Though actually, I don't know anyone who has held an actual Tupperware Tupperware party. Instead, they have Princess House parties, or those stupid candle parties, or other useless things. I mean, at least Tupperware makes useful and durable stuff.
I'm constantly having trouble with motivation. You can only be in 'emergency mode' for so long before deadlines become an amusing but irrelevant footnote.
Right now, I am wasting my time searching for and looking through early American plays to see if I can figure out what people used for a standard greeting.
Whereas I just spent an hour watching Victor Borge skits on YouTube, because I was reminded of his 'phonetic punctuation' skit by that question about pronouncing parentheses.
(Which question still needs two close votes. So hurry up and accrue some more rep so you can vote about such things.)
Even though it was obvious from the HTOED shots, I shall point it out that “Howdy” (“How do ye?”) predates “How do you do?” by more than a century. Which is rather amusing, since I always thought it was the other way round, and that the former was a contraction of the latter.
Of course, I also tend to answer "how are you" with a factual description. I have to force myself at work to reply with a bland "I'm fine, and how are you".
@Kit At this time of year, I assume it's a young doe?
So I'm reading through this play and it has the joke of the man mis-hearing his friend. The word is "gallantry" and the man mistakes it for "girl huntry." Ah these early American witticisms.
Funny thing about deer - when we told our relatives in Hungary about the deer nuisance in our backyard, they totally assumed we must live somewhere very rural and back of beyond. When we told them the capital of the neighboring state (i.e. a big industrial city) is just across the river, they were floored. Deer in Europe are just not that numerous.
@Kit That's one of the things we have to teach folks in the SCA (medieval recreation group I belong to): just because it's old doesn't mean it's good.
That seems odd. I have the (mis)conception of most of continental Europe being like the Black Forest region, which in my mind's eye is thick with deer.
@Vitaly Well, I'm pretty sure New York City doesn't have a deer problem. So it's not the fact that you're in Moscow, it's the fact that you're in a city.
In phonetics, apheresis (; or , from Greek apo away, hairein to take) is the loss of one or more sounds from the beginning of a word, especially the loss of an unstressed vowel.
Apheresis as a historical sound change
In historical phonetics, the term "apheresis" is often but not always limited to the loss of an unstressed vowel. (The Oxford English Dictionary gives this particular kind of apheresis the name aphesis .)
The loss of any sound
*English [k]nife pronounced
*Swedish [st]rand > Finnish ranta "beach"
The loss of an unstressed vowel
*Greek episkopos > Vulgar Latin [e]biscopu > E...
@Vitaly — By the way, anent this, I do believe the Anglo-Saxon word scop (akin to bard, a singer of heroic songs such as Beowulf), may ultimately be derived from episkopos, which became biscop in OE (today's bishop). Episkopos of course meant "overseer"; and I like to think that scop meant "seer". Well, not bad for a folk etymology, ne?
WordNet is mostly used by computational linguists and computer scientists. Does the fact that I find it and derivations thereof useful for language learning mean I am a Turing machine?
Important:
All SE sites (with one exception - see below) are now supported. Please upgrade to the latest version to enjoy this wonderful new feaure!
A special thank you to Jacob Jernigan for donating space and bandwidth to host the images generated by this script.
Please...
I care enough to fix my nonsense, but I just don't know better. I have been studying English in earnest for 3 to 4 years at best, so my command of the language is kind of limited. :-/
How much do you think it would cost to hire a bunch of illustrators to illustrate meronymy for WordNet++ and a bunch of lexicographers/people/IDK to improve the meronymy part of WordNet?
I looked it up in Wikipedia (ashamed), but it appears to mean the relation between one word's belonging to a class and another's being the name of the class? How would you illustrate that?
Oh, the kind of pictures they use in some learner's books, I see!
Yes, that would be great. But... I imagine you'd need either a lot of separate, one-item pictures if you want to illustrate all concrete nouns from Wordnet, or perhaps pictures with semi-arbitrary groups of things on them.
In short, how much would it cost to draw all nouns that refer to concrete objects? I have no idea, but it would probably be quite a lot, considering that many illustrators will have no idea what many plants and animals look like, and, well, the sheer number. Still, it might be feasible.
@Vitaly As long as the text is scalable, and the image just shrunk the crude way, it should normally work all right? They would never shrink beyond the size of a cell phone screen...
@Vitaly Okay, but how would the interactivity of these images work?
The typical thesaurial tree diagrams could be used, with an image attached to each node?
I am thinking more like multi-levelled illustrations (and vector graphics comes in handy here). Suppose you are searching for the Parthenon in the textual part of the thesaurus, it displays an illustration of it, you move your cursor to it and it highlights a column (or the roof, the entablature, whatever), you click on it, it zooms in and you can highlight the chapiter, the plinth, the shaft or whatever
Oh, and there is one more advantage of vector graphics over photographic pictures: the latter contain too much visual noise, whereas the former are neat and tidy and proud
But what if "Parthenon" gave you a node, leading to, amongst other things, another node "Greek temple", and if that node were a static picture with all those elements annotated, and if you could click on the text label of each element to go to another node, about the element itself? I.e. if the links worked from word to word, not from image to image, the images being just attachments to each word—not as pretty as your thing, but still reasonably effective?
1. Visual noise. No thanks. 2. It's not very difficult to imagine that the photographs for a cat and for a cat's paw don't match. And to make it even worse, it could be a bear's paw. 3. Adding part highlights to the photographs would be exactly as time-consuming as drawing vector versions of those photographs from scratch.
And if you don't add highlights, there is no way to tell whether an arrow points to a whisker, or the muzzle, or the jaw, or the cheek.
@Cerberus The illustrations found in modern print encyclopedias are originally vector, as opposed to drawn with pen and paper. Also, those are not photographic.
3. I think it would still be quite time consuming but considerably less so than drawing the images from scratch, At any rate I wasn't proposing highlighting: the arrows found in conventional encyclopaedias work OK...
@Vitaly Okay, well, perhaps a bit of scientific testing would be interesting: have a hundred learners memorize a hundred words, one group with vectorized images, the other with conventional ones from encyclopaedias.
@Vitaly Aww... to be honest I don't quite remember learning through such images.
Hi, I am a new member. My simple question asking for a synonym was rejected for the reason "It does not meet our quality standards." How can that be? I got the same when I asked in Meta. Thanks in advance for any tips.
In many mathematics papers I read sentences like "...with an appeal to Theorem 4.5 we get...". My question is, is the capitalization of theorem in this case correct? If it is correct why do we capitalize the word?
It is not closed because it was never opened. For your info the question title is 'Synonym' Synonym? and the question itself is "Does there exist a synonym for 'synonym'?". Can you see any problem with that?
There are certain quality filters we apply to incoming questions.
Make sure your question has
a clear title
a reasonable explanation of what your question is, sharing your research on the matter
correct use of English and actual sentences
Also, if your question is so brief that it could be ...
Well, your question is only nine words long (including the title, prepositions and articles), and four of those words are the same: "synonym". I can totally see why the quality filter doesn't like it.
@RegDwight: Thank you for help. 'Quality filter'? So we now have programs deciding the quality of sentences? Good job Joyce can't log on. Anyway, I previously repeated the question as the title, but with the same result. Never mind.
@Robusto: As synonym literally means the same name, I wouldn't say your suggestions are synonyms.
Sure, I know what it means really. That's just what google comes up with. I wouldn't translate vögeln as copulate either though, it's a bit more vulgar I think.
Wenn ich das Geschlecht eines Anglizismus bestimmen muss orientiere ich mich an 3 Gegebenheiten:
Hat das Wort ein echtes Geschlecht (the mare, die Stute)?
Welches Geschlecht hat die Übersetzung im Deutschen
Nach welchem Geschlecht klingt das Wort
Ersteres erscheint mir verbindlich, aber die ...
Hi.
Let's say that you have a word that should be typed with leading lowercase letter. Perhaps it's a computer command. Perhaps it's an Internet nickname. I can't find any more serious examples.
When you put that word at the beginning of a sentence, should you capitalise it?
cat allows you...
Here is a quote from a book on C++ ("for", "while" and "do" are keywords in many languages, and in most languages they have to be in lower case. The C++ language is one of those.):
Simply put, algorithm names suggest what they do. "for", "while", and "do" don't.
One cannot write "For" inste...
Possible Duplicates:
How Should Trademarks be Written?
How do you capitalize a proper noun such as “iPhone”?
Many products these days have names that intentionally begin with lowercase letters. The most common examples are of the Apple "iDevice" variety, but there are so...
When a sentence starts with e.g., should the e be capitalized?
Neverminding that it might be better to start with "For example," ... Thinking of SE posts and comments, should the starting e be capitalized?