« first day (203 days earlier)      last day (5014 days later) » 

15:13
Currently I'm wasting my rep downvoting stupid answers. Soon I'll have to actually do something or I'll run out.
That's what rep is for! ah the power
@Rhodri downvote, downvote my lady!
i'll give you some pity rep if you feel like you need it
Kit
Kit
@JSBangs Wha-? I leave for lunch, and this is what I come back to?
I guess I should post a question then. How about one about greetings?
15:30
Q: What is the difference between "hello" and "scumbag" as a greeting? Can I greet my mother-in-law with "hello, scumbag"?
Jez
Jez
apparently there's a usage of hard-on which isn't sexual
@Jez being hard on the heels of someone?
Jez
Jez
not really the same expression
Kit
Kit
@JSBangs It's the best I could come up with on short notice.
Not really, no. Also, my brain really doesn't want to go there :-)
Kit
Kit
15:40
@JSBangs So who does measure scrambled eggs with tablespoons?
Jez
Jez
hmm i have a query that would be really useful to have a french language & usage site for
what is a good French equivalent for 'sticks out like a sore thumb'? :-)
Kit
Kit
@AlainPannetier Alain, @Jez has a question for you!
15:59
@Kit probably the same people who invented C++, i.e. people that i hate right now
Kit
Kit
@JSBangs I can't believe you hate me for inventing C++. I was young and foolish...
@Kit, well, we all make mistakes. just try not to turn your mistake into a de-facto programming standard wasting billions of man-hours next time
2
Jez
Jez
heh
Americans want their unhealthy food
Kit
Kit
16:16
@JSBangs Well, there was that little math mistake I made back in the 1990s, but that only cost about $500 million dollars. I'm not sure how many man-hours.
Jez
Jez
1
A: Chat messages should be previewed in WMD editor

YOUYou can try it in Chat Sandbox if you are not sure about formatting.

Jesus, -6? you vicious bastards.
wasn't that bad a bloody request
Kit
Kit
@Jez As I was told, downvotes on meta are different than the main sites.
It just means that they disagree with your request.
Can anyone think of a nice, unusual girl's name that starts with "L"?
Lorelai
Leilani
Larisa (my wife's name)
if we had had a girl we were going to call her Lorelai Sabina
Kit
Kit
I think I like Larisa for this purpose, thanks.
um, what are your purposes?
Kit
Kit
16:30
wicked giggling
Nuthin'.
nefarious
Kit
Kit
I. Love. That. Word.
@JSBangs My son calls The Wrong Trousers "The Nefarious Penguin movie."
@JSBangs Nothing to worry about. I've got everything under control.
Done. "Larisa B. Thompkins" fake student number 12.
16:54
@Jez Why would you want a Weapon of Mass Destruction editor anyway?
17:13
@Rhodri Fallback if you're on the receiving end of a very heavy thwacking.
Kit
Kit
@JSBangs Do you know how to do corpus searches?
@z7sg That's more of a Weapon of Martha Distraction. Mostly loaded with baby photos, I suspect.
3
Kit
Kit
Ok, anybody here know how to do a corpus search?
@Vitaly I stand in the room of chatting and I summon you. Can you please help with a corpus search?
I would but i'm frozen out of it.
Kit
Kit
@z7sg Should I ask why?
17:19
@Rhodri What else did you think WMD stood for?!?
@Kit Searching too many rude words of course!
Kit
Kit
@z7sg I don't want contemporary anyway; I need this corpus.byu.edu/coha, but I don't know how to work it.
@z7sg That seems unfair. Researching rude words could be very scholarly. Not in your case, I imagine, but then, how would they know that?
It's restricted to 15 searches (sweary or otherwise) then you have to register. But being an academic site of course the system is flaky as hell.
Kit
Kit
I'm getting super-annoyed by the "answers" to my question.
I said it would be howdy!!!
Kit
Kit
@z7sg Prove it. That's all I'm asking. Show me some usage, not just that it existed as a word.
@z7sg I meant that kindly. It's not you I'm irritated with.
For the love of Frigg, I mention that I have looked at Etymology Online. I don't need it copypresto'ed by someone who says it's the "answer."
And while I think Martin Beckett's response is clever, it doesn't answer the question.
But hey, it made the multicollider. I guess my day's not all bad.
17:32
That's for sure. And I've been on the multicollider too but tbh I'd much rather have one Robusto or Kosmonaut answer than ten one-liners copied out of etymonline.
5
Kit
Kit
@z7sg I'll drink to that.
@Kit — It's very likely I cannot answer your question. However, if it's about howdy, then the earliest occurrence found in the COHA is dated 1845, and hello is 1834. It doesn't constitute any evidence, because the corpus cannot possibly capture the usage of that period in full. Particularly, representative samples of spoken English of that time are impossible to get.
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly I'm really irritated by this question. I've got people posting etymologies, but I have no idea if these words were used commonly, or just existed. Seriously, did pilgrims say "Hail" to each other?
Ime glad youve jined that uther Bobb who is zactly thar with a kwil, and you ma sai " howdy " tu him fur me. Well I thot az that I might az well kill the roomeytiz by tellin you how I kill turkis, az to grunt fur nuthin.
It's the txtspk of 1845
Kit
Kit
@z7sg Ok, that makes me feel a little better.
@Vitaly So is there any other way to address this question, or am I SOL?
Interesting that hello is about fifty years sooner than Etymology Online gives.
17:40
@Kit Well, “representative samples of spoken English of that time are impossible to get.” There will only be weak evidence through fiction and whatever texts decided to record spoken usage. Try resetting the search options and searching for [=hello]in the COHA.
That will give you a few synonyms.
All occurrences of hi in the 1810 are just typos / misspellings / OCR errors.
@Kit Interesting also how geographically limited it is. All those early occurrences are related to Georgia.
Kit
Kit
@z7sg How can you tell?
> It were petter for de digestions. Hi, you kunning ape — I'll cut your ugly visand off if you pe saucy— to pe shure !
^ dated 1836 in the corpus
I can't tell if that's genuine hi.
In any case, if we forget about Americans for the moment, and load the HTOED… Let me see what it has to say
Guy Rivers: A Tale of Georgia; The Adventures of Three Southerns. By a Virginian; Georgia Scenes, Characters, Incidents, &c., in the First Half Century of the Republic. By a Native Georgian; Charcoal Sketches; or, Scenes in a Metropolis (by Joseph Clay - a Georgian)
Ok so there is a Virginian in there too...
trying to make a website screenshot is a pain in the bottoms
HTOED: i.imgur.com/6DHYa.png Of course it isn't limited to American English, but it mentions North America in some entries (the “How”, particularly)
17:51
Actually looks like Joseph Clay Neal isn't a Georgian after all.
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly Thanks, that's helpful. Trouble is, I still don't know how common the usages are. I find "howdy" hard to swallow, to be honest. "Greetings" seems more plausible.
I just noticed “howdy” isn't on the list
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly It's really very colloquial American, I think. Cowboys say "Howdy."
it's in the OED under “how-d'ye” / “how do ye” / “how do you” / “how-dee”
> 1575 G. Harvey Let.-bk. (1884) 90 To requite your gallonde of godbwyes, I regive you a pottle of howedyes.
^ not American
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly Ok. What on earth is a pottle?
17:58
> 1570 J. Foxe Actes & Monumentes (rev. ed.) II. 1803/1 God be thanked for you. How doe you?
A small pot, obviously.
Kit
Kit
@z7sg Ah. Of course.
@Kit 1.9 litres
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly Ah. Of course.
In any case, it's in another category in the HTOED — taking a screenshot again
Kit
Kit
18:01
Well, I guess I am not really going to have satisfaction on this question. I am particularly annoyed that Martin Beckett's little joke is being so highly upvoted. It's funny, but not a real answer.
Well folks, time for me to give you a gallonde of godbwyes. :o)
Kit
Kit
@z7sg I regive you a pottle of howedyes.
Not limited to American speech either
@z7sg — Later
Kit
Kit
I forgot about "How's tricks?" I like that one. I used to use it all the time in my coffee shop days.
2 hours ago, by Jez
what is a good French equivalent for 'sticks out like a sore thumb'? :-)
- "Se voir comme une mouche dans une verre de lait" (conspicuous like a fly in a glass of milk)
- "Se voir comme le nez au milieu du visage" (stick out like the nose in the middle of the face).
Kit
Kit
18:06
@Jez You're welcome!
@AlainPannetier I see my little summoning worked!
In any case, “how do ye” predates “hello” by a few centuries in all varieties of English combined (the HTOED does not discriminate between them), so…
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly I wonder if American colonists would have stuck to the traditional British "how do you do" greeting, with "howdy" as a local variant.
@Kit albeit with some delay, Junior wanted to take a bath with Daddy. Since he's got >38° temp, I had to live you chatting about C++ and the rest.
Kit
Kit
@AlainPannetier Oh, no. Is he okay?
@Kit — American colonists weren't really from the higher social circles, now were they? ;)
Kit
Kit
18:09
@Vitaly :) I resemble that remark.
11
A: How did Americans greet each other before "Hi"?

Martin BeckettYá'át'ééh (Apache/Navajo) Tânisi (Cree) niksokowa (Blackfoot) And lots more

I am not a fan of this snarky non-answer being top voted.
Am I just being grumpy?
Kit
Kit
9 mins ago, by Kit
Well, I guess I am not really going to have satisfaction on this question. I am particularly annoyed that Martin Beckett's little joke is being so highly upvoted. It's funny, but not a real answer.
@Kit — But it's totally possible they would have stuck to the traditional greeting, being highly religious and therefore conservative, so who knows…
@Kit Yes, don't worry. This happens all the time. He had 40 yesterday and after the drug had had its effect, he was hopping and bopping all around. At 3 o'clock in the morning. So Cerberus and I were chatting till the birds were celebrating dawn.
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly It's true they were very religious. Probably more likely to use a religious greeting, like "God give you good day"
@AlainPannetier Is it an ear infection or something?
@Kosmonaut Wouldn't "corpus searching expert" imply only one corpus being searched?
18:12
Sore throat I guess. We are in Tunisia at the moment and that's very good to train your specific immune responses.
@Kit No. We don't pluralize any words in such constructions.
It's just always singular
Kit
Kit
@Kosmonaut Good to know (making notes)
@Kit E.g. "car manufacturing plant", not "cars manufacturing plant"
Kit
Kit
@Kosmonaut Do you have any suggestions on finding suitable evidence to establish early American greetings?
It seems I've asked a question that cannot be answered without a time machine.
@Kit regarding greetings, "God give you good day" is very close to the traditional German greeting "Gruss Gott".
18:17
@Kit I don't know, but I think it would certainly be findable.
@Kosmonaut — Yeah. Unfortunately, there really isn't any way to force people not to vote for the flip answers over the serious, informative, germane ones. That certainly militates against the ultimate effectiveness and purpose of SE sites in general, I think.
@Robusto Agreed.
Apr 5 at 1:13, by Robusto
I saw one of @nohat's answers where he f***ing nailed it, had charts and everything and a well-written, well-reasoned answer, and it got like two votes.
Kit
Kit
@Robusto Of course, the other two answers are pretty much copypasta from Etymology Online.
Problem is, I think people see the big upvoted answer, then don't bother to write their own.
Apr 5 at 0:47, by Robusto
Aaaaaaaand ... my answer to "poured into a dress" strikes again. People just never get tired of that one.
There is no accounting for popularity. Look at all the puerile crap that hits the multi-collider and gets huge interest.
18:23
I don't see what's wrong with Bruno's answer… Well, except that it's incomplete (there are a lot more greeting formulæ as illustrated by the HTOED links I posted here earlier).
I've given way better answers than that one, but it's received the most votes of any of them.
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly Yeah, that's pretty much it. And he posted the "howdy" from Etymology online after I had commented it as a source in the Ambo100's answer.
Also, that was all he had originally; he added the "hail" part later, but it's not clear that that is really relevant.
if someone can recommend a free and easily accessible corpus of early American English correspondence that works with wordlists, you could combine all the HTOED entries into a wordlist and do a search
Kit
Kit
And "howdy" is listed in his answer (and my comment) as originating in 1840, so that's maybe ten years before Etymology Online's origin of "hi"
but then you would have to account for different spellings
18:27
Well, if the SE system works, then this bad answer will get pounded back down and a different answer will rise to the top.
Kit
Kit
The US actually existed for almost a century prior to that; the colonies even longer, if you want to be flexible about "American English".
@Kit Exactly. And we are living alongside sovereign Native American reservations today. You could give that answer to any question about American words in the present day too.
Kit
Kit
@Kosmonaut He's at 11 votes. I don't think another answer will overtake him.
@Vitaly I suppose this is a pipe dream, though, isn't it?
At 13.
@Kit — @Kosmo knows better.
Kit
Kit
@Kosmonaut I'd argue that Native American languages are not English, though. Therefore, this answer is not appropriate for this site.
18:31
@Kit — I think he was making a statement about the system itself.
Kit
Kit
@Robusto Oh. Sorry. I'm getting caught up. I'm becoming quite ridiculous over this superficially simple question.
@Kit Yes, it is off-topic for sure. I am saying that this comment doesn't even make an insightful point — so there were speakers of languages other than English in America at the time, so what? The same is true today.
@Kosmonaut: What's the policy on moderation for this kind of answer?
@Robusto Normally I would actually delete it or convert it to a comment. Because it has so many upvotes and is the highest voted, I am trying to decide what to do. Usually a comment like this would be at -2 once I get to it anyway.
Great, it's gotten 2 more upvotes in the past few minutes.
0
Q: Origin of the word "mainframe"?

hotpaw2What might be the origin of the word "mainframe" for describing a type of computer?

Close as gen ref?
Kit
Kit
18:39
@Robusto Look on Wikipedia. It's right there.
I'm just pointing it out. Already voted to close.
Kit
Kit
@Robusto Soon I will have that privilege. It makes my fingers tingle.
@Robusto I would say yes to this one, but I guess sometimes etymologies can be more interesting than they appear on the surface.
Basic dictionary definitions are what I really think are general reference almost all the time.
"The term originally referred to the large cabinets that housed the central processing unit and main memory of early computers.[2][3] Later the term was used to distinguish high-end commercial machines from less powerful units." — Wikipedia
Etymonline gives "from main + frame"
I agree that etymologies can be fascinating. Only this one isn't. "What is the origin of the term 'shoe box'?" Kinda on that level.
Kit
Kit
It's true that I keep missing questions because of my age. Like CC and BCC. I was around prior to email, so their origin is obvious to me.
So for younger people who don't remember the original mainframes, this might be interesting.
You know, the ones who can't conceive of a computer that takes up a whole building and has less computing power than a modern graphing calculator.
18:45
Thing is, I never met an actual mainframe in my life, but I still find it trivial to deduce the origin of the term. Don't even need to consult The Big Black Book of Forbidden Knowledge [ahem, sorry] Wikipedia.
0
A: Origin of the word "mainframe"?

The RavenThe OED gives this: "central processor of a computer system," 1964, from main (adj.) + frame. In the days when large installations were becoming more common, a computer system would require a specially built room (as far as I know, they still do). Tape drives, disk drives, printers, car...

Kit
Kit
@Martha Meh. Maybe. It's probably the "frame" part that's confusing.
Says “the OED” and links to Etymonline?
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly Maybe because OED is paid access?
@Robusto Yeah, so like I said, I agree with you on this one.
18:47
I think he's using it to mean _O_nline _E_tymological _D_ictionary.
But I don't want to rush to close as general reference too often I guess.
ELU is a mess today.
Thank you @Martha.
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly Look, I tried to post an interesting question. It just went all kerwonky. Hit the top of the multicollider.
Must be the moon or something.
The whole day has been crapola.
I am not blaming you. (What's kerwonky? Cranky?)
Just what it sounds like: wonky with an added dollop of ker.
Kit
Kit
18:51
@Vitaly It's a squash of kerfluie kerflooey and wonky.
I thought it was made of kersploosh and wonky.
kerwonky adj., adv. In a kerwonkish manner; of or behaving like a kerwonk. More at kerwonk.
Kit
Kit
@Kosmonaut No, kersploosh and wonky is kerwonk. Common mistake.
[Does the definition of kerwonk then refer you back to kerwonky?]
Kit
Kit
@Robusto You forgot kerwonkily.
18:54
@Martha — If the system is set up right, yes.
@Kit — A common mistake. The adjectival and adverbial forms are the same.
Kit
Kit
Well, anyway, I wasn't trying to assume blame. Just trying to ask one interesting question today, and look what happened.
Kersplooosh
Kablooey
Well, your question is still better than the scumbag one.
@Martha — Word.
Kit
Kit
@Martha Ick. And thanks.
0
Q: In SQL, is it composite or compound keys?

igordcardAbout SQL (Computing/Databases): When we have two or more fields in a table that, together, identify its records uniquely, what's the proper way of calling them? Composite or compound keys? I've seen on the web both uses so I'm not really sure.

Off-topic?
I'm thinking this belongs in Stack Overflow.
19:12
@Kit I agree.
Kit
Kit
I still can't believe that my silly little question is over "dingsbums" on the multicollider.
all the answerers, the asker herself (@Kit), and I committed a fundamental mistake of extrapolating Present-day English usage onto earlier periods of time, to some degree
there is no reason to assume that howdy was informal back then
That non-English answer makes me so annoyed. I should have deleted it right away — I just feel like something is wrong if I delete an answer with more than 10 upvotes.
it could have very well been the opposite—a formal salutation
Kit
Kit
@Kosmonaut It's up to 16 now.
19:18
@Kosmonaut — Well, if the community were always right, we wouldn't have needed mods in the first place. I am for converting it into a comment.
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly That's true. I hadn't thought of that.
I guess this is all the fault of the multicollider though.
Kit
Kit
Still, with our Puritan roots, it's more likely to be something more religious, isn't it?
A bunch of tourists coming in and voting without caring about the impact.
@Kosmonaut — Exactly.
Kit
Kit
19:20
@Kosmonaut I just don't understand what makes "Hi" more compelling than "dingsbums."
@Kosmonaut Is it appropriate to protect it?
@Kit — And that's another thing I am not sure of. There is some evidence that excessive religiosity of the founders is a recent myth laboriously being created by the folks. I haven't assessed the evidence, but I know there is a whole book about it.
@Kit Ah, good point.
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly Are you asserting that my ancestors were a bunch of roustabouts, good sir?
@Kit — Besides, the Cambridge History of the English Language claims that the story about the early settlers (especially in the Appalachian region) was being created in the early 20th century or so.
Kit
Kit
@Vitaly You mean, where they were fleeing the Cylon tyranny? That's made up?
19:28
@Kit — It is? No way!
I am still trying to find the webpage…
Okay, I converted that answer to a comment. It is just bad for EL&U in multiple ways.
It is off-topic and not an answer to the question.
Kit
Kit
So now at least I'm left with answers.
I'm not very excited about either one. @Vitaly, do you want to post an answer based on our discussions?
Here it is. The book is public domain in PDF.
@Kit — He will do all the leg work, but he balks at posting the answers. I practically begged him to post his answer to my last question, but he just blew me off.
Kit
Kit
19:37
@Vitaly Sweet. Thanks. Huff Post to boot. Happy Kit.
Well, then. Please @Vitaly, I actually beg you, I beseech you, I prostrate myself before you. Post a reasonable answer to my question. Please.
Or @Robusto can do it.
@Robusto can do it!
I would but I'm frustrated with something at work right now. It's this odd thing called "work" ...
Kit
Kit
I'd say @Kosmonaut, but that might be unethical.
@Robusto Sh*t! Work! I knew I forgot something today.
2
@Vitaly Please, please, please...
Don't leave a perfectly reasonable question in such a shoddy state.
I gave all the links I could. Those two screenshots of the HTOED Online, coupled with Etymonline and common sense, is enough to post a reasonable answer.
You could also earn the self-learner badge!
Kit
Kit
0
Q: article to precede acronym beginning in vowel

inquisitive_web_developerI was taught that 'an' should precede words beginning with vowels. What is the proper article ('a' or 'an') to precede an acronym begining with a vowel? For Example: In the sentence "A UFO is scary.", Was the word 'a' used properly or should it be replaced with 'an'?

Dupe, right?
@Vitaly I've already answered my own question once. It's embarrassing. @MrHen, @Martha want to give Vitaly's answer for him?
19:42
Already voted to close. It's a dupe of a dupe, in fact.
Tyrants! Oppressors! Enemies of the people!
Kit
Kit
@z7sg You could post Vitaly's answer.
Wait, how'd I get so many stars?
Let @Vitaly post it, he doesn't have enough points.
Kit
Kit
Three of the top six are me. That's freaking me out.
May 14 at 13:56, by RegDwight
You're so repophobe, Vitaly, that's really something.
Kit
Kit
19:50
@z7sg I think he's shirking because he's trying to maintain his privacy.
@Vitaly — @RegDwight misspelled "repo man" ...
Kit
Kit
@Robusto thwack
Please somebody, post me an answer. I gotta run. TTFN.
11 mins ago, by Vitaly
You could also earn the self-learner badge!
gotta go. cya later
Later.
Kit
Kit
19:53
10 mins ago, by Kit
@Vitaly I've already answered my own question once. It's embarrassing. @MrHen, @Martha want to give Vitaly's answer for him?
Kit
Kit
20:28
@Vitaly I've thought of it! The play's the thing!
I popped in just to say, we should search plays. They would capture "natural" dialog.
I've gotta run, but I'll see what I can find tonight.
 
2 hours later…
22:47
is it me or there is a new acidic colour scheme?
I haven't noticed any difference in the color scheme.
umm…
Is it the same for you?
I can't believe I spent an hour on a simple answer to a question which accepted a different answer while I was at it. I'm too slow. XP
2
G2g folks.
@Vitaly — Apparently, it was me. Something weird is going on.
@SpareOom — CU.
@Vitaly It looks like it failed to load a background image. Happens sometimes.
23:02
@Martha — I thought it failed to load something at first, but reloading the webpage, clearing the cache, and, finally, restarting the browser didn't help. It's back to normal now somehow.
Hm. Strange. Gremlins?
The thing is that the colour isn't uniform in the screenshot. It's purplish and greenish in places.
Jez
Jez
damn this e.coli outbreak is annoying
Was it like that on your screen? I.e. is the blotchiness on the screenshot just an artifact of compression? (Although png doesn't usually do that...)
Jez
Jez
im reluctant to buy fruit/veg
23:09
To quantify it in RGB terms, I see three different colours in the background in the screenshot (which is supposed to be uniform): #f6f8f4, #f6f9f1, and #f6f9eb
Can't you just wash the produce more thoroughly than usual? (I'm not being facetious, I'm really wondering.)
@Martha — Yes, it was like that on my screen.
Which is why I said “acidic,” because of that and the greenish shade.
@Vitaly Veddy straange.
Jez
Jez
23:30
@Martha heh, i wouldn't want to take my chances with e.coli-infected produce, even if well washed
catch that and you'll regret it bigtime
How much difference in RGB points can a human whose colour vision is OK notice on a calibrated S-IPS screen? I can't seem to find any data in English…
23:46
1
Q: "Parentheses" as an extension to English?

compmanOkay . . . How quickly will this question be closed as "Off Topic" or something else? Would any of you want to use a "logical parentheses" extension to English to clarify grouping? Say that our opening parenthesis is the particle "ka" [kah] and our closing parenthesis is the particle "na" [nah]...

This is definitely OT.
@Robusto — Do you know?
I do know.

« first day (203 days earlier)      last day (5014 days later) »