@Kit I know you're teasing, and I'm not upset. Just that I'm sad that youth in this world no longer shows the respect in times past, as well as...HEY You said you never giggled!!!!
gasp ohfrigfrigfrigfrig Forgot huge meeting in 15 minutes *that I'm supposed to lead*--executive team, etc. Gotta run. @MrHen I want to think on your question more over lunch.
A joke is a question, short story, or depiction of a situation made with the intent of being humorous. To achieve this end, jokes may employ irony, sarcasm, word play and other devices. Jokes may have a punchline that will end the sentence to make it humorous.
A practical joke or prank differs from a spoken one in that the major component of the humour is physical rather than verbal (for example placing salt in the sugar bowl).
Purpose
Jokes are typically for the entertainment of friends and onlookers. The desired response is generally laughter; when this does not happen the joke is...
@ThirdIdiot It's not the practicality that troubles me, it's more whether it's right/wrong thing to do. I have a goofy sort of code of honour with my voting behaviour otherwise I'll start downvoting people because I don't like them or something.
@z7sg You're right. Actually, the reason you could take back your vote only after the question has been edited is because the answer might have changed so that you no longer think it that bad. So if you wish to take back a down-vote because you no longer believe a post is that bad, it wouldn't be wrong.
oh and by the way @RegDwight, it didn't come exactly as a surprise, since I could see that I got =>10 messages starred and could roughly remember the chat user activity, so I started wondering if I missed something
Why does C# allow code blocks without a preceding statement (e.g. if, else, for, while)?
void Main()
{
{ // any sense in this?
Console.Write("foo");
}
}
As I understand, in at least some major dialects of Chinese (maybe all, I don't know), the /l/ and /r/ sounds exist but are prosodically restricted. The /l/ can only appear syllable-initially while the /r/ appears syllable-finally. This means that a Chinese speaker would have more trouble with ...
Hey, your last two words fell over. Let me help you get them on their feet.
Being on SO and not using C# is like watching the people come and go in an exclusive nightclub while you're standing on the other side of the velvet rope.
@RegDwight, rhetorics is a bit wider than figures-of-speech and a bit more formal. I think most importantly it can be used to mark the questions that look at aspects of ethos and pathos in translations
btw, @RegDwight, i'm still pondering your question about lots of overlapping tags for curse words. i think we should merge them all with cussin or [tag:do-you-kiss-your-mom-with-that-mouth]
@Unreason i'm not against using rhetoric if you think it's useful and distinct from existing tags
there's no problem, in general, with low-frequency tags, unless we wind up with a whole lot of basically identical low-freq tags
In the latest South Park episode, I noticed a line:
We have so many abandoned babies and
not enough people like yourself who
care.
Which kinda struck me, because I'd expect it to be people like you.
Is the original quote broken, or are both correct, representing a different meaning?
@JSBangs Yes it is. I've always believed that it was non-standard, if you look in a grammar book or dictionary it is frowned on or not listed. Yet I heard the chancellor of the exchequer on the radio doing it, it is all over google books and it's nothing new, it has been used extensively over the years.
Don't have time to attempt a proper answer right now but not satisfied with the existing ones.
@Robusto Look, I can compare apples and oranges: http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=apples%2Coranges&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=0&smoothing=3
@RegDwight: We are under attack! I am trying to keep the bastards off, but so far we are about 300 against their 500 points. This Alpha guy has a decent deck. I haven't lost to him yet, though.
@Boob, @Unreason ok, but just in case: comparing on to upon is like comparing apples to oranges for several reasons: these are not completely interchangeable (upon belongs to a different register), you can say mile upon mile but cannot say mile on mile, once upon a time but no once on a time, etc, etc.
@z7sg I cannot come up with a counterexample, so I will agree; but then on which becomes less frequent in that ngram just like upon which, so no point in that ngram either
I remember my English teacher saying that there are only two valid ways to make a one-word sentence:
A question:
Why? Where?
A command:
Go! Stop!
Is this correct?
by the way you can play this game with prepositions in all languages that have them, there is a similar game for languages with case systems instead of prepositions
This question got multicollidered when we weren't looking. That's an awful lot of votes for a simple answer, and an awful lot of answers for a simple question.
If I were to reverse the sentence, "I care about the truth" I would want to say:
I care about the false.
Is that correct? It seems awkward at best:
He speaks the truth! / He speaks the false!
This one truth is important to all / This one false is important to all