« first day (2311 days earlier)      last day (1643 days later) » 

5:10 AM
I don't think that this is an ideal way to handle this particular question - I expect it to be quickly closed on Math.SE and MO will be left with the migration stub (for some time).
Probably the question could be turned into a reasonable question for math.SE - but at least some context would be needed. (Where does the problem come from? What exactly is the goal of the derivation where this is taken from? And so on.)
Anyway, we'll see what happens with the question.
I have at least linked to some basic info on MathJax - so let's hope that when this user post their next question, they choose the correct site and they also formulate the question better than this one.
 
 
1 hour later…
6:27 AM
The question was migrated.
 
 
3 hours later…
9:50 AM
Hi @DenisNardin. Did the recent events on Meta Stack Exchange generated some discussions on the site you moderate?
I see that there is this post (where you're one of the answerers, the other one is also active on MO): Has the recent mess on SE anything to do with our site?
 
@MartinSleziak That's pretty much it. People are a bit worried because the rules about pronouns do not translate well at all in Italian, but I doubt it's going to have a big impact
 
hey
would anyone mind explaining why the "descend" step here preserves injectivity?
2
Q: Direct summand of an injective module is injective

mezI am thinking the following statement is true: Direct summand of an injective module is injective Given $0\to A\to A'$ and $A\to C$, we compose the canonical injection to obtain $A\to C\oplus C'$ which is injective, thus extends to $A'\to C\oplus C'$. We then descend this to $A'\to C$, whic...

 
@DenisNardin It seems that on MO most people have the view that there's nothing which would cause immediate worries. (Despite the whole situation being rather weird.)
 
@MartinSleziak I agree with the assessment. The troubling bit is the implication for SE's attitude towards the volonteers, rather than the CoC or the FAQ (that have been revamped to a point that I don't believe they are problematic anymore)
 
In any case, it is much less likely that SE would remove a moderator on MO than on other sites - since MO is a separate entity. And historically it seems that SE preferred to threat lightly when dealing with MathOverflow.
Of course, they might remove diamond from somebody after consulting this first with the MO moderator team - I know only about one case when that happened. (And even in that situation it was mostly precaution.)
 
10:07 AM
In my opinion, the likelyhood that a similar confrontation involves MO is vanishingly small. That said, SE has a way of surprising me...
 

« first day (2311 days earlier)      last day (1643 days later) »