« first day (168 days earlier)      last day (4756 days later) » 

3:02 PM
Yeah the food tag is nice.
 
you ask a really good question about the purpose of tags, though
 
1
Q: What word can I say if I want to give approximate number?

AnonymousWhat to say if I want to tell approximate number of something. What should I say? E.g. I have (around/ about/ some) 5 books. Is there a rule for number approximation?

 
i think that, in theory, during beta tags get created willy-nilly, but by the time you go public some sort of consensus on tagging conventions has emerged. we, unfortunately, went public with some really awful tags in our top 10
 
I don't think this question should be tagged word choice.
He is not explicitly choosing between words.
 
To be honest, I never use them at all. I just add some tags when I ask a question myself; and I rarely add some tags to a question when I'm editing it anyway.
 
3:03 PM
It shouldn't be tagged usage either.
 
@Billare i agree
you could argue for there
 
Does SWW fit it?
I mean SWR.
 
I have no opinion on tags until I know what they're for, though I like the way you guys are thinking and cleaning them up.
 
@Cerberus i have a hard time saying what the purpose of tags is for an experienced user like me. i read almost every question anyway, so i'm definitely not using them for filtering. and my "favorites" list is actually a list of anti-favorites
 
Haha.
I use the titles of questions to decide whether I want to read them or not.
 
3:06 PM
What other tags need fixing?
 
Do you have an idea of what the purpose of tags should be for inexperienced users, then?
They won't use or even understand ...
 
@JSBangs IIRC it was me who slapped on that one, precisely because he mentions several words.
 
@Cerberus i feel that should have been made the base and the synonym, rather than the other way around
 
We have a few questions of that kind, that are both and a .
Anyhow, I gotta go.
TTYL.
 
3
Q: Is "case-sensitively" a word?

JeffSaholA colleague just asked about comparing values "case sensitively". I see those words together on technical sites, but nowhere else. I myself see no problem with the phrase, though it sounds a bit awkward. Is there a better single-word substitute for "in a case-sensitive fashion"?

 
3:08 PM
Huh?? What is the relation between plurals and grammaticality?
Bye @Reg!
 
What should this question be called?
@Cerberus I think he meant plurals and grammatical number.
*be tagged, rather.
 
@Cerberus as for the purpose of tags for non-expert users, i see them as a sort of "table of contents". these are the sorts of questions we answer here, and you can click on these tag lists to take a look at the kinds of questions and answers we provide.
 
@Billa: Oh, yes that would make sense.
 
there are some tags that i'll gladly browse, like (which tends to have interesting questions/answers), and
haha, sorry, fixed
no, not fixed. too old. boo hoo
 
Aww hehe.
Okay, as a table of context for new users. I'll ponder that some more.
Must go now, adios!
 
3:11 PM
Why do people give their questions such bad titles?
@Cerberus Ciao.
 
Damn, missed the bus.
You'll have to enjoy my company for 7 more minutes.
 
@RegDwight :(
 
@Billare For the same reason they give them bad tags and bad spelling and bad everything else.
 
@RegDwight :(
 
@MrHen You had me at the first one.
 
3:15 PM
@RegDwight How do you think that "case-sensitively" question should be tagged?
These "is a word" questions.
 
First of all, . That's really a no-brainer.
Secondly, part of the question is a single word request, so I would leave that one, too.
 
@RegDwight good call. just added.
 
Well, obviously. But that doesn't encapsulate what it really is?
 
"Is there a better single-word substitute for..." That's the very definition of a in my book.
 
4
Q: Why do we say "supposed to" for "should have"?

FumbleFingers I was supposed to do my homework, but I went out clubbing instead. On a literal interpretation, supposed to suggests that other people (or indeed, myself) might have supposed (thought, imagined, assumed) that I would do my homework. I could continue the synonyms (expected, demanded, required...

1
Q: Are 'should' and 'be supposed to' interchangeable?

RayI guess I really can't tell if 'should' and 'be supposed to' are interchangeable from the definitions of the dictionaries. Can anyone prove they are synonymous or not, with evidence? Thank you.

The latter question is actually an exact duplicate of the first.
Help me close it.
 
3:18 PM
voted
 
God, when am I supposed to read that answer by @Cerberus?
Brevity = wit, my friend dog!
I'll leave the closing to the community. If you fail miserably, I'll help you out when I'm at home.
 
Wait, do we automatically comment "possible duplicate" when we close now?
 
Always has been that way.
 
@JSBangs There you go.
 
Unless there is a comment pointing to that question already, it will be added automatically.
I'm out!
 
3:21 PM
@Billare It's from ages that it happens.
 
I didn't know, I usually wasn't the first to instigate dupes, probably.
 
@RegDwight so i can subvert the system by manually commenting "definitely not a duplicate of <link>", and then vote to close. everyone will be so confused!
 
I think we need a separate tag for "does a word exist"?
Is there a pithy way of summarizing that notion in a tag?
 
@Billare Yes: the-dictionary-does-not-lie.
 
@kiamlaluno but that's precisely the problem. oftentimes people asking this question have consulted the dictionary and found that the word isn't listed, but they frequently see it used
we could invent a tag for this
or, for many of these you could repurpose
not repurpose it, really, just use it
the "case-insensitively" Q could definitely take
 
3:32 PM
@JSBangs That is what I am saying: the dictionary doesn't lie; it omits some words.
 
@kiamlaluno in that case i suppose i prefer [tag:the-dictionary-is-an-oppressive-tool-of-the-bourgeoisie]
 
Bourgeoisie?
 
He's mocking Communist polemics.
Communists would often call anything they disliked tools or machinations of the bourgeoisie.
 
I didn't know that was the word for borghesia; I thought there was an English word from Old English.
 
@JSBangs Would neologisms really work? What if someone asked "is gruntled a word"
 
3:36 PM
@Billare That is what I know. :-) Don't forget where I live.
 
@Billare neologisms wouldn't work there... but it works for a lot of them. i didn't say it worked for all of them
 
@kiamlaluno Italy had problem with Communists? Didn't really associate the place with it.
 
The Italian Socialist Party (Partito Socialista Italiano, PSI) was a socialist and later social-democratic political party in Italy founded in Genoa in 1892. Once the dominant leftist party in Italy, it was eclipsed in status by the Italian Communist Party following World War II. It was disbanded in 1994 as a result of the Tangentopoli scandals. History Early years The Italian Socialist Party was founded in 1892 by delegates of several workers' associations and parties, notably including the Italian Labour Party and the Italian Revolutionary Socialist Party. It was part of a wave of...
The Italian Communist Party (, PCI) was a communist political party in Italy. The PCI was founded as Communist Party of Italy on 21 January 1921 in Livorno, by seceding from the Italian Socialist Party (PSI). Amadeo Bordiga and Antonio Gramsci led the split. Outlawed during the Fascist regime, the party played a major part in the Italian resistance movement. It changed its name in 1943 to PCI and became the strongest political party of the Italian left after World War II, attracting the support of about a third of the voters during the 1970s. At the time it was the biggest communist pa...
 
it's not inherently absurd to claim that the dictionary is a tool of the bourgeoisie. after all, the purpose of the dictionary, even supposedly descriptivist dictionaries, is to provide a source of authority for the spelling and meaning of a word. standardization and authorization are bourgeois activities
 
For other information, see operazione Gladio.
 
3:39 PM
Should we create the tag "impersonal pronoun"?
 
on the US side, see Sacco and Vanzetti
 
@Billare We don't create tags; we use them.
 
Right, I knew about Gramsci. But AFAIK I know Communism in European countries was far "softer" and less polemic than in the hard East.
Use, then.
 
I always thought that "Sacco and Vanzetti" was referring to a bag. :-)
 
i don't think there is such a thing as an impersonal pronoun
 
3:41 PM
(Sacco means bag, in Italian.)
 
yes, i know.
Ferdinando Nicola Sacco (April 22, 1891–August 23, 1927) and Bartolomeo Vanzetti (June 11, 1888–August 23, 1927) were anarchists who were convicted of murdering two men during a 1920 armed robbery in South Braintree, Massachusetts. After a controversial trial and a series of appeals, the two Italian immigrants were executed on August 23, 1927. There is a highly politicized dispute over their guilt or innocence, as well as whether or not the trials were fair. The dispute focuses on small details and contradictory evidence. As a result, historians have not reached a consensus. Overview Sa...
 
It's impersonal you.
It's good they weren't Calabrian. :-)
 
3:53 PM
(Well, it could be also il sacco di Roma, and in that case it doesn't mean Rome's bag.)
 
gtg
 
4:42 PM
@JSBangs BTW, while I a) totally see your point and b) haven't been active on SO for a year or so, from what I've gathered from MSO discussions, they must be getting tons of questions tagged only with or or or or or some other nonsense. Not to mention the famous , which had to get killed with fire, and then killed again, and then killed some more.
Of course, that certain amount of general laziness is common to all sites, so what we're seeing on ELU, and will be seeing even more in the future, is the I-honestly-don't-know-the-terms cluelessness being piled on top of the I-just-don't-care laziness.
 
was a tag applied by old timers to posts by newcomers, which is... not the same thing. it was funny, though. i wish it hadn't been burninated
 
Well, they even killed the on MSO, whose rules are much more relaxed.
So I guess it's only fair to kill "fun" tags on the main site.
 
5:19 PM
Hey, I was noticing there seem to be a fair few Russian speakers around these parts, but the Russian stack exchange proposal hasn't attracted much support. Any ideas why that might be?
I have an interest in it... I have lots of noob questions to ask. It seems like it will never reach beta. :(
 
Too few high-rep people? Lemme see...
You mean this one?
29
English-Russian Exchange

Proposed Q&A site for those learning Russian or English as a second language. (Well... I want to learn English. If you want to learn Russian, we could help each other.)

Currently in commitment.

 
I prefer the other one, but I'll take that one, not fussy!
29?! There is a whole russian chatroom somewhere. I've seen it!
 
You are in that room right now.
 
Wha?? Am I speaking Russian now?
 
Apr 23 at 23:40, by RegDwight
Hey I just realized that I could change the description of this room to read "General discussion for english.stackexchange.com. IN RUSSIAN."
Apr 23 at 23:58, by RegDwight
I could transliterate the entire protocol into Russian.
 
5:25 PM
Such power! Luckily you appear to be exercising it more wisely... so far
 
Anyhow, do you mean this proposal?
14
Russian language and usage

Proposed Q&A site for everyone who wants to improve their Russian: grammar, spelling, pronunciation. Linguists and students are welcome.

Currently in definition.

 
Yes but I think it should be sacrificed for the more popular one, if that will get things moving faster,
 
Well, I am following both.
And I have no commitments left.
And when I get one, I will spend it on Linguistics.
 
Thanks.... thanks for nothing. :(
 
Hey now.
I helped them both out.
And I plan to help out more in the future.
 
5:27 PM
It's cool I will be patient....
 
But those are not the only sites I'm interested in, sorry.
Anyhows.
You need to drum up support. Spread the word. Evangelize.
 
No worries... trying to do that right now.
 
We could always ping @Vitaly, for starters.
 
@Vitaly @Vitaly @Vitaly
 
The process confuses people though. It's like, 'what I have to sign up and then wait for 6 months?'
 
5:29 PM
you should hear a beep
 
@z7sg I know.
 
ah, it only works in console IRC clients like irssi
 
4
Q: How do we do what we committed to do?

LarsHProposal: Linguistics When I committed to this proposal, I agreed to ask or answer 10 questions during the next 3 months or something. But right now I can't see a way to ask or answer linguistics questions. Except this "start a new discussion" thing, which seems to be more about the proposal. S...

Many people are confused.
 
If it were in beta I could get fresh blood I'm sure...
 
There's a follow-up on MSO.
9
Q: Area 51 commitment phase: better explanation

LarsHI was advised that my question on Area 51 - Linguistics belonged here. I'll restate it for this different context. Like many people, I've stumbled across some proposals on Area 51 that I liked. Yesterday it was a banner ad I clicked on for Linguistics. I read the list of questions that were in/...

The thing is, every site needs a critical mass.
So people who do like a proposal really should be committing.
There are probably tens of thousands of Russians on SO.
I am fairly certain many more of them than just 20 have seen those proposals.
It doesn't help to just say, yeah, this would be cool.
 
5:34 PM
I will go in some of the other chatrooms and bring it up. The thing is, this site is quite successful, so it could be a good model for other language proposals. People would know what they were signing up for.
 
Just out of interest, which rooms are we talking about?
 
The process is a bit confusing but plenty of sites have come through it.
Which rooms?
 
I mean, you could have me as a guest speaker or something.)))
Yeah, which chat rooms. Full of Russians.
 
Ah ok, not sure how to set that up. I've not been in any of the other rooms yet... I need to speak to people and gauge the responses.
 
Okay.

 Говорим по-русски (Speaking Russian)

Место, где можно пообщаться по-русски
 
5:40 PM
Yes, that's it.
 
Fine.
I'll be afk for a while, gotta call my wife.
Hm... if only she were online!
Oh well, I guess I will have to settle for @JSBangs.
0
Q: Plural of "document"

RegmiI thought the plural of "document" is "document" itself. Which one is valid, "Document" or "Documents"?

 
yeah, i just got back
 
Is this for real?
 
google chrome managed to blue-screen my laptop. bad google! no cookie!
 
Oooohhhhh....
 
5:46 PM
@RegDwight that Q is begging for "too basic"
so voted
 
@RegDwight General reference, eh?
 
I'm trying to think of any circumstances where the plural of document would be document...
 
-1
Q: What is a good synonym for "style"?

RichaHello everyone! Can you please tell me synonym for style or trend?

Can we close that as general reference too?
 
I mean, the question isn't, "is document sometimes a mass noun"; no, it's the other way round, "I think that document is a mass noun; is it sometimes not?"
 
@RegDwight Documentation?
 
5:49 PM
@MrHen That's a different word, in case you're not noticing.
:P
 
@MrHen yes. voted to close
 
@RegDwight Well, yeah. But I can see some potential confusion there.
"These are document."
 
@MrHen I see your point now, but then that should be stated in the question.
 
@RegDwight in the case of fundamental confusion on the part of the asker, i'm not against both answering (to set the OP straight) and voting to close (to send the signal that this is not a good question)
 
Is anybody voting on MrHen's dupe, BTW?
 
5:50 PM
@RegDwight Oh, I am not actually suggesting this is where the confusion actually came from. I think the OP was just misguided.
@RegDwight I saw one
 
0
Q: How do I pronounce "s's" and "s'"?

MrHenHow do I pronounce possessives that end with the awkward "s's" and "'s"? Examples: I found the mistress's attitude ridiculous These are the eggs' shells. Which coat is Amos'?

 
And also the other dupe you found was more or less dead on
Which I then noticed was linked
So search fail on my part
 
> Did you mean: nag a ram
LOL
 
@RegDwight Bah. Edit for kindness.
 
Nice.
 
5:51 PM
why is @Billare in this room twice?
 
Last seen and talked at different times, too!
I think Billare beats @Cerberus.
I would kick one of the Billares, but I'm not sure if it'll kick the other, too.
 
he's been split in two due to a quantum time-travel accident
no, leave him there. much more amusing that way
 
0
Q: Is there anything wrong with the word 'denigrate'?

z7sgAfter the controversy over the word niggardly -- a perfectly innocent word that unfortunately sounds like a racial slur -- is it safe to use denigrate which is actually derived from the Latin niger? Please feel free to answer the broader question of whether whole families of words can similarly ...

How... wha...
> You're right, my question probably should be closed. :( I don't think there would be an argument though... everyone would probably just agree.
Ah ha
Funny.
 
actually, i think the question can be edited to become interesting
and non-subjective
i answered, and i may try my hand at editing it now
 
@JSBangs I also answered, so I'll watch for the edit to make sure my answer is still relevant :P
 
5:59 PM
aw, and now one of them went away
@MrHen, i think your answer is pretty good. (i also think my answer is pretty good.)
 
@JSBangs Agreed. Between you and me we got both sides of the interesting question. :)
An interesting note is the word "cock"
Homonyms will always fall prey to this
"Hancock" being the punniest
@JSBangs Ah, I see you mentioned the pronunciation too. I missed that in my first pass.
 
7
Q: Are greetings and salutations redundant in an e-mail?

JoJoDo I really need to write my email this way? Hi John, [My Message here] Regards, Jane The email header already includes the to and from. The recipient should not be confused by who the email is directed at (himself) and who it's coming from if the greeting and salutation are missi...

protect this question?
 
Ha, not a bad idea.
Done.
That avatar...
 
@RegDwight Huh?
 
lol
Yeah, it gets alot of views.
 
6:07 PM
@Vitaly We were wondering if you would be interested in any of those Russian proposals.
 
Oh.
 
3 rep to 1 view ratio on stack overflow
 
I am fairly certain this hasn't always been her gravatar.
I know her profile picture, but I don't recall seeing the gravatar.
 
Is it a her? It seems like a fairly good way to get attention for one's questions and answers.
Why are there so many responses on that question in such a short amount of time?
 
6:09 PM
@Billare s/it/(s)he/ s/her/she/
 
Must be something people Google often.
 
@RegDwight, ok, the English—Russian proposal partially overlaps with English.SE, the Russian proposal has even worse activity than HSW, and is destined not to reach even the private beta stage, is there something I am missing?
 
@RegDwight And I'm fairly certain that ♪ Grace Note ♪ gets extra deference because many people think that he/she is a girl.
 
@Billare True.
 
plus the whole idea of the first proposal in question seems subjective and argumentative, I have already seen Atheism.SE fail because of that
 
6:14 PM
@Vitaly I don't think Atheism failed because they wre subjective and argumentative.
@Vitaly That would ironically have drawn more people in.
@Vitaly And their mods did a fairly good job policing...they just had nothing to talk about.
 
@Billare, I beg to differ; the answers were of terrible quality precisely because the topic was subjective and argumentative, which drove most of us out
 
4 responses within 40 minutes.
Why?
@Vitaly Hm, you're right. I think it was outside of the subjective and argumentative stuff, there was nothing to talk about.
 
true that the lack of something to talk about contributed to it, but it's not the main reason for the failure, in my opinion
 
I dunno, I'm like 50/50 between those reasons.
 
@RegDwight This is why: lifehacker.com/#!5796308/…
We got linked to by lifehacker
 
6:18 PM
Oh God, are we like famous now? Quick, comb your hair!
 
@RegDwight Whee!
But they're coming in at like 20 hits per minute, almost all new users, so prepare for alot of non/poor quality answers
 
speaking about proposals, something bugs me about the books proposal
 
@Billare It's protected.
 
I am confused as to whether asking for books on QM/QFT would be off-topic
or books on linguistics
 
@Vitaly You can ask for clarification, either in comments or by posting a question in the Area51 discussion zone.
 
6:22 PM
good idea
 
@RegDwight Right...
 
is there a way to search for existing discussions (questions?) about a specific proposal?
other than searching for “proposal books” in the search field in the top right corner
 
Uh, lemme check... IIRC think the search just shows everything in one place...
Hm... the list of ninja options seems the same as everywhere else...
But I mean, if you're looking for questions about a given proposal, they must all be linked to it anyway.
So you just go to the proposal's main page and look at the list there.
What's not there hasn't been asked.
 
oh, thanks.
 
Besides, if you accidentally ask a dupe, it will just get closed as such.)))
 
6:36 PM
@RegDwight cough
One more to close:
-1
Q: What is a good synonym for "style"?

RichaCan you please tell me a synonym for style or trend?

 
@MrHen Note that I edited that question significantly..from its original off-topicness. If you feel my edit was wrong, you should vote to re-open. Nevertheless, I will join you.
2
Q: Do "to pony up" and "to pungle" come from the same Latin?

CubbiFor to pony up, etymonline.com says 1824, in pony up "to pay," said to be from slang use of L. legem pone to mean "money" (first recorded 16c.), because this was the title of the Psalm for March 25, a Quarter Day and the first payday of the year (the Psalm's first line is Legem pone michi dom...

Vote up this question, it's interesting and it doesn't have enough votes.
 
@Billare Well, looking up synonyms is for a thesaurus.
So I voted closed for a different reason than the original off-topicness :)
 
2
Q: Do "to pony up" and "to pungle" come from the same Latin?

CubbiFor to pony up, etymonline.com says 1824, in pony up "to pay," said to be from slang use of L. legem pone to mean "money" (first recorded 16c.), because this was the title of the Psalm for March 25, a Quarter Day and the first payday of the year (the Psalm's first line is Legem pone michi dom...

 
@Billare Eh?
 
Another one of pageman's "answers" which can be just barely called an "answer"
 
6:51 PM
I think you can link into an answer directly:
0
A: Do "to pony up" and "to pungle" come from the same Latin?

pagemanThis is a very interesting question. What I did was to compare the original Latin text with another Latin translation just to get the sense of what the word "pone" means. Here's the Biblia Sacra Vulgata version: ostende mihi Domine viam tuam et deduc me in semita recta propter insidiatores m...

 
ahh...k
 
@Billare Yeah, it seems more like "Hey! Look! A, B, C, D. And over here is a number!"
 
People shouldn't be afraid to downvote more.
I mean, this question here is a total wreck:
3
Q: History of the phrase "break wind".

Tim WintleThe choice of the verb "break" seems a strange choice for the phrase. Does anybody know where this phrase originated?

We can do better than that!
 
@RegDwight Wait... was that inadvertently answered elsewhere?
2
Q: Is there a technical term for an idiomatic phrase that originates from words that closely resemble each other?

pagemanIn the question "History of the phrase 'break wind'" I noted in the comment that the word "break" might have originated from the Middle English blowe, blaw, northern variant of blēwe, from Proto-Germanic *blewwanan 'to beat' (compare Old Norse blegði 'wedge', German bläuen, Middle Du...

 
Wow, how did I miss that one?
 
6:57 PM
Can we close a question as "absorbed by later clarification of confusion caused by original question?"
 
I am still trying to wrap my head around his question.
It does not make any sense to me whatsoever.
Just like his comments on the original question.
 
lol
I feel like there are gaps in his thought processes.
He jumps from thing to thing.
 
@RegDwight Well, yeah, I just sort of threw something out there to see where it went. He seemed happy with it.
 
break is not related to blow. Period.
It's as simple as that.
Everything else is a red herring.
 
Honestly, I was just tired if it sticking in the unanswered bin.
 
7:00 PM
I think I'll comment.
 
0
Q: Could someone clarify the criteria for questions being off-topic on Books.SE?

VitalyProposal: Books I am confused as to whether asking for a book or list of books about a specific (very) technical subject would be off-topic. First, it says in the description of the proposal (emphasis added): About all kind of books, technical, programming/computer related, fiction, nonficti...

 
@MrHen I have commented, and I am considering closing it as NARQ. If I can get any support, that would be appreciated.
If not, I think I feel comfortable enough closing it unilaterally.
 
@RegDwight I can support a NARQ. It is difficult to figure out what is being asked.
I am pretty sure I would have already voted close if I thought enough votes would have made it through. Instead I just answered it.
 
@RegDwight I will join.
 
@MrHen It's okay. No sweat. A closed question can still be improved and re-opened.
It's just that I feel very strongly that in this case, it must be improved.
 
7:10 PM
@RegDwight Well, part of the reason I didn't is because this is well outside of my expertise.
But if you guys see the same thing I do, close away.
@RegDwight Yeah. I hate questions that start off with, "This is the case. So is this. Now how about this?"
It is too much work to say, "Er... let's back up a bit."
 
Closed. Thanks @all.
Let's see what's next.
 
Haha. Somehow I take perverse pleasure in closing a question in which I have the only answer and it was upvoted and accepted.
 
The thing is, and I'm not afraid to say this in public, I can totally see how a few weeks from now people will start coming to this chat and asking, "how the heck did that guy get to 2000?"
 
@RegDwight Yeah. I am just now looking at the other answers.
6
A: Can anybody "learn" or "acquire" a talent?

pagemanThere are different views about talent and one view popularized by Malcolm Gladwell in his book Outliers is that talent is something that can be "acquired" through "deliberate practice" (or preparation): "For almost a generation, psychologists around the world have been engaged in a spiri...

Not to keep picking on the same guy.
 
Unfortunately, we have, to an extent, as he does have a history of poor answers.
 
7:20 PM
@Vitaly Yeah, that does seem inconsistent.
@RegDwight Over half of that answer could easily be trimmed
 
@MrHen He had an answer that got deleted because he quoted someone's entire article verbatim.
He's also the author of that Tetris answer that got deleted.
 
@RegDwight The word count from the answer I linked is 140 words his; 507 words quoted
Well, we are now going to war in the comments. sigh
 
7:36 PM
Why has my question been tagged 'community-wiki'?
5
Q: Is there anything wrong with the word 'denigrate'?

z7sgA few years ago there was a controversy over the word niggardly -- a perfectly innocent word that unfortunately sounds like a racial slur. Given that controversy, is it safe to use denigrate, which is actually derived from the Latin niger? Can whole families of words become tainted purely by ass...

 
@MrHen Yeah, he has responded to mine, too. On that NARQ.
@z7sg Guess who added that tag...
 
@RegDwight Wow.
 
Well, we don't even use that tag here... such questions should be closed.
I have no problem with a question being closed if the community decides it's out of scope of course.
I thought you needed 2k rep to edit without approval.
 
@z7sg You get retagging abilities at 500.
 
@RegDwight Ah ok.
 
7:47 PM
@RegDwight The big problem with him is that he isn't a troll. He's just verbose so things take four pages to hash out. As best as I can tell he has a good enough attitude... just odd end results.
 
0
Q: Humorous way to tell unavoidable circumstance

DonotaloI was composing an email to send it to my teammates. The purpose of the email is to reschedule a presentation session. Here is the first line: The TT4 MA presentation session is rescheduled for unavoidable circumstances. It is nothing serious actually. I put unavoidable circumstances ju...

On-topic? Off-topic? Writers?
 
F'x
@RegDwight off-topic, possibly Writers
 
@RegDwight I voted for Writers.
 
@Vitaly HSW didn't fail because of lack of activity if I understood correctly. So you think the Russian proposals simply lack enough participation to be successful? It's a pity. There could be potentially plenty of interesting questions imo.
 
F'x
0
Q: How do you explain how to voice a consonant?

user7834I'm a native English speaker . . . but let's pretend I'm not ;). How do you voice a consonant?

 
7:53 PM
@MrHen I agree... he posts some interesting stuff but mostly just confuses me.
 
@z7sg There used to be a really cool proposal, "Путеводитель по жизни в России" or something, but I don't seem to be able to find it anymore.
 
F'x
yet to come: “How does one operate a pneumatic drill? It is related to English because of the weird pronunciation of pneumatic which has a silent initial p. — PS. I know how to operate it, actually, but I thought it would ignite a fine discussion anyway”
 
@RegDwight Would be cool, I could have made good use of it... and it would be amusing
 
@Fx Look at that user's other questions.
He really should be getting the message about Linguistics vs ELU by now.
 
F'x
@RegDwight yes; please close before he actually gets any sort of answer :(
 
7:59 PM
@RegDwight Okay; I am done with the talent question/answer/comments.
I said my piece
 

« first day (168 days earlier)      last day (4756 days later) »