« first day (1772 days earlier)      last day (3143 days later) » 
02:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

2:17 AM
@Robusto We read some Boorstin for Comp II. I think what we read was from The Image.
Anyway, that.
 
So I punch through to MW to look something up, and it interposes its word of the day that I have to continue on through to get to what I wanted. Problem is that that word was quondam. I hate to break this to them, but quondam can’t be a word of the day; word of yesteryear, maybe, but not word of the day.
 
OED's is pluranimity.
 
Somehow that reminds me of onymous.
In that it is the opposite of a more common word.
And rather less common.
Does apex have a natural antonym that is customarily paired with it, the way zenith pairs with nadir?
I think it doesn’t, because apex is the tip of something, and what’s the opposite of a tip?
 
The deepest depths of a hole?
It's the natural enemy of the pile.
 
2:33 AM
I don't think we have a word for it. Hm.
Rephrase.
I don't think I know the word for it.
 
Heh.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 How do you feel about this nice quotation from XDA?
> Most consumers are happy with whatever phone they get, yet always want something better.
 
Zenith and nadir are from Arabic by way of Medieval Latin out of Spain, apogee and perigee from Greek by way of Latin and thence French, but apex from Latin proper.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 By the way, I was mentioned in an article on their front page, but I only found out just now. And I was mentioned for criticising something. Isn't that nice?
 
I feel like there should be some bottom of the crevasse type word, an inverted apex.
 
2:47 AM
It’s like how we have two different words for the top of your house, one for when you look at it from inside and a different one for looking at it from outside, or for a corner, one for looking at the exterior part and another for the interior part.
 
@tchrist the base.
Basis? Radix?
 
Radical.
 
3:03 AM
@tchrist: English has different words for a corner looked at from the inside vs. the outside? What are they?
 
Wait, did you say English? :)
> 3. rincón ‎(plural rincons or rincones) (US, southwestern US) An interior corner; a nook; hence, an angular recess or hollow bend in a mountain, river, cliff, etc.
So yes, but only in a small rincón of where English is spoken.
Noun: rincón ‎(plural rincons or rincones)
  1. (US, southwestern US) A meadow on the south-facing upper slopes of a mountain.
  2. rincón m ‎(plural rincones)
 
@Cerberus wow, you're a "senior xda member"?
 
Hola, Señor Member.
 
@Cerberus I think that quote is very truthy.
 
@tchrist I didn't know if I was included in the "we." My brother is very annoyed by the lack of an inclusive-exclusive distinction in the English first-person-plural pronouns, and now I can see why.
@tchrist I guess this is my "word of the day."
@tchrist wait, does that say that the second definition of "rincón" is " rincón" ?
 
3:08 AM
@sumelic Onebox buglette.
The real page isn’t silly.
It’s interesting that neither of the two contrasting words for corner in Spanish comes from Latin, nor are they shared by any other Romance language outside Iberia (that I know of). The internal rincón is from the Arabic invaders and the exterior esquina is from the Visigothic invaders.
 
French has coin, Italian angolo.
And I don’t know that they have an interior/exterior foil.
 
I've never heard of one in French.
 
On dit dans le coin, je crois.
And I think that means something up in the nook or something living on the corner.
 
you can also have aux coin
As a child I often heard my mom tell me "va t'assoir dans le coin"
As in English: you can sit "in a corner", which means in the inner angle formed by two walls, but you don't sit "on a corner", unless it's on top of the corner of a piece of furniture. Something could be located "at" the corner, which would typically be the outside corner.
I'm rusty but I think all those cases have direct, straight-forward correspondences in French.
I wonder how many languages have words that differentiate the inside corner vs the outside.
 
3:19 AM
There's also "getting cornered"
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 That's interesting.
I think in English one lives on the corner.
But you would stand at the corner.
For the outside!
And in the corner for the inside.
 
well, it's getting late and I'm tired of arguing with libertarians and anti-vaxxers on g+, so... good night!
 
You shouldn’t do that. It just makes you smell bad.
 
Later pal.
 
> We start with egg whites boiled for 20 minutes at 90 degrees Celsius and return a key protein in the egg to working order
Ok then, so they were at two miles when they did this. Obviously.
Otherwise it wasn’t boiling at 90 C.
 
3:30 AM
So in Death Valley water would boil at 110 C?
 
It’s at –10,000 feet?
Thought not.
Only –280.
So not even a full degree.
A cymatium is a molding on the cornice.
From a diminutive of Greek kyma, whose gender the Romans never quite worked out, bequeathing their confusion on the rest of us.
 
Define: cornice
 
Probably not a good esquina substitute though.
A kind of game hen. :)
> 1. Archit. a. A horizontal moulded projection which crowns or finishes a building or some part of a building; spec. the uppermost member of the entablature of an order surmounting the frieze.
 
Sometimes the room automatically defines words when I use the "define:"
 
Related to cornix, Latin crow (Corvus cornix), otherwise known as the Roman game hen. :)
> cornice /ˈkɔ˞ːnɪs/, sb.
Forms: 6– cornice, 7 cornishe, corniche (coronix), 6–8 coronice, 6 coronich (cornix), 6–9 cornish.

Etymology: The forms cornice, cornishe, were taken immed. from Fr. and Ital. equivalents: cf. 16th c. Fr. cornice, cornise, in Cotgr. cornice, corniche ‘the cornish or brow of a piller or wall’, mod.Fr. corniche; ad. Ital. cornice /korˈnitʃe/ ‘the ledge whereon they hang tapistrie in any roome; also an out-jetting peece or part of a house or wall’ (Florio); cornice represents the Ital. spelling; Fr. corniche, Eng. cornish derive from Ital. pronunciation. The variants
 
3:37 AM
Wiki: Rome
 
That was Kit's toy.
In the United States, a Cornish game hen, also sometimes called a Cornish hen, poussin, Rock Cornish hen, or simply Rock Cornish, is a hybrid chicken sold whole. Despite the name, it is not a game bird. Rather, it is a broiler chicken, the most common strain of commercially raised meat chickens. Though the bird is called a "hen", it can be either male or female. A cornish hen typically commands a higher price per pound than typically sold chickens, despite a shorter growing span of 28 to 30 days, as opposed to 42 or more for regular chicken. The Rock Cornish game hen or Rock Cornish hen is a cross...
 
But it worked in here just the other day?
 
Oh really?
Didn't know.
 
Wikipedia: Cornish game hen
Define: hen
Maybe it was on another room :-/
 
Betcha.
 
3:44 AM
Yep, that must be it.
 
looks like the start of a new span wave. Any mods around?
*spam
Oh, I didn't realize smokey could actually blacklist people.
 
blacklisted user :O
 
4:26 AM
Smokey listens to user-input messages only in the Tavern and Charcoal HQ, I believe.
That’s where you blacklist people.
But this is a new pattern, which he is now being trained on.
We don’t actually need mods if there are enough of us.
The rate is not very high. Yet. They may just be probing. It isn't clear.
The Tavern is always awake all night, although they don't most of them have many ELU flags. It would probably be enough though. We'll see how it develops.
 
 
1 hour later…
5:40 AM
@tchrist how did you one box that?
I think that is what I was confusing with "Define:"
 
@skillpatrol https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/rinc%C3%B3n
 
I see, thanks pal.
 
 
4 hours later…
10:03 AM
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 He wrote about fruit, or transportation?
 
 
2 hours later…
12:05 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I really don't know why he called me a "senior member". I never did anything special there; perhaps all old members with a certain number of posts get that title.
 
Thought for the Day ... no, I got nothing.
 
Same here.
 
I had something, but I lost it.
 
Nice. Fucking Nirvana is boring
About @cornbread's Wordnik link... I feel curmudgeonly but really they're looking to add any nonceword but not OCR or spelling mistake?
sometimes people do make mistakes.
Shit... I'll even accept 'braggadocious' but there's a lot more crap out there.
 
12:34 PM
@Mitch Is this the best of all possible words?
 
Lots of neologisms are needed. Lots of neologisms are crap.
 
will they classify the use of that when than should be used as a new meaning for that?
 
How about "teh"?
ELU has become a public toilet that we have to clean daily.
-4
Q: “A big pair of tits ” vs. “A pair of big tits”

Honza ZidekI am aware of the question “A new pair of ” or “A pair of new”. However, there is a specific case where all the answers seems not to be fully satisfactory for the specific case of a big pair of tits a pair of big tits The answers state that in case of new both the variants are poss...

Why, Lord? Why?
This is a "serious" question about English?
It is merely an exploit. A way has been found to hack our site that does not involve code.
 
Who cares?
 
@MattE.Эллен hyperdescriptive. not anything goes, but whatever happens is. But your example, if everyone started doing it then I guess maybe it'd have to be noted in grammar books as an 'alternate'. Noooo!!!!
 
12:44 PM
The question is legitimate; answer it or ignore it.
 
@Cerberus I don't care about the language used, only that is crass and a mockery of us.
 
@Robusto Why care about that?
 
Why not?
 
We should be above responding to what you perceive as mockery.
 
12:48 PM
Is that really how you mean that statement, to single out my individual perception?
 
@Cerberus It's obviously childish as Dan Bron commented.
There's nothing there that couldn't be asked better using other non tendentious subjects. The OPs insistence on the nouns is contrary to any grammatical interest.
Where is our 'close because stupid' reason?
 
Not only that, but it is a clear dupe that the OP goes out of his way to draw a spurious distinction from. I am not persuaded that "new pair or" vs. "pair of new" hasn't been answered for all cases in the former.
And so I just dupe-hammered it.
 
@Robusto I have no opinion on whether or not it is intended as mockery, so I did not wish to present its status as such as a fact.
 
@Cerberus That is remarkably high-minded of you. I suspect things would be different had the question extolled the iPhone.
 
@Mitch Are you sure? Who knows: there could be something subtly different about tits. Or it could simply be the first word he thought of when considering this construction.
@Robusto !!!
Give me tits over Iphones any day.
 
12:58 PM
And that's a gay man talking, folks.
 
My point is that, even if the question was intended as mockery, I see no problem in simply answering it.
 
BTW, I don't know how you'll get on here in America should you visit. Virtually all gay men I know use iPhones here. It's like a correct fashion accessory or something.
 
Horrible.
 
You might be forgiven because you would be a foreigner, or because you might be hot enough where such a thing would be considered racy.
 
A strange paradox.
 
1:01 PM
@Cerberus Pretty sure. Disinterestedly, it's possible that there's a difference with 'boobs' or 'tits' but in looking, no there's not.
 
@Cerberus And in those dark bars, I'm sure nobody is looking at the bulge the phone makes in your pants.
 
Alas, I think Iphones and Macbooks are in the majority among people who went to university in Amsterdam. They care about brands too much and don't know anything about computers.
@Robusto You must have more experience with this than I.
 
@Cerberus Or a more accurate imagination.
 
No doubt.
At any rate, Iphones are usually smaller, QED.
 
Come, why so glum, chum?
 
1:05 PM
You mentioned the I-word.
 
@Cerberus Not the 6+.
 
Iphones are for the egoistical.
@Robusto Still smaller than large Androids.
Vroom vroom!
 
@Cerberus They are a fashion accessory, first and foremost. That is my take.
 
I agree, for the most part.
But I think another reason is that at least they won't be crappy, like some cheap Androids, so people know it will work well enough for what they need.
 
I think the danger they fear is that the phone won't be perceived to be cool enough. They don't have to determine that for themselves, and they take the safer course of following the herd.
 
1:08 PM
If you don't know anything about a product category, and you're not too interested in saving money, and you don't care about getting the most functionality out of the product, then it makes sense to buy an expensive item from a high-end seller/brand.
@Robusto Yeah, that's one half of it.
 
@Cerberus Isn't that sort of an endorsement of the whole Apple brand?
 
These are the same people who wear explicit designer labels so that they can have ostensive proof that they are cool enough to pass.
 
I mean, I think people who buy Louis Vuitton bags genuinely believe that the bags will last longer than some other bag they once bought from a low-end brand. Even if it's not true.
 
@Cerberus That's a strange thing to want in a LV bag.
 
@Robusto Cut off the labels and sew them on somewhere else.
All my underwear is Ralph Vuitton.
 
1:11 PM
people who buy bags like that tend to also be the people who buy bags frequently
 
I think people who buy Vuitton bags would buy them even if they were demonstrably worse in quality.
 
thus, longevity is not important.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 They need a bag for all their bags.
 
@Mitch How do you mean? There is no denying that an Iphone works as well as a €150 Motorola for almost all users. It's not full or errors and stutters. Various cheap Samsungs are.
 
draws up business plan
 
1:12 PM
If you have to worry about replacing expensive bags, well, obviously you're not rich enough to be one of the cools.
 
@Mitch my wife literally keeps some of her purses in other bags when she's not using them.
 
A bag of bags!
O bag of bags!
 
well, a bag of bag. one purse per bag.
 
@Cerberus I don't know ctual things. I'm just going from what you said re iPhones "at least they won't be crappy, like some cheap Androids,"
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Mmm that depends. I have this friend who is really into brands, but she has worn her Burberry coat since high school. She swears no other brand would have held out so long (now it's finally wearing out).
 
1:13 PM
Matryoshka bags?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Or mosaic/quilt bags, use pieces of old designer bags to make new ones
 
@Robusto I agree; but that doesn't mean they don't still believe that it will last longer.
 
reassesses business plan
@Robusto Exactly. Bags all the way down.
 
@Mitch The thing is that to some degree, under certain circumstances, if you're not allowed to consult an expert, it makes sense to buy an Iphone.
 
@Cerberus Well, there may be some truth to that. Often, high-end products use higher-quality materials. That may mean greater durability.
 
1:15 PM
At the very end, some lip balm, a used tissue and a paper clip. (wait how did the paper clip get in there?)
 
@Cerberus I think you need to see rich women in action before you render your final judgment on the matter. Women don't buy clothes because they're durable, at least not primarily for that reason.
 
@Cerberus It's not that consultants aren't allowed, they are just total nerds, and anyone fashionable enough wouldn't give them the time of day. Nerds are good for something I suppose like changing light bulbs or changing the channel on the remote other technology things
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yes. Many cheaper products are just as durable; but you can't tell in advance, so in a way it makes sense to buy the expensive product, because there is a greater chance that it might be durable. Of course reading up on products or consulting an expert is smarter, but people aren't smart.
 
I'm always annoyed at jeans, which are supposed to be rugged and durable, when the knees fade quickly and give out over a year.
 
@Robusto I always said it was only one factor. I think in most cases looking cool or aping friends is more important. But durability is part of the aura of a brand too, in many cases.
@Mitch Consultants, as in from McKinsey?
@Mitch Isn't it simply that other materials wear out sooner?
 
1:19 PM
@Cerberus And I'm saying I've never really seen an ad for women's clothing with a headline like "Built tough for tough situations!"
 
No, but ask the women.
 
In fact, fashion doesn't expect clothes to last beyond the next season.
 
Depends on the item.
I'm sure some of your women will tell you they expect the Louis Vuitton to be more durable than a cheap brand.
In a way, it is an excuse.
Rationalizing brand love.
 
I seldom believe what people tell me without applying some understanding of their motives first.
 
Well, as you see, I claim to have some understanding of their motives.
About durability, one part is rationalizing, the other some practical experiences, which may or may not be representative.
As to Iphones, I think my story about crappy Samsungs is less relevant in America.
Because you basically have no choice but to get an expensive phone in America, owing to the carrier's business plans, nobody there ever sees a cheap Samsung.
 
1:24 PM
@Cerberus I wonder how much expert data there is on the durability of expensive fashion items.
 
Right?
 
define "cheap samsung"
 
Under €100 in Europe.
I have heard many people complain about their crappy Samsung here.
 
Sure, you pay for the name.
 
Over here there are plenty of cheap smartphones. These are the ones given away free with a contract, when the expensive ones cost $200 with the contract.
 
1:27 PM
Or maybe under €150, I don't know.
@Robusto Those are still expensive smartphones, probably, if you buy them separate?
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 tweakers.net/categorie/215/smartphones/producten/… If you want to use a number of modern apps on the phones on the first couple of pages, you will probably have a bad experience compared to your friend's Galaxy or Iphone.
Take only the lack of storage. I hear so many people complaining about how their Samsung's 4GB of memory are full and they can't install any apps any more. I have to agree, that is an extremely crappy phone, in this day and age, where 16GB of storage costs maybe €7 max.
 
@Cerberus yeah I've never heard of those, except maybe Galaxy Ace. But we do have "cheap" samsungs here, and also cheap every-other-brand. Maybe not THAT cheap.
@Cerberus yeah, and you know what? installing updates to built-in apps doubles the storage required.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 How cheap, then?
 
One of the work phones I had, I think it was a sony xperia of some sort, had no room left to install Chrome on it, despite having no third-party apps installed.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Even to non-built-in apps?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 If you delete an app and reinstall it, do you normally get a new version requiring less space or do you have to go through the whole process again?
 
1:35 PM
@Robusto No, when you install third-party apps, there is only one copy
 
I think it only applies to apps that come pre-installed, that you can't uninstall.
 
but the factory-installed apps, the original version is never uninstalled
 
How about any versions in between the first and the last?
 
@Cerberus That right there is my single biggest complaint. WTF do I need with Verizon's NFL app?
 
afaik it only keeps the first and last
 
1:36 PM
@Robusto Root your phone and get rid of it!
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 OK.
 
I know, I know.
 
Good, good.
 
If you are running Android 5, rooting your phone may make it impossible for you to install OTA updates
it has for me.
I don't recall the problem before Android 5.
Luckily, I have a Nexus, so it's easy to install any version of the OS I want. I can install the latest version over the current one without wiping it and it's fine. Just takes time and requires plugging in to a PC.
 
OMG iOS 9 is now available for my iPad.
 
1:39 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yay!
@skillpatrol It may slow it down...
 
I guess I have to install it, right?
 
No...
You can delay installation.
First read up on what IOS 9 does to your particular model.
 
But, but, ... I'll keep getting this message?
 
Probably.
What Ipad do you have?
1? 2? 3?
 
Mini
3
 
1:44 PM
Last weekend of summer, folks. Drink it up.
 
Mini 3?
 
Yes
The latest mini
 
> Should work fine: iPhone 5, iPhone 5C, 5S, iPad 4 and later/iPad mini 2 and later

None of these should have any problems running iOS 9. They run iOS 8 comfortably. The only question, particularly for older iPhones, is whether the battery is up to the task.

In the past, battery problems have occured immediately after new software releases are common. They normally settle down after subsequent updates, or after a hard reset, but it might be worth waiting a few days before updating if you want to be careful.
I think their advice is sound: wait for a couple of days, then read up on other people's experiences.
 
@Cerberus we already cover the women stuff too
with a blanket
 
The tits?
 
1:47 PM
Thanks pal @Cerberus will do :-)
 
made of old Louis Chanel bags
@Cerberus Nope, the boobies
 
Good luck!
@Mitch Oh, the other birds.
 
Your dluck got stuck in the machine.
 
machine machine machine
 
More importantly, what happened to Pink Floyd between Meddle and Dark Side of the Moon. They were all trippy one year then all of a sudden Top 40. Like if Picasso went from doing three nosed, one-eyed is-that-a-nude s to making hyperrealistic sea-shores on Titan.
 
1:56 PM
@Mitch Wut?
 
It's relevant. Just follow the thread.
 
If you think Dark Side of the Moon wasn't trippy, then I suspect you never tripped.
 
I think hyperrealistic seashores on Titan are trippy but let's say more accessible.
but what ever words I'm using, there's a big difference, right?
 
How about hyperrealistic seashores in Titian?
 
OK that would work.
 
2:00 PM
IDK. I don't think Pink Floyd were ever trippier than in Piper at the Gates of Dawn, which is mostly a bunch of Syd Barrett songs. But they were never really "not trippy" (in my view) or pop-oriented. They've always lulled you into a state of disarming contemplation, whereupon they zing you with something profoundly disturbing.
 
It's not Barrett leaving because that happened many albums before.
 
jinx-ish
 
'm just talking about the general feel for the music. DSotM however trippy is commercial sounding, before not.
 
The "jam" songs that are identified with the "trippy phase" of PF—like "Set the Controls for the Heart of the Sun" and "Astronomy Domine"—were actually the exception. They were always trying to write ordinary songs in an extraordinary way.
 
Oh. or 'Echoes'
 
2:03 PM
Well, maybe the trippiest they got was the studio disc off of Umma Gumma.
 
that's what I'm talking about. umma gumma weird, DSotM not
 
@Mitch To a lesser extent, yes. I would add "Interstellar Overdrive" and a few others as well.
@Mitch I disagree. I just think DSotM finally crystallized a lot of their inchoate leanings, and longings.
 
umma gumma: cannot whistle to. DSotM, well if you can't whistle to it at least it is a whole lot closer
 
DSotM is mature Pink Floyd.
 
OK maybe that's it inchoate vs very choate.
 
2:05 PM
As is WYWH.
The Wall is a bit overripe Pink Floyd: still good, but not the apotheosis they were hoping for.
 
everything from DSotM is a recognizable sound that is different from before. WYWH animals, the Wall, uh, other stuff?
it's an apotheosis compared to the execrable final cut
 
DSotM antedates WYWH, Animals, The Wall.
 
listening to WYWH now (I love this youtubey thingy!)
 
WYWH is in my top 5 PF albums.
 
Right, DSotM was the first break.
 
2:08 PM
I would rate them this way:

DSotM
PatGoD
WYWH
The Wall
Animals
 
In other world news, I just got an email dated 'tomorrow'
 
But I have a fondness for many of the others.
 
broker being contacted now
@Robusto one of those is not like the others
 
Even in DSoT they had flashes of the old magic.
 
and that's what I am tlaaing about. Why is that (and I've already disallowed Syd Barrett as he answer even though that may be a big causation)
 
2:10 PM
@Mitch They are enough alike.
You have to appreciate what a seminal album PatGoD was. It was recorded and released in '67, and was miles beyond the other "psychedelic" albums of that year, like Sgt. Pepper and Their Satanic Majesties Request, and much less commercial (for good or ill).
 
PatGoD is like a different universe.
 
@Mitch Syd Barrett was always at the soul of the band in some capacity, even in his absence.
 
so maybe that's the answer anyway
 
He fathered the band, and they carried his DNA till the end.
 
2:14 PM
Syd Barrett really influenced everything til DSotM, then it was Waters mostly
 
feels dizzy all of a sudden
 
feels nauseous
 
@Mitch Do not discount how much Barrett influenced Waters. At some point the son takes over for the father.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Wretched excess?
 
breathes slowly and thinks of good times
@Robusto Sure, I'm just trying to find an explanation (though there just may not be one) of the great difference between before and after DSotM
@Robusto The Onion?
 
breathe, breathe in the air / don't be afraid to care
 
2:17 PM
fears caring. holds breath
 
@Mitch Esquire Dubious Achievement Awards.
@Mitch The difference is pretty obvious. Roger Waters finally was able to pick up the slack as a songwriter. He had learned his craft.
 
Microsoft has a lot of great people working for them. But somehow they just ruin everything good. for example Sharepoint. which, however bad you may already feel about it, ruins life
 
And I think that was for two reasons: one, he learned more how to construct songs, and two, the collaboration/competition with Gilmour gave him the impetus to write.
 
@Robusto Waters = slacker. noted
 
I'm talking about the slack created by Barrett zoning out.
And I think Waters finally did become a better songwriter than Barrett. It just took him a while.
> That cat's something I can't explain.
 
2:24 PM
I don't think Barrett was zoning out as much as listening more intently to his own inner creative voice. or to put it another way, dealing with a brain tumor
 
> Apple is a known quantity, a quality product, an aspirational item. Get an iWhatever and your elderly relatives who don't know it from a toaster will be impressed. Apple doesn't need to get down and dirty with specific numbers; their customers Don't. Care.
 
2:54 PM
in Lounge<C++> on Stack Overflow Chat, 12 mins ago, by Anastasiya Asadullayeva
J’ai la France en moi. Je n’y peux rien. C’est une passion. Je peux essayer de la domestiquer. Mais le feu incandescent est là. #NSParisien
 
3:18 PM
Hi mates
I want to know what's the meaning of mirrorlessrumors in the following phrase:
> (via Canon Japan via mirrorlessrumors)
 
the above-mentioned phrase have been inserted in the bottom of a text
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 -> It's a name?!
So, Why they don't have write that with the CAPITAL CASE?
 
yeah. It's saying that something came from some place by way of another place.
 
e.g. Mirrorlessrumors instead of mirrorlessrumors
 
because it's probably the name of a blog and blogs don't care about that sort of thing.
Names don't always follow rules.
 
3:24 PM
Someone has told me that its meaning is about Camera Sorts.
The texts about a Shooting Camera:
> This is ISO 4,560,000 with Canon’s Crazy New Camera
Back in July, Canon announced an ultra-high-sensitivity camera that has a ridiculously high max ISO of over 4,000,000. If you’ve been wondering what the camera can capture, check out the eye-opening sample video above that Canon just released.
The ME20F-SH features an EF lens mount and the ability to capture “high-quality” video even in situations in which the human eye can’t see anything. Its minimum subject illumination is 0.0005 lux, or the equivalent of ISO 4,000,000+.
 
yeah, the context doesn't change any of what I said.
Here is mirrorlessrumours: mirrorlessrumors.com
it reported on something that Canon Japan reported. Then that article you posted repeated what mirrorlessrumours said.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 -> Thank you mate :)
 
Someone could come here, read this chat transcript, then write about the ME20F-SH via elu chat via mirrorlessrumours via canon japan.
Furthermore, evidence from the site itself suggests that they prefer MirrorlessRumours.com as their name, which would mean that the article you posted just misspelled it.
 
whathisquestionis
 
@MRS1367 You are right that names should normally be capitalised. But especially informal websites don't always stick to the rule.
 
3:40 PM
@Cerberus -> Thank you
 
That’s hardly the only orthographic sin rampant in that domain; running together words without spaces is another common form of typographic injustice committed in the name of marketing.
But what I was really wondering is whether @MRS1367 understood what was meant by the term mirrorless in the context of electronic cameras.
Or rather, whether that was their question.
 
@tchrist But also in the name of URLs.
 
@Cerberus Which brook no whitespace nor casing. True.
> The Internet standards (Requests for Comments) for protocols mandate that component hostname labels may contain only the ASCII letters 'a' through 'z' (in a case-insensitive manner), the digits '0' through '9', and the hyphen ('-').
> The original specification of hostnames in RFC 952, mandated that labels could not start with a digit or with a hyphen, and must not end with a hyphen. However, a subsequent specification (RFC 1123) permitted hostname labels to start with digits. No other symbols, punctuation characters, or white space are permitted.
Some folks use hyphens, but many do not.
 
But Chinese URLs are now possible, aren't they?
 
Quite so.
 
3:55 PM
@Cerberus any unicode, right?
 
@Mitch Yeah.
 
> User's expectations and use of the Internet have moved on since then, and there is now a growing need to enable use of characters from any language in Web addresses. A Web address in your own language and alphabet is easier to create, memorize, transcribe, interpret, guess, and relate to.
 
@tchrist But you said a–z and no other symbols.
@tchrist Alphabet?
 
@Cerberus Those are the original Rules for these things.
 
3:56 PM
Script.
 
@Cerberus Think Greek words transliterated into the Latin script versus those written in the Greek script.
> A standard approach to dealing with multilingual domain names was agreed by the IETF in March 2003. It is defined in RFCs 3490, 3491, 3492 and 3454, and is based on Unicode 3.2. One refers to this using the term Internationalized Domain Name or IDN.
That’s our novus ordo seclorum.
 
02:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

« first day (1772 days earlier)      last day (3143 days later) »