« first day (1773 days earlier)      last day (3152 days later) » 
01:00 - 14:0014:00 - 21:00

1:58 AM
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M *problema
 
2:09 AM
el problema, el programa, el tema, el planeta, el cometa, el prisma, el clima, el drama, el morfema, el enigma, el estigma, el idioma, el aroma, el sistema, el pirata, el mapa, el papa, el día
That is not an exhaustive list, but it is an illustrative one.
 
None of those are feminine in Greek.
Dies is normally masculine in Latin.
Only mapa I cannot explain, but then I do not know its origin.
 
> Del b. lat. mappa, toalla, plano de una finca rústica
 
> Latin mappa "napkin, cloth" (on which maps were drawn), "tablecloth, signal-cloth, flag," said by Quintilian to be of Punic origin (compare Talmudic Hebrew mappa, contraction of Mishnaic menaphah "a fluttering banner, streaming cloth")
 
b. lat. = bajo latín
 
What is finca?
 
2:14 AM
Like a farm I think.
A ranch?
> Propiedad inmueble, rústica o urbana.
 
A rustic farm, then.
 
Somebody's property. Land.
But toalla is towel, for Pete's sake.
 
Like toile.
 
Yes.
 
By why is it masculine?
 
2:16 AM
By about 800, I should imagine.
 
It's f. in Latin.
 
It can be either.
It depends on the sense.
> 1. m. Representación geográfica de la Tierra o parte de ella en una superficie plana.
2. m. Representación geográfica de una parte de la superficie terrestre, en la que se da información relativa a una ciencia determinada. Mapa lingüístico, topográfico, demográfico.
3. f. coloq. p. us. Lo que sobresale en un género, habilidad o producción. La ciudad de Toro es la mapa de las frutas.
So 1 and 2 are masculine but 3 is feminine.
But really, almost always it is masculine. I don't know when it started to be such. I could look in El Çid if you'd like.
> “Mapa” es masculino en el español actual, aunque etimológicamente era femenino y así fue al comienzo en español, al igual que sigue siendo, si no me equivoco, en italiano (la mappa) y en francés (la mappe) por ejemplo.
So it changed.
Nice contrast between era and fue there.
I went to the store today to buy a wedding card and was astonished to find not just Mr&Mrs cards but also Mr&Mr and Mrs&Mrs cards. If I can see such things in my lifetime, then surely words’ genders can mutate in the fullness of time.
But most of it we can blame on the Greeks.
room topic changed to English Language & Usage: Smelly is to green as sense is to this chat room [elu-the-sequel]
Including the room topic.
 
2:54 AM
Haha.
What did the Greeks do with mappa?
I still have trouble distinguishing between perfect and imperfect in the Romance languages, despite having studied the difference in Latin.
 
@Cerberus No, the rest I blame on them.
@Cerberus I bet it’s because it’s ser that things seem mushy. I doubt you would hesitate in choosing the right Latin tense between say peccabam and peccavi.
The question is whether it is the descriptive/repetitive past, or whether it is the completed past. So is it recounting a lasting condition or is it talking about a transient state that occurred and was done with occurring.
Think of era as used to be; think of fue as did be ugly though that sounds.
At least here.
Pretty sure Latin had the same distinction. It does not come naturally to Germanic speakers, perhaps.
But it is something one must always keep firmly in mind in every single Romance language.
I'm pretty sure you can read Spanish well enough for this to be of use to you:
> Gramaticalmente, la diferencia es que "era" corresponde al tiempo pretérito (o pasado) imperfecto; mientras que "fue" es el pretérito perfecto simple.

Ahora bien, se usa "era" cuando se refiere a la acción del verbo "ser" en un pasado que ha tenido cierta duración o que la acción no ha terminado: "Cuando era niño, iba al circo" (era e iba están en imperfecto), "Mientras leía el periódico, me acordé de que tenía examen".

En cambio, "fue" se usa para referirse a una acción más lejana en el tiempo (en un punto del tiempo) o que finalizó (acción finita): "Él fue un buen alumno" (el verbo se
"When I was a boy, I would go to the circus."
Well, or he. Can't tell, and doesn't matter. :)
"What I was reading the newspaper, I remembered that I had (was having) a test."
"He was a great student." — but those days are gone.
"Yesterday was my birthday." — that day too is gone.
lejana is distant.
There is a typo of uja for una in that text.
Fixed.
Eventually you get used to it, develop a feel for it.
I remember when @Robusto was learning all this.
Note that was learning would be in the imperfect. :)
Although I might use a progressive, like iba aprendiendo.
 
 
5 hours later…
8:10 AM
@Robusto Huh? Oh wait. The auto incorrect somehow liked that one better.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:24 AM
@Robusto Have you seen the show before?
The host is brilliant imo.
 
11:18 AM
@JohanLarsson Yes, of course. I do like the show, but I somehow fail to watch it.
 
ok I had never seen it before
they have a youtube channel
 
11:58 AM
Todo el mundo tiene un canal de YouTube.
 
Everything in the world has a yt channel?
 
Everybody has a YouTube channel.
The whole world has a YouTube channel.
 
I know 62% of all Spanish, in the world.
 
More than me, I guess.
 
Didn't you know like 96%
Also shouldn't it be 'more than I do'
 
12:07 PM
That's another way to say it. Mine was more colloquial.
Sometimes, like John Lawler and tchrist, I affect a more homespun vocabulary.
 
it was a nit remark
 
@JohanLarsson At one point it told me 76%, but once I finished the course and only do it for maintenance, it dropped me back to 56% (even though I know and am comfortable with much more of the language than I did upon completion). I basically would not give a fig for their assessment.
@JohanLarsson Wut?
 
@Robusto my remark
 
Why "a nit"?
Do you mean a "nitpick"?
 
yeah
I think nit is commonly used
 
12:10 PM
Yeah, but not like that.
 
Say in a code review if I find something minor. Nit: I prefer x here.
maybe nitty
 
A nit is a louse egg, and when you strip "nit" from its customary cliché and plunge it into another context, you resurrect the spectre of vermin.
 
Huh, are you sure?
I thought a nit was an animal unto itself.
 
You could say "nitpick" or "nit" but if you say "a nit remark" that makes it hard to parse.
 
12:12 PM
Might be a louse larva, idk.
> The egg of certain parasitic insects, especially a head louse.
 
I thought it was more like a mite.
 
Nit was very commonly used in the online poker community
 
Hmm interesting.
 
@JohanLarsson Yeah, and that was understood in context.
 
12:13 PM
You offered no context when you said that.
@Cerberus All this means is that somebody somewhere along the line got it wrong, and it stuck.
 
Yes.
 
@Robusto I rely on your parsing skills all the time :)
 
Fatal error.
 
:o For once I think I understand the conversation here.
 
Think again!
:D
 
12:15 PM
@JohanLarsson Note that in poker, a nit is someone who bets very small and seeks to chisel away at other player's stacks. It means someone who is annoying but not bold.
 
Thinking again
@skillpatrol I think I have to wait for you guyses to warm up.
 
*guys
 
> Mites are among the most diverse and successful of all the invertebrate groups. They have exploited an incredible array of habitats, and because of their small size (most are microscopic), go largely unnoticed. Many live freely in the soil or water, but there are also a large number of species that live as parasites on plants, animals, and some that feed on mold. It is estimated that 48,200 species of mites have been described
 
*Guyseseseseseseseses
 
@Robusto yeah
 
12:17 PM
 
@Cerberus I care nothing for mites, only hoping never to have to deal with them.
 
How surprising.
How long have you preferred nits?
 
I translated an article about gochujang, the Korean chili paste.
 
I still think I'm ~correct~ about nit
Have seen it used like that many times.
When correcting ad unimportant detail
 
Well, you didn't sell me on that, however much you may tell me now.
 
12:27 PM
to be continued if I find examples by natives
 
@JohanLarsson If you had simply said "That was a nit" or "My remark was a nit" I would have gotten it right away. But you just said "a nit remark" and you left out so much context that it was confusing.
If you simply want to maintain your rightness about a small matter here, so be it. If you want to learn something about English, pay attention to what I'm telling you.
 
@Robusto yeah, was poor
@Robusto No pride involved, just a feeling that I had seen it used like that.
the feeling is fading into confusion and will soon be gone
 
12:57 PM
I'm concerned about our new meta question.
0
Q: Is British English unwelcome on ELU for some people?

chasly from UKThis is a genuine question, asked in a spirit of enquiry. I don't want to start a row - simply to ask for people's thoughts. Background I and some other Brits on ELU have noticed that a minority of US English speakers appear not to value our variety of the language and, as a result not value ou...

I don't have my head together enough quite yet this morning to put together a cogent response, but it worries me.
I fear this will not turn out well.
 
I agree.
I fact it could turn down right ugly fast.
 
@tchrist Gonna comment.
 
I'm afraid to comment.
 
Is there any country that teaches Americanlish?
 
Comments are the only way to keep this civil.
 
1:02 PM
@tchrist why?
 
@JohanLarsson Misinterpretations of the author of the comment's intentions.
 
@JohanLarsson Careful there.
 
@tchrist I asked it on main. Why careful?
 
People get sensitive about word choice in stuff like this.
@JohanLarsson that's^ why
 
am I out-of-line?
 
1:06 PM
not imo pal :)
 
Flaming nationalists are embarrassing. Wearing your flag on your shirtsleeve as though it granted you some special authority is going to piss people off. Holders of American passports have equal claim to having "invented the language".
 
Americanlish makes much sense imo.
 
@JohanLarsson That's silly. Please don't.
 
invented was long ago
have evolved much since then
 
Is there any country other than USA that teaches Americanlish? — Johan Larsson 3 mins ago
Oh boy.
 
1:07 PM
reading original English is probably pretty hard
 
Well, now you've gone and put your foot in it.
 
the shot that was heard around SE
 
Maybe we should all just go back to bed.
 
but I just made popcorn?
 
1:10 PM
@tchrist You can say that again.
 
There will be no winners in this war.
There never are.
The OP doesn't understand why he rubs people the wrong way.
And he uses arguments to support himself that are simply going to trigger more of the same bad feelings.
 
I'm still wondering, what's the point in such a meta post?
Does he need someone to nod and say "you're right"?
 
Of course that's what he's looking for.
 
Almost all of those questions read rhetoric-like to me.
 
It isn't going to change anything.
It will only make things worse.
 
1:12 PM
trollology 101
 
All right. I am decided then.
Done.
And I nearly never close vote meta posts.
 
0
Q: Is there any suitable word to be replaced "humpty dumpty?"

MANILAL AHEIBAMI am searching the most suitable word that can replace- "Humpty dumpty."

 
Good one, that.
 
It is true that more than a few Americans on this site assume that everyone speaks American English, but I would say they truly oppress the minority.
Maybe the OP experience a few bad comments.
 
1:15 PM
Had said some bad comments were deleted after flagging, so maybe that's the issue.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M No selfies in this chat.
@Cerberus "Truly oppress"?
 
E.g. "that's stupid, because it's British", or "that's not a valid answer, because American English is the only true variant".
 
@chaslyfromUK: I presume he means a country where schools teach children American English by default. Perhaps such countries exist, but I've never heard of any. — Cerberus 3 mins ago
 
presumed right
 
Worserer and worserer.
 
1:16 PM
Yay.
 
@Cerberus how much will you pay me if I say we study - "study" - AmE in Iran?
 
no idea what oblique means
 
Damn it.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M I will pay you to agree with me, not to disagree with me!
 
@MattE.Эллен Would you mind stopping by if you have a moment, please?
 
1:17 PM
But is that really true, that most/all schools in Iran teach the accent of the Big Satan?
Or is it some schools?
 
@tchrist So do the French and Germans if we're playing that game :P
 
All schools abide by the curriculum. And the thing is, the curriculum says
> I had a dialog.
And in a footnote:
 
@terdon +1
 
@terdon If they're native speakers.
 
> Dialogue is an alternate spelling.
 
1:19 PM
Stop.
Please.
 
I again don't understand what we're saying/babbling/uttering/shouting/murmuring/mumbling.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M That is a bit...circumstantial. What do they actually teach in schools?
 
"invented the language". Please. Evolved, developed, OK, but invented?
 
@terdon Yes, that's offensive, actually.
 
I don't think my teacher would have corrected "color" and such, mind you. But it was not the spelling she taught us.
 
1:19 PM
And that's indicative of the underlying problem.
 
The guy uses his flag as an avatar.
'Nough said.
 
Offensive?
 
I still answered though. If only for the next poor sod.
 
@terdon That too is indicative of the underlying problem.
 
1:20 PM
@Cerberus The nationalism and ignorance implicit in the statement are, yes.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Haha aww.
 
@tchrist Probably a friend of our red dino.
 
@terdon I think it's a bit silly to be "offended" by a general and fairly common remark like that.
 
@Cerberus Faggots are sick.
 
It greatly inflates the notion of "offence".
 
1:21 PM
@Cerberus You always think it silly. That doesn't help anything.
 
That's pretty "general and common"
 
2
Trekking

Proposed Q&A site for people who go on treks

Currently in definition.

 
And still very much offensive.
 
The philosophy is killing me.
 
@terdon Perhaps so. It is a biological aberration, in a way.
 
1:22 PM
Okay, waiting for the inevitable now.
 
@terdon Perhaps so, although I have never heard it.
 
Being offended relies on where you think you are and what behavior you expect.
 
@Cerberus Yes and no. There are some interesting ideas about the importance of homosexuality in nature. The percentage is pretty much stable in most mammals as far as I know.
 
True.
But still.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M This will be our last Area 51 proposal ever.
Space is the final frontier.
 
1:24 PM
@Cerberus I have. Though not using a slur for it. And from a girl I had just slept with. "You know, those people are sick and need treatment". As you can imagine, that rapidly became a one night stand.
 
@tchrist So much for finding an interesting Area51 proposal. It's like a ghost town there.
 
Oh, did the guns-rights proposal get shot down?
 
At any rate, saying that certain minorities who are in fact under threat in certain places are inferior or should be removed or changed is, in my opion, a fairer candidate for offence than a remark on a language variety, and one that you can certainly interpret in a way that is true, i.e. English originated as such in England.
 
N.B.: The English didn't "invent" English. They simply communicated in the language of their community, and the language changed as it would. Invention implies a deliberate act, not the somewhat random progress that actually occurred. — Robusto 27 secs ago
 
My ancestors have equal claim to his.
 
1:26 PM
@terdon Funny. I'm sure some people here would say that, but not many.
 
@tchrist What?!
 
@tchrist I thought they were Scandinavian?
 
What would a guns-right site look like?
 
Like a shotgun wedding.
 
1:27 PM
@Cerberus Yes, but that doesn't mean it was invented and it certainly doesn't mean it was invented by "the English".
 
Perhaps the guns-rights proposal was nuked. You lose!
 
Experience says a Q/A shouldn't just be something popular, it should be something people have questions about.
 
@terdon Sure, if you interpret it that way. But it's not absurd.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M You don't want to know. The gun rights people have the loudest, ugliest presence outside of the Westboro Baptist community.
 
@Cerberus Well, the Danes are just Germans pretending to be British. But I'm more than half English. It doesn't matter.
 
1:28 PM
Oh man, there was a wedding in my neighborhood yesterday and they were shooting their guns off all night. Bloody Cretans.
 
@tchrist Fair enough.
@terdon Wow, is that legal?
Are you sure it wasn't fireworks?
 
@terdon So that's why I couldn't sleep last night.
 
@Cerberus Why would that stop them? Haven’t you been to Mexico?
 
@terdon That is a characteristic of a third-world country, IMO. Got something to celebrate? Jack a magazine or two into the sky from your AK-47.
 
what does it looks like when they shoot at a party? Sounds really nasty.
 
1:29 PM
@tchrist Do I look like I have been to Mexico?
 
@Cerberus Sí.
 
@Cerberus Probably not, but it's traditional!
 
@JohanLarsson Presumably they shoot up to the sky.
 
@Cerberus I think your third head is headed to Mexico.
 
There is no confusing fireworks and gunfire, in my view. Rounds from an assault rifle sound quite different from firecrackers.
 
1:30 PM
@terdon Heh. Oh, well, if they're having fun and not harming anyone?
Or is it the noise?
 
@Cerberus In Greece?
 
Yes.
 
@Cerberus The bullets are lethal when coming down.
 
@Robusto Tell me about it. There was a story a few years back about how the father of the bride was so excited, he fired into the air but, sadly, age had taken its toll and he didn't manage to raise his arm enough. Ended up killing the groom. And he managed to convince the cops it was an accident, too!
 
I sometimes wonder if Chemistry is trying to match up to ELU.
 
1:31 PM
Also a human is pretty vulnerable when firing at her from above
 
It is infuckingsane to fire off a deadly weapon and believe that its ordnance reaches escape velocity before coming to rest in someone’s breast.
 
@Cerberus It's the idea more than anything else. Guns are weapons and have no place in a celebration as far as I'm concerned. Especially considering that they're being shot by drunken idiots.
 
is it legal?
 
We had someone killed here very recently. A kindly grandfather.
 
Sounds really strange
 
1:32 PM
@JohanLarsson Again: why would that matter?
It’s illegal to run down pedestrians. Guess what? That doesn't stop anybody.
 
@JohanLarsson Nahh surely not?
 
@Cerberus pretty sure but don't have the source available
 
@terdon I agree, but, you know.
 
@tchrist curious about Greece
 
@tchrist hello!
 
1:33 PM
Oh hi.
 
@JohanLarsson Hmm, let's consider each bullet is 2 grams (it's usually less).
 
I'm worried about the row.
 
It can't be lethal.
 
@JohanLarsson Not Greece, as such, only Crete.
 
1:34 PM
@tchrist which row?
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M It can and it is, sometimes. Idiots.
 
In Sweden gun + alcohol is illegal. Firing in a nonsafe direction is illegal.
 
@MattE.Эллен The last meta question, though it seems to have been controlled well.
@terdon But that doesn't make sense.
 
@MattE.Эллен The one about not starting one. The one by your flag-waiving compatriot.
 
What would be the the starting velocity of the gun fired?
(V_0)
 
1:35 PM
I'm not sure how any good can come of this.
It seems like a personal issue.
 
87
A: Can bullets fired into the air kill a person when they fall?

SumaAs for physics, it is really very simple, the kinetic energy is converted to a potential energy while climbing and then to kinetic again when falling, with some of it converted to a heat due to friction. The air friction is quite substantial, the landing velocity, which is reported to be in range...

 
is this chasly's meta Q? I've only just seen it
 
But I don't know the history, nor do I wish to.
@MattE.Эллен Yes.
 
@JohanLarsson It's not really very simple at all.
 
There are certainly people who tout their nationality in ways that make me uncomfortable, but I try not to say anything about it.
 
1:37 PM
@tchrist I don't think he's waived any flags. Or rights, for that matter.
 
Usually this is Americans doing it, but not always.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M you mean the answer is wrong?
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M 600-1000 m/s
 
Hmm, gh = 1/2v^2. Thus if v = 800 m/s, that'd be 1/2 x 6.4 x 10^5.
@JohanLarsson Let's find out.
 
The problem is finding out how much is lost due to friction with the air
 
3.2 x 10^4 meters = h
 
1:39 PM
The rest is simple
 
That's 32 kilometers.
 
@JohanLarsson I'm guessing that'll be negligible in this context. The point is the acceleration gained while falling back down, probably.
 
Which is above atmosphere.
In stratosphere.
@Johan do you really expect the air currents to allow a free fall from 32 kilometers above the ground?
 
@terdon I think not, the friction proportional to v^2 iirc
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M How do you get 32km?
 
1:41 PM
Take that Skeptics. I'm skeptical of your skeptical-ness.
 
@JohanLarsson No, I mean that friction or not, it will accelerate significantly while falling and that's what we need to know.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M I don't understand
 
@terdon I imagined the velocity is 800 m/s since some of it is lost due to friction.
 
> the landing velocity, which is reported to be in range 50-200 m/s
That would be very high.
 
@JohanLarsson It's not likely to fall on the ground. If it's ever gonna do.
 
1:41 PM
@terdon that it is a bad idea to fire up friction or not?
 
Exactly
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M even more confused now
 
But I am not entirely convinced that the statistics from Sceptics are about bullets that were fired at close to 90 degrees.
 
@JohanLarsson Look. The bullet doesn't fall down like Tom and Jerry do.
 
muzzle velocity of a shotgun is ~400 m/s iirc
 
1:43 PM
Hmm, let's measure gravity's effect on the bullet.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M even more confused :)
 
If you fire at 45 degrees, the bullet may impact someone 2 km away at an angle of -45 degrees, maybe?
 
Celebratory gunfire (also called aerial firing or happy fire) is the shooting of a firearm into the air in celebration. It is culturally accepted in parts of the Balkans, the Middle East, the Central Asian region of Afghanistan, the South Asian regions of Pakistan and Northern India as well as Latin American regions. In regions such as Puerto Rico and other areas of the United States it is practiced illegally, especially on holidays like New Year's Eve. Common occasions for celebratory gunfire include New Year's Day as well as the religious holidays Christmas and Eid. The practice may result in...
 
Then it will still have a lot of horizontal velocity.
 
If the bullet is 2 grams, and it's 30 kilometers high above the ground, F = mg = 1/500 x 9.8 = 0.196 N
 
1:44 PM
@MattE.Эллен I think that I think, that if Chasly is being harassed or hazed in comments, I would rather it had remained private and quietly disappeared. Him coming to meta and saying that England invented English and that this has some standing is not going to help things.
 
So my question is: is the vertical velocity of a falling bullet, fired from a gun at 90 degrees, high enough to kill people?
 
Pretty weak for a gravitational force.
 
@tchrist I haven't noticed any anti-BrE sentiment in the flagged comments. Well, not a trend, anyway. There are equal numbers of people who dislike any dialect. I've upvoted terdon's answer. I think that's all we need to do for now.
@tchrist I see
 
@Johan it's likely that the gravity won't be able to pull the bullet down.
 
Yes, dialect bigotry can be a problem.
 
1:45 PM
It's true, it won't make things better for Chasly. I will keep an eye out if there are more flags
 
Thanks.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M so you think it ends up in orbit? I think not.
 
I also believe the shots are . . . No that's not what I said.
I also believe the shots are never done with a 90 degree angle, so you're ending up with a curve.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M It can't be 30km!
 
8 mins ago, by inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M
3.2 x 10^4 meters = h
 
1:48 PM
I would expect a normal distribution around 90 deg to be a decent model for party firing.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Yes, but where did that come from and where are you taking into account the drag of gravity?
 
@terdon Why shouldn't I? It's the same formula that Skeptics answer is talking about.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Because 32 kilometers is one hell of a long way. There's no way a bullet can travel that far. It would mean you could shoot into the next city!
 
When the bullet is first shot, it's hot and fast, that's why it's lethal.
@terdon You could.
If the bullet travels a straight line, which it does not.
 
No way. I found this which claims ~3km. That makes more sense.
 
1:51 PM
In straight shot, the bullet is being dragged down.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Yes, exactly.
 
Hmm, so let's take a look back and see what we did wrong.
 
If guns could shoot 32 kilometers, the Allies could have just shot across the English channel from the straights of Dover.
 
@terdon If v=200 m/s, then the height would be 2 x 10^4 meters.
Which is 20 kilometers, still.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M You are ignoring both friction and gravity again.
 
1:54 PM
@terdon I'm not ignoring gravity, but I still try to take fiction into account.
I'm trying to say
> Imagine the muzzle v is 300 m/s.
Then I plug into the formula 200 m/s, so that friction will be taken into account.
WAIT.
Waiwaiwaiwait.
 
Plus, at 200 m/s, it would travel 12 kilometers in a minute. And that's still ignoring gravity and friction.
However, gravity and friction would constantly be leaching away its speed so if v=x at t0, it will be x-y at t1 and so on.
 
Hmm, I thought the units were wrong.
They're not.
 
In any case, guns simply do not fire a bullet 32 kilometers away!
 
@terdon I'm not saying it does. I'm just calculating energy.
I wanted to say that there's a point where the bullet will stop, and that point is where all the kinetic energy has turned into gravitational potential energy @Terdon. So it wasn't ignoring the gravity.
What I was ignoring is that I was contradicting myself.
 
1:59 PM
Indeed. I'm just saying that that point is not going to be anywhere near 32 km away.
 
think ^ is accurate for firing straight up, dunno how much error using constant g gives
 
The bullet never stops in the air, just as I told @Johan.
 
01:00 - 14:0014:00 - 21:00

« first day (1773 days earlier)      last day (3152 days later) »