@Cerberus Why would the snow remain intact? That really isn't very much snow, what with high winds, high solar gain, and actual sublimation at this altitude. It needn’t wait to melt you know just to disappear.
@Cerberus Still reminds me of April in New York. Whatever its steepness or gentleness, the new-cases slope maps almost always to the new-deaths slope a month later.
@Robusto I didn't realise conditions in Thailand were so bad. It's normally mentioned as one of the few places in the region which isn't a complete basket case. In part because the British, never, er, visited.
@Cerberus It's entirely fair. and they're mostly fairly small places. And whether they are doing well, I don't know. Both Singapore and Vietnam are basically police states. North Korea is cut off from the world.
@tchrist Can you comment as to whether there is any reason to use the Python 3 re module vs PCRE in Python 3? Though that may be a moot point, since Debian doesn't seem to have a PCRE for Python. Which seems surprising, so maybe I need to look harder.
There were at least historically a lot of vocal Python converts who've been screwed over by being forced to maintain poorly written Perl code. This of course makes as much sense as cursing the hammer and screwdriver for a poorly built house or the paints and brushes for a poorly drawn portrait.
Bad code is written by bad coders, not by a bad programming language.
I was hoping to standardize on PCRE, since it seems to be something of a standard. Or at least, as much as a standard as prevails in this area. Which doesn't seem to have actual standards.
@tchrist I don't suppose that's packaged for Debian.
When you say "standardize on" PCRE, what do you mean? Do you mean across all possible programming languages and compilers and operating systems? That seems a tall order to fill.
POSIX has two flavors of "standard" regexes, but they define too small a feature set for anyone to want to use just those alone.
I would also recommend Russ Cox's re2 library that he originally wrote for Go.
@tchrist Yes, that's what I meant. Though my possible use cases would be quite meagre, since I only know a few languages.
No, it's there after all. I even have it installed, for Python 2. For some reason apt-cache search python regex doesn't pick up python-regex. :-) I guess I need to install the Python 3 version now.
I would normally recommend that one measure a regex implementation against conformance with Unicode Technical Standard #18: Regular Expressions, but perhaps you still use only TELEGRAM COMPATIBLE CHARACTERS.
Basically, searching text requires a special kind of backing-store indexes to be built, and very few RDBMs provide that sort of thing. I believe Oracle may.
@FaheemMitha That was my impression long ago, yes.
It looks like I'll have to rebuild the most recent version of python3-regex currently available in unstable for buster, because it won't install on it. Assuming that's possible, of course.