« first day (4832 days earlier)      last day (385 days later) » 
01:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

20:00
The heart of the matter is: does who refer back to he or to the boys?
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. I am a reference. But now you're asking me to do some work, and I decline.
4
Google "singular plural defining relative clause".
@Lambie All I can say is: I generally downvote answers that don't include citations from reliable sources, since their accuracy is impossible to verify; if you just say "I've heard it for years and years," I have no way of knowing exactly how often you've heard it, where those speakers are from, and to what extent they're relevant to the situation described by the OP.
There was a big discussion about this in the Portuguese site. It is about 1%. One percent of the students who miss the class OR One percent of the boys who misses the class? I say this: One percent misses the class every year. BUT: One percent of the boys miss the class every year. Only boys can miss class, percents cannot. Generally speaking, I'd go with the antecedent. One of the boys who are good at English.
This question has been asked several times on ELU.
20:03
@alphabet Yes, and that's the problem with SE and its sites. It is not equipped to deal with many types of questions. The change from a to the in the typical pattern: I went to a restaurant yesterday. The restaurant was great. That typical usage and pattern is hard to find sources for. However, any good native speaker will automatically do that switch from a to the. So, it is not about a or the. It is about the relationship between the two sentences.
Well, I was discussing this point with people on social networks. They just rejected singular verb. Then I just took some pictures of Oxford Practical English Usage by Michael Swan in which he used both of them.
But people didn't accept the singular verb. So, I was thinking of gathering some authentic sources to give them.
@Lambie On very basic questions, yes, that makes sense, but it's questionable when you're talking about uses from regional dialects that you'd expect to be present in a dictionary but can't find.
Let's change the sentence: One of the boys comes to school without breakfast. Clearly, singular.
Yes, but the rule is different in relative clauses; see the answer from Auracaria that I linked above.
That question also has several other answers, and there have been a bunch of duplicates of it with answers of their own.
(Incidentally: for more complicated questions about a and the, you actually do need sources, since you need to provide the general rules that explain why a particular article should be used; native speakers are quite bad at doing this based on pure intuition.)
One [[of the boys]] [who] comes to school without breakfast is nice. One of the boys who come to school is nice [buzzer]. Why buzzer? Because the sentence needs a verb to go with the subject.
20:11
See the answer I linked above. Yet again, intuition misleads.
It's a bit more complicated.
@alphabet. Thanks but what should I tell my students to follow? Singular or plural...?
But we have to use the verb according to THE BOYS, right?
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Both are equally correct. I'm not sure which is more common.
Micheal Swan said that SINGULAR VERBS are commonly used.
Both are commonly used.
He is//one of the boys// who is good at English. You can't say: One of the boys come to school without books.
20:15
I think in exams or tests, plural verb is more accurate.
Maybe Singular verb is informally used.
You would expect the right answer to be plural, since in "He is one of the boys who__________good at English" the subject of the relative clause is understood to be plural. But there's a special rule that the word one can override the normal subject-verb agreement rules in cases like this; that's presumably the point that Swan is trying to make.
Is this discussion available in Cambridge's book?
Yes, that's right.
Can you help to reach that screenshot of Cambridge?
He's [one of those people who always want to have the last word]. -- (
Neither is more accurate than the other. This answer suggests that, while some style guides insist on the plural there, both are very common and other style guides say both are fine.
I mean the sentence which was mentioned there in the main website of Stacker change.
I don't think boys is the subject of the relative clause. One of the boys who is good at English. The relative clause is: who is/are good at English, not boys who.
Boys who are good at English sit over there. Subject /Boys/ relative clause ?who are good at English/ predicate /sit over there?.
20:20
The subject of the relative clause is who, but we understand that who as plural since it's anaphoric to the boys. But this can get overridden because of the special properties of one.
I see.
So, both are grammatically correct.
Yes, exactly.
As the answers I linked above explain.
Is it available in Cambridge Grammar of English by Ronald Carter and Micheal?
Well, I don't accept that overriding business. I say are is standard and is is used by many people.
Those answers cite a number of reliable sources (usage manuals and grammar textbooks). Do you have better ones?
20:23
@Lambie. In our tests, specially, in Asian countries, people don't accept Singular verb, they stick to plural.
It is true that some usage manuals will tell you to use the plural there; others say either is acceptable, though, and from a descriptive point of view both are common.
According to descriptive grammar, plural is right, right?
And perceptive grammar uses singular?
You know the word anaphoric came late to English grammar...yes, from a descriptive point of view sure.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. No.
descriptive and prescriptivist
20:25
What's anaphoric?
As I explained: both versions are grammatically correct, though some usage manuals prefer the plural version.
I don't know why I face these challenges in grammar.
One of the boys is nice. One of the boys are nice [buzzer]. So, One of the boys who speaks good English is whatever.
I would try asking ELL if you have more questions; you'll generally get better answers there than you can in chat.
@Lambie The answer linked above explains why things are a bit more complicated.
@alphabet. So it was from Reference: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Huddleston & Pullum [et al], 2002.? Right...?
20:30
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Yes, but that's a linguistics textbook so it may not be useful for learners.
But it's authentic one. So, we can easily convince people who don't accept this.
Which one is okay for grammar? I mean which books should I follow to study for grammar?
I'd ask ELL instead of this chatroom.
Okay, @alphabet. Sure. So send me the link after the discussion m
I will also read it.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. You can ask ELL here: ell.stackexchange.com
Unfortunately they will attach that link to read.
So I am not comfortable to ask there.
I wanted to get your views.
Because you guys have already been there to share points on it.
20:41
If your specific question isn't adequately answered by the answers linked above, you can post a new question with your more specific inquiry.
0
Q: Antecedent agreement-verb and subject

I don't know who I am.Which verbs or verb should be used to fix the grammatical point? He is one of the boys who_____interested in learning English. is are Both are acceptable. Let me know why? Attach any references to support your ideas. Moreover, I have also gone through Oxford Practical English Usage by Michael S...

I have asked this there.
@alphabet. Is my method to ask question there is okay? If it needs edits, kindly do.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. ELL users will decide that. They may just link you to the same answers we did, though, unless you make it very clear why your question is different.
@alphabet. Thanks a bunch for kind help. Anyway, I am a government teacher from Pakistan. How about you?
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. I'm a raccoon.
Oh, great to meet you. I guess you are a teacher too.
@alphabet. Your name should be raccoon 🦝.
Oh, these animals are found in North America.
20:51
Not a teacher, just an amateur.
I see. That's great!
Well, why can't I find the rooms in ELL?
I used to be there with StonyBay, Khan, Fumble Fingers and MAR.
How can I find their rooms, @alphabet?
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Dunno.
Can you help me to reach out there?
@Lambie I mean, I'd like to talk to you about the comments you're making (calmly lol), but I don't have time rn
@alphabet Dude. Just start a raccoon class already.
Also, is it 'racoon' or 'raccoon'? That should be lesson 1.
21:04
Both spellings are, I believe, acceptable.
Did you know? Raccoon is an agglutinative language; the word human literally means "stripeless idiot."
@alphabet I didn't know that.
@alphabet That statement itself is considered acceptable by some and unacceptable by others.
In order to accept the argument for One of the things that make/makes him great, you have to cut the parse at "things that". That for me, is inaccurate.
@Laurel Laurel, it would depend on what you are referring to.
@Lambie For you, perhaps, it is. Other speakers (most, I think, including me) find both versions acceptable.
21:22
Some people say "coon" very offensive word for a black person.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. You would learn that in the second class from @alphabet. He's vey good at all things raccoon.
Lol! I don't want to learn about Racoons. I want to learn about Grammar only which is my passion.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. He's told us all we need to know about raccoon grammar:
22 mins ago, by alphabet
Did you know? Raccoon is an agglutinative language; the word human literally means "stripeless idiot."
Maybe we'd also need a dictionary too.
Racoon grammar is a hard nut to crack.
Wordle 959 4/6

⬛🟨🟨⬛⬛
⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
21:34
@alphabet It is not that I don't find it acceptable. I find it to be non-standard due to the parse. And the override thing is a bit much. I will say this once again (NB: No sarcasm intended at all): As a linguist whatever anyone says is fine. From the finest trailer trash to the grossest bourgeois/upper class cant. People speak like they speak. That said, correcting a PhD thesis is not going down to the corner store and chatting with people.
Hi, is it a game? @jlliagre.
@Lambie. You're a language lover. However, I love grammar. 😍
@jlliagre. Would it improve my memory power or vocabulary?
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. I don't know who you are.
I gave you a very nice answer on ELL. I explained that the powers that be (formal grammarians on ELL and the books they quote) think it's fine. We say here in the states: What else do you want? Eggs in your beer? [That's a joke for those who might misread me.] But allow me to say that linguists don't do right and wrong or pass judgments on how people speak. They merely identify those manners of speech/writing.
21:38
They pretend to, at least.
Daily Quordle 740
5️⃣7️⃣
3️⃣6️⃣
m-w.com/games/quordle/
There's also twordle, and zwordle. Oh wait, that last one hasn't been invented yet.
@jlliagre. I am who I am. Lol!
@Lambie. I will accept your answer there. Let others share their opinions on it.
@Lambie. I like your positivity. Thanks for being with us here.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Why thank you I-don't-know-who-I-am. Thank you for recognizing me.
21:53
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. You know it! Your nickname is misleading :-) Anyway, how would I know if it would improve you vocabulary if I have no idea about it? Anyway, I like this family of games because they they involve logic, memory, and also guessing from its spelling what might be an acceptable word in English (I'm a non native speaker.)
@Lambie There are actually a large number of such overrides. Examples: "A number of people are still waiting in line," "Three eggs is enough for me," "Two miles is a long way to run," etc.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Don't let @jlliagre fool you. He's what I'd call near-native, and in multiple languages.
He makes me work at these stupid games.
To be clear, @jlliagre is no raccoon.
That, I agree.
@Lambie Those eggs beer in mint people always confuse me.
22:02
There is only one raccoon and Alphabet is his name.
I feel like you're about to break out in a song.
@Mitch Or pimples.
@Mitch Coons, toons, and raconteurs. And -teuses.
@Robusto Are you telling me he's some sort of goose? Or teenager?
Mongoose! C'est toi!
22:04
@Mitch Wait, goose? Ruining his liver to make paté, you mean?
Foie gras is not paté!
Why do we talk about Raccoon? Is it our subject today?
@jlliagre You don't make that out of goose liver?
Rapacities full of turnips.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Only one person keeps harping on that.
22:06
Who is that, @Robusto?
My Furies can beat your Harpies!
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Look at the gravatars.
The person icons.
Is it harpoon or Harpon?
@Robusto Yes but calling it paté is a misnomer.
@Robusto Il faut souffrir pour être belle.
22:07
Omg! That's raccoon. I found his DP. Lol 😂
THOU SHALT NOT WORSHIP FALSE ICONS.
Guys, I guess he will get angry at us. Don't make a sport of him...!
@jlliagre What do you expect from me? I didn't attend the Sorbonne, you know.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. We're not worried.
@jlliagre Is this one of those Holy Roman Empire things again?
A Song for Arbonne is a novel by Canadian writer Guy Gavriel Kay published in 1992. It is set in a fantasy world with two moons and is loosely based on 12th-century Provence and the Albigensian Crusade. There were 25,000 copies of the book published in the first printing. == Plot == The story is set in Arbonne, a fictional country bordered by the countries of Arimonda, Gorhaut, Gotzland, Portezza and Valensa. Residents of these countries worship one of two deities, the war god Corannos or the mother goddess Rian. The main protagonist is a Coran soldier named Blaise from Gorhaut. Like other men...
22:09
Is foie gras a terrine?
Y'all mean pâte?
@Robusto Neither did I but fun fact, I was at the Sorbonne this afternoon.
@jlliagre Well, you're definitely one up on me then.
@jlliagre. Are you a girl or boy? 😲
@jlliagre Oh la la. I was at ... counts on fingers ... at home today.
22:10
@DannyuNDos Oui ! Comme un coq en pâte.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. A boy.
@tchrist. I asked a question about English grammar on ELL. I need to get your views as well if you get Free.
Well, I missed Cataji as well.
That's be six bits a minute.
Daily Octordle #740
🕚5️⃣
9️⃣6️⃣
3️⃣7️⃣
🔟8️⃣
Score: 59
@tchrist Cha ching
22:12
@Robusto I'm stuck at #1
Too sadge my IME can compose circumflexes but not carons.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. It is generally not recommended that you @ specific people with requests in chat. Instead, just post your question and hope someone will see it; don't ask to ask.
@Robusto. I don't know how to play it.
@jlliagre I know, right? That was my hangup.
@DannyuNDos I'm still impressed that you called out the mispellings!
> < French pâté (c1170 in Old French in sense II.2a; 1711–13 or earlier in sense I.1; 1739 in sense II.2b in pâté de foie gras pâté de foie gras n. (compare earlier pâté en pot chopped meat cooked in a pot: end of the 14th cent. in Middle French)) < pâte paste n. + ‑é ‑ate suffix1. With sense II.2a compare earlier pasty n., patty n., petit pâté n.
22:13
@Cerberus. Okay, thanks for your kind words.
No Peppermint Patty for our goose.
@DannyuNDos to get a corcumflex, I had to use my phone to type it, then message that to myself, and open messaging in my laptop browser and cut and paste.
It was worth it.
@tchrist Yes, you can make paté from foie gras, that doesn't mean foie gras is a paté.
@Mitch Oh yeah? Then how do you get a circumflex?
@jlliagre yes yes
22:14
@Mitch Being on Linux is helpful.
@DannyuNDos Or a Mac.
Which is BSD.
@alphabet Those are not that/who verb predicate. Anyway, a number of = several, (more than two less than many) several people are/three eggs is enough for me=non-standard, yes. Two miles is a long way. Tipically, distances are singular. But here's one for you: A lot of people go there. Usually not preceded by: Who goes there? [again, a joke, just in case the speech police are out and about].
@DannyuNDos I'm on everything -but- Linux.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. I don't think I was kind haha, but thank you.
...and Windows.
22:15
ě ê
... and a bunch of other ones.
That said, I complained about inability to compose carons because of pinyin.
@Cerberus. I am lil kid. Don't make me unhappy.
@DannyuNDos Natively on the keyboard, right. It's a bother. I use an assist.
@Lambie. I guess he was talking about notional concord.
22:16
@Lambie Yes, the rules are complicated, which is why "lot" gets used with a singular verb but "number" doesn't. Note that, while "a number of people" and "several people" have the same meaning, they differ in syntactic structure; the "a" shows it's a singular NP.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. You're good.
How old are you?
@Mitch ah gees, you need the international keyboard.
@alphabet Hmm when is lot singular?
Daily Octordle #740
🕚8️⃣
🔟7️⃣
5️⃣6️⃣
4️⃣9️⃣
Score: 60
@Cerberus. I am 25.
22:18
@Cerberus Sorry, I meant to say that "lot" also goes with a plural verb. Got confused for a second.
@jlliagre Finally. We've been waiting for, like, an hour or something.
It depends on the contexts again when talking about a lot.
@Cerberus Not in: The Crying of Lot 49.
A lot of money was misused. A lot of books were read.
@Robusto I know, I'll try to be more focused next time.
22:19
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Oh, you're tiny.
@Lambie Is that the Bible?
@Cerberus. How about you, friend?
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Good example.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. 40.
@alphabet A semantic "override" is preferable to getting one's knickers in a twist with "One of the /boys who etc./ a number of is in the dictionary. boys who is not.
Though it doesn't apply if there's a singular noun after "a lot of," as in "A lot of water was spilled on the floor."
@Lambie "A number of" is in the dictionary, but it's not a syntactic constituent.
@Cerberus No, a lot is a batch.
22:21
Point is: subject/verb agreement is more complicated than "a plural NP goes with a plural verb form" and "a singular NP goes with a singular verb form."
Whenever I see "NP", I think of the complexity class.
@Lambie OK.
Daily Sequence Octordle #740
5️⃣6️⃣
7️⃣8️⃣
9️⃣🔟
🕚🕛
Score: 68
I was not the one who brought that up. Just responding to your posts...a number of is in the dictionary as meaning the humble several, adjective.
@DannyuNDos Ah, right. Software complexities.
22:23
@Cerberus I confess I was being tricky wicky.
Angry!
With singular A LOT I guess uncountable nouns were used, I guess.
@Robusto As in P vs NP.
Another example: "The committee have finally reached a decision," which is generally considered correct and standard in BrE but not AmE.
@Lambie I have a MacBook Air, and the iOS keyboard gives, with the US keyboard, some extras like a cedilla and some diacritics on vowels. -usually-
22:25
Well, collective nouns are happy with both singular or plural in BrE. But Americans use singular a lot.
But I must have pressed some unknown keyboard shortcut and now it just repeats characters instead of giving the alternate characters.
@Mitch The shopgirls and coiffeuses actually say that.
It depends on how you use it. If it's a single unit then use singular verb, if it's collection of individuals then use plural.
@alphabet Exactly, it's a single unit. It doesn't break down.
In British English, singular words like family, team, government, which refer to groups of people, can have either singular or plural verbs and pronouns.
22:27
@Lambie It breaks down syntactically, if not semantically.
Plural forms are common when the group is seen as a collection of people doing personal things like deciding, hoping or wanting. Singular forms are more common when the group is seen as an impersonal unit. Compare:
– My family have decided to move to York. They’re going in April.
The average family has 3.6 members. It is smaller than 50 years ago.
– My company are wonderful. They do all they can for me.
My company was founded in the 18th century.
The dictionary lists plenty of items that aren't single syntactic units.
@tchrist What is eggs beer in mint?
Daily Sequence Octordle #740
5️⃣6️⃣
7️⃣8️⃣
9️⃣🔟
🕚🕛
Score: 68
@DannyuNDos Whenever I see "P", I think someone had an accident.
22:28
@Robusto Corbata!
@Lambie People there are who pronounce experiment as though 'twere eggs beer in mint.
Somethin' like that.
Many singular quantifying expressions ▶ (172) can be used with plural nouns and pronouns; plural verbs are normally used in this case.
A number of people have tried to find the treasure, but they have all failed. (More natural than A number of people has tried …)
A group of us are going to take a boat through the Dutch canals.
A couple of my friends plan to open a travel agency. (NOT A couple of my friends plans …)
A lot of social problems are caused by unemployment. (NOT A lot of social problems is caused …)
@jlliagre We're thinking more and more alike. This could be alarming, depending on your viewpoint.
@Robusto OMG I was staring right at it and couldn't see it.
@tchrist Sorry, I ratted it. [say that in French]//a number of is a single unit meaning several. It just looks like it isn't. A lot of functions the same way.
22:30
@Mitch That's why we go over this stuff.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Did you know that you can skip the of after couple and say a couple friends or a couple friends of mine — but not *a couple my friend? It's a curious thing.
@Lambie They're just trying to make a sale.
Yes. I knew it. Thank you for reminding me, @tchrist.
@tchrist Nah, you must mean: a coupla friends [j] I gonna start putting [j] after my remarks so I don't get suspended for being mean.
@Lambie I shall not denounce the French.
22:33
Coupla is easy to use when it comes to spoken English.
@Mitch I'll give you a subject, your write funny, and I'll manage the stand-up contracts. Do you do stages?
@tchrist 👀
Like little girl to lil gal...!
"Coupla" is just how we often pronounce the thing we write couple of.
There is a grave confusion between writing and pronunciation of weak forms going on here.
I thought that was a typo of cupola.
22:34
Yes, copula is also a name given to verbs in English.
@Lambie OK...do the phonebook.
@DannyuNDos Or copula!
A cupola is up on the top of the bóveda, right?
Copular or copulative verb...! Or in quick shot, copula...!
@Lambie Why? I don't see a reason to posit that.
Oh, I was referring to Johnson solids.
22:35
Noun: cupola (plural cupolas or cupolae)
  1. (architecture) A dome-shaped ornamental structure located on top of a larger roof or dome.
  2. (military, railroad) A small turret, usually on a hatch of an armoured fighting vehicle.
  3. (geology) An upward-projecting mass of plutonic rock extending from a larger batholith.
  4. (geometry) A solid formed by joining two polygons, one (the base) with twice as many edges as the other, by an alternating band of isosceles triangles and rectangles.
  5. A type of furnace used for smelting.
(3 more not shown…)
Noun: copula (plural copulas or copulae)
  1. (linguistics, grammar) A word, usually a verb, used to link the subject of a sentence with a predicate (usually a subject complement or an adverbial), that unites or associates the subject with the predicate.
  2. (statistics) A function that represents the association between two or more variables, independent of the individual marginal distributions of the variables.
  3. (music) A device that connects two or more keyboards of an organ.
  4. (biology) The act of copulation; mating.
Now do Capulet
😂😂😂
Raccoon 🦝🦝.
Wait... who are you calling a raccoon?
@Mitch. I don't know. It's just an animal and I love that animal. 😜
@Mitch You weren't impressed with the upward-projecting mass of plutonic rock extending from a larger batholith?
22:38
I see.
Just calling a raccoon a raccoon.
The one who has his DP....!
@tchrist An inselberg?
A tor?
@Mitch. Why is that cat missing on your DP?
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. What is 'DP'?
Oh... avatar?
DP = display picture.
22:39
Here I think they call it 'avatar'.
Basilisks of Pluto.
@tchrist. I love rocks. I am a geologist as well. My major was Geology at University.
I love pumice here in my region.
Doubtless outranked only by General Studies.
Also grey granite and pink granite are found here.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Any karst or eskers?
22:41
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Vishnu schist can be found hereabouts.
Yes. @tchrist.
@tchrist Gesundheit!
Pakistan has all types of rocks.
Specifically, in North part of it.
@Mitch I think that one escaped from the other end.
Coal is abundantly found here.
Intrusive rocks and extrusive rocks.
Basalt and Garbo...!
We have also reserves of salt here.
22:44
The Vishnu Basement Rocks is the name recommended for all Early Proterozoic crystalline rocks (metamorphic and igneous) exposed in the Grand Canyon region. They form the crystalline basement rocks that underlie the Bass Limestone of the Unkar Group of the Grand Canyon Supergroup and the Tapeats Sandstone of the Tonto Group. These basement rocks have also been called either the Vishnu Complex or Vishnu Metamorphic Complex. These Early Proterozoic crystalline rocks consist of metamorphic rocks that are collectively known as the Granite Gorge Metamorphic Suite; sections of the Vishnu Basement Rocks...
The Black Canyon of the Gunnison also gets down to the schist. That's part of the blackness.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Oh... now that I understand what you are referring to, I don't know why the person who made the sign thought the cat was missing originally, but I found it funny that the cat may have always been there, and standing next to the picture jus proves that the signmaker doesn't know what is going on.
There's Rama Schist, Brahma Schist, and Vishnu Schist.
and Maso Schist.
@Mitch Yes, limestone and sandstone as well.
@tchrist I hope you got it all out.
22:46
@tchrist. Oh, names from Hindus...!
@Mitch. The cat is so funny!
What about this cat?
This cat used to live in my univ.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Also it's a good example of the use-mention distinction. @DannyuNDos might enjoy that part.
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Yes, it's unusual. Usually our Indian Country toponyms involve Indian names like Na'nzho:zhi not Hindian names like Vishnu. :)
@tchrist. You're from India?
@Idon'tknowwhoIam. Not that kind of Indian. :)
22:49
So what kind of Indian are you? @tchrist.
Indian Country is what we call places near reservations here.
@DannyuNDos Yours is so sweet like candy.
Like Hopi, Navajo, etc.
@tchrist What is Na'nzho:zhi? Is that like Milwaukee or something?
No, It's a Navajo word.
22:50
@tchrist. I see.
It means "at the bridge".
@tchrist. So you're from India, hmmmm!
@tchrist I'm just going to pursue this one more step, with great trepidation... is there now or was there ever... a bridge at that location?
@Mitch Indeed.
22:51
@tchrist Whew!
All is right with the world!
Okay, dear buddies. I'm going to hit the hay. We'll meet next time. Thanks for your time! ❤️
> However, in many cases, the Anglo and Navajo names have no connection: Gallup, New Mexico, is Na'nzho:zhi, "at the bridge." A place may also have names in two or more Indian languages. The Hopi Indians call one of their villages Walpi ("the gap"), while the Navajo refer to it as De:z'a:ji', "toward the point," an appellation descriptive of its location on the end of a finger-like projection of a mesa.
> The name for Red Lake on the western border of New Mexico is simply an approximate translation of the Navajo Be' ek'i' Halehi:' (literally "lake that is red").
@DannyuNDos. I like your car as well. Thanks!
Everybody has a different name for the same thing. Feels like travelling in Wales.
I don't own a car.
22:54
chat
No char in chat!
@DannyuNDos. So, visit me in my dreams.
My dad promised to buy a truck for me, and it's supposed to cost like 250 USD.
@DannyuNDos. You're going to be a nice truck 🚛 driver.
Though, the real concern is... Is it gonna have manual transmission?
22:56
@tchrist Those Indian names are all so analytic, saying exactly what they are.
Unlike Springfield or Loveland or Death Valley
23:15
A lesson about Korean tradition: Don't lie on your back on that. That's not a cross.
Instead, lie on your front on that.
01:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (4832 days earlier)      last day (385 days later) »