« first day (1180 days earlier)      last day (3748 days later) » 

8:04 PM
You could go clear. I do that sometimes.
 
If you ever go clear, you never go near.
 
Go clear
Never go near
Go from the rear
Go without fear
My poem of the day, lol.
 
Lol
 
Eat a pear
Why doesn't that work?
 
Poetically?
 
8:12 PM
@GlenTheUdderboat Because normally it's "eat disappear".
 
Poetically, it's obviously very good. But it doesn't seem to rhyme.
 
Neinneinneinneinneinneinnein!
 
I think he has a point.
 
Wow that was much funnier than expected.
Yay the is question was briefly no. 3 on the MultiCollider.
At last, something that's actually got to do with language and not sex.
Down a few spots again, though.
Still oscillating.
 
@RegDwigнt Where's that?
 
8:22 PM
3
Q: What is a reasonable definition for "is"? What is the rule for inserting it in a sentence?

craig0990I am learning a foreign language with the help of an excellent tutor who speaks enough English for me to be able to understand them. The deal is, essentially, I correct their English if they teach/correct Malaysian. Today I got a bit stuck. They provided the following statement: That not exa...

Or you mean the MultiCollider?
The MultiCollider is that thing with "hot network questions" on the right-hand side of most pages.
Used to be a drop-down menu in the top left corner, whence the name. It actually collided.
 
Who ever uses that anyway?
 
I always wonder who ever uses the SE site at all.
But apparently, billions of people per second.
Like the Wikipedia start page. You know, the actual www.wikipedia.org.
 
The what site?
 
I only ever navigate there by accident, but apparently I'm very special.
 
@RegDwigнt Never seen that one, is it like google.com?
 
8:25 PM
It's better than google.com in some ways and worse in others.
 
I think those pages are for the inefficient.
Like your mother.
 
Read: the majority.
 
No offence.
 
My mother can't tell a difference between an email address and a modem.
 
In fact, your mother might be a wizz kid.
 
8:26 PM
No offence, mom.
 
Ah.
 
That? Not exactly correct.
 
The first time my mother wanted to use a computer, she just sat down in front of the screen and said, well, it isn't working.
She had no idea it had to be turned on.
 
@GlenTheUdderboat yeah now wait for misguided purists to point out how you've created two wrong sentences out of one.
My guess is you won't have to wait for long.
Well, outside of this room anyway.
 
I'm waiting.
 
8:28 PM
As I said, not happening in this room.
 
You've created two wrong sentences out of one.
 
@Cerberus I only just realized that you can go to the front page of youtube and see all sorts of stuff....that is to say I only ever got to youtube by someone else's links to individual videos.
 
But grab a random person off the street and they will tell you how every sentence must verb.
 
That? Not. Exactly. Correct.
 
@Mitch It has a front page? I see.
 
8:29 PM
@Cerberus sorry, but you are not a misguided purist, so you do not qualify.
Not for the lack of trying, of course.
 
Says who?
 
@Cerberus haha... shut up. I'm new to this computer thingy.
 
I see.
What you do is go to your address bar, type "y kitten video", and it should search Youtube for kitten videos.
 
I think my computer is off.
 
If it doesn't work, create a Youtube keyword-bookmark, takes 5 seconds.
 
8:30 PM
I'll try.
 
@GlenTheUdderboat brains ≠ computer
 
bathes computer in caffeine
 
@GlenTheUdderboat Go to Youtube.com for once in your life, right-click in the search box, click "add keyword..." and proceed from there.
 
Wait. The other one.
 
Eek!
Spilled coffee on your thousand-dollar laptop again?
 
8:32 PM
The quantum mind or quantum consciousness hypothesis proposes that classical mechanics cannot explain consciousness, while quantum mechanical phenomena, such as quantum entanglement and superposition, may play an important part in the brain's function, and could form the basis of an explanation of consciousness. It is not one theory, but a collection of distinct ideas described below. A few theoretical physicists have argued that classical physics is intrinsically incapable of explaining the holistic aspects of consciousness, whereas quantum mechanics can. The idea that quantum theory h...
 
@Cerberus Just the really really disgusting keyboard that nobody should ever take the keycaps off.
 
Ahh that one.
Also been used by smokers?
 
No, no.
Just me eating lunch.
 
Ah OK.
 
Good, so you have something to eat.
 
8:34 PM
You know the really cool game with keyboards, I presume?
 
N...no? Do I want to?
 
I. Want. To.
 
Where you lift it over your head and stare straight up at the keys, then shake it laterally.
 
Hahahaha.
 
@GlenTheUdderboat Hint: you. Do. Not. Want. To.
 
8:35 PM
I did get some of the caffeine into my brain, you know.
 
Those are not sentences.
 
@aediaλ I think I actually once followed those instructions.
@GlenTheUdderboat Sure they are. There are some verbs there.
 
What kind of word is 'to'?
 
I you all the time
 
When used in 'to learn'?
 
8:36 PM
English
 
@GlenTheUdderboat Either a preposition or a particle, I would say.
A particle if you consider it part of the "full" infinitive.
 
Why is the word "to" so common?
 
'[A] function word not assignable to any of the major word classes'. Well, that's useful.
 
In grammar, a particle is a function word which must be associated with another word or phrase to impart meaning, i.e. which does not have its own lexical definition. On this definition, particles are a separate part of speech and are distinct from other classes of function words, such as articles, prepositions, conjunctions and adverbs. Particles are typically words which encode grammatical categories (such as negation, mood, tense or case), clitics or fillers or (oral) discourse markers such as well, um, etc. Particles are never inflected. Languages vary widely in how much they use ...
@skullpatrol Well, some word has to be common.
 
@Cerberus Not if every word is only used once.
 
8:40 PM
If.
 
It is common because it has to be?
 
Why are flies common?
 
It makes sense that a commonly used word would be short as well.
 
I don't think a clear answer is possible.
@GlenTheUdderboat Yes.
And prepositions are also quite common.
 
8:43 PM
Does that imply that dinosaurs went extinct before language evolved?
 
So having commonness is apart of all languages?
 
Or that T-rex is among us?
Has there ever been a linguistic argument against 'young earth' theories?
 
@GlenTheUdderboat people who subscribe to "young earth" "theories" don't listen to arguments, linguistic or otherwise.
 
News. Today I read that the relationship between two Harry Potter characters was regrettable.
 
They will just put their hands over their ears and scream "Languages were muddled at the tower of Babel"
 
8:50 PM
@GlenTheUdderboat sigh
I read the news today oh boy!
 
About a lucky man who made the grade.
 
@GlenTheUdderboat Yeah. Young earth doesn't rhyme with any thing except 'intellectual dearth'.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 A+!
 
Were languages muddled at the tower of Babel?
 
@GlenTheUdderboat Only after it rained
 
8:52 PM
No just good soaking rain.
 
@GlenTheUdderboat before Babel, everyone spoke one language. God decided we were getting along too well together, so he made it so nobody could understand anyone else. Conclusion? God's an asshole.
 
What an ass.
Also:
 
@GlenTheUdderboat Yes.
 
0
A: What is a "temporary mental apparition"?

user64610The Quran says that the anti Christ will only be able to see through his left eye and michel angelos close initiate painted the ant Christ with the devil talking in his left ear

 
8:53 PM
@skullpatrol It is a part of most frequentative phenomena, I would say.
 
I really want to comment: "So are you answering or just giving an example of such?"
 
Harhar.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I have spent € 40,10 on Android applications since July 2012. You?
 
Devil works in mysterious ways.
 
Looks good. Who's 'michel angelos'?
 
8:55 PM
The arch angel Mike.
 
The devil helps those who help themselves..to devil's food cake!
 
You not read the Bible?
 
Oh, Mike.
 
@Cerberus I don't think that much since Mar 2011
 
@Mitch Is that like cheese cake?
 
8:55 PM
@Mitch hey I am trying to establish the usage of Devil without an article. And you're not helping.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 So when did you think much?
 
@GlenTheUdderboat OK who were the characters (and then we get to guess the regret)?
 
It's so unfair the God gets to be God, but the Devil does not get to be Devil.
 
@Cerberus No it is identically angel food cake but with chocolate added.
 
@Cerberus I try not to. It's just so hard.
 
8:56 PM
@RegDwigнt @Mr.Shiny I hope you know about buildwithchrome.com
 
@Mitch Oh this I do not know.
 
@Cerberus I can find the exact place in the transcript.
 
And hullo and such.
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Yes... I have a WIP on it right now :)
 
@RegDwigнt Wait, it actually happened?
Which tab?
 
8:57 PM
I wish it had more pieces
 
@RegDwigнt I gave you one of each. You should be thanking me ... with the devil's food cake!
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 :)
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 yeah. My wife found it somehow and then I think I posted it in this very room.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yes, I was annoyed by the finite amount of pieces available.
 
Hi @corn did you like the game?
 
8:57 PM
@RegDwigнt this very room, you say?
 
@Cerberus wiki devil's food cake
 
@Mitch Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger.
 
@Cerberus 781000529311112nd.
 
@skullpatrol I was amused by all the bird scoring but ultimately felt bad for the horse.
 
It will take me some time to tab to the tab.
 
8:58 PM
@RegDwigнt Tab, tabby, tab!
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 no, I didn't say that. It was an illusion. And it worked.
 
@GlenTheUdderboat OK I give up. What did they regret? I get that she regrets pairing up with him, he's kind of a prat.
 
@Mitch 'JK Rowling has admitted she made a mistake by marrying them off.'
 
@GlenTheUdderboat I read that yesterday on Spiegel Online.
 
8:59 PM
@RegDwigнt So?
 
And briefly considered not reading Spiegel Online again.
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Cute!
 
@Cerberus !!wiki devil's food cake
 
No!!
 
@GlenTheUdderboat That's dumb. Not every story needs to end with the hero man getting rewarded with a wife.
 
9:00 PM
The hole in my left sock is bigger news than Rowling regretting the shit she wrote. And I do not even have a hole in my left sock.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 well, Ron is definitely not the hero.
 
@corn the horse needed to give more respect to the bird's defense
 
But now I must be off to play Twilight Princess.
Lators.
 
@KitFox every time I play this card, I think of you.
 
??
 
9:01 PM
@skullpatrol indeed.
Oh dear.
 
:-)
 
@RegDwigнt I think that's news in the sense that it shows you forgot to take your meds.
 
Do I suddenly find myself among Harry Potter readers? (That would be the end of it, for now.)
 
@Mitch right. Ron is a side character and so is Hermione and it's fine for them to get married. If she marries Harry it just seems like a cheap trope.
 
Devil's food cake is a moist, airy, rich chocolate layer cake. It is considered a counterpart to the white or yellow angel food cake. Because of differing recipes and changing ingredient availability over the course of the twentieth century, it is difficult to precisely qualify what distinguishes Devil's food from the more standard chocolate cake, though it traditionally has more chocolate than a regular chocolate cake, making it darker. The cake is usually paired with a rich chocolate frosting. Overview Devil's food cake is generally more moist and airy than other chocolate cakes, and o...
 
9:03 PM
But then, whatever. for all that I enjoyed the HP books they have lots of problems. what's one more or less?
gotta run!
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I think she did well for a 'young adult' novelist in that she deftly missed many cliches that would otherwise be automatic.
LIke that.
No, I can't think of any more.
@GlenTheUdderboat If you did or did not?
 
The. End. [BTW, @Mitch, is that a reference to The Usual Suspects?]
 
It would be clever of me if I did.
 
That's a 'no' then.
 
I just saw a piece of that the other day. Also spoof of a piece of it (different times, unrelated)
@GlenTheUdderboat It would be clever of me to agree.
 
9:06 PM
Cheerio!
 
Lucky Charms!
 
@Mitch Ah, I see.
 
It's a kind of sponge cake which is on the extreme end of the continuum of kinds of cake (based on proportion of flour to egg to sugar to blah blah blah)
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Aww!
I went to a Super Bowl party yesterday and the best part was the Kitten Bowl on the 2nd tv. More interesting than the humans on the other tv.
 
@Mitch So lots of butter and sugar?
 
9:26 PM
@Cerberus I think egg is the extra proportion (not a yeast cake). But yes lots of sugar, and I guess butter.
 
9:42 PM
Ah.
 
Why are hardbacks much more expensive than softbacks in many cases?
 
They weigh more?
 
9:58 PM
posted on February 03, 2014 by sgdi

A man asked if something was true Asking me, he thought that I knew I told him that, no I just didn’t know He said his disdain for me grew

 
They last longer too.
The books take up more space.
 
10:17 PM
probably a bit more expensive to make also
 
Yeah, especially if they have stitching and aren't just glue and paper
 
10:30 PM
I've seen really nice leather covers.
I think the Feynman lectures have a collectors' edition done that way.
 
@aediaλ Hardcovers without sewn signatures do not merit the name.
 
10:59 PM
I agree the mutant paperbacks with heavy covers stuck on are horrid, but I call them hardcovers since they seem to make up the majority of the type nowadays.
A quick look at my bookshelves in this room revealed only Jane Eyre and a blank notebook someone gave me that have sewn signatures. Not a one among the hardcover technical books I glanced through. Maybe some of the ones on my shelf downstairs are real; I can't imagine the Knuth hardcovers aren't sewn, for instance.
 
11:33 PM
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 omg, that's my cat!
 
@aediaλ Hardcovers are for sissies. I use original manuscripts held together by alligator clips. Then I take off the clips, throw it up in the air down a tall building's stairwell. Then collect them all back up again (no page numbers). Then I take a nap.
 
And the tuxedo cat has found her voice and now she won't shut up.
 

« first day (1180 days earlier)      last day (3748 days later) »