have that perception of infinite depth of field.
No, not antiqua. You're thinking of that West Indian island that I didn't go to on my vacation.
How obscura.
The stupid cats just chewed through another charging cable. Damn them all to hell.
If they weren't so damn cute they'd be dead.
02:50
Scary.
There are over 7,000 islands in the Caribe.
I stand corrected. A few sunbirds can actually hover, although most perch.
Hmm.
Do the male and female bananaquits look the same? If not, why did I always see them in pairs?
03:08
I do not believe they are sexually dimorphic. See Sibley 2nd ed p 502.
He only shows juvenile and adult forms, not breaking it down into male and female.
That would explain it.
I need to take an oath to stop placing only just before the verb.
It's a sucky position for it.
I don't see anything wrong with it. I only see stylistic variation.
It’s weaker there then anywhere else.
Does everything have to be strong always? That is a weakness in itself.
03:13
He shows only juvenile and adult forms,
He shows juvenile and adult forms only,
Both those are better than the original, which is a creature of habit.
Maybe. But it doesn't bother me, and there is no single "strong" way to write something. You have to keep mixing things up, freshening your prose.
I find I have slipped into dull habits, and only placement is one of them. So is saying just far too often.
Have you read Gene Wolfe’s Book of the New Sun yet? I'm trying to get Cerb to read it.
Highly recommended.
I'd be curious what you think of the new SF novel I just put up on Amazon.
03:23
Oh!
I thought you were writing detective thrillers.
No, not at all.
Got it?
Done.
I have a house-guest for the weekend. Need to go check on her.
Cool. TTYL.
Greetings
Hullo.
03:30
How you been?
Good. Just back from Curaçao.
Ah duchy Curaçao
Or however they spell it.
That's it.
The wife and I had quite a few laughs . . . because we're immature.
It's a Portuguese name. The natives speak Dutch or Papiamento (Portuguese creole).Pap
03:32
No wait . . . it's dushi
@Robusto That I knew. I was talking about the dushi part.
}} |nation = }} |region = |speakers = 260,000 |date=1999–2011 |ref=e17 |familycolor = Creole |fam1 = Portuguese-based creole |fam2 = (relexified under Spanish influence) |iso2 = pap |iso3 = pap |lingua = 51-AAC-be |notice = IPA }} Papiamento , or Papiamentu, is the most widely spoken language on the Caribbean ABC islands, having official status on the islands of Aruba and Curaçao. The language is also recognized on Bonaire by the Dutch government. Papiamento is a language derived from African and Portuguese languages with some influences from Amerindian languages, English, Dutch and Span...
@DavidM I get it. You haven't been passing yourself any NO2, have you?
@Robusto No, although I've had plenty of opportunity today.
You still use nitrous oxide?
@Robusto Not when I can avoid it. But, there are plenty of people who still do.
@DavidM When is it unavoidable?
03:35
dushi - sweet / sweetie. This is used in the sense of pan dushi, sweet bread; dushi Korsou: sweet Curacao, but also as common word between young friends when greeting one and other (eeeeey dushi; hi darling) or used by boys to express their interest in an unknown girl passing by. A dushi is always a female.
@Robusto When one of my partners turned it on and I've taken over their case . . .
When one of my CRNAs uses it despite my telling them I don't like it, etc.
CRNA?
Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist
(Nurses who give anesthesia under my supervision)
I got it.
Understudy gas passer.
03:37
Something like that.
Physician extenders.
Similar in function to PAs, nurse practitioners, etc.
Yeah.
But I'm curious why it's ever used anymore. I would have thought it gone with the days of ether.
@Robusto Less flammable than ether, easier to control, etc.
Was more important in the days before low solubility anesthetics.
Blah blah blah jargon
The long and the short of it . . .
It starts up quickly and goes away quickly.
I see.
In the days when you had anesthetic gasses that didn't, you used to dilute them in NO2
Meaning you'd use 75% of the anesthetic as NO2, and 25% as the other . . .
03:42
Or closer to 60/40
This way you could wake the patient up faster at the end.
Nowadays we have really quick onset and offset gases that are not NO2.
And, don't have some of its annoying side effects.
What are the side effects?
Well . . .
Nausea is a big one.
Because of its low molecular weight it freely diffuses throughout the body.
It collects inside of hollow organs like the stomach and intestines, over-inflating them, making it difficult to close the abdomen in an open case.
It can increase the pressure inside of the eyes in certain types of repairs.
@DavidM I can see where that would be a liability.
Whenever I've been given intravenous morphine I immediately puked.
It also seems to be associated with certain types of heart disease, etc.
But that's more sketchy.
@Robusto A perfectly valid reaction.
I hate morphine.
I prefer to give dilaudid.
Fewer side-effects.
@DavidM Me too. Like I said before, I don't see how people get hooked on the stuff.
03:47
I think it's a lot like a lock and a key.
If you have the right key, it clicks right and turns.
Some people are just meant to enjoy and get hooked on things like that.
I don't have the right key. I hate all those narcotics. I like to be alert.
Me, too.
I don't even drink anymore.
I stopped enjoying it years ago.
I enjoyed it on the vacation. But that was wine with food.
My primary motivation for drinking was to hang around at bars.
My primary motivation for hanging around at bars was to meet women.
My primary motivation for meeting women ... was obviated by getting married.
@DavidM I know the name of that tune.
Well, I'm beat. Going to bed now, sorry. Was a long flight yesterday. Talk to you another time.
03:50
Enjoy. TTYL
04:04
which are the best tools/softwares/book to learn english grammer?
 
2 hours later…
05:35
Hi.
05:47
helo @Cerberus
Hi!
0
A: What does it mean "reject it who will"?

CerberusThe French is this (book I, chaper 8): Voilà parler! s'écria-t-il. L'excellente chose, et vraiment merveilleuse, que ce matérialisme-là! Ne l'a pas qui veut. Ah! quand on l'a, on n'est plus dupe; on ne se laisse pas bêtement exiler comme Caton, ni lapider comme Étienne, ni brûler vif comme Je...

What do you think?
06:35
@Cerberus morning
Morning right?
 
4 hours later…
10:39
I would say it means something more like "Whosoever may reject it, materialism is nevertheless an excellent choice." — Robusto 18 secs ago
10:49
@tchrist: Here's a video on the birds of paradise, which may make up for my entire lack of bird photos from my trip.
 
1 hour later…
12:17
@Robusto Where did you trip?
where did you go on your trip?
[sic] intended :)
:)
@JohanLarsson Where did you vacation?
trip is more ambiguous, can you spell ambiguous btw?
12:26
me neither
 
1 hour later…
13:35
@JohanLarsson Curaçao.
did you have a good time?
and how long?
Just a week, and yes we had a good time. I posted some pictures yesterday evening.
14:03
read some of the camera discussion
I would want a 3 megapixel full frame camera. (High end)
Low noise and huge range would be nice.
3 megapixel is enough for most purposes.
14:28
But more megapixels mean you can blow up details.
true if no noise and sharp
 
1 hour later…
16:11
@KyriakosKyritsis ba
Jez
Jez
afternoon
That, too.
Jez
Jez
bit bored today
Sundays are like that. In a good way mostly.
16:35
@Cerberus Sounds good to me. Translation is weird, one has to preserve expression -and- meaning at the same time. And maybe the meaning is a bit incoherent through the expression (either intended or not).
Umm yeah, something like that.
Jez
Jez
16:51
I don't think "JustOK" sees the irony of his response
@Cerberus Ne l'a pas qui veut is closer to not everyone who wants it has it
@terdon I don't think so...
Ne...pas modifies l'a primarily.
@Cerberus exactly
He has it not who wants it would be a direct translation
Hang on, I'll just go ask a frog
Yes, OK.
The thing is, you need to assume who wants to not have it, or it doesn't make sense in context (and it would have been mistranslated).
@Cerberus Confirmed by a french school teacher. Ne l'a pas qui veu == not all who want it have it.
17:03
Would that make sense in context? That would mean the translation is wrong.
@Cerberus The translation has really changed stuff, yes.
I assumed the translation was correct.
Not the way I read it, and much more conclusively, not the way my French housemate reads it.
I don't know this French school teacher, but the text was presumably translated by a certified translator familiar with 19th-century French...
Jez
Jez
very odd to begin with Ne not followed by pas
17:04
@terdon Then how do you read reject it who will?
@Jez Yes, it is certainly an uncommon construction, at least in modern French...
@Cerberus As a mistranslation.
Unless it is supposed to be imperative: have it not who wishes it not
Wouldn't that be odd?
Hang on, let me check with my expert again
Is this expert a Frenchman? What does he teach?
Perhaps it is a disputed passage.
Jez
Jez
"All that glitters is not gold"
probably an odd turn of phrase like that
17:07
@terdon I took it to be an imperative or subjunctive, yes. But then it still doesn't mean what your translation would mean.
@Cerberus Nope, can't be imperative apparently. She understands "not everyone has it" and can't be coerced into another interpretation. It might be an archaic form but I doubt it cause my resident expert is 1) a native speaker 2) a language geek herself and 3) a school teacher the three should translate into a pretty good grasp of the language.
Does she teach French literature?
@Jez Not really, no. Ne me parles pas for example. That is a very common construct.
And what do you mean by "can't be imperative"?
The translation clearly is an imperative/subjunctive?
@Cerberus No, no, she's a school teacher. I'm not saying she is any kind of expert, just a knowledgeable native speaker with an interest in language.
17:11
I'm sure. But so is the translator, presumably.
@Cerberus I know, I asked if it could be understood as an imperative as in "have it not who want it not" but she couldn't see it that way.
And this construction is apparently rare, I can't find much about it.
@Cerberus Charles E. Wilbour? Sounds like a non-native. Probably is an accomplished scholar of course and certainly speaks better French than I but he is also not infallible.
@terdon It is clearly not an imperative in French, so I would agree with her hehe.
@terdon Why do you think a non-native?
Charles E. Wilbour?
17:12
Sounds French enough.
Nah.
Anyway, he was american:
> Charles Edwin Wilbour (March 17, 1833 – December 17, 1896) was an American journalist and Egyptologist.
Okay, so no.
It could be an lesser-quality translation.
Apparently it was the 1st (according to his wikipedia page)
Let's find a more recent one, then.
I merely translated the French that way because it seemed to fit the context.
"Whoever wants it, doesn't have it" would not seem to fit?
@Cerberus The meaning is more "Not all who want it have it"
17:15
That would indeed be the more obvious translation, but I was forced to reject it.
@terdon Right, that is another interpretation, but...
@Cerberus I found another translation on google books. Looking for the relevant passage now
@Cerberus the other translation agrees with me: "Not everyone who wants it can have it"
> Not every one who wants it can have it.
Is what I find.
@terdon Can't access it.
@Cerberus Exactly. So the Wilbour translation is wrong.
What translator is that?
This is Hapgood.
@terdon Yes, apparently so.
Yes, exactly, Hapgood
17:23
That is, unless the later translator(s) is/are wrong...
Okay, same translation.
How can they be? They agree with me!
Hehe.
I shall have to amend my answer, the part about the French translation.
Though not the English.
But I have to go now.
Later
17:24
Le fasse qui veut!
poof
18:17
posted on April 13, 2014 by sgdi

I wrote something down yesterday And then put it safely away When I looked for my note To read what I wrote My memory caused me dismay

 
2 hours later…
20:39
@Cerb, @RegDwi: ^^ I was SO close to doubling again, then it all fell apart.
21:01
@Robusto Congratulations!
Now I feel like playing 2048 again.
21:12
loses even before getting a 2048; stops playing
01:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

« first day (1249 days earlier)      last day (3969 days later) »