I was glad he got the phone call on Todd's cell: "Is it done?" "It's done." "Is he dead" "He's dead." And then: "You feeling a little under the weather, Lydia?"
@Robusto yeah I took that as a middle finger to all the speculations that it couldn't be Lydia because it was way too obvious and besides he already almost tried it, blah blah.
@RegDwighт Yes! My wife and I were talking about that right afterwards.
Except did you notice that in the crawl space he was all boxed in, his world getting smaller and smaller. And at the end of this one he is spread-eagled, off on his free-wheeling journey Across The Universe.
Because I keep reading comments left and right that The Wire is much better. I have to say, I watched that one supposedly genious scene where they keep saying "fuck" for three minutes on end, and that sort of spoiled the show for me forever. I just can't take it seriously. That was really, really, really bad.
A lot of people don't want to say Walt achieved some redemption at the end, but I think he did. He did what he could for the people who mattered to him, and accepted all the blame and all his punishment.
By now I have probably zapped into easily thirty different episodes of Lost, from all seasons. And at all times, they all had one thing in common. The sets look like sets. The costumes look like costumes. Makeup is clearly makeup. The actors are clearly actors. And the camera work is clearly camera work.
Vince Gilligan has to feel like a conquering fucking hero. The balls on that motherfucker to make such a show—and on that channel!
@RegDwighт Dexter has been crap for a while. It had possibilities, even in Season 8, but it would have had to go dark and sick. Fucking Boy Scout serial killer. Get the fuck outta here, Dexter.
From what I've read or heard on his ideas that didn't make it into the show, he's actually one sick fuck. But in a good way. Not like Tarantino. Or perhaps he is. Hard to tell.
@Robusto I dropped out right after Season 4, and I couldn't have been happier, and every single person who watched on keeps telling me how happy I am.
So anyway. Just to finish that thought. Vince actually pitched a whole bunch of Saddamesque ideas. Thank god his writers, and sometimes actually the executives, overruled him.
There was one quote in the article where Gilligan talks about Cranston, how he wants to do a scene, and Gilligan is arguing with him for a while and then he gets hold of himself and has the good sense to shut the fuck up. He says, "Here I am, trying to tell Walter White what he feels, and he tells me I'm full of shit and he's right. I'm trying to fuck up my own show." Or something like that.
Well, I have a very personal relationship with this show. It's just been amazing.
Yeah, I will too. But not for a while.
When I was in Albuquerque last year I stopped in at the Sandia Bar, where they filmed some episodes. Remember where Hank went and beat up the bikers just to prove he still had it?
I'm not saying I will make it through the podcast start to finish. I'm just saying I heard good things about it, and that good people showed up, like Dave Porter, so yeah.
@Robusto fcourse.
In fact there was an article on Spiegel Online earlier today, on how ABQ copes with all the sudden fame and tourists and souvenir business. Except I didn't read it of course as I was careful about spoilers.
Yeah, I used a Droid too, when I worked for Google. There were a few things I liked about it, but overall it was never as fun or easy to use as my iPhone.
I have mixed feelings about iOS 7 so far. There are a few things about it that I quite like, a few others that I haven't gotten used to yet, and a couple of missteps.
@Cerberus Sure. I like my phone because it does what I want and it does it very well, and it looks good while doing it. There is nothing rational, however, about claiming superiority (and you are claiming superiority) because you like a "better" mobile phone. To each their own—this is my own.
Some of my coworkers ended up using the Droid as their full-time phones, others (like me) only used the work phone for work and kept their personal whatever-phones.
@BraddSzonye Okay, well, I am not talking about old phones from three years ago. It is possible that the Iphone 3GS was better than the Nexus S, why not?
@Mahnax Umm I have a very long and rational list of things that don't work as well or not at all in IOS.
Sharing stuff is two. You can't share any thingy (image/link/location/file/etc.) from any application to any other application in IOS: you can only share stuff in very limited ways.
Widgets is three: you can't get useful info immediately available on your homescreens in IOS, like a rain graph, Whatsapp messages, appointments, etc. etc.
@BraddSzonye Swap the standard IOS keyboard for Swype, so you always use Swype where you used to use the standard keyboard.
(And I believe the IOS keyboard still doesn't have any kind of word-swiping at all. The standard Android keyboard does, but it's still not as good as Swype's.)
@BraddSzonye Most people agree that swiping words on a good keyboard, mainly on Swype, is usually faster than typing, after having tried it for a while and gotten used to it.
@Mahnax But only Apple's weather. Not any widget you want, so not the excellent two-hour rain graph.
I remember that one of the few things I preferred about Droid was the predictive typing method, but then the iPhone got a lot better, and I got more accustomed to it.
Yeah. On the other hand, Cerberus wants the best stuff. Customizability, and so on. We're all looking for different things, and it comes down to what you want. So this is pointless.
@Mahnax But you have an app drawer, and as many home screens as you want. A widget can be extremely useful. A combination of widgets and application shortcuts is the most efficient. And you can make the graph as small as you want, even the space of only one application button. And you launch the application if you press it.
@Mahnax But Yahoo weather is not as good as other weather widgets. The rain graph I mentioned is better. Wouldn't it be a huge coincidence if every single stock application in IOS were better than all other applications with a similar function? It's not: usually there is a better one, sometimes a much better one, as in this case.
I don't care much about weather on my phone, so the app that I don't have to track down and configure is better than the one I do, no matter who cool the former is.
But now they're finally enough to my liking, enough more so than my Windows box, that I might consider getting a Macbook for my next home computer, instead of a new Windows box.
It could happen, although it would really have to get a lot better than the iPhone to lure me away, and I'd also have to have an opportunity to experiment with one for cheap long enough for it to sink in.
Yeah, I never entirely got rid of Windows because I needed it to play my favorite video games.
Because I can't afford to fix (or pay somebody to fix) something open source any more than I can afford to get Microsoft, Apple, etc. to fix it for me.
I've done it a handful of times, and it just wasn't worth it.
Anyway, it's possible to object to both Microsoft and the free/open crowd in much the same way it's possible to object both to fascists and anarcho-capitalists.
I really don't understand how you can be against "it's good if software is free and open source" on ideological grounds (as opposed to practical). But so be it.
More importantly, most of the great free/open software I've used ended up being profoundly disappointing when I actually tried using some of its non-free competitors.
The practical argument is more important for me. Used GIMP for years, for example, was kinda fun but kinda frustrating. Photoshop, on the other hand, just gets the job done.
I actually find it really difficult to explain to folks why I don't find free/open all that compelling. And it's hard to articulate why I find it disturbing without resorting to genitive fallacies.
I really don't mean to be a serial downvoter or to attack specifically, but there's a guy whose every question - and most answers - simply deserve a downvote.
Most of videos like this says "India has bright future!" "China will face some serious challenges such as old population and negative effect on 1 child policy!"
@AvnerShahar-Kashtan such people typically accumulate flags and might ultimately get suspended for low-quality contributions. If you see a low-quality post, you can flag it as such. Do try to edit it into shape first, if you can, but if that simply ain't possible without completely changing the intent of the post, flag away.
Downvoting every single post of a user, on the other hand, might ultimately bring you to mod attention. If you cast them in rapid succession, they'll also automatically get reversed anyway. And if you cast them like one downvote a week, that requires quite some determination and while they might not get reversed automatically, your name still ends up in all kinds of stats you'd rather not show up in.
Yeah. Like myself. 52% of my votes are downvotes now. At times it's like I'm downvoting everyone on everyone's behalf. So yeah, do downvote sometimes. Like, at least once in a leap year would be nice. Kthx.
You just defined the words using themselves, so it's a bit hard to follow.
Regardless, your first example sounds wrong to me. "The bus will arrive in two hours" is fine. "From now" is redundant.
But generally speaking, I think you got it right. "in two hours" means that something will happen two hours from now. "within two hours" means it will happen at some point between now and two hours from now.
Please could a moderator explain whether 'Insular English' is still acceptable, on this site, as a way of describing the English spoken in the British Isles. I ask this since I notice that the reply given by @tchrist to the question on 'In-built' still stands, but the voluminous commentary has ap...
His agenda is that he is a retired old coot all bent out of shape from a lifetime of fiddling with figures, and now he wants to take it out on his oppressors.