« first day (776 days earlier)      last day (4146 days later) » 

user19161
12:05 AM
I just downvoted some posts to keep my rep at a multiple of 5.
 
user19161
@tchrist I gave you some presents just now. =)
 
12:27 AM
@JasperLoy I earned 272 yesterday. That may be my second highest ever. I need to undownvote more often.
 
cpx
@JasperLoy Done!
 
12:45 AM
hey everyone, is there any word or phrasal verb in English describe "after doing something that you intend to do"
 
That's... a lot of information to pack in a single word, and how can it possibly be a verb?
"After X" is a prepositional phrase. Verbs don't function as prepositional phrases.
@tchrist I have 2169 downvotes. Sounds like a gold mine on paper. Except that 50% of my votes are on questions, and god knows how many of the rest on deleted stuff.
 
thanks
 
No problem.
If you have context, we can have a second look.
 
1:07 AM
Phrasal verbs are difficult to remember. Any solution ?
 
Yes. Do not study them. Just use them.
You will forget everything you don't use. Maths, geography, musical theory. Language is no different. Unless it's your mother tongue.
 
definitely true
 
@tchrist he sure likes using "if you will". It's giving me a headache. Stupid fillers.
And with that I guess I'm logging off for today.
CU all tomorrow.
 
user19161
1:24 AM
@cpx Well done!
 
user19161
I am such a rep whore ain't I?
 
user19161
@RegDwighт 2169? Geezis!
 
2:36 AM
Wow, my tide-and-time question is sitting at slot #3 on the supercollider.
 
2:48 AM
@tchrist Congrats on 25.001k!
 
I did?
I'll have to downvote something. :)
 
Yessir.
 
I hadn’t even noticed. I did do a lot of rep whoring and rep cranking yesterday though.
Got several new hats, too.
But no mystery ones.
 
Aww.
Gah, I have to erase and re-sync my iPod with this new update?
 
I’m ahead in the hat race. And I think I need only one more repcap for the only hat I’ve been trying for.
Erase is not good.
 
2:51 AM
It doesn't seem to be erasing, but it said it would. Huh.
In my stocking I got smoked almonds. Yum.
 
Those are certainly tasty.
Oh drat, you just reminded me I forgot to give something out. BRB.
 
Have fun!
Oh, it totally did erase my iPod.
Stupid stupid.
 
3:06 AM
Were you backed up?
 
Yeah, but I have to re-sync everything.
> Copying 505 of 2304: …
It's actually pretty quick.
 
That’s a relief.
 
Yeah. When I updated, all of my music disappeared, and I had a small panic attack.
Then I realized that iTunes had simply changed the path to the music collection and all I had to do was change it back.
 
Good for you to notice.
 
Heh, thanks.
I had my music in a hidden folder for some reason.
So I had to use my command line to find it, haha.
I did $ find . -name '*.mp3' and found it like that.
 
3:16 AM
evenin'!
 
Hi Cornbread! Happy Christmas!
 
how long have I been in here? rubs head
@Mahnax Happy Christmas, &c to you! ;)
 
@cornbreadninja Dank(e)!
 
I am making my list for thank-you cards
punctuation be damned
 
Are you drunk?
 
3:17 AM
Should I be?
 
Well, no.
Not necessarily.
 
Grandma usually opens a bottle of Asti Spumante, but that didn't happen this year.
 
My grandmother opened up some white zinfandel.
 
It was a different kind of Christmas this year.
 
user19161
@Mahnax Is that some wine?
 
3:19 AM
@JasperLoy Yes.
Two dollars a bottle, for a sort of silly reason. Good wine, apparently.
 
@JasperLoy hello! so is asti spumante
two buck chuck?
 
user19161
@cornbreadninja I decided not to wear the stupid SE hats!
 
Nah, it's award-winning wine produced by some dude in the States. But his wife divorced him and sued for a portion of his wine profits, so he decided to reduce those to basically zero by selling the wine on the cheap.
 
user19161
But the hats still show up sometimes even after I opted out!
 
user19161
This is WEIRD.
 
3:25 AM
@JasperLoy whoa. all of the ones you'd earned?
@JasperLoy I hated hats for a minute, but I I un-hated them for Kit.
 
I have a swell new hat to wear!
 
Woah, how'd you earn that?
 
Work. :)
30 answers with a vote total of at least 1.
 
Cool.
 
The hard-to-get hats are the ones that look coolest.
 
3:29 AM
That is the point, yes.
 
I get around to archive some, but I'm lazy one :(
 
@tchrist Dang, that is a swell hat.
 
My badge totals are all off-by-one.
 
24 hats!
 
Compared to what I wish they were, that is.
@cornbreadninja Yep!
I’d like 5/50/100 instead of 4/49/99. You know?
 
3:33 AM
@tchrist oooohhhh, @kitfox will be jealous.
 
Yeah, I know. :)
I just created a tag wiki, but I don’t think that’s one.
I am close to the 5 repcap emperor’s crown.
I don’t think she’ll be getting that one.
 
@JasperLoy I've been on the site for 28 months. That's less than 100 downvotes a month.
 
@tchrist I do know.
 
@tchrist speaking of tags, I see you've been retagging and I think there's a problem.
 
@RegDwighт That’s more than I have. Barely. I’m down to 1919, with about 50 more than that pre-Christmas.
@RegDwighт Oh? I’m sorry. Please tell me what I can do to help.
 
3:36 AM
@tchrist and you are a noob. You've been registered for what, 25 months? Pfft.
 
Very unnegative of me, don’t you think?
 
@tchrist ah, nothing with you. A general conundrum that comes up every so often.
 
Of course, I’ve only been posting for about six of those 24 months. :)
 
It's kind of the problem with the system as such. Or a dilemma.
 
3:37 AM
@tchrist I didn't want to be that harsh. Let's leave it at that you're a noob.
Anyhoo.
The problem with tags is that they are really just for questions.
 
If you would like me to do something differently, you know you have only to ask me.
Oh that.
 
There's no way to tag answers.
 
Yes, I know.
I have thought of that, and more than once.
Including this time.
 
Yeah it keeps coming up, as I said.
I did notice that before with your retaggings, but that was like one question out of forty each time, so I never bothered. Or plain forgot.
 
The problem is when the questioner does not know the right tag. This is often the case.
It was on the fancy rhetoric terms.
 
3:39 AM
But this one is really special in that we don't have a single question on metathesis. Only answers.
@tchrist ah, hold on. That's a different issue still.
 
Trying to tag based on answers is stupid pointless.
 
In those cases retagging is perfectly valid and I would say encouraged.
I do it all the time, like with hypernyms. Which people call a thousand names just not hypernyms.
But what we have here is that the question is not about metathesis at all. If the OP knew it was about metathesis, the question plain wouldn't exist.
 
I try not to make a tag that is on only one question alone. That’s why I went hunting.
 
I mean, it's kind of like asking on Photography, which camera should I use, and then someone tags it with
 
And the other candidate was a dupe-closed one, which Some people delete.
Yeah.
I have a cure.
 
3:41 AM
@tchrist yes, that's the actual problem. We kind of need those tags if only to be able to find stuff later.
 
I can ask a question with metawhateverousness in the question proper.
 
Plus what kind of site are we if we don't have a metathesis tag. I mean, really.
 
@RegDwighт This is really bad.
 
@tchrist oh, by all means do.
 
No kidding. It’s like not having a palatalization tag.
Strange slowness.
 
3:43 AM
@GnomeSlice yes. And yet, when the question is answered with Nicon and the OP accepts that as the answer, it's not like it doesn't make sense for future reference.
 
Did you know that it is Neyekon in the US, but Nikkon in the UK?
 
So what I've been doing so far with such questions is to tag them as specifically as I possibly could without mentioning the answer in the tags.
@tchrist wha?
 
Oh, right. I see the problem now.
 
@RegDwighт Yes it does, because that's probably not the only answer on the question. This is a bad example since that question is far too subjective (there is no single best camera), and the whole point is that different answers can provide different information.
 
It is something else again in Japan. More like Spanish, I think.
 
3:44 AM
i.e. the accepted answer might be to use a Nikon, but another answer might say to go Canon, and some readers might find that answer more helpful.
 
@RegDwighт Yes, truly.
 
@GnomeSlice yeah I knew someone would say that. Of course such a question would get closed pretty much anywhere. I'm just trying to illustrate a point, is all.)))
 
I am doing lame spelling pronunciations, of course. It is always spelled the same as a marque, just said differently.
 
So, for example, I have answered like OVER 10000 questions about metathesis. And yet none of them is labeled with that tag.
(As an aside, I seem to specialize in doors now. All doors questions go to me. Someone make a tag.)
 
@RegDwighт The second part is still relevant.
 
3:47 AM
Okay well. Let's take a different example if you're so insistent. Suppose someone asks on SO, where is the bug in this code, and then someone tags it with .
 
@RegDwighт For the record, I was agreeing with you.
 
I know.
I don't care. I'm in the zone.
 
OKAY
 
North America has Nikon with the vowel of Mike, the UK has it with the vowel of Nick, and the Japanese as near as I can tell has the first stressed vowel of Neekerbrackers in the first syllable, and something more like the first stressed vowel of Spanish joder in its second syllable.
What do Germans and Russians do?
 
So wevs. Where's that MSO post anyway. There was an MSO post.
@tchrist Naikon? Seriously?
 
3:49 AM
Vraiment. De veras.
As though it were a radish!!!!
 
Ai caramba.
 
At least they can’t diddle Canon's name quite so badly. But I do see Cannon a lot on the net.
Well, if you would like to take back some or all of the metanalysis tags, do please do so.
 
Muh. MSO is impossible to search. Even with Google. Even with Lycos.
@tchrist let it sit. I'm not in a hurry.
Plus as I said people have done it in the past and I don't even remember the questions, or tags.
 
It was not the tag wiki I created. I did instead: here.
 
Perhaps a meta post is imminent.
@tchrist I saw that.
The metathesis is still empty.
 
3:53 AM
Do you get updates on when tag wikis are created? Is that something I can see?
 
Sorry, I mean metaanalysis.
Mine were about metathesis. Yours were metaanalysis.
@tchrist only suggested edits.
 
Are there two a's in that word?
Of course, there should be.
But are there?
 
I checked manually before coming in here which tag wiki you meant.
 
I have not been able to use SEDE to find the empty tag wikis.
 
:This article is about the term in linguistics; in the natural sciences "metanalysis" is an alternative spelling for "meta-analysis". In linguistics, metanalysis is the act of breaking down a word or phrase into segments or meanings not original to it. The term was coined by the linguist Otto Jespersen, from Greek elements meaning "a change of breakdown". One example from English is a huge number of verbs of Latinate origin appear to have been back-formed from nouns in -tion, -sion and the like: profess, relate, pollute, confect and literally hundreds more are, with rare exceptions, fi...
One.
Wevs. I'm in the zone.
 
3:55 AM
The query that is there to do so does not work, and is marked as such.
 
Be thankful I don't type in Russian.
 
I am.
What do Russians call Nikon?
Spelling pronunciation is fine.
 
@tchrist I didn't know that field is in the dump.
@tchrist um, Никон?
 
@tchrist Don't be silly, in Soviet Russia, camera names you!
I can't believe I just made that joke.
 
Are your vowels pure?
 
3:56 AM
Nikon (Nikon Corporation, , Кабусики гайся Никон, произносится «Никон» ') — японская компания, специализирующаяся на производстве оптики и электронных устройств для обработки изображений. Nikon входит в Mitsubishi Group. Основана Kōgaku Kōgyō 25 июля 1917 под названием Nippon Kogaku K.K., переименована в 1988. Президент — Митио Кария (Michio Kariya). История Nikon Corporation была основана в 1917 году при слиянии трёх производителей оптического оборудования (Seisakusho, Iwaki Glass Co, Fujii Lens) в полностью интегрированную компанию под названием Nippon Kogaku Kokyo K.K. Компания пр...
 
So is it Neek or Nick?
 
Well yeah. They really call it Nikon. Not Никон. Don't get me started.
@tchrist short I.
 
In Latin?
Ok.
Like the Brits.
 
Yeah in Latin. I mean when they advertise it and stuff.
 
They advertise in Latin script??
 
3:58 AM
Only McDonalds had the balls to actually embrace Cyrillic.
 
That is weird.
I mean, can you imagine advertising in Latin script in Iran?
 
@tchrist yeah tell me about it.
 
@RegDwighт M!
 
Yet nobody gives a shit about Russia.
 
Ronald did.
 
3:59 AM
I think you were around when we discussed how they don't give a shit about cases.
 
I heard McDonald’s is introducing two veggie options in India or Pakistan. They discontinued that trial long ago here. Only Burger King has veggie burgers.
 
Writing in Latin helps with that.
 
Ah.
 
Not that that's the only reason. But for some it might be the main I guess.
Which still doesn't make sense because spoken language is primary.
 
That is my own opinion, yes.
But others think otherwise.
 
4:01 AM
@tchrist Ronald was one of the first to conquer Russia. It was still the USSR, in fact.
Same with Pepsi.
 
That’s a shame.
 
In case you didn't know, Pepsi had a license to sell their product in the USSR.
 
I don’t much like Pepsi.
 
There were special kiosks on every corner.
 
Anyone want to help me write for a parody Twitter account?
Ah, nevermind.
 
4:02 AM
When I asked for a Coke on the plane here, she asked whether Pepsi was ok, and I said only if you have a lemon. So she compromised and gave me Dr Pepper instead.
 
Dr. Pepper is the shit.
 
I next to never drink pop, but I was arriving in after midnight, and had far to drive, and still cannot drink coffee again freely.
They do not offer real tea, just airport tea.
 
And so the water is only at about 90 C, so will not brew the tea properly.
 
Do note how they did localize the logo.
These were the times.
 
4:04 AM
Hm. Is this like how in Europe they have random English words in advertising? Do they in Russia have random Latin-script words?
 
@tchrist not many, mostly just product names.
Actually Germany is way more prone to taking English stuff verbatim. Complete with whitespaces where none belong in German.
And punctuation and word order.
It's awful.
 
Like saying wind shield wiper instead of windshieldwiper?
 
@GnomeSlice I can only drink so many at a time. By which I mean one.
@tchrist yeah. Or just using the German word FFS.
 
How can they screw with word order? That would come off as ungrammatical, wouldn’t it?
 
They import not just words, they import grammar and punctuation.
 
4:07 AM
This is a problem for the language’s future.
 
@tchrist "number one shampoo", "number one this", "number one that".
 
It will creolize, if that is a word.
 
In German, that should be "shampoo number one".
But they don't give a damn.
 
It is “fashionably foreign” that way.
 
Nah, not even that.
 
4:08 AM
Just carelessness, then.
 
It is completely and utterly awkward even to the last hobo who couldn't care less about linguistics.
But they repeat it twenty times a day, and bam! it enters the language.
 
But he should have an ear for his own language.
 
That's a different problem still. The Germans are among the people who know and care the least about German.
 
The know bit is common. The care bit, hardly rare.
 
The amount of mistakes on the German television is breathtaking. I haven't seen anything like that anywhere else in the world. It's like they have never heard of proofreading let alone editors.
I mean, written text.
Spoken is of course the same everywhere.
 
4:10 AM
But Grimm was German. Most of the 19th-century philologists who did all the PIE were, weren’t they?
 
So they rest on their laurels.
 
Written mistakes on television? Wow!
 
If they are even aware of who Grimm were.
 
There oughta be a law.
 
Hah.
The laws are one source of the problem.
I mean the orthography reform.
 
4:12 AM
Because people disagree, or are unaware?
Or something else?
 
It was pulled off by ten-odd secretaries of the various states. Needless to say, none of them had any qualification. They might as well have rewritten the rules of linear algebra.
 
I only remember the ph > f one.
Which is a common enough mutation.
 
But no amount of protests helped, and the reform passed, and then people went like fuck off we'll keep on writing like we were taught in grade school, yada yada, everyone now writes whatever and however they like, and it's all okay with everyone.
 
At least it is possible to attempt something like that in Germanspeakingland. It is simply not possible in English.
The Portuguese and Brazilians (and others) recently tried. It only got so far.
 
But that's the point. It is not possible in German, either.
Austria passed a different reform. Switzerland said, are you insane? Go away!
 
4:15 AM
Austria got rid of the sharp s, I believe I recall.
 
And many German publishing houses or famous writers still cling onto the Old Spelling.
 
So it was not one reform treaty to which they were all signatories?
 
It's a complete, utter, unfixable mess.
 
Sounds like they just made things worse than when they started.
 
@tchrist education is in the jurisprudence of individual states.
Remember that Germany was modeled after the US.
 
4:17 AM
Then what was the agreement?
 
I can't even wrap it up that it makes sense.
The German orthography reform of 1996 (Rechtschreibreform) was an attempt to simplify the spelling of the German language and thus to make it easier to learn, without substantially changing the rules familiar to all living users of the language. The reform was based on an international agreement signed in Vienna in July 1996 by the governments of the German-speaking countries of Germany, Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. Luxembourg, in which German is one of the three official languages, regarded itself "as a non-German-speaking country not to be a contributory determinant upon the...
 
Do each of the Länder get to pick and choose, or it all of Germany?
 
> In 1998 the [Federal Constitutional Court of Germany] stated that because there was no law governing orthography, outside the schools people could spell as they liked.
 
It would be bizarre to make a loi against spelling things a certain way.
 
@tchrist as far as education is concerned everyone can cook their own soup, as they say in Germany, though of course reaching some sort of consensus is usually tried (and generally fails).
 
4:20 AM
I wonder if spelling mistakes in advertising are legal in France? :)/2
 
I think they still dust off the guillotine regularly just in case.
 
We have lawn police. I can see the French having spelling police, ones who go around and fix people’s signs for them and then charge them for the privilege.
BRB
 
The problem with the German reform was that educated people simply couldn't teach their kids spelling anymore, because they didn't know what the correct spelling now was, and if they taught their kids what they had learned themselves, the kids would get an F.
While uneducated people don't care either way.
So what you get is that a whole generations is suddenly spoiled.
Plus the real underlying problem was the motivation for the reform.
They did it only because German children sucked at spelling.
So rather than teaching children and making them educated people, they went into the opposite direction.
 
Hmm.
 
Kind of like saying, our children suck at maths, so rather than teaching our children some maths we will give them all a B, problem solved.
 
4:25 AM
Fine then.
 
@RegDwighт Except that's exactly what happens.
 
Yeah I know, grade inflation is rampant everywhere. Be it Harvard or a kindergarten in Duisburg.
Anyway, nice rant, but I must be off.
Lators or tomorrows.
 
What I was trying to say, I think, was that I received Hobbitus Ille for Christmas.
 
Is this offensive:
@DJSnM Clearly, the solution is to add more power. Just ignore those science nerds on the ground talking about "files". More power!
 
@Mahnax I was half-expecting the same, but did not.
 
4:38 AM
@tchrist Aww.
 
No I got other stuff instead.
 
Oh?
 
A book of art from the Brothers Hildebrandt, from their Tolkien years.
 
That's pretty neat.
I got a french press, too. Mm.
 
I had all their old calendars as a kid.
 
4:57 AM
Cool. So it has a sort of nostalgic feeling to it then?
 
Yes, that’s right.
Not something you’re apt to be afflicted with for some time yet, I reckon.
 
You'd be surprised. Even us young ones can have memories that feel like they were so long ago.
 
At your age, it has to be when you were under half your age, maybe before kindergarten even.
 

« first day (776 days earlier)      last day (4146 days later) »