« first day (3221 days earlier)      last day (1996 days later) » 
03:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

21:00
I'm clicking it.
I also feel that DiDonato does it very nicely.
Perhaps her manner is a bit exaggerated, in the American way, but her style is attractive.
I like how at 10:36 he asks the boy if he can have his violin, then asks him if he can have the bow, and then immediately says "ah, this bow is too heavy for this violin". Before even playing a single note.
And, like, bow weights differ by maybe a couple grams, and he'd never played this violin before. But he just knows.
Ah, and we believe him, too.
You better do. That's how you progress.
That's why I keep watching videos like these. Even if I don't play the instruments in question.
The value of good teachers cannot be overstated.
With one simple sentence they will save you a decade of work.
Yes.
But neither are they perfect.
Well no which is why everyone typically has half a dozen different teachers at different points in life.
21:04
Sometimes they are impressing their own particular style upon their pupil.
My violin teacher studied in like five different cities in three different countries.
And I will hear her say, you cannot do x, when I happen to know that another famous singer does just that, and it's just a different style.
Good.
@Cerberus well yes. But I'd rather play or sing in one style really well than in a thousand styles really poorly.
And then if I want a different style, again, I'll go have a lesson with another teacher.
And it's not frowned upon or anything. It is commonly understood that that's a thing that you do.
Been that way since forever. Since Baroque. Probably earlier. You'd literally travel across the world to have a couple lessons with someone else. Or take a sabbatical year. Common practice then, common practice to this day.
@RegDwigнt As long as other styles aren't presented as Wrong.
@RegDwigнt Certainly.
I've not seen enough of her to be a judge on that.
But at the end of the day it's sort of expected that you develop your own style anyway. Most of all, you yourself start expecting it of yourself.
You're just a sieve for all your life's experiences.
Everyone has their own mix of experiences, and everyone is a different sieve.
21:11
I didn't mean to say that she in particular does that all the time.
But I have seen it on occasion in similar lessons.
I presume the pupils will know this, too, so it isn't a problem.
The pupils will probably know more than us as laymen. Maybe for them like half of the advice we dismiss as stylistic isn't actually stylistic at all. For whatever reason. Or a multitude of reasons.
We're at the bottom end of the Dunning-Kruger scale on this. We don't know what we don't know.
All rules are there to be obeyed for exactly as long as you don't know if they are actually rules or not.
Absolutely.
But I remember hearing her give very specific advice about singing a certain part of an aria legato.
And then I heard Jaroussky singing it non legato.
Staccato?
You forgot your Latin?
Legato is tied together. Staccato is each note separated from the others.
Non legato is in the middle. Like détaché on the violin. You can actually make it sound very legato even though it technically is not.
Ah.
I never knew my Italian.
I think it was this piece:
@Cerberus Neither did the French. Whence all the confusion.
21:18
I think my favourite aria by young Jaroussky.
That's France 3 huh. Haven't seen that logo in a decade.
The strings are playing spiccato there. That's like one of ten other things you can do on strings between staccato and détaché.
It's a clusterfuck of terms and techniques.
Ack.
Which is why it's so difficult to come up with a truly definitive interpretation. Let alone a historically informed one. Stuff gets even murkier the further you go back.
Hell, we still can't agree on the metronome numbers for Beethoven.
People think that 120 means 120 when he clearly meant 60 by it.
So yeah, Vivaldi is like literally free for all. Nobody knows what the fuck they're doing. Even when they do, for a fact, know what the fuck they're doing.
Like, I told you about that score I did of that other thing Jaroussky sang. It's from 1762. There's not a single instruction for the singer. Just the naked notes.
Is there a continuous tradition?
That is significant.
Back then it was commonly understood what you would do with them.
But because it was commonly understood, nobody bothered writing it down.
And then it was suddenly not commonly understood and everyone was like FFFFFUUUUUUUU what we do now
All we have is naked notes.
And that was like 200 years ago.
Now people can't even google for "spiccato".
They can only type "dafuq you on about, does anyone have a translator"
And they can't even type that into Google.
Which reminds me, I started reading "Twentieth Century Harmony" last night. I must continue now.
Still no inlining love for Amazon? Boooooo.
21:30
Maybe change it to .com?
I believe we tried that before.
I think it just stopped working altogether at some point.
See.
@RegDwigнt If there is a continuous tradition of performances for that composer, we usually have at least something?
@Cerberus I can't make general statements like that. It's too unwieldy a situation.
@RegDwigнt Flawless performance. I presume he's a counter tenor?
Like, even a continuous tradition suffers from what you outlined earlier. One teacher colors their student ever so slightly, and then so on.
@Robusto inorite. And yes.
21:32
But a darker voice than most counter tenors.
If I'd just heard that without seeing it I'd have said alto or contralto.
It's certainly very rich. I know what you mean.
Mmm ... not contralto.
Well countertenor is basically mezzosopran.
13 mins ago, by RegDwigнt
It's a clusterfuck of terms and techniques.
Well ... it's basically about vocal coloring at those fine shades, not vocal range.
soprano tuba
21:34
Well yes. A layman would probably call this falsetto or castratto when it actually is not. He's using his whole voice.
But thanks for that.
No prob. Complete accident I happened across it. So I figured it might take you 40 years to find it just like it did me.
Most things in life are complete accidents.
The violin lesson is a lot harder to follow than the singing lessons!
For a lay dog like me.
I probably would never have discovered the flute if a friend hadn't given me one in lieu of a monetary debt. Accident, totally.
21:35
Complete accidents on the other hand are mostly predetermined.
@Cerberus I can't say I know more about the violin than you do. But I found it easy to follow. Vengerov uses very colorful language. With lots of similes and stories. He's a Märchenonkel.
@Robusto well for starters I never once expected to be born. Biggest surprise of my life.
At least you actively play some instruments.
@RegDwigнt I certainly never expected you to be born, either.
OMG we should be like friends or something.
Sounds rather deliberate. Can we accidentally become friends somehow?
21:38
Oh I finally watched Once Upon A Time... in Hollywood last Sunday.
You seen it yet
And ...?
Yes, I have.
For me, better than the Hateful Eight. And much better than Django.
The very fact that he cut Tim Roth tells me he is willing to start learning from Sally Menke.
High time he did.
Not nearly as good as Inglourious Basterds.
And I would have to put it somewhat beneath a pedestal, frankly.
21:40
Also everyone says, I believe Tarantino included, that it's like the second coming of Pulp Fiction and that's like the wrongest thing you could possibly say.
More like Kill Bill part 2.
That's more like the vibe I was getting.
@Robusto I went with a friend with whom I've seen most if not all of Tarantino's previous movies together. We had a dozen tequila beers between the two of us. It was worth it.
Well, see, the whole "Sharon Tate" murder thing, which really happened, and then it has a surprise Hollywood ending ... I just didn't know what to make of that.
I saw it with my kids. They didn't get the "this shit really happened, sort of" thing.
Tarantino is the last person who still makes movies. So whatever he gives me, I'm kinda thankful in a way. If you know what I'm saying.
Not having been alive in 1969 and all.
@RegDwigнt I do. I just wish he wasn't in such a marked decline.
@Robusto the friend I went with knew everything about the murders. I did not know the first thing. Like, at all. Nothing.
Every film since IB has had major flaws.
21:42
Well. Sally Menke died.
Pulp Fiction would've been 4 hours long without her.
Imagine that.
And probably in sequence.
Hah. Good one.
I just felt he was wasting my time in "Once upon a ..."
Anyway. I didn't take that for a surprise Hollywood ending at all. If anything it's the most Tarantino thing about it. A copycat of IB, as it were.
@Robusto ah, but that was the best part for us. We savoured every minute of the fluff. And then he gave us 40 more. And that's just that one scene.
Of those 41 minutes, you could easily cut 50.
@RegDwigнt Yeah. And IB was flawed itself, although I forgave the graphic novelish excesses in that one.
21:45
No idea where he was going with the wife murder B plot though.
Like, I don't think even he does.
@Robusto I was extremely surprised to see this little violence. Biggest surprise of the century, for me.
I don't know either. But here's the difference: he thoroughly immersed me in Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown, and IB, right from the git-go. The others ... I had to struggle to stay interested.
Like, literally nothing happens at all. Then just a little bit happens but really also nothing. Then it ends.
It's like he was buying my attention on credit.
We sat there and watched it like GTA 5.
@RegDwigнt I need more.
21:48
I know what you mean. But I also know that Pulp Fiction still exists so I could just go watch that. I dunno. Yeah he could do more. I'm torn.
The thing people don't acknowledge often enough is that Tarantino is a writer first and a director second. His dialogue is really what makes his films. Think of any classic Tarantino moment and you'd have to say it was the dialogue that made it.
"Say what again! I dare ya. I double-dare ya!"
There was like zero interesting dialogue in this latest one.
Well yes. Which is why we also loved Natural Born Killers and Killing Zoe.
@Robusto I might add True Romance to the list, but it's been 25 years since I last watched it so I won't. Other than that, good list.
Kill Bill 2 though, why you no give love.
Because of Kill Bill 1.
@Robusto yeah I was very much wondering about rewatchability or quotability.
@Robusto what that to do with anything, that movie is not even the same fucking game.
Might as well say "because of Battleship Potemkin".
It ain't even the same sport.
21:52
Kill Bill 2 stands on its own merits. Kill Bill 1 falls on its.
Then name it some other name.
Or don't allow Kill Bill 1 to be made.
Don't worry, now that George Lucas is free he'll rename it and repackage it and make three prequels.
Bill: Period 1.
With pod racing!
And they'll find that Michael Madsen is actually Uma Thurman's father!
See, just like that by saying "Uma Thurman" you reminded me of just how many fucking feet there were in Once Upon a Time.
Now that was getting excessive. And then never stopped.
Yes.
21:56
Just how many feet of footage did he shoot?
Ba-dum-tsss.
I guess I see it like this: Tarantino used to be an enfant terrible, and now he's no longer an enfant.
@RegDwigнt I thought that's what you meant by feet.
I remember being weirded out by all of closeups of Uma's feet back then. Little did I know.
Oh well.
I must go read Persichetti now. I already told Cerberus as much half an hour ago and I don't want him to think me a liar.
Like, I am, but I don't want him to notice.
Enjoy.
Thank you. I will return to discussing this in great detail with you and none other.
/ bows
22:00
/ reverences
Or however you say that in English.
Good enough.
Now then. Lators gators!
 
1 hour later…
23:26
@RegDwigнt obeisances maybe?
03:00 - 21:0021:00 - 00:00

« first day (3221 days earlier)      last day (1996 days later) »