« first day (2462 days earlier)      last day (2465 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

12:27 AM
@Tonepoet What is that, lol.
 
@JasperLoy Apparently it's an attempt to reply that I never finished and somehow ended up posted anyway, probably as the result of me dropping my keyboard.
 
@Tonepoet Did you try selling your Paravia for a huge sum? LOL. Now we are two of the few people in the world who have a copy...
Of course, if they make a fourth edition, then our edition becomes useless, LOL.
 
1:22 AM
I need to make draft answers when writing S.W.Rs.
I was just about to suggest this myself, alongside the word close, but I think it can be done much better than this. Would you mind if I gutted your answer and improved it to bring it more in line with the type of collaboration I believe this website normally seeks? I think it'll make it much clearer that this is probably the right word, which is probably more important than the rep. to me. Trust me when I say, I can make this answer much more convincing and interesting, but I need the time to be able to do so, which I now don't have otherwise. — Tonepoet 5 mins ago
If I had just noticed it earlier. Oh well, my goal on this website isn't really to earn rep. (although the voting privileges are something I want eventually.)
 
1:51 AM
Hey @JasperLoy did you see the lunar eclipse?
it was about 7 hours ago
 
2:34 AM
So creepy.
 
2:54 AM
Is it?
Oh, it is not the normal kind? Is it not the Earth, blocking the sun's light?
 
 
2 hours later…
4:26 AM
@Cerberus The yellowish coloration suggests that it is a harvest moon. Granted, I suppose you're actually asking about the eclipse but still. XP
 
5:14 AM
@Mitch Nope. My whole life is eclipsed, so I don't really give a damn about the moon, lol.
@Færd It looks like those Twilight Zone movies or something...
 
 
2 hours later…
7:41 AM
@Tonepoet Meh, the yellowish colouration suggests dodgy white balance. You can't really tell the harvest moon status with photos...
 
 
1 hour later…
8:58 AM
how long until of becomes a generally recognised auxiliary verb?
 
@MattE.Эллен "I should of done it"?
That's very common in some BrE dialects, roight?
 
9:29 AM
yes. I just saw an example in a FB post. it surprises me that people don't realise it should be 've
 
 
1 hour later…
10:51 AM
0
Q: Is there word like "excruciating" but relating to pleasure rather than pain?

VocoderI was hoping for some help on this one. I'm looking for a word that carries all the connotations of "excruciating" (intense, prolonged, unbearable, torturous, etc) but relating to pleasure rather than pain. I could potentially use "excruciating pleasure", applying it's lesser used meaning to imp...

 
11:24 AM
0
Q: Is there a word for a place in which the dead are washed before burial?

kazhvanIn Islamic culture and tradition , the dead are washed before they are buried. The people who wash the corpse are called corpse-washer .These person should be mahram to the dead . A mahram is an unmarriageable kin with whom marriage/sexual intercourse would be considered haram (illegal in Islam)...

 
11:45 AM
@Mitch Wiktionary is being foolish again:
Verb: assure (third-person singular simple present assures, present participle assuring, simple past and past participle assured)
  1. (transitive) To make sure and secure.
  2. (transitive, followed by that or of) To give (someone) confidence in the trustworthiness of (something).
  3. I assure you that the program will work smoothly when we demonstrate it to the client.
  4. He assured of his commitment to her happiness.
  5. (obsolete) To guarantee, promise (to do something).
(9 more not shown…)
 
-3
Q: English India and I need a synonym of my questions

Ramalakshmi VedulaI'm very loving and caring person and liked by all and bit possesive and anger

I think the synonym he's looking for is "WTF".
 
12:36 PM
I'm not sure I have the right tense in this sentence
"Any miscalculated risk he would take would result in losing a game"
I'm doing a replay/analysis of a game. so in this particular case, the matches have already been played.
I'm not sure if using "would" two times in that sentence is correct?
 
@Tonepoet I will never use Wiktionary as my dictionary, full stop.
@RegDwigнt Hiiii. Good to see you again.
 
12:51 PM
@JasperLoy The main reason I do it is because the license is compatible with the CC-BY-SA 3.0 terms imposed by Stack Exchange, by virtue of being the same. All of the other dictionaries have stricter copyright provisions, which is something would rather not run afoul of if such is unnecessary.
There was one time when I did rely upon the content of a definition, but it wasn't so much because I was endorsing the definition itself, so much as the fact that I needed to make reference to a series referenced within.
Wiktionary is very, very low on my prioritization list otherwise. Out of the contemporary dictionaries I'd rather use the A.H.D. first, then any other dictionary which corroborates my point if the A.H.D. is insufficient (this often ends up being the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus for some reason), then Wiktionary as a second (or maybe third) to last resort, with the Urban Dictionary being the absolute last one.
Even then, I'd probably only use the palm sized printed version of the Urban Dictionary at that, because it offers a limited selection that excludes most of the junk.
 
1:25 PM
@JasperLoy To pursue that metaphor, the moon is only in partial darkness for a short time, and even so it doesn't disappear, it's just the Earth and Moon and Sun spinning mindlessly with a few coincidences. But when the Moon is in transition across the face of the Sun, blocking all light in the middle of the day, the locusts will swarm, boils will erupt, frogs and vermin will fall from the sky. And then things will start to get bad.
@Færd did you see it in real life?
@MattE.Эллен officially? Never. By linguists... not sure. In use? years ago.
 
@Mitch I guess every native English speaker has the of->'ve merger, but when did adults start writing of in place of 've? I understand children would do it, but I remember teachers telling people it was wrong. HAVE WE FALLEN SO FAR?!
 
1:48 PM
@MattE.Эллен Yeah, I'm pretty sure we've fallen very far. But so far yet to go.
 
I don't see why not. We live in a world where nucular is considered OK, this belongs to Mary and I also, hopefully means I hope and momentarily means "in a moment".
 
For example, 'a' is the (perfectly understandable and acceptable) future marker
 
Not to mention I'm sat here. Why would of be any different?
 
Imma get me some more tea
BBIAS
 
of isn't like any of those. it's special. you see... I'm ranting about it.
 
1:49 PM
Ah, good point. I'd missed that.
 
@terdon whoa dude...hopefully and momentarily you gonna take that back
 
Nevah!
 
@MattE.Эллен hahha
That does change things considerably
so it sounds like 'of', and people are dumb and spell it that way, despite the scars on their knuckles and pysches from ...
 
I thought as much
 
1:51 PM
From teachers trying to force us into their cultural syntactic hegemony
 
who doesn't love a good hegemony?
 
I don't know, if I have it after say 2pm, I have a hard time falling asleep that night
Some of the weirdest dreams
Like this one time, I had a dream where, in the dream, I had just awoken from a nap, and so I thought I was awake, but I wasn't, so I was late to work.
 
@terdon but really none of those changes are category changes, the adverbs are still adverbs, etc. of -> have is a leap of preposition to auxiliary verb. It's quite striking.
 
And then I woke up, and realized oh shit it's really late. So I was late to work in real life
 
@MattE.Эллен Fair point.
 
2:01 PM
@Mitch the dangers of napping are real
 
Yeah. Don't put the nap in napalm!
Damn. That one sounded better in my head.
 
I love the smell of naps in the morning?
 
@MattE.Эллен I think the problem is that we don't teach children to write contractions very well. We teach them what they are, then tell them to never use them.
I don't remember writing 've contractions in school.
 
If you have a headache, take a sodium nap?
 
And especially, people get uneasy when you have something like wouldn't've
 
2:12 PM
I wouldn't've bothered
 
A double contraction? that can't be right. wouldn't is fo sho okay, so, maybe it's spelled wouldn't of
 
@Jonas Sounds OK to me. If an English teacher or copy editor at a newspaper would complain, I would have no idea. But your sentence sounds natural to me.
 
@Jonas I wonder if it shouldn't be would have taken, would have resulted
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 well, that brings us back to 'Imma' which is a contraction of 'I am going to'
 
@Mitch yeah. And lawler would point out that n't've is usually just spoken as na: He shouldna spelled it that way.
 
2:16 PM
Or even better, 'a-u-o' all nasalazed is a contraction of "I don't know"
 
Or 'mm' is a contraction of "I found that quite delightful and delicious"
 
@Mitch or sometimes it can be pronounced m-m-m in the same tone/rhythm.
 
or 'h' (slight extra breath out the nose, a nasal fricative?) for "I see the attempted humor in your observation, but I can't be botherd to look up from my twitter feed about the dog who saves the other dog from being swept away in the river by pulling on the stick, and then you realize the first dog doesn't really care and just wants the stick"
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 m
Short for 'oh, right'
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 THat's so uneducated. You're supposed to pronounce it 'shouldnv' with a syllabic 'v'
 
@Mitch I'll tell Lawler you called him uneducated.
Also I'll tell him you made fun of his mother.
Just in case the first doesn't get him mad.
 
2:28 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Tell him also I said '.'
and I mean it to sting
 
2:42 PM
@Mitch I'm not your message-boy!
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I guess it goes to show that spelling really is nothing to do with grammar
 
@MattE.Эллен It's kinda weird? There's probably some cross-over, some kind of feedback?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I'm not your pal, message-boy
 
15
A: Is it wrong to answer bad questions that aren't close-worthy?

KilluaThere is no "moral guideline" for answering questions here. If you want to answer the question, answer it; if the community thinks it's bad enough that it shouldn't be answered, then it will be put on hold. On larger sites like Stack Overflow, I often see people getting belittled for answering "...

 
I'm not your NTSC, message-... uh... writer!
 
2:48 PM
Should I tell 'im about English language & Usage? >_>
 
I'm not your National Travel and Safety Board, buddy
@MattE.Эллен That's no shirt off my nose
 
Evenin' everyone
 
@Mitch you misspelt "and the horse your rode in on"
hello @William
 
@Mitch okay
 
I was wondering, can "Superhuman Scent" be used as a name/description for a dogs sense of smell? I wrote it out without considering it, but I can't tell if it's right or wrong.
 
2:52 PM
will probably change the whole sentence into something simple
 
From what I can tell, "scent" can be used as a synonym to "smell".
 
I think people would usually say "superhuman sense of smell" to avoid ambiguity, and "sense of scent" isn't really a thing people way.
I don't think scent as a verb is synonymous with smell as a verb
 
I'm just going by what the friendly Google Dictionary is telling me: i.imgur.com/dCUmAAZ.png
But yeah, it does seem funky.
 
fair enough. sounds weird to me
I tend to think of "scenting" as a thing one does to give something a smell, rather than sensing a smell
 
@MattE.Эллен you can’t beat that with a dead horse
@WilliamMariager Sounded fine to me at first, but on reflection, a scent is something that is smelled, not the ability to smell. So 'superhuman scent' is a smell that is particularly strong, probably not what you intend.
Funky is exactly what it is
get down, get down
 
3:03 PM
Sounds like it hit you the same as me. Sounded fine at first but then it started to look weird.
 
get down offa that thang
then get back up again
 
but not too quickly, you might fall off and hurt yourself
 
@WilliamMariager It doesn't just seem weird, it is weird, or rather, not what was intended.
@MattE.Эллен get on up
let me hear it now
 
It worked out nicely though when I used it. It was for a roleplaying session and a player of mine got a wolf-like pet with a Superhuman Scent. We had a lot of fun.
 
3:05 PM
hah! 'a' is used as a past-present-subjective particle!
 
I think they enjoy it just a little too much when i screw up my games.
 
@WilliamMariager That pet musta smelled bad
Or smelled GREAT!
How do you keep a fish from smelling?
 
Oh yeah, I guess scent doesn't have to be a negative. :P
 
Put it on ice, duh
 
You tell it a dad joke? :P
 
3:07 PM
@Mitch is it though? isn't just used to represent a sound that basically means "I'm so excited I added a syllable"?
 
@WilliamMariager It is what it is
and what it is is, is dad joke heaven
@MattE.Эллен Oh. Hm. I suppose. Yeah, a song making thingy to fill the space.
Like 'yeah'
 
@Mitch hey now, I can't change names more frequently than once a month
 
I used to think Madonna was an idiot for half her song lyrics being 'yeah'
knowhatamsayin?
 
Ibasicallyunderstand
 
@MattE.Эллен that's not a thing
 
3:10 PM
Isitnotathing?
 
@M.A.R. haha. names are arbitrary and fluid. but my mind is not. It's hard to keep track without a program, and there's no program.
 
Ithoughtitwasathing.
 
issathingnow
youstabeathing.
Greeks did it. Latins did it. Some Argentines without means do it
 
Letzfallinluv!
 
haha. Latvians were called Letts
 
3:19 PM
@Tonepoet Oh, is it more likely to be yellow around the harvest season?
 
@terdon funny little monkeys in the zoo do it
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 . . . ♪ ♪ let's fling our craaap ♪ ♪
 
Are you singing the same song I'm singing?
 
0
Q: Is there an adjective for 'Ability to reset to a known state'?

myguyResettable seems to be the closest thing I can find, but it doesn't feel that good. I have a list of three characteristics: Programmatic access to data sources Exclusive access to testing data when in use Ability to reset testing data to a known state when finished The third one is obviously...

 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yes. The one with all the marsh bunnies, right?
(channeling my inner Mitch)
 
@terdon Inside here is too hard to read
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Ah, no then. I was on:
 
@terdon I hesitate to ask but... what's a marsh bunny?
 
@Mitch No idea. It's what I got when I remembered I didn't remember how to spell marshmallow half way through the word.
 
@Cerberus Hmm, I thought so but apparently not. It just has an orange hue when it is closer to the horizon because of atmospheric thickness. It does not seem to be an uncommon belief though, given that the webpage is designed specifically to address this matter.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 that was visually disturbing
 
@Mitch yeah I've never seen the video before just now.
 
@terdon Oh. Yeah. I see that.
 
@Tonepoet "Hmm", indeed.
Oops.
I didn't even see it in my first edit.
And you deleted your line as you saw my first edit—even though I hadn't edited indeed!
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yikes.
 
3:35 PM
 
that's a lot of hmm'ing
 
edited: :39299629 "Ham", indeed.
 
I could have sworn I saw the n for a moment, but I have no proof of my own to counter yours.
Regardless, 'tis fixed and that's what matters.
 
@MattE.Эллен Ham 'n' eegs.
 
freshly lewd eegs
 
4:39 PM
Poll: or that new bank from Spain that's popping up all over, do you say:
 
What?
 
wait for it...
'sæn TÆN dr' or 'sahn tahn DAIR'
 
Oh, Santander.
They bought our biggest bank (ABN) ten years ago, in a consortium with RBS and Fortis.
 
@Mitch the former
 
Three of the world's biggest banks, and they managed to fuck up our bank such that the Dutch government had to save ABN and parts of Fortis paying €50 billion or so.
ABN was also one of the world's largest, but still.
 
4:49 PM
A footballer got paid 222 million Euros recently, WTF!
 
Horrible.
 
They could at least give me a million Euros out of that, LOL.
 
And it's only getting worse.
With more commercialisation, more corruption, more advertising, more copyright bullshit. I'm talking about popular sports.
 
I never really liked watching or playing football or soccer as it is called elsewhere.
My favourite sports I like to watch are tennis and table tennis.
I can't play tennis, but I can play a little table tennis, but I can't spin the ball, so only at the beginner level.
I think the real table tennis experts play it like tennis, smashing and spinning the ball hard and fast and standing quite far from the table itself, which made me laugh because it was so dramatic.
 
Dramatic things make you laugh?
No wonder. Sad movies occasionally make me pee.
 
4:57 PM
Santander is just an anagram for Satan Rend.
Or possibly Santa Rend, but it's the same guy in the red suit.
Never trust a guy who's an asshole to reindeer.
 
@MetaEd no, Satan nerd
@MetaEd never trust reindeers that fly
 
@M.A.R. Don't stand underneath as they fly by.
 
They must be ultrasonic deer, considering the distance Santa has to cover
 
@M.A.R. Of course asshole to reindeer is just an anagram for released heroin sot.
So maybe we should recognize that the poor elf needs treatment.
 
0
Q: A thane is a person granted the honorary title of?

Maddie S.> A knight is a person granted an honorary title of knighthood by a monarch or other political leader for service to the monarch or country, especially in a military capacity. As a knight is one who is granted knighthood (or the title of knighthood), a thane is someone who is granted the title o...

 
5:05 PM
@Cerberus Look man, global financial conspiracies are surely a concern, but what's really important is how people pronounce it.
@M.A.R. Thank you. I find that (the first one) the most natural accenting. The one with the accent on the end sounds very foreign. But it's the one everybody uses here.
 
@Feeds the honorary title of honor, duh
@Mitch Epitoam
 
nd the point is is that that is confusing because most people here couldn't give a rat's ass about foreign accent pronunciation.
I will pronounce it san-tan-DAIR when they start pronouncing the beer lø ven broy instead of low en brow
@JasperLoy I think that's what his manager gets. For about the same effort as everybody who is not a footballer.
 
@Mitch ♫ ♫ here's to good friends, tonight is kinda special ♫ ♫
 
Those guys get real tired. THey have to run like a bunch of miles within a game
@MetaEd OK wtf, what do you do to get the sing songy notes and stuff through your keyboard?
 
@Mitch Dunno IPA. But it's "sant" rhyming with pant (although the a sound is slightly different, I'm sure @tchrist could give you an IPA) and "andér"
 
5:09 PM
@Mitch That one is U+266B BEAMED EIGHTH NOTES.
 
@Cerberus Sports celebrities are just entertainers, and therefore the modern aristocracy
money is being funneled to them out of a cult of personality.
In person they're usually pretty boring
 
@Mitch My own keyboard won't produce it, but I can paste it from a Unicode tool.
 
Except for Victoria Principle and David Beckham. The sparkling repartee between them just crackles
 
@Mitch It's not a conspiracy, just bad management, Thatcheresque deregulation, and a lack of long-term interest in the corporation by shareholders.
@Mitch I do hope you know how horrific I find that sound!*
 
@MetaEd so ALT-266?
 
5:12 PM
*likes this construction
 
@Mitch I'm mistaken. I can produce it on the keyboard by holding Alt and pressing +266b
 
@MetaEd Oh. Right. I use ipa.typeit.org for ipa (but as you can see I'm too faul for even that)
what Unicode tool do you use?
 
I won't bring up Autohotkey.
 
@Cerberus Any institution big enough, incompetency is indistinguishable from evil
or something like that
 
Nor how incredibly easy it is to assign hotstrings to unicode characters.
@Mitch Mm interesting point.
 
5:14 PM
@Mitch Usually just the stock Windows utility Character Map.
No Autohotkey in this chat.
 
@Grobber Nice icon.
Not that the icons of the others aren't nice.
 
@Cerberus ™™§∫™™§I think more a long the lines of if something is seemingly evil, it probaly means they're just unconscious and incompetent.
 
@Mitch You search for "unicode note", go to the relevant fileformat.info page and copy it.
 
but making them conscious of it and increasing competency doesn't necessarily remove the problem, they may just be better at covering it up.
 
Or just Ctrl+Shift+u and then 266b
 
5:19 PM
@Mitch Sure, that happens. Besides, I think evil in the true sense is a bit strong for any large corporation.
 
Oh wow. I'd never realized that evil is live in reverse.
 
266b
nope
@terdon live dual: laud evil
live vile, evil veil
The strength of an opponent who likes variety meats is a rival liver lover valor
 
@Mitch curiouser and curiouser!
 
bad pun of the week (ar at least last week):
Aug 4 at 18:49, by Mitch
> i got sick at a party and threw up on the family of the commander of the Apollo 13 mission. It was the wrong thing to do on so many Lovells.
and a small dirty house for one of the Wright brother's is:
Orville's rival liver lover valor hovel
with shutters is:
Orville's rival liver lover valor hovel louvers
@terdon OK I can't figure out how to do it and I'm sure I'll forget the number, so 'unicode poop emoji' will have to do.
OMG, just checked the unicode list for emoji. what a 💩
 
5:39 PM
💩
Ctrl+Shift+U1f4a9
 
they don't have 'a crock of 💩'
or 'horse💩'
but bull hockey... is that a thing?
 
Always makes me think of a Jophur or Traeki.
 
Hunh. THat's a new one. Recommended?
 
SmokeDetector marks NAAs it catches as 💩
 
My browser doesn't recognize what you're talking about.
 
5:45 PM
@Mitch Ooh, yes absolutely. Brin is very good.
 
@Færd about the poop Uni-emoji
Unimoticon?
 
Yay. My guess was correct.
@M.A.R. Yeah, I guess.
@Cerberus "Hey, I have that move to my name. Nobody can dribble like that except me."
Or what do you mean by intellectual property in sports?
 
@Færd Well, for example, where the Olympic games were held in London, even the brands on hand dryers in the loos were taped over.
And you weren't allowed to wear a t-shirt with a brand, not even as a visitor, I think.
Etc.
 
Haha.
 
Incidentally, I think the term "intellectual property" is incorrect and horrible.
 
5:52 PM
Hmm. I feel you.
 
I felt him once but he slapped me.
 
Should have tried someone else.
 
I'm an agile bird. I can take a dog.
 
I'd probably not even realise what was going on.
 
It's true. Two of his heads are asleep most of the time.
 
5:54 PM
Makes me look like such a pervert.
 
And the third one has a cold.
 
A bird taking a dog? It's bestiality.
 
In bloody August.
@Færd Only now?
 
Well, as a crow.
My other disguises have other stories.
@MetaEd Honored.
Or am I?
 
I see.
I really wonder why having sex with an animal is forbidden in many jurisdictions, but killing it is not.
In many cases, the animal won't be much bothered by the sex.
 
5:58 PM
Well, because it's not the animal's right that's in question.
 
Why do we need laws for this on top of existing laws about cruelty to animals?
Then what is?
 
@Cerberus Humans feel offended when someone of their kin degrades its race by sleeping with an animal.
 
But that doesn't make for a rational law, so it should be irrelevant in a modern jurisdiction.
 
Maybe.
They don't feel as offended when someone has sex with inanimate toys.
 
Indeed not.
Sex robots will rule the world.
 
6:02 PM
Unless the toy looks like something .. sensitive.
@Cerberus Aren't they already?
 
Quite possibly!
Or perhaps we're all computer programmes.
 
That doesn't tell me anything meaningful about me.
I wouldn't be so shocked if some day I found out that I am one.
 
In a sense, we are all "programmed."
 
Of course.
 
@Færd another reason why emoji are idiotic. Also, even when they are rendered properly, I personally have a hard time telling what they are. They're like Chinese ideographs, but with only color contrasts (not black/white) and infinitesimally small features. So basically they suck
 
6:05 PM
@Færd aww, one year old? So cute
 
@M.A.R. Want a pic?
Talk to my mom.
 
It still baffles me that not everyone should regard those stupid little faces as childish.
And I'm not talking about Trump's women.
 
@MetaEd If your bird starts acting up, then you take her dog.
 
When it becomes common practice it looses its intrinsic characteristics.
:-)
 
@Cerberus saved for posterity
 
6:08 PM
casts Prismatic Spray on Færd
@Mitch The animal's corpse?
 
Aww.
 
@Færd Have you ever looked in a mirror, real close, right at your eye, right at the iris of your eye, and noticed if there are any of the tiniest flecks of just the tiniest bit off-color, or long strands making up the pattern of your iris? draw the pattern linearly (not in a circle), it forms a spectral analysis (can be interpreted cyclically). If you notice anything that doesn't look quite right, there's your evidence.
I did that once.
Kinda gross.
Like if you look too closely at blue cheese, you realize that it really is milk that has some fungus growing on it.
kinda puts you off things
 
0
Q: Verb that means "to make an excuse"

Some_GuyIt's on the tip of my tongue. I think there's a word (possibly ending in -ate) which means, loosely, "to make excuses". Not in the sense found here of "decline", but meaning to try and justify something. It doesn't necessarily have to have the connotation that these excuses are bad ones, or th...

 
@Mitch Oh interesting. Can I do that with someone else?
 
@Færd resists making mom/bestiality/vegetarian/poop emoji joke
 
6:13 PM
And I'm a bit colorblind, so I may not be able to draw the whole pattern correctly.
@Mitch You made all those jokes in one line.
 
@Cerberus haha. yuck. no. your quote.
@Færd other people will think you're weird(er)
 
Even you?
 
@sumelic I had acknowledged that, but the problem is, if it's bogus, the old question should be reopened instead of reasked.
 
@Færd _googles 'unicode bestiality mom emoji' _
 
@Mitch I won't dare
 
6:24 PM
Not sure if that's true. Surely you can tell someone that without implicating maybe some of their toes aren't pretty?
Would depend on what you mean by some, no?
 
'You've got some great toes'
I don't think you're referring to just a few of them at the expense of the others.
it's not all so literal as that
 
That's what I thought. Thanks.
 
Clarke's law = "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Hanlon's razor = "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
Grey's law = "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice."
 
6:41 PM
In what context can one lay down the first law?
Sounds like something a self-pleased scientist or engineer would say.
 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (2462 days earlier)      last day (2465 days later) »