« first day (950 days earlier)      last day (4266 days later) » 

00:20
@MετάEd ハハハ
Which is a mom and a half.
!!/jinx
Damn it.
@cornbread I left a message for her creator.
01:30
> A "file" is an analogy, and like all analogies, it's incomplete. It breaks down when taken too far, and then it must be discarded, because analogies only exist for our convenience.
@KitFox lowers eyelids, unbuttons blouse, puts finger to collarbone Thank you.
@Cerberus It's an abstraction. Abstractions leak.
01:48
@Robusto I think you are referring to Joel's terminology?
@Cerberus It's not his, exactly, though he uses it.
Ah OK.
It is indeed a related point.
@Cerberus Do you even lift?
@KitFox Do you even lift?
Hahaha this is funny
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Hey, any time.
I found when you say this to someone they will get so mad at you
01:55
Lift what?
gym exercise
It's similar to "You jelly"?
I have never heard anyone ask that in this way. Do you mean "do you lift weights?"?
No idea what "you jelly" would mean.
a condescending expression used on body building and fitness forums to question the legitimacy of someone’s fitness expertise or weight lifting routine. Similar to other interrogatives like “U Mad?” or “U Jelly?”, the phrase is mainly used to aggravate another user during arguments about physical fitness.
John: There's no way you'll make it on the football team.

Brian: Bro, do you even lift?
I do not frequent body-building fora. Nor do I use the expression "U".
So I'm green as a pea.
"Do you lift?" is a neutral expression unless the target obviously is a bodybuilder. Consider the question "Do you speak English?" Not bad when asked of someone in China, say, but insulting in London.
02:02
oh
that's right
> Because the bulk of documents and discovery often lie with the defendant, plaintiffs can inflict maximum financial pain on a defendant, while producing relatively few documents themselves. This tilted playing field gives plaintiffs an unfair advantage. ...
> Unfortunately, the only option available to Veoh was to file a motion to recover fees after it won the case, even though this avenue was too little too late; the mortal damage was already inflicted [and the company out of funds and shut down]. Six years of combative litigation cannot be undone entirely by recovering legal fees. Yet, the standard for recovering fees is very high and Veoh was not successful.
> Instituting "loser pays" into the concept of commercial litigation in appropriate situations improves the chances for defendants, and could reduce meritless litigation.
02:34
Hi @Cerberus
Good morning
03:01
@Robusto ☥FU♥র.
hey. I have a NAS. it needs a name.
My current computer family is named Eternia, Cruithne, and Asterion.
Deceased computers include Ephemeron, Wook, and Smed.
Aww.
So what kind of a name are you looking for?
i'm sure there are more deceased computers but I probably forgot them.
Greek mythology?
Tolkien?
Vance?
Man? Woman? Neuter?
03:08
Something appropriate for a NAS. it stores lots of stuff.
Thesaurus?
It means "treatsure (chest)".
hmmmmmmmm
Silmaril!
thanks
Heh.
stores -> treasure chest-> silmaril
So your videos are the light of Laurelin?
Or what light did the silmarils hold?
03:11
the two trees
Both in each silmaril?
I dunno. yes, I think so.
The only thing is that a silmaril is small.
so is my NAS! It uses 2.5" drives
I'm not quite sure Tolkien imagined silmarils to be 2.5", but okay.
03:18
I always assumed they were large for gems.
The books don't really say how big they were, except that an elf or man could enclose one in his hand.
And that Feanor used to wear them on his head.
So small, in absolute terms, but large, in gem terms. That's what I always imagined.
17
Q: How big were the Silmarils?

SteveEDI was reading through the Silmarillion and came up with this question: Exactly how big were the Silmarils? I don't see even a single reference to their exact size. The references that I do see say an elf could carry and throw one easily, which is pretty vague. Another reference says that Morg...

Good luck wearing a 2.5" hard drive on your forehead. Perhaps you should hammer it into a pear shape first.
oh, it's not the drive that is the Silmaril. It's the whole NAS.
More hammering.
@Cerberus: Would you mind if I use/used your mobile?
Meanwhile, I'm trying to think of a good way to program my mouse cursor to automatically move out of the way when I'm typing in Forefox.
03:23
Which is more apt?
@Sudhir Um, yes.
@Sudhir Both are OK.
"Used" is a bit more correct, but "use" is fine in a less than formal setting.
Can you pls explain which one to use at which condition?
"Use" also makes it more immediate: you're talking about using it right now, as a real option, whereas "used" could be an hypothetical situation.
@Cerberus: It'd be "an hypothetical" or "a hypothetical"?
@Sudhir do you pronounce the H? then use "A".
03:29
No
no?
you don't pronounce the h?
We pronounce it as "H" not as "A".
No, I mean in words that start with H. If you pronounce the H then the article you should use is "a", not "an". If you drop the H then you should use "an".
But, if you're not sure, both options are OK here.
In standard american and canadian english, an + h is basically not acceptable most of the time.
03:32
We're not American.
Anyway, @Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 what condition(s) should I use to move the cursor when it's in the way?
Unfortunately, I cannot detect where the caret is in Firefox.
I could move it away after a sequence of {enter} {any letter}.
how about hiding the cursor, then making it appear on mouse move?
that's what word processors do
Hiding it by default?
Hmm...
no, I mean when you start typing, hide it.
So at any letter?
sure
or any two letters
03:35
And unhide it after...
mouse move
or delay
Hmm.
I could do that.
But I'm a bit scared. It would have to be 100 % reliable.
Hiding the cursor is quite intrusive: if it goes wrong, you have a big problem.
I would purchase a sports car if I had a million dollars.
OR
"I would have purchased a sports car if I had a million dollars."
The former.
@Cerberus: But my rule says if IF + Past perfect+ would have
eg. If I had found her address, I would have send her an invitation.
03:41
*sent
@Sudhir That's [form of have] + [past participle] in both clauses.
In your sports-car example, the second clause has no past participle, but the first clause does.
You can only do that if the second clause happens after the first clause; however, they should happen at the same time in your example.
'had' is not working as past participle in sports-car eg?
Nope.
It's a past finite verb.
@Cerberus: I'm not able to recognize past participle in both eg.
You can't have a past participle unless the same clause also has a finite verb.
Would have purchased: would = finite verb; have = infinitive; purchased = past participle.
In your second clause, there is only this verb: had = finite verb.
(Almost) every full clause must have a finite verb.
So, if there is only one verb in a certain full clause, then it must be a finite verb.
In second sentence: first clause : found past participle and second clause: sent. Am I right?
03:51
Correct!
So we used [form of have] + [past participle] in both clauses
rule.
Am I right?
Correct!
Sorry!
I've edited.
So have I.
Thanks for clearing my doubt.
:)
03:53
It was a pleasure!
It always bites me.
So you could fix the second version of your first example by saying, I would have purchased a sports car if I had had a million dollars.
But, in casual speech, I wouldn't be surprised if you heard the "wrong" variant.
it's late, I'm going to sign off. cya
Bye.
@Cerberus:what's time at your end?
03:55
It's almost 6 am. So it's bed time!
Good afternoon to you.
Its fresh morning here.
Sun is hiding behind clouds.
Is it hot?
Temp is cool today bringing respite from scorching heat.
Good.
How hot was it?
Its too hot.
03:57
It's going to be 38 degrees here on Wednesday, they say.
around 40C
Yikes.
Sun heat is not bearable.
The all-time record temperature here since—I don't know, 1500, is 38 °C, so we may get a new record.
Yeah, it's much worse in the sun.
So its 38 degree at your end?
its frustrating then
03:59
It may be 38 on Wednesday. Now it's fine, 23 degrees max yesterday.
Today is going to be 25 or so.
that's awesome temp
20 is my favourite temperature on normal days, maybe 25 when I'm on vacation and not moving.
20 when I'm walking around a city. I'm assuming sun.
We love that temp.
But its goes to 45 here in summer.
uff...
So does everyone! Why don't we make the whole planet 20 degree all year round, day and night?
45 is unbearable.
We once had 43 in Italy. In the sun, it was 68 degrees.
We don't have AC so it causes a lot of irritation at 40.
04:02
Neither do we.
Because it's cool most of the year.
Ya I know.
Although I would love to have it!
Its great place to live.
We also have lots of cold and rain...
Walking around town when everything is covered in ice is not fun.
In morning we've some drizzles.
04:03
It's dangerous, even.
But I have to go to bed.
Good day!
so you're going to sleep?
Yup.
Bye!
Bye!
Sweet dreams.
take care
04:36
m
 
1 hour later…
05:51
Guys
Since engineers get paid the most
can I call myself "English Literature engineer"?
I saw a profession called "Graphic design engineer" before
06:11
abs can go through bullets
 
3 hours later…
09:35
@O0oO0oOO0ooO Who says that?
When you are eating a sandwich or something similar, do you rate the food by how many bites it takes to get to meat section?
I saw a guy who blames his food because it takes more than 1 bites to taste core (meat) section
never looked at it that way
@JohanLarsson It was a website owned by a web designer and he called himself "web design engineer"
but I forgot the URL
 
3 hours later…
12:31
> The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed. — William Gibson
haha
12:46
nags @KitFox
12:59
@Cerberus, that's not an answer. If you don't know the answer, STFU. ;) — d-_-b 5 hours ago
Hello, roomlings.
Haaai.
Hello, Beatrix.
@Cerberus what an unpleasant fellow
Hello
Hello een beetje dom.
@MattЭллен Quite.
13:01
He did add a smiley.
@RegDwighт So your spirit inhabits Máxima now, eh?
@RegDwighт Yes. Even weirder.
He probably thinks he's funny.
The funniest thing is, the top answer has been saying the same thing in even stronger words.
3
A: Putting User Directory on Mapped Network Drive on Windows 7

Joel CoehoornThis is a bad idea. The problem is that mapped drives vary by user, and so drive E: cannot exist until after you've already logged in and loaded your profile. You might get it working via UNC path (\server\share), but I still don't recommend this. A better alternative would be using Roaming Prof...

> This is a bad idea.
That question is three years old anyway.
@RegDwighт Exactly.
Looks like he didn't want to fck around with a 17k user.
But poor little Cerberus...
Is it also stupidly hot in your Bundesland?
Weather forecasts and even actual reported temperatures are off.
13:06
Our Bundesland is the stupidly hottest one right now, in point of fact.
With BaWü a close second.
Ugh.
It's 28 here.
You?
how odd. It's but 21 °C here
are you in the UAE, @Reg?
13:09
So you have to be a "star architect" to come up with that shit?
Wow, seriously?
They said it was going to be 38 tomorrow here...
@MattЭллен way too much green.
it's only 37 C in Dubai!
@MattЭллен well to be fair you're not even in Europe.
@RegDwighт Modern architects suck. Most of their buildings are extremely repetitive and made from cheap and ugly materials.
13:10
True. except geologically
@MattЭллен Only 37? Wow.
Speaking of shit,
And they have A/C everywhere.
I would shit myself right then and there.
I want it
13:10
Ugh.
Horrible.
aren't large slabs of granite / marble classical, @Cerb?
You look down and you see a concrete desert. You look up and you see passenger planes approaching. Fuck that.
A hospital bathroom for the nouveau-riche, is what it is.
@RegDwighт No, the planes are also down.
@MattЭллен In a huge hall or temple, yes.
@Cerberus oh, thank God. So I'm guaranteed not to make it to the first floor.
And some marble is OK in a bathroom.
13:12
@Cerberus Dive! Dive!
@MετάEd Too late. Oh, you meant the planes? They don't need to, they can't miss you.
This is how I like my marble.
@Cerberus It's a submarine joke.
@RegDwighт Sure, if you need a hallway that large...
You'd think Cerb would get it, given that he is sub marine
13:14
@MετάEd Ah, one of those classical submarine jokes...
@Cerberus that's a metro station.
Nice.
@RegDwighт A submarine station?
Is it in Moscow?
It's not even the nicest.
Yes, in Moscow of course.
I just searched for the first name I could think of. There are others that make this one look like a piece of crap.
13:14
I knew it.
So anyway. That's where marble goes.
I wonder why they didn't make the Petersburg metro like that.
I'm so used to marble from public places from my childhood, I wouldn't want to have it in my bathroom.
Hey, was Moscow every severely bombed?
@RegDwighт Of course.
Severely? I don't know. Bombed? Very much so.
In fact the metro stations, including the one pictured above, were used as bomb shelters.
13:16
Well, marble is all right in a bathroom; just not like that picture.
@RegDwighт Ah OK.
So were many buildings near the inner city destroyed?
I do not know. I do know they didn't pull off any of that Dresden shit.
Anyway, I'm desperately trying to get on topic again.
When I see that bathroom, I wonder from which direction the next train is approaching.
It's so engraved in my brain.
0
Q: Are all words nouns?

VaradA noun is a 'name' assigned to a particular person, place or a thing. Does that make every word a noun, since each word, be it a verb, adjective or anything else is also a 'name' for that idea? For example, the word jump is by definition a verb. But, 'jump' is the name assigned to the act of push...

Oh come on.
Why off-topic? That's not off-topic. That's the very definition of rhetorical.
it's off topic because it's not about English
it's about language, but any language that has nouns
It is about a misconception of what a noun is.
@MattЭллен Well obviously it's many things. But off-topic means "you can go ahead and ask that nonsense question elsewhere". While NARQ means "please do not go ahead and do unto others as you have done unto us".
Fair eough.
13:21
I mean, it's gen-ref as well. But first and foremost it's common sense.
If he had asked it differently, it might be an OK question about the history of terminology.
Why was the word "noun" chosen for nouns?
Why was the word "car" chosen for cars?
because noün could think of anything better
I dunno, we can't have that question for every word in existence.
There is enough you could say about this.
For example, noun is a bastardisation of Latin nomen.
13:24
That's in every etymological dictionary.
Then the question becomes, why did the Romans pick nomen?
and nomen can kill the witch king
2
That's on-topic on Latin Language and Usage.
And that was because the Greeks had onoma.
And that's for Greek Language and Usage.
13:25
And so you could describe the history of the word.
...as does every etymological dictionary.
Not very extensively.
Much more extensively than you have just done.
It doesn't explain why the Greeks picked onoma, and what could be a reason that makes sense.
Anyway. We are wasting bytes.
13:27
Ugh, they're raised the age where you can buy alcohol to 18 years. So stupid.
in Amsterdam?
Everyone knows it won't make any difference.
In the entire country.
What is it in England?
18
has been for a long time
And do all kids drink at 16/17?
earlier if possible
13:28
Especially the ones who are most likely to drink too much, right?
So you're only stopping the meek, wise kids who wouldn't drink too much anyway.
but it is legal to buy alcohol for a 16 year old in a pub if they're having a meal (I think, although that might also have gone by the wayside)
@Cerberus I'd also say earlier 13/14
Then why on earth do governments make these laws?
@MattЭллен Ah, much better.
the illusion of control and doing something "to protect the children"
Fucking stupid.
They all smoke pot too, which was never legal under 18.
13:30
It's long been known that if children are allowed to drink and taught responsibly by their parents then binge drinking decreases.
Yeah.
But you can't change that as a government.
although, these days all the adults (in the UK) grew up as bingers
Ugh.
so who knows what will happen
A brainless generation?
13:31
:D maybe just sodden
more prone to accidents
Heh.
perhaps then there will be a more relaxed generation after mine, where they see the problems and advantages of alcohol and can choose wisely
but probably not
Haha.
Probably not.
Then again, the problem of alcohol is as old as civilisation.
true, true
@Cerberus Have you considered whether or not the laws actually have any effect? I mean, one's perception of reality is not always 100% accurate.
13:36
I don't think our government's puritanical mindset helps any
ISTR reading that raising the drinking age actually reduces drinking.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 especially if one is drunk
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 From what I've read, laws have little or no proven effect. Consider how the French have always used more softdrugs than people here.
Someone once posted an article here about drinking, but I think we dissected that thoroughly, and it seemed an unreliable piece of propaganda against drinking.
Some random data.
but it's difficult to compare other countries where lots of things are different. Culture plays a huge part in it.
Exactly.
13:45
even in Canada, there are sub-cultures that have major alcohol problems. They have stricter laws to deal with those communities.
The drinking age has very little influence, if any.
@Cerberus so my point is that a lower drinking age in France doesn't say anything about what raising the drinking age in NL will accomplish.
Yeah.
It's all symbolic action.
I am unaware of any real experiment where the drinking age was raising in one city but not in a neighbouring city, and what happened to binge-drinking of kids between those drinking ages over 10 years.
one thing that was tested was raising the minimum price of a unit of alcohol. apparently that helps reduce binging in some Scottish cities
Sure. I'm all for that.
Although 3/4 of the price is already taxes, I believe.
13:50
yeah, it is pretty steep
But I have to run.
Happy drinking!
I have to sit. CU!
@Cerberus s/happy/heavy/ :D
@Cerberus Some studies have reported drops in alcohol-related car crashes after raising the drinking age. sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080701083542.htm
Here's one that suggests that teenagers in US states where the drinking age was lowered from 21 were more likely to grow up to be binge drinkers later news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/24886.aspx
@MattЭллен I was going to start it yesterday, but work! And today work!
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 The younger you are, the more likely you are to become an addict and the harder it is to quit.

« first day (950 days earlier)      last day (4266 days later) »