« first day (1181 days earlier)      last day (3758 days later) » 

2:02 PM
 
@Reg That’ll learn ’m.
 
ZZ top of the pops.
 
0
A: Use of LaTeX (MathJax) in E.L.U

tchristIf all you want are special symbols, then Unicode v6.1 has 940 code points with the General Category of Math Symbol and 2,195 code points with the General Category of Other Symbol. (I haven’t tallied more recent releases, let alone the impending Unicode v7.0 release.) I’ve a hunch you might find...

I only listed the Math ones, though. :)
 
Yeah my thinking exactly.
 
And the screen shot idea solves the harder cases.
 
2:06 PM
He might also want to have those cursive variable names, but who knows.
 
Oh.
Right.
 
maths deals with snakes! ⨌
 
Those are legion.
Those are from Block = Mathematical_Alphanumeric_Symbols
They require 4 bytes to represent them both in UTF-8 and in UTF-16.
Which means they count as two “characters” to SE-the-Dumb.
I wonder how they sort. Mmm.
 
so they've got more character than most
 
It’s cause the SE idiot C# programmers count char units not code points.
 
2:11 PM
What is a byte? Is it, like, a part of a terabyte? I've never heard of it.
 
It is a bite, but why?
 
Yeah why would you bite a terabyte?
It's like all electric on your teeth and all.
 
Why electric?
You can make a terabyte in bamboo.
 
Ok done: astral characters duly added:
 
I actually don't know why they put electricticity into computers.
 
2:15 PM
𝟎 𝟘 𝟶 𝟬 𝟢 𝟏 𝟙 𝟷 𝟭 𝟣 𝟐 𝟚 𝟸 𝟮 𝟤 𝟑 𝟛 𝟹 𝟯 𝟥 𝟒 𝟜 𝟺 𝟰 𝟦 𝟓 𝟝 𝟻 𝟱 𝟧 𝟔 𝟞 𝟼
𝟲 𝟨 𝟕 𝟟 𝟽 𝟳 𝟩 𝟖 𝟠 𝟾 𝟴 𝟪 𝟗 𝟡 𝟿 𝟵 𝟫 𝐀 𝕬 𝖆 𝑨 𝒂 𝓐 𝓪 𝐚 𝔸 𝕒 𝔄 𝔞 𝐴 𝑎 𝙰 𝚊
𝗔 𝘼 𝙖 𝗮 𝖠 𝘈 𝘢 𝖺 𝒜 𝒶 𝐁 𝕭 𝖇 𝑩 𝒃 𝓑 𝓫 𝐛 𝔹 𝕓 𝔅 𝔟 𝐵 𝑏 𝙱 𝚋 𝗕 𝘽 𝙗 𝗯 𝖡 𝘉 𝘣
𝖻 𝒷 𝐂 𝕮 𝖈 𝑪 𝒄 𝓒 𝓬 𝐜 𝕔 𝔠 𝐶 𝑐 𝙲 𝚌 𝗖 𝘾 𝙘 𝗰 𝖢 𝘊 𝘤 𝖼 𝒞 𝒸 𝐃 𝕯 𝖉 𝑫 𝒅 𝓓 𝓭
𝐝 𝔻 𝕕 𝔇 𝔡 𝐷 𝑑 𝙳 𝚍 𝗗 𝘿 𝙙 𝗱 𝖣 𝘋 𝘥 𝖽 𝒟 𝒹 𝐄 𝕰 𝖊 𝑬 𝒆 𝓔 𝓮 𝐞 𝔼 𝕖 𝔈 𝔢 𝐸 𝑒
𝙴 𝚎 𝗘 𝙀 𝙚 𝗲 𝖤 𝘌 𝘦 𝖾 𝐅 𝕱 𝖋 𝑭 𝒇 𝓕 𝓯 𝐟 𝔽 𝕗 𝔉 𝔣 𝐹 𝑓 𝙵 𝚏 𝗙 𝙁 𝙛 𝗳 𝖥 𝘍 𝘧
 
Perhaps something to do with scientists.
@tchrist huhuh, you said ass trail.
 
That’s when the toilet paper is trailing behind you as though you were Ariadne.
 
Ariadne? Is that that philosophy of Hitler's?
 
I don't see ℕ in there
 
Nobody ever needs ℕ.
 
2:18 PM
macbook# uniprops  ℕ
U+2115 ‹ℕ› \N{DOUBLE-STRUCK CAPITAL N}
    \w \pL \p{LC} \p{L_} \p{L&} \p{Lu}
    All Any Alnum Alpha Alphabetic Assigned InLetterlikeSymbols Cased Cased_Letter LC Changes_When_NFKC_Casefolded CWKCF Common Zyyy
       Lu L Gr_Base Grapheme_Base Graph GrBase ID_Continue IDC ID_Start IDS Letter L_ Letterlike_Symbols Uppercase_Letter Math Print
       Upper Uppercase Word XID_Continue XIDC XID_Start XIDS X_POSIX_Alnum X_POSIX_Alpha X_POSIX_Graph X_POSIX_Print X_POSIX_Upper
       X_POSIX_Word
 
It's only natural to use ℕ
 
Nobody ever is natural.
 
Oh FFS I did char prop GC=Sm not char prop Math.
And these are . . . different.
 
Gesundheit.
 
Once more into the beach.
 
2:21 PM
Doctor doctor, I char prop gee see equal assem not char prop math.
Here, have a Valium.
 
Ok, if you add just char prop Math, you get 2,310 code points with a queer sort: they don’t even end with Omega any longer.
𝟎 𝟘 𝟶 𝟬 𝟢 𝟏 𝟙 𝟷 𝟭 𝟣 𝟐 𝟚 𝟸 𝟮 𝟤 𝟑 𝟛 𝟹 𝟯 𝟥 𝟒 𝟜 𝟺 𝟰 𝟦 𝟓 𝟝 𝟻 𝟱 𝟧 𝟔 𝟞 𝟼
𝟲 𝟨 𝟕 𝟟 𝟽 𝟳 𝟩 𝟖 𝟠 𝟾 𝟴 𝟪 𝟗 𝟡 𝟿 𝟵 𝟫 ⦟ ≌ ≊ ≈ ⩯ ⨿ 𝐀 𝕬 𝖆 𝑨 𝒂 𝓐 𝓪 𝐚 𝔸 𝕒
𝔄 𝔞 𝐴 𝑎 𝙰 𝚊 𝗔 𝘼 𝙖 𝗮 𝖠 𝘈 𝘢 𝖺 𝒜 𝒶 ⟑ ∠ ⦞ ⦤ ⥀ ∳ ⟲ ⨑ ↶ ≐ ≆ ⩰ ≅ ≒ ⤶
⤷ ⤵ ⤴ ⊦ ∗ ≃ ∵ ≬ ⧹ ⧸ ⧓ ● ⧭ ♣ ◆ ⧪ ▾ ▼ ⧗ ◀ ◢ ⧫ ◾ ◼ ▰ ▶ ♠ ■ ★ ◤ ▴ ▲ ▮
𝐁 𝕭 𝖇 𝑩 𝒃 𝓑 𝓫 𝐛 𝔹 𝕓 𝔅 𝔟 𝐵 𝑏 𝙱 𝚋 𝗕 𝘽 𝙗 𝗯 𝖡 𝘉 𝘣 𝖻 𝒷 ⤻ ⌡ ⎵ ⋈ ⧑ ⧒ ℬ
∙ ℭ ℂ ⁀ ⦼ ⊛ ⦿ ⊝ ⨸ ⊘ ⊙ ⊜ ⧁ ⦺ ⧀ ⊖ ⨶ ⦷ ⦹ ⊕ ⦸ ⊚ ⊗ ⦶ ⦾ ⦵ ◐ ◒ ◑ ⧂ ⦻ ⧃ ◓
⨐ ^ ⥁ ∲ ⟳ ∱ ↷ ⩍ ⫏ ⫑ ⫐ ⫒ ⩌ ⩐ 𝐂 𝕮 𝖈 𝑪 𝒄 𝓒 𝓬 𝐜 𝕔 𝔠 𝐶 𝑐 𝙲 𝚌 𝗖 𝘾 𝙘 𝗰 𝖢
 
That's some aleph shit.
 
Yeah, apparently the Hebrews go after the Greeks.
 
Apparently, it's from Omega to Aleph.
 
I just had an argument about zero being a "natural" number >8(
 
2:23 PM
Well.
 
With a math prof
 
Customers who liked arguing whether zero was a number also liked arguing whether black was a color.
 
he got mad and left
 
Sounds like a math prof alright.
 
u maths, prof?
 
2:25 PM
he comes to the math chat room
 
Zero is an imaginary number. Discuss.
 
all numbers are imaginary. I can imagine any of them.
 
@tchrist Hey I can see all of those.
 
Oh right. So can I.
 
@RegDwigнt You're an imaginary hippo.
 
2:27 PM
I wonder just how many I can see at home.
 
𝟎 𝟘 𝟶 𝟬 𝟢 𝟏 𝟙 𝟷 𝟭 𝟣 𝟐 𝟚 𝟸 𝟮 𝟤 𝟑 𝟛 𝟹 𝟯 𝟥 𝟒 𝟜 𝟺 𝟰 𝟦 𝟓 𝟝 𝟻 𝟱 𝟧 𝟔 𝟞 𝟼 𝟲 𝟨 𝟕 𝟟 𝟽 𝟳 𝟩
𝟖 𝟠 𝟾 𝟴 𝟪 𝟗 𝟡 𝟿 𝟵 𝟫 ⦟ ≌ ≊ ≈ ⩯ ⨿ 𝐀 𝕬 𝖆 𝑨 𝒂 𝓐 𝓪 𝐚 𝔸 𝕒 𝔄 𝔞 𝐴 𝑎 𝙰 𝚊 𝗔 𝘼 𝙖 𝗮 𝖠 𝘈 𝘢 𝖺
𝒜 𝒶 ⟑ ∠ ⦞ ⦤ ⥀ ∳ ⟲ ⨑ ↶ ≐ ≆ ⩰ ≅ ≒ ؆ ؇ 𞻱 𞻰 ؈ ⤶ ⤷ ⤵ ⤴ ⊦ ∗ ≃ ∵ ≬ ⧹ ⧸ ⧓ ● ⧭ ♣ ◆ ⧪ ▾ ▼
⧗ ◀ ◢ ⧫ ◾ ◼ ▰ ▶ ♠ ■ ★ ◤ ▴ ▲ ▮ 𝐁 𝕭 𝖇 𝑩 𝒃 𝓑 𝓫 𝐛 𝔹 𝕓 𝔅 𝔟 𝐵 𝑏 𝙱 𝚋 𝗕 𝘽 𝙗 𝗯 𝖡 𝘉 𝘣 𝖻 𝒷
⤻ ⏟ ⌡ ⏝ ⎵ ⏡ ⋈ ⧑ ⧒ ℬ ∙ ℭ ℂ ⁀ ⦼ ⊛ ⦿ ⊝ ⨸ ⊘ ⊙ ⊜ ⧁ ⦺ ⧀ ⊖ ⨶ ⦷ ⦹ ⊕ ⦸ ⊚ ⊗ ⦶ ⦾ ⦵ ◐ ◒ ◑ ⧂
What about those ones?
 
There are three I cannot see.
 
@Cerberus spake an imaginary dog on an imaginary network using pixels of an imaginary color.
 
Hey!
 
how are we ever going to accept the negative numbers without 0?
 
2:28 PM
No need to rub it in.
Yes, I am in a weaker position.
 
we need 0
 
@skullpatrol You speak nonsense.
 
I don't see 𞻱 𞻰, and anything after the four Hebrews: 𞸢 𞸂 𞺂 𞹢 𞹂
𞺧 𞸇 𞸧 𞺇 𞹧 𞹇 𞺷 𞸷 𞸗 𞺗 𞹷 𞹗 𞸃 𞺣 𞺃 𞺸 𞺘 𞸘 𞺳 𞺓 𞸓 𞺦 𞺆 𞸆 𞺮 𞸮 𞺎 𞸎 𞹮 𞹎 𞺴 𞸴 𞺔 𞸔 𞹴 𞹔 𞺱 𞸱 𞺑 𞸑
𞹱 𞹑 𞸙 𞺹 𞸹 𞺙 𞹹 𞹙 𞺨 𞺈 𞹨 𞸈 𞺺 𞺚 𞹺 𞸚 𞸏 𞺯 𞸯 𞺏 𞹯 𞹏 𞺻 𞸛 𞸻 𞺛 𞹻 𞹛 𞺰 𞸐 𞸰 𞺐 𞹰 𞸞 𞹾 𞸟 𞹟 𞺲 𞸲 𞺒
𞸒 𞹲 𞹒 𞸪 𞸊 𞹪 𞺫 𞸫 𞸋 𞺋 𞹋 𞺬 𞸬 𞺌 𞸌 𞹬 𞺭 𞸭 𞺍 𞸍 𞹭 𞹍 𞸝 𞹝 𞸤 𞺄 𞹤 𞺥 𞺅 𞸅 𞺩 𞸩 𞺉 𞹩 𞹉 𞸉
 
@skullpatrol What is this circle?
 
@RegDwigнt The Greeks go after the Latins, the Hebrews go after the Greeks, and the Arabs go after the Hebrews. Of course.
 
2:29 PM
@RegDwigнt Uhh I can see none of those!
What are you doing?
 
@Cerberus that is what I am saying, yes.
 
But I could see almost all of Tchrist's.
 
No you couldn't.
These are of Tchrist's.
His message is long. There's a scrollbar.
I also can't see the ⟍.
 
Oh, wait.
 
U+1EE00 ‭ 𞸀 ARABIC MATHEMATICAL ALEF
U+1EE01 ‭ 𞸁 ARABIC MATHEMATICAL BEH
U+1EE02 ‭ 𞸂 ARABIC MATHEMATICAL JEEM
U+1EE03 ‭ 𞸃 ARABIC MATHEMATICAL DAL
U+1EE05 ‭ 𞸅 ARABIC MATHEMATICAL WAW
U+1EE06 ‭ 𞸆 ARABIC MATHEMATICAL ZAIN
U+1EE07 ‭ 𞸇 ARABIC MATHEMATICAL HAH
U+1EE08 ‭ 𞸈 ARABIC MATHEMATICAL TAH
U+1EE09 ‭ 𞸉 ARABIC MATHEMATICAL YEH
U+1EE0A ‭ 𞸊 ARABIC MATHEMATICAL KAF
U+1EE0B ‭ 𞸋 ARABIC MATHEMATICAL LAM
 
2:30 PM
So together with 𞻱 𞻰, that makes three, probably the same three you didn't see.
 
𞻱 𞻰 ⏟ ⏝ ⏡ ○⃦ ○⃮ ○⃭ ○⃫ ○⃥ ○⃯ ○⃬
I have trouble with all of those
 
Plus the rest which is below the fold.
 
@RegDwigнt I had not unfolded his line. I can't see the last block of characters.
 
@tchrist goes to show that Arabs and maths just don't mix.
@Cerberus QED.
 
@RegDwigнt Algewhat?
 
2:31 PM
Then the two if us can't see the same set.
 
and a bajillion others I didn't notice until Reg pointed out the scroll bar
 
@tchrist Algen.
 
I think the problem is using the word "natural" number
 
Zebra. Algezebra.
 
@MattЭллен I can't even select them: it selects all sorts of characters above and beneath my cursor when I try.
 
2:31 PM
Algeℕ.
 
@RegDwigнt Yes. Mystery solved.
 
German for Alga𝔼.
 
@Cerberus That’s because they have the right to left bidirectional character property.
 
Bi the bi.
 
ℕatural number
 
2:33 PM
And I stripped off the overrides that I did in my linewise U+ paste above.
 
sideways Aries ⊱
 
’Tisn’t!
That’s a Star Wars fighter.
 
@tchrist Yeah? That makes me select characters two rows up and down?
 
so 0 is unnatural?
 
But not laterally?
 
2:33 PM
@skullpatrol Yes, ℕatural number, but ℤero. QED.
 
@skullpatrol That blasphemous circle again.
 
Zero is a natural number flipped 90 degrees.
 
@Cerberus ¿Quién sabrá? You use ancientware.
 
Firefox 25.
 
I can’t find an analemma.
 
2:34 PM
I have never had any problems with right-to-left.
 
FF 26.0 here.
 
heh
 
6 mins ago, by skullpatrol
how are we ever going to accept the negative numbers without 0?
 
@RegDwigнt They update every minute nowadays.
 
Dec 9 '13 at 13:57, by RegDwigнt
By trying really hard and succeeding.
 
2:35 PM
-1, -2, -3...
 
@skullpatrol By denying their orthodoxy.
Stop it! You make mine eyes hurt!
 
Dec 9 '13 at 13:59, by tchrist
Eyelidectomy is such an ugly thing.
 
U+1EE00 ‹𞸀› \N{ARABIC MATHEMATICAL ALEF}
    \w \pL \p{Lo}
    All Any Alnum Alpha Alphabetic Arab Arabic Arabic_Math Arabic_Mathematical_Alphabetic_Symbols InArabicMath Assigned Is_Arabic
       ID_Continue Is_IDC Changes_When_NFKC_Casefolded CWKCF L Lo Gr_Base Grapheme_Base Graph GrBase IDC ID_Start IDS Letter
       Other_Letter Math Print Word XID_Continue XIDC XID_Start XIDS X_POSIX_Alnum X_POSIX_Alpha X_POSIX_Graph X_POSIX_Print
       X_POSIX_Word
    Age=6.1 Age=V6_1 Script=Arabic Block=Arabic_Mathematical_Alphabetic_Symbols Bidi_Class=AL Bidi_Class=Arabic_Letter BC=AL
 
♈⊱
 
NOTA BENE: Bidi_Class=Arabic_Letter
 
2:36 PM
...,-4, -3, -2, -1, ?, 1, 2, 3, 4,...
 
1, 2, 3, 4 is what you need.
 
@skullpatrol just leave it blank. we'll come back to it later
 
what is half way between -1 and 1?
 
@RegDwigнt Those were intended to be included in the not-good. Or maybe they deserve to feel offended XD
 
@skullpatrol That doesn't matter
 
2:37 PM
What's halfway between Atlantis and France?
 
And BC=AL goes the ‮other way
 
> There is no universal agreement about whether to include zero in the set of natural numbers: some define the natural numbers to be the positive integers {1, 2, 3, ...}, while for others the term designates the non-negative integers {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}. The former definition is the traditional one, with the latter definition having first appeared in the 19th century.
@skullpatrol you're arguing about whether to apply a label to a number. It doesn't meaningfully impact number theory.
 
I love discussing number theory in ELU chat.
Strawberry fields forever.
 
But it is neither positive nor negative.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 surely if an equation works for the original N but not the N with 0 in it, that's important?
 
2:40 PM
-1, ? , 1
halfway is no sign
 
there's no sign of it
 
@MattЭллен It's just a matter of describing a set. Sometimes it's convenient to include zero, other times not. As long as everyone agrees up front what they mean by "Natural Numbers", communication is preserved.
 
@tchrist Strawberry fields?
 
@skullpatrol Are you claiming that zero is positive?
 
@Cerberus Fields, rings, groups, and I forget the other.
 
2:41 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 yes, but it would be easier to agree on one way
 
In general, Microsoft’s disapproval is usually a strong indication that you’re doing something right. — tchrist 1 min ago
 
I am not cognisant of this trope.
 
@tchrist Can we get their disapproval of natural numbers, and put this to rest?
 
Apropos de rôle.
 
Or topos, or whatever it be.
 
2:42 PM
@Cerberus Oh. Sorry. It’s called abstract algebra.
No, really.
Not funnin’.
 
Unbeknownst to me.
 
has anyone not heard of the zeroth law of thermodynamics?
 
In abstract algebra, a field is a nonzero commutative ring that contains a multiplicative inverse for every nonzero element, or equivalently a ring whose nonzero elements form an abelian group under multiplication. As such it is an algebraic structure with notions of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division satisfying the appropriate abelian group equations and distributive law. The most commonly used fields are the field of real numbers, the field of complex numbers, and the field of rational numbers, but there are also finite fields, fields of functions, algebraic number fi...
 
@skullpatrol isn't that "don't talk about thermodynamics"?
 
I know they have fields...but why strawberries?
 
2:44 PM
> As such it is an algebraic structure with notions of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division satisfying the appropriate abelian group equations and distributive law. The most commonly used fields are the field of real numbers, the field of complex numbers, and the field of rational numbers,
 
or is it "collect underpants"?
 
That’s the relevant part.
@Cerberus I was hungry.
For the tweedle beetles’ battle.
 
!!wiki zeroth law of thermodynamics
 
!!youtube strawberry fields
 
2:45 PM
The zeroth law of thermodynamics states that if two thermodynamic systems are each in thermal equilibrium with a third, then all three are in thermal equilibrium with each other. Two systems are said to be in the relation of thermal equilibrium if they are linked by a wall permeable only to heat, and do not change over time. As a convenience of language, systems are sometimes also said to be in a relation of thermal equilibrium if they are not linked so as to be able to transfer heat to each other, but would not do so if they were connected by a wall permeable only to heat. The physical...
 
There you go, make her earn her keep!
 
we can use 0 to count so it is "natural" to call it a natural number
 
@tchrist Ah, that explains it.
No cheese fields?
 
In this weather?
 
Cheese doesn't grow no trees. You're thinking of spaghetti
 
2:47 PM
The cows dry up and lay no cheese.
 
@skullpatrol we can use 0.5 to count, if we want.
 
Ah.
But fields normally don't have many trees.
 
@MattЭллен yes
 
@Cerberus so why are you thinking of spaghetti?
 
An oak savanna is a type of savanna, or lightly forested grassland, where oaks (Quercus spp.) are the dominant trees. These savannas were maintained historically through wildfires set by lightning or humans, grazing, low precipitation, and/or poor soil. Although there are pockets of oak savanna almost anywhere in North America where oaks are present, there are three major oak savanna areas: 1) California and Oregon in the west; 2) Southwestern United States and Mexico; and 3) the prairie/forest border of the Midwest. There are also small areas of oak savannas in other parts of the world. ...
 
2:48 PM
You're thinking of gaarden/-(c?h?)ards.
 
orchards
 
Oaks are quirky.
Or querci.
 
@tchrist You would call something a field where they specifically cultivate trees?
@MattЭллен I know, but which part if etymologically part of the word?
 
Ha, I once wrote a story where the protagonists were trees, and one was an oak that lived in an oak savanna
 
hi @cornbreadninja麵包忍者
 
2:50 PM
@Cerberus Who says fields are only those things which Man has manicured with his cultivars?
 
@skullpatrol howdy.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Oh, that was the one with the trouble with the maples, right?
 
Oak! Savanna, do not cry for me. I come from Alabama, with my banjo on my knee.
 
@tchrist the oaks are just too greedy, and they grab up all the light.
 
jinx
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 I'm sorry. I don't know what you mean. Use the !!/help command to learn more.
 
@tchrist No, there were no maples in it.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 It’s more peaceable that way. No hatchets, ax, or saw.
 
Time to make the donuts coffee.
 
The background story was an ongoing war between the grasslands and the evergreen forests. A fungus was afflicting the forest trees and they had to venture into the grasslands to infiltrate the oak society to find a cure.
The trees and other plants were "animate" (fungi too, to some degree) and the "animals" were inanimate. I had to, er, bend the rules a bit.
 
2:53 PM
And yet, trees cannot live without the fungal kingdom.
Symbiotes. Roots.
Huorns.
 
Oh the last bit is interesting.
How did you go about making animals inanimate?
 
Steal their souls.
 
Yeah but they still move around and things.
 
Sin ánima they become mere zombies.
 
They are animated for all meanings of animated.
 
2:55 PM
Well, the plants are free to move around. The animals are rooted to the ground.
 
Oh.
 
And yeah, some of the plants/fungi are allies and some are enemies.
 
if they're of power 3 or less you can cast Runner's bane
 
You can't think too hard about it all or it starts to come apart at the seams.
 
How did the animals feed?
Did they wait for a plant to come around and sacrifice itself?
 
2:57 PM
I never addressed how the animals worked.
 
how did root vegetables work?
 
This is why I didn't let any of you guys read the story.
 
Weird, Canada is all but barren of oak savanna.
I think it’s because there, the cold conifers and brusque birches have won the battle.
As mounts the altitude or latitude, so go the deciduous angiosperms.
 
3:00 PM
Tchrist, your comment really is cryptic.
He writes two possibilities, and you say "It's an error"... so we have to guess which of them is the error? — GEdgar 4 mins ago
 
@RegDwigнt I’m a one-register answer machine. I’ve neither stack nor queue for questions. I answered the last one asked.
 
@tchrist It's the other way around: fields are not what man cultivates trees on. That's all I was saying.
 
Does anybody know the formula to convert gains in altitude to gains in latitude?
Answer: you swap the first two letters.
But truly, there is one.
I forget what it is.
It’s like this much altitude gain equates to this much latitude gain.
I know that you lose 3-5 F° per kilofoot gain in altitude.
 
@tchrist I have edited your comment accordingly. Do cross-check.
 
3:07 PM
Actually it’s 2 °C per 300 meaters, but who’s counting?
@RegDwigнt Yes, right. Thanks much. I lacked the magic.
 
Yeah.
 
It’s snowing here. Again and again and again.
 
Oh, we got rain the other week.
Right after I told you how we had not had rain for decades.
 
15.5 F feels like 15 F. Talk about splitting hairs.
 
3:09 PM
Yeah.
It’s because they’re doing internal calculations in C I imagine.
But since it’s CGI, it could also be Perl.
 
Gosh, that's like all the data anyone could ever possibly need, not need, and everything else.
 
Wait, how come they didn’t covert the Wind Direction into metric???
 
Though I'm missing the current measurements of each grass straw, in inches, centimeters, German elbows, and Russian sazhens.
 
Shouldn’t 335 degrees be 93% of a circle?
 
In Kelvin or Réaumur? Instructions unclear.
 
3:14 PM
@RegDwigнt It’s the National Center for Atmospheric Research — what do you expect?
 
@tchrist less numbers and more research.
Like, "because of this, you should not be doing business today", or "the straws are aligned such that you should marry someone named Susan yesterday".
Then I would even consider subscribing to their newsletter.
5
Q: What do the letters ï and ô mean?

David Voyance Possible Duplicate: What is the distinction between “role” and “rôle” [with a circumflex]? What is the significance of the “ô” character in “rôle” in this work? What is the standard rule for using or not using hyphen and diaeresis on the words like reelect , reexamine, and cooperate? “...

Haha, now it looks as if it was tchrist who asked that question.
 
!!jquery load
 
@JSBձոգչ api.jquery.com/load
 
3:35 PM
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 is this a fun game? Should I try it?
 
3:56 PM
@KitFox yes!
 
Why does fair weather translate to fine weather in Eurospeak? Is this some Teutonic barbarism?
 
@tchrist Because fair weather means good weather.
Unlike in other contexts such as grading, where fair means "less than good".
 
4:25 PM
is "fair to middling" reduplication, or is fair better than average, there?
is reduplication what I mean? what's the term that covers things like "joint and several"?
 
4:45 PM
@MattЭллен In that context, fair is better than middling.
 
@RegDwigнt There\'s hardly any time left!
@MattЭллен dammit, now I'm thinking of spaghetti.
 
5:24 PM
@MattЭллен Pleonasm, or even tautology, is the word you meant.
And I agree with Ed that fair is better than middling.
 
Thurber would have drawn a pleosaur and a tautosaur, if he'd thought of it.
 
I would probably read pleosaur as "navigating lizard"...
 
5:45 PM
Are unnamed sources not authorized to speak?
 
Umm.
Context?
 
Glad you asked.
0
Q: Unnamed sources: Are they not authorized to speak?

Glen The UdderboatA simple Google search reveals that many newspaper articles do not name their sources (quite often "officials"), [...] because they are not authorized to speak [...] So, taken somewhat literally, and with perhaps some naiveté, this seems to imply that such articles besides their main topic ...

Is there a Journalism SE?
 
@GlenTheUdderboat An anonymous source may have a reason other than "unauthorized" to request anonymity.
 
So, did a journalist in such case just write down a blatant lie (without checking it)?
 
I don't think anybody knows the proportion of people who are generally not supposed to say what they say to journalists compared to those who are. It seems fair to suggest that there will be significant numbers of both. In many cases, the "revelation" seems contrary to the interests of the party reported on; then it seems reasonable to assume that the employee was not supposed to talk. In other cases, anything is possible... — Cerberus 7 secs ago
 
5:53 PM
"The law enforcement officials, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak about evidence found at the scene [...]"
 
@GlenTheUdderboat That seems like a good reason for anonymity, even though it may still have been their bosses who encouraged them to speak up.
 
how is it called again when you apply by your own to an enterprise without precise job offer?
 
"Last spring, an FBI agent asked state Sen. Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) if Solis had solicited his support for the fundraiser, according to the two sources, who requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak about the case."
 
@cyril An open application?
At least that's what it's called in Dutch.
 
hmm, I will try that
 
5:56 PM
@GlenTheUdderboat Is this question on-topic for skeptics? What is the notable claim?
 
I think there was an expression like opportunist application (not this word but close)
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 It's claimed thousands of times.
 
@GlenTheUdderboat Oh, you're skeptical that people tell reports things they're not officially allowed to reveal?
 
An example. Note that the Accor Group is French, though.
 
@Cerberus perfect
 
5:58 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 If there turns up a journalists' handbook saying: always use "because they are not authorised", even if it is blatantly false.
 
@cyril There may be different terms in different countries/markets!
 
"candidature spontanée"
 
Ah, oui.
 
@GlenTheUdderboat How could you possibly know one way or another?
There are dozens of plausible scenarios where a source might not be officially authorized to speak but chooses to do so anyway.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 The only criterion you have is, "is this revelation contrary to the interests of the bosses, or the opposite?".
 
5:59 PM
@GlenTheUdderboat Yes, it has happened.
 

« first day (1181 days earlier)      last day (3758 days later) »