The 2nd Monitor

Duga

00:02

possible answer invalidation by Vlastimil Burián on question by Vlastimil Burián: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/294753/revisions

REFRESH! There are 5254 unanswered questions (93.2190 answered)

possible answer invalidation by Vlastimil Burián on question by Vlastimil Burián: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/294753/revisions

Captain Obvious

00:58

0

Q: Been a While Since An Advent of Code Beginner Haskell Solution, So Here's Mine!

This is part 2 of Day 4 of 2024's AoC: The problem is as follows: It's an X-MAS puzzle in which you're supposed to find two MAS in the shape of an X. One way to achieve that is like this: M.S .A. M.S Irrelevant characters have again been replaced with . in the above diagram. Within the X, ea...

Duga

01:10

If your code works, but you want to improve it, it may be a candidate for Code Review . — Old Dog Programmer 17 secs ago

Duga

04:26

If you have working code that you want to have reviewed for improvements, your question belongs on Code Review, which was created specifically for that purpose. — Ken White 44 secs ago

Mast

05:22

@DerKommissar Switching is dangerous, takes some major tests before you van roll that out.

@CaptainObvious At least they owned up to their mistake, I don't see why that's rewarded with -4...

I doubt they'll bother fixing it now.

Peilonrayz

@Mast I stopped downvoting off-topic questions for similar reasons

Mast

05:36

None of those are mine either.

Peilonrayz

05:47

feelsbadman.jpg

toolic

10:22

@SᴀᴍOnᴇᴌᴀ: I see from the timeline that you cast a close vote on the question. It also shows "Review completed". I guess this is why the question does not show up in the Close Review Queue for me.

Apparently, this is a "feature" instead of a "bug". I guess if a Moderator casts a close vote, the question is not immediately closed, but it prevents the question from entering the review queue for others to see. Is that how it works? It seems odd.

One moderator action - the moderator's review will be the binding, final outcome

I'm confused.

Der Kommissar

12:07

@Mast Unfortunately the old ones are out of production and getting expensive, and the new ones are substantially more improved anyway. Just a matter of figuring out all the potential pain-points

Duga

14:19

Ah, @brian d foy re-opened because he wanted to do a code review. But this is a code review site. That's not a valid reason for not being a dupe. — ikegami 17 secs ago

Captain Obvious

15:07

0

Q: Building Multi Period Linear Programming Matrices

I'm solving a linear programming problem, made of many small problems with some common shared constraints, meaning that they are all together. Each individual unit has constraints unique to the unit and also global constraints which are influenced by all units. I've implemented this by making the...

python numpy linear-algebra

Duga

15:51

What would you like us to check for? Do you have some reason to think that there's a problem with this? If so, please edit to explain what you're unsure about so that we can write answers that better address your concerns. The following post might be helpful too: Why is "Is this correct?" an off topic question, and what should I ask instead? Also, if you're just looking for general suggestions on how to improve working code, Code Review is designed for that exact kind of question. — EJoshuaS - Stand with Ukraine 1 min ago

Captain Obvious

0

Q: Photo Reduction Tool version 2 - Possible reinvention of the wheel

The code is a Linux command line photo size reduction tools. It reduces the size of all the photos in a directory. It may work on Windows 10, but it has not been built or tested on Windows. It takes about 2.3 seconds to resize 20 photos. This is my first use of the opencv library and boost progra...

c++ boost opencv c++23

Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ

16:10

Monking

@toolic yes - as a moderator our votes are binding

> Moderator votes are binding. Any place we have voting — close, open, delete, undelete, offensive, migration, etc. — that vote will reach the threshold and take effect immediately if a single moderator casts a vote.

@toolic I voted to Edit .... not close

> The Edit option should be reserved for when the question is close-worthy as written, but when you believe you can rescue the question to make it allowable for the site. This may mean adding in details that the asker left in comments or making slight adjustments to an opinion-based question so that it's objective. Don’t make minor edits if the question would be closed even with these changes, as it will remove the question from review.

toolic

@SᴀᴍOnᴇᴌᴀ: Thanks for the reply. I am still confused. I did not vote to close, and you did not vote to close. Yet, this question does not show up in the review queue for me.

Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ

in my (first) edit I updated the wording as it seems the OP created a wrapper instead of an implementation

toolic

I assume it does not show up in the queue for anyone.

Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ

@toolic yes... since I voted (to edit instead of closing) then the item will no longer appear in the queue

toolic

@SᴀᴍOnᴇᴌᴀ: OK. Mystery solved.

pacmaninbw

16:45

@DerKommissar Are you using newer versions of the same PLC?

Mast

18:02

@toolic If a moderator casts a close vote, the question is immediately closed.

@DerKommissar Finding replacements is one of my jobs, but usually we try to stay within the replacements presented by the same manufacturer. They should not have major inconsistencies between them, but that's theory. In practice.....

Parts get obsolete all the time.

toolic

@Mast: Thanks.

Duga

20:22

"I want to verify my code and would like suggestions, if any." -> Code Review — chickity china chinese chicken 23 secs ago

Captain Obvious

20:43

0

Q: Physics Engine using Pygame

Im making a physics Engine using Pygame revolving around 2 particles and there collisions. As of now if you run the code, there will be 2 particles reflecting there x axis per collision. As of now, I cant find a way to accurately apply the same effect to the y axis when the particles are bouncing...

python simulation pygame physics collision

skiwi

21:04

Monking (x2)

Peilonrayz

21:16

@toolic binding votes are typically colloquially called a 'hammer'. Likely derived from the 'ban hammer' term. Moderator votes are always binding, but can also have additional effects. For instance deleting a post as a moderator means no-one can vote to undelete the post.

toolic

22:00

@Peilonrayz: Thanks. The main take-away is that someone cast a close vote, but this question never entered the Close Review Queue.

Peilonrayz

Perhaps I am misunderstanding something. The timeline for "Axios wrapper used with API requests" shows the question went into the "First questions" and "Close votes" queues.

Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ

@toolic the post timeline shows it did at 2024-12-19 19:24:32Z

hence why I saw it in the CV queue

Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ

22:34

Actually I made a mistake in my copying - it entered the queue at 2024-12-19 16:46:55Z, and was completed at the other timestamp, which was when I submitted the edit

Peilonrayz

Yeah the timeline interface can be a little confusing at times

Transcript for