« first day (4132 days earlier)      last day (180 days later) » 

00:19
REFRESH! There are 6042 unanswered questions (92.2421 answered)
01:07
Since, except for the last attempt, your program worked, this looks like it would be better asked at Code Review. Please read their How to Ask. — Old Dog Programmer 18 secs ago
This question should be reopened. Code Review is not what this is about: The code was broken - it did not correctly do what was required. In this specific case, the requirement includes performance. Algorithmic Complexity is entirely within what SO is for. — rzwitserloot 52 secs ago
 
6 hours later…
06:55
@pacmaninbw Great answer. I've added one of my own, though I needed to consider it overnight before I could write it constructively.
 
2 hours later…
08:38
0
Q: React Heatmap like GitHub Contributions calendar

DorukAfter having trouble with a few Charting libraries I decided to implement my own GitHub style heatmap with react and React-Bootstrap. It actually works. Since it does not need to be extensible it only has the features that it needs. However I was wondering if the code quality can be improved. Sel...

09:23
I suggest you to ask this on code review and to don't write "What is the fatest way" but "How can I make X faster?" which is not asked as opinion-based thing — Elikill58 41 secs ago
 
3 hours later…
11:55
@TobySpeight Thanks.
0
Q: How to do performance for code Full-option detail updates (delete, update, add)

Thanh SkyDevThis is my code: My db has a table tbl_request_transfer_detail include request_id and this table join with another table tbl_request_transfer, which also contain id. I'm building api to update of tbl_request_transfer along with associated tbl_request_transfer_detail. Example: request_transfer_c...

 
3 hours later…
15:14
Monking
16:13
I’m voting to close this question because it's better suited for Code ReviewJRiggles 16 secs ago
@JRiggles While this may be on-topic on CR, in the future, please don't use the existence of the Code Review site as a reason to close a question. Evaluate the request and use a reason like Needs more focus (as I have done here), primarily opinion-based, etc. Then you can mention to the OP that it can be posted on Code Review if it is on-topic. Please see Does being on-topic at another Stack Exchange site automatically make a question off-topic for Stack Overflow?Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ just now
16:29
If you believe that the code works correctly, consider presenting your work (with its unit tests if you can) in a more-complete fashion over at Code Review. You'll likely get some suggestions on making it more efficient, easier to read, and better tested. Before you do that, make sure to read A guide to Code Review for Stack Overflow users first, as some things are done differently over there - e.g. question titles should simply say what the code does, as the question is always, "How can I improve this?". — Toby Speight 44 secs ago
16:51
CODE REVIEW might be a better place. — Olivier Jacot-Descombes 36 secs ago
 
2 hours later…
18:24
Monking
I need two downvotes lol (:
@skiwi or triple the number of bronze badges
19:08
@SᴀᴍOnᴇᴌᴀ I thought it said 66,668 but misread (:
If you believe that the code works correctly, consider presenting your work (with its unit tests if you can) in a more-complete fashion over at Code Review. You'll likely get some suggestions on making it more efficient, easier to read, and better tested. Before you do that, make sure to read A guide to Code Review for Stack Overflow users first, as some things are done differently over there - e.g. question titles should simply say what the code does, as the question is always, "How can I improve this?". — Toby Speight 51 secs ago
19:37
@SᴀᴍOnᴇᴌᴀ: Thanks for updating your old Duga question today. What timing, too, because earlier in the day, I was just thinking how I'd like to see the historical data somehow. Unfortunately, when I click on your playground demo link, I get an error. I'll try to figure out why later.
20:21
@toolic Duga has had her high days. We're looking for a backup that's actively maintained, but that's not an easy task.
20:37
@toolic The request to chat.stackexchange.com/… comes back with a HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden response :/
Also, it appears that sometime after 2021-06-20 the beginning of her message changed from RELOAD! to REFRESH!
Nope.
@SᴀᴍOnᴇᴌᴀ That's a known issue.
For some values of issue.
Since it was on purpose.
perhaps they are blocking scripts like this
21:09
at this point perhaps a tampermonkey script might be the only way to get around CORS issues
@SᴀᴍOnᴇᴌᴀ: Maybe that's the day Duga became self-aware :)
its not her fault... it appears to be StackExchange blocking the request from domains other than chat.stackexchange.com
 Access to fetch at 'https://chat.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22REFRESH%21%22&user=125580&room=8595' from origin 'https://stackexchange.com' has been blocked by CORS policy: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource. If an opaque response serves your needs, set the request's mode to 'no-cors' to fetch the resource with CORS disabled.

« first day (4132 days earlier)      last day (180 days later) »