I like how at 10:36 he asks the boy if he can have his violin, then asks him if he can have the bow, and then immediately says "ah, this bow is too heavy for this violin". Before even playing a single note.
And, like, bow weights differ by maybe a couple grams, and he'd never played this violin before. But he just knows.
@Cerberus well yes. But I'd rather play or sing in one style really well than in a thousand styles really poorly.
And then if I want a different style, again, I'll go have a lesson with another teacher.
And it's not frowned upon or anything. It is commonly understood that that's a thing that you do.
Been that way since forever. Since Baroque. Probably earlier. You'd literally travel across the world to have a couple lessons with someone else. Or take a sabbatical year. Common practice then, common practice to this day.
The pupils will probably know more than us as laymen. Maybe for them like half of the advice we dismiss as stylistic isn't actually stylistic at all. For whatever reason. Or a multitude of reasons.
We're at the bottom end of the Dunning-Kruger scale on this. We don't know what we don't know.
All rules are there to be obeyed for exactly as long as you don't know if they are actually rules or not.
Which is why it's so difficult to come up with a truly definitive interpretation. Let alone a historically informed one. Stuff gets even murkier the further you go back.
Hell, we still can't agree on the metronome numbers for Beethoven.
People think that 120 means 120 when he clearly meant 60 by it.
So yeah, Vivaldi is like literally free for all. Nobody knows what the fuck they're doing. Even when they do, for a fact, know what the fuck they're doing.
Like, I told you about that score I did of that other thing Jaroussky sang. It's from 1762. There's not a single instruction for the singer. Just the naked notes.
@Cerberus I can't say I know more about the violin than you do. But I found it easy to follow. Vengerov uses very colorful language. With lots of similes and stories. He's a Märchenonkel.
@Robusto well for starters I never once expected to be born. Biggest surprise of my life.
Also everyone says, I believe Tarantino included, that it's like the second coming of Pulp Fiction and that's like the wrongest thing you could possibly say.
More like Kill Bill part 2.
That's more like the vibe I was getting.
@Robusto I went with a friend with whom I've seen most if not all of Tarantino's previous movies together. We had a dozen tequila beers between the two of us. It was worth it.
Well, see, the whole "Sharon Tate" murder thing, which really happened, and then it has a surprise Hollywood ending ... I just didn't know what to make of that.
I saw it with my kids. They didn't get the "this shit really happened, sort of" thing.
I don't know either. But here's the difference: he thoroughly immersed me in Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown, and IB, right from the git-go. The others ... I had to struggle to stay interested.
The thing people don't acknowledge often enough is that Tarantino is a writer first and a director second. His dialogue is really what makes his films. Think of any classic Tarantino moment and you'd have to say it was the dialogue that made it.
"Say what again! I dare ya. I double-dare ya!"
There was like zero interesting dialogue in this latest one.