« first day (196 days earlier)      last day (4743 days later) » 

12:00 PM
@Kit Give him some cookies?
 
Kit
@ThirdIdiot Hey! Fix that "can not", would you? You're making my head hurt!
 
Everyone, we have a problem. MrHen is having difficulty choosing the answer to his question. Should we make this a question on Meta??
 
Kit
@ThirdIdiot I only give cookies to my puppy. Speaking of, has anyone seen Cerberus this morning?
 
@ThirdIdiot There are a couple issues with that answer. First: I never used the word "True"
@ThirdIdiot No, chat works well for this.
 
@Kit You can't use "falsity" because "true" is an adjective, and an adjective's direct opposite is not a noun.
 
12:02 PM
Oh hey @SpareOom
 
I don't care about "true"
"True" is only ever used in the title
 
@Vitaly Hey @Vitaly
 
Kit
@ThirdIdiot Huh? I mean "can not" should be "cannot."
 
@SpareOom the server's up in case you are staying, but I have to go for a few hours.
AFK.
 
@Kit Happy?
My head is hurting too!!
Everyone is asking me to make tiny changes to my answer!
 
12:04 PM
@Vitaly I have to go to work now, actually. I think I'm gonna be late if I post an answer to Mr Hen's question.
 
@ThirdIdiot Hey, you posted a second answer while we were talking about the subject
 
Kit
@ThirdIdiot Quit your griping, urchin. :)
 
@SpareOom Don't be late on account of me. I will pick an answer later today
 
@MrHen What do you mean? Please explain.
@Kit Shut up! Show some respect! You just made me write something rude!!
 
@ThirdIdiot As in, we are talking about the subject; you should expect requests for small changes :)
 
Kit
12:05 PM
@ThirdIdiot giggles
@ThirdIdiot Are you really upset? I was just teasing.
 
@Kit I know you're teasing, and I'm not upset. Just that I'm sad that youth in this world no longer shows the respect in times past, as well as...HEY You said you never giggled!!!!
 
> You've earned the "Outspoken" badge. See your profile.
@SpareOom Oh, ok.
 
@Vitaly Did Kit earn it?
 
Argh, curse these timeouts! I want to unvote, why can;t I unvote?
 
12:08 PM
@Vitaly Congratulations, my dear man.
 
Thanks.
 
@z7sg Edit the question slightly, then unvote.
@Kit You said you never giggled! I don't understand!
 
Kit
@ThirdIdiot When?
 
@Kit I know that's a good reply, cause I'll have to go back in chat some 20 days and read up over 5000 comments to find yours.
@Kit You have a dilemma coming up in ...six days.
 
@ThirdIdiot Make an unnecessary edit to someone's question just so I can unvote it??? Hmmmm
 
12:11 PM
@ThirdIdiot You could search?
 
@z7sg Don't listen to that; he said my gravatar is “like a windows sign.”
 
Okay, I am out for now.
 
Kit
gasp ohfrigfrigfrigfrig Forgot huge meeting in 15 minutes *that I'm supposed to lead*--executive team, etc. Gotta run. @MrHen I want to think on your question more over lunch.
 
g2g folks
 
@z7sg Slight one, like capitalize an uncapitalized word or something.
@MrHen Search what?
@Vitaly No offence, young man, I was just making an allusion to the Microsoft symbol.
@Kit Good Luck! Hope your baby behaves well during the meeting.
 
12:13 PM
Mar 22 at 19:15, by RegDwight
A joke is a question, short story, or depiction of a situation made with the intent of being humorous. To achieve this end, jokes may employ irony, sarcasm, word play and other devices. Jokes may have a punchline that will end the sentence to make it humorous. A practical joke or prank differs from a spoken one in that the major component of the humour is physical rather than verbal (for example placing salt in the sugar bowl). Purpose Jokes are typically for the entertainment of friends and onlookers. The desired response is generally laughter; when this does not happen the joke is...
 
@Vitaly Ahh! Now I comprehend!
 
See, people only star my jokes when they get re-told by Vitaly.
Apr 30 at 1:11, by Robusto
user image
 
@RegDwight It's the way he tells em
 
@z7sg He has a gentle humour
 
@Vitaly it looks like a wiggly lambda to me dude
 
12:21 PM
Ugh. I don't wanna see nobody's wiggly lambda.
 
@RegDwight He wants to see a straight lambda
 
@ThirdIdiot It's not the practicality that troubles me, it's more whether it's right/wrong thing to do. I have a goofy sort of code of honour with my voting behaviour otherwise I'll start downvoting people because I don't like them or something.
 
@z7sg You're right. Actually, the reason you could take back your vote only after the question has been edited is because the answer might have changed so that you no longer think it that bad. So if you wish to take back a down-vote because you no longer believe a post is that bad, it wouldn't be wrong.
 
@RegDwight — I prefer The Silence of the Lambdas.
 
Going to sleep! See ya folks eight hours later.
 
12:30 PM
@Robusto Quid pro quo, Claris.
 
that Outspoken badge is so difficult to get it should be a gold badge
 
@Vitaly — I weep not for you. Look at the requirements for the Epic badge, then the Legendary one.
 
oh and by the way @RegDwight, it didn't come exactly as a surprise, since I could see that I got =>10 messages starred and could roughly remember the chat user activity, so I started wondering if I missed something
apparently, the cron process just took its time
 
@Vitaly — Hey, nice gravatar! Is that new?
 
@Robusto yeah, I changed a pixel in the original one
 
12:35 PM
Nice.
Just the right touch. Although I might have changed a different pixel, now that I think about it ...
 
Yeah, shopped. I can tell by the pixel and from having seen many gravatars in my life.
 
Yeah, after you look at it for a while it kind of jumps out at you.
 
May 13 at 19:33, by Vitaly
I am pleased with myself. A single picture I posted results in a whole day of religious talk.
religious^Wgravatar
 
@Vitaly — Careful. You are starting to awaken the iconoclast in me.
 
OK I have to go and visit a barber. I hope I will at least like my brand-new beard style, after that disappointment with cracked lambdas.
CU.
 
12:43 PM
Laterz.
 
Hey, you rep hounds. If you really want SO rep, consider learning C#. Check it out:
5
Q: Why does C# allow {} code blocks without a preceding statement?

SeldonWhy does C# allow code blocks without a preceding statement (e.g. if, else, for, while)? void Main() { { // any sense in this? Console.Write("foo"); } }

23 upvotes for the top answer in less than 2 hours. We may only guess where it will go from there.
 
Oh, oh, may I, may I? It will go... up??
 
Hmm ... hard to say. Science has pondered this question for milliseconds.
 
Wow, I got an accept for an SO answer I posted Jan 28 '10 at 11:44.
 
Linkies.
 
12:46 PM
0
Q: Block Zoom in IE 6

elairoHow can I block the zoom-function of the Internet Explorer 6?

I mean, if passive rep levels like that aren't pathetic, then nothing is.
 
Hahaha. It's hard being the underclass on SO. I mean, CSS is so not C#.
 
@Robusto I don't even remember the question. At all. Even after having re-visited it just a minute ago.
This is how old and useless SO is to me.
 
Well, I upticked you, so there's +25 passive rep in just one year.
Hummm ... things are going slightly crazy in chat atm, as the banner promised.
I think you should give the OP a reach-around at this point.
 
@Robusto OMG. That's almost not-even-tenth-way-there to my third Yearling badge.
Yeah, stupid chat kicked me out.
 
Prat chat.
 
12:51 PM
Apparently it takes five attempts to post a simple OMG.
That's plat, you pineapple.
 
Oh well ...
 
Yeah, I liked how that stupid NS came around and "fixed" plat into prat. As if that makes sense or something.
 
Hahaha.
Interesting that Oichi-san transliterated prat into plat.
Since there really isn't any "L" sound in Japanese. Although they do use the "R" sound to express it.
 
There's a question for that, even!
13
A: Is it true that Chinese speakers have troubles with 'r's and 'l's in English words?

KosmonautAs I understand, in at least some major dialects of Chinese (maybe all, I don't know), the /l/ and /r/ sounds exist but are prosodically restricted. The /l/ can only appear syllable-initially while the /r/ appears syllable-finally. This means that a Chinese speaker would have more trouble with ...

 
And, OK, it's not really an "R" sound, either. But it's closer than it is to an "L".
 
12:54 PM
Oh well, I thought it would be about Japanese as well. Turns out it's Chinese-centric.
 
Well, both cultures use chopsticks.
 
Also, they are both cultures.
And most importantly, both of them are both!
That proves that they are the same.
 
Your logic is inescapable. But I'm running for the hills anyway.
 
Schon wieder?
The hills have eyes.
 
As long as they don't have legs, I'm fine.
 
1:02 PM
Legs is for hoi polloi. Moving is for minions. Big Brother is not running after you, he's comfortable with just watching.
 
That's so ... comforting.
 
Well, I see nurses in drag, I watch. How else am I supposed to react?
 
Our C# answer is up to 25 upvotes now. Who could have foreseen this?
 
Well, certainly not me. Don't look at me. Me, I would've never foreseen that.
 
What, never? No, never! What, never? Well, hardly everrrrr! Hardly ever would RegDwight foreseeeeeeee!
 
1:15 PM
Nice edit, you pineapple.
 
I had so many e's in the first version it blinded me.
 
The apple does not fall far from the pine.
 
I pine for the days when it did. When mortals were asked to judge the beauty of goddesses — oh, wait, we still are.
27 and counting.
I wonder how many C# accepted answers on SO don't hit the century mark in 24 hours. Can't be very many.
And to the "What's the opposite of the 'sub' prefix?" question, I am so tempted to answer: "I dunno. The 'sub' suffix?"
28 and counting.
 
Obviously, the opposite of the 'sub' prefix is the xıɟǝɹd ,qns,.
 
Hey, your last two words fell over. Let me help you get them on their feet.
Being on SO and not using C# is like watching the people come and go in an exclusive nightclub while you're standing on the other side of the velvet rope.
 
1:31 PM
Who said the rope was velvet? I don't want to belong to any club that will accept people like me as a member.
 
@RegDwight — OK, Woody.
 
please make that picture go away
woody allen gives me nightmares
so we now have both and
was the former created on purpose by someone?
because i'm just about ready to retag all of them
(there are only 3)
 
@JSBangs Your wish is my command.
 
Maybe you're this kind of Woody.
 
@RegDwight so much better
 
1:37 PM
@JSBangs Don't want no word-requests round here. Kill it.
 
There's another kind, but I can't post that one here.
 
sorry @Robusto, i prefer @Reg's woody to your woody
2
 
Swordfight!
 
in the meantime, this is an older question but it really needs to be killed with fire:
2
Q: Slangs use for immigrants?

FurqanWhat are slangs do british/american use for (poor) immigrants?

actually, not that old
 
Old? 9 hours?
 
1:39 PM
i had gotten confused and thought it was several weeks old
 
@JSBangs — You get confused a lot. Like when you said you prefer @RegDwight's woody to mine.
You've never even tried mine. But I'll allow that you have tried his.
 
@Vitaly those are allowed
 
30 and counting.
 
oh I didn't actually follow my own tag link
thought it wasn't there
 
1:41 PM
ha! i pre-emptively foiled you (since i created that tag a few weeks ago during the Great Retagging)
 
It could be. How is it different from, say ?
We also have and .
 
I think it's useful. Rhetoric is more than just figures of speech.
 
@Vitaly Yeah, I left out a bunch of obscure ones, such as
 
1:52 PM
don't forget (by the way, are there tags more obscure than ugandan-english that are still legit?)
 
is perfectly legit
and any other [tag:$national-english] that get created
 
Apr 8 at 13:41, by RegDwight
Well, we could always go with .
Nobody likes my suggestions. Evar!
 
@Kosmonaut: I'd appreciate your considered response, if you have one, on my origin of "try and" question: english.stackexchange.com/questions/27008/…
 
How do you come up with a question that would require creating another obscure&legit tag?
 
We also shouldn't marginalize 1337-Americans by not recognizing their dialect of English
 
1:55 PM
Absolutely! There are so many — like, so many! — questions we could tag 1337!
 
@Kosmonaut — Are there still as many as 1337 leet-speakers left? I thought that was an endangered language.
 
we should add for all of those NNSs
 
@Robusto They are just masquerading during the day. They only come out at night.
 
hits the mark all by itself. The "-english" is redundant.
 
@JSBangs I think someone's already suggested .
@Robusto also, should be just a synonym. It should automatically resolve to .
 
1:57 PM
Good point.
Look, there's one now!
 
Yes. Looks quite leet to me.
 
all of my l33t friends look just like that
 
@RegDwight, rhetorics is a bit wider than figures-of-speech and a bit more formal. I think most importantly it can be used to mark the questions that look at aspects of ethos and pathos in translations
 
@JSBangs You have non-l33t friends? That's so not kewl.
 
@RegDwight — Well, he likes your woody. How uncool is that?
 
1:59 PM
Get ready for some severe thwacking.
 
Promises, promises ...
 
Furious, merciless, extreme.
I'm just building up the momentum.
K pipls, gotta go. Corporate BBQ.
CUlaterz!
 
Mach' Spass.
 
Hab' Spaß.
I never am fun. I only have some.
I'm out!
 
Danke.
Und danke Gott!
But I did think it was "Spaß machen" as in "Wir machen Spaß."
 
2:04 PM
btw, @RegDwight, i'm still pondering your question about lots of overlapping tags for curse words. i think we should merge them all with or [tag:do-you-kiss-your-mom-with-that-mouth]
@Unreason i'm not against using if you think it's useful and distinct from existing tags
there's no problem, in general, with low-frequency tags, unless we wind up with a whole lot of basically identical low-freq tags
 
@Robusto I'd have to do some research, because I don't really know the history of it either.
 
Kit
@Robusto I just threw up a little in my mouth.
 
@Kosmonaut Thanks. It just struck me as odd the other day and I realized I have no idea how it got started.
 
@Robusto It's a really really interesting question.
 
@Kosmonaut — Thanks.
@Kit — I think that was the intended reaction.
 
Kit
2:13 PM
@Kosmonaut I agree. It drives me bonkers.
 
@Robusto I always say Spaß machen but the dictionary says both dict.leo.org/…
 
@z7sg — So @RegDwight is gratuitously correcting me. Again.
 
Kit
Egad! How did all these stupid meetings end up on my calendar today? TTFN. Thanks for the puke pic. Pretty much sums up my day.
 
@Robusto Yep. I tried to speak German in here the other day and he corrected pretty much every word. :(
I'm sure they weren't all wrong!
 
2
Q: "People like you" versus "people like yourself" ?

RiMMERIn the latest South Park episode, I noticed a line: We have so many abandoned babies and not enough people like yourself who care. Which kinda struck me, because I'd expect it to be people like you. Is the original quote broken, or are both correct, representing a different meaning?

this is actually a really interesting question
 
2:20 PM
@JSBangs Yes it is. I've always believed that it was non-standard, if you look in a grammar book or dictionary it is frowned on or not listed. Yet I heard the chancellor of the exchequer on the radio doing it, it is all over google books and it's nothing new, it has been used extensively over the years.
Don't have time to attempt a proper answer right now but not satisfied with the existing ones.
 
me neither
i started writing an answer, then started doubting my answer and deleted it before i finished. the rabbit hole appears to go pretty deep here
 
Yes indeed. The question leaves something to be desired too tbh and it has been overlooked.
 
2:36 PM
 
2:48 PM
@z7sg, yes that's a good one... I ended up writing something similar under the current question
 
@z7sg They can often be used interchangeably?
 
woohoo, just got Outspoken
i guess that means i'm spending enough time in chat these days
 
@JSBangs Lucky you, I have to sleep less then.
 
@Boob I'm sure they mean something different... I mean it's clear they're not 100% interchangeable but I want to know when you can use each
 
most of people are in most wonderful chat room
 
3:01 PM
The most wonderful people are in most of wonderful chat room*
@z7sg Aha, that's what we are looking for.
 
the most of grammatical errors are mostly unsure about most indefinite articles most of time
 
Wah, You're trying to gaslight me.
 
I am most hungry and the most tired.
 
3:37 PM
@Boob to gaslight sbd, never heard that one before. safe
 
to gaslight or not to gaslight, that is some question
 
4:03 PM
Should we up-vote an answer among others, even though it doesn't satisfy us?
 
@Boob Link us up?
 
In general
 
Good question for meta.english
 
Good idea
 
Myself prefer to comment on the deficiency because your vote gets locked after a couple of minutes and you can't reverse it.
 
4:11 PM
yeah i wanted to change my most of the vote but it was locked
 
@Unreason: in reply to this answer of yours: link 1, link 2, link 3
Seriously, proper use of Google Ngrams is worth a FAQ linked to in giant red font on the main site
 
@Vitaly I think it's reliable .. When something is largely used, it's 99.999999% correct
 
yesterday, by Kosmonaut
@Robusto Look, I can compare apples and oranges: http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=apples%2Coranges&year_start=1800&year_­end=2000&corpus=0&smoothing=3
yesterday, by Kosmonaut
Looks like I should use apples instead of oranges.
 
XD, Got it got it
 
@RegDwight: We are under attack! I am trying to keep the bastards off, but so far we are about 300 against their 500 points. This Alpha guy has a decent deck. I haven't lost to him yet, though.
 
4:26 PM
@Boob, @Unreason ok, but just in case: comparing on to upon is like comparing apples to oranges for several reasons: these are not completely interchangeable (upon belongs to a different register), you can say mile upon mile but cannot say mile on mile, once upon a time but no once on a time, etc, etc.
 
True. In those examples, on is probably not possible because they are fixed expressions.
 
@Vitaly It's OK to compare 'on which, upon which' though I would think.
 
mile on mile sounds acceptable to me
 
@z7sg I cannot come up with a counterexample, so I will agree; but then on which becomes less frequent in that ngram just like upon which, so no point in that ngram either
 
4:32 PM
Hmm
OK, bad example then
 
Google wishes to change it to "mile one mile" for reasons unknown
once upon a time is a solid example
 
@Vitaly But comparing in same sentence interchangeably would work
 
once upon a time is too quirky and idiomatic though
try to think of parallel constructions: twice upon a time, once upon the time, once upon some time, once upon an era...
 
@Boob What?
“I tried on a few jackets” — “I tried upon (?!) a few jackets”
“I haven't got any shoes on” — “I haven't got any shoes upon (?!)”
 
new topic: is there any legitimate use for ? as far as i can see it just looks like junk
 
4:39 PM
“Turn the power on by flicking this switch” — “Turn the power upon (?!) by flicking this switch”
There are literally thousands of examples like those ^, so I guess I made a point
 
"upon closing the door" - "on closing the door"
 
ought i ask what is the difference between synecdoche and metonymy?
 
@Vitaly Agreed.
 
our entire tagging systems needs a big dose of evolution
there's no clear right tag for asking what to call some concept
 
@JSBangs I think it would be useful for Linguistics.SE, I can't see any use for it on our site (OK @Cerberus found something here)
 
4:40 PM
@JSB: On the first two pages, I found only one question that would warrant this tag:
4
Q: Forming valid one word sentences

UrbycozI remember my English teacher saying that there are only two valid ways to make a one-word sentence: A question: Why? Where? A command: Go! Stop! Is this correct?

Because it is actually about the concept of what makes a sentence.
 
by the way you can play this game with prepositions in all languages that have them, there is a similar game for languages with case systems instead of prepositions
 
@JSBangs I can't think of any independent usage of this tag.. It should be related to other tags, somehow .. right?
@Cerberus It's grammar
 
@Boob: Yes, but it deals with the question "what is a sentence?".
I suspect that there might be more.
 
@Boob,, @Cerberus, @Vitaly sounds like we mostly agree about it being junk. i may look into retagging
 
@JSB: Yeah. It could be made useful, but it isn't in its current state.
 
Kit
5:22 PM
@Vitaly "I tried a few jackets upon my torso." "I haven't got any shoes upon my feet."
 
different syntax
 
Kit
5:38 PM
@Vitaly Point taken.
 
Kit
5:49 PM
@MrHen I edited my answer for you. I hope you like it.
 
This question got multicollidered when we weren't looking. That's an awful lot of votes for a simple answer, and an awful lot of answers for a simple question.
18
Q: "True" is to "false" as "truth" is to... what?

MrHenIf I were to reverse the sentence, "I care about the truth" I would want to say: I care about the false. Is that correct? It seems awkward at best: He speaks the truth! / He speaks the false! This one truth is important to all / This one false is important to all

 

« first day (196 days earlier)      last day (4743 days later) »